I'm running a LoadRunner test , upon user failure at login /even at any other transaction it has to fail and execute log off portion of the script.
Note: I have put text check and with textcheck count if the transaction fails( using if condition I have handled it) it then ends transaction with fail status .I would need solution to perform log off also at the point where the if condition fails.
Can anyone share me with an example to execute log off when textcheck fails.
Depends upon your language choice.
Assuming you have the default language of C with your HTTP virtual user, then simply implement a logout function which contains your logout code. Call that function upon failure of your condition. A "return 1;" inside of that if/then conditional will also start a new iteration immediately. "return 0;" goes to a new iteration with respected pacing. "return -1;" kills the virtual user altogether.
Related
I have 4 transaction controllers named
Trans_api1
__Http Request
Trans_api2
__Http Request
Trans_api3
__Http Request
Trans_api4
__Http Request
that contain Http Requests, However when I run my test plan, I want them to run in numerical order but then they run randomly. How do I fix the order to it runs from 1-4?
Each JMeter thread (virtual user) runs Samplers upside down so you don't need to do anything, your requests are executed from top to bottom already. If you run your test with 1 user - you will see that requests are being executed sequentially.
If you're seeing some "mess" most probably it's caused by concurrency, like
1st user starts 1st request
2st user starts 2nd request
2nd user starts 1st request
1st user starts 3rd request
etc.
You can see this yourself if you add ${__threadNum} function as the prefix or postfix for your request (or transaction controller) label and eventually ${__groovy(vars.getIteration(),)} function to display the current loop number
With 1 user:
With 2 users:
With 2 users and 2 iterations:
As it evidenced by the above images each users executes samplers sequentially on each iteration, these "inconsistencies" are misleadingly interpreted due to concurrency
See Apache JMeter Functions - An Introduction article to get familiarized with JMeter Functions concept
In Robot Automation, how to re-run the failed test case immediately if it is failed, before going to another test case execution.
For instance,
*** Test Cases ***
Login User And Create Another User
Login User ....
Create Another User ...
Login With New User
Login User..
Test Function ABC
.....
.....
Since one test has a dependency on another test, I need to re-run the failed case immediately after it is failed. Before executing another test.
In one word, you can't, and you shouldn't; a case is a case, with binary outcome. And if you have dependencies between tests, that's a smelly design; try to change it to a pre-condition (env setup) for the second case, so it is atomic.
Disclaimer: this rant is for the automatic re-execution in a single run. After a run has finished, RF has baked-in functionality to re-execute just the failed ones (so flaky tests are given the chance to succeed); but as I understood your question, you are not asking for the latter.
In two words, if you really need to do it, you can; extract the whole test case in a keyword, and call it inside Wait Until Keyword Succeeds, giving it 2 (or more?) attempts:
*** Test Cases ***
Test Function ABC
Wait Until Keyword Succeeds 2 times 100ms The Actual Test For Function ABC
*** Keywords ***
The Actual Test For Function ABC
.....
.....
Is it possible to handle exceptions from the test case? I have 2 kinds of failure I want to track: a test failed to run, and a test ran but received the wrong output. If I need to raise an exception to fail my test, how can I distinguish between the two failure types? So say I have the following:
*** Test Cases ***
Case 1
Login 1.2.3.4 user pass
Check Log For this log line
If I can't log in, then the Login Keyword would raise an ExecutionError. If the log file doesn't exist, I would also get an ExecutionError. But if the log file does exist and the line isn't in the log, I should get an OutputError.
I may want to immediately fail the test on an ExecutionError, since it means my test did not run and there is some issue that needs to be fixed in the environment or with the test case. But on an OutputError, I may want to continue the test. It may only refer to a single piece of output and the test may be valuable to continue to check the rest of the output.
How can this be done?
Robot has several keywords for dealing with errors, such as Run keyword and ignore error which can be used to run another keyword that might fail. From the documentation:
This keyword returns two values, so that the first is either string
PASS or FAIL, depending on the status of the executed keyword. The
second value is either the return value of the keyword or the received
error message. See Run Keyword And Return Status If you are only
interested in the execution status.
That being said, it might be easier to write a python-based keyword which calls your Login keyword, since it will be easier to deal with multiple exceptions.
You can use something like this
${err_msg}= Run Keyword And Expect Error * <Your keyword>
Should Not Be Empty ${err_msg}
There are couple of different variations you could try like
Run Keyword And Continue On Failure, Run Keyword And Expect Error, Run Keyword And Ignore Error for the first statement above.
Option for the second statement above are Should Be Equal As Strings, Should Contain, Should Match.
You can explore more on Robot keywords
I am facing the following problem:
I have multiple HTTP Requests in my testplan.
I want every request to be repeated 4 times if they fail.
I realized that with a BeanShell Assertion, and its already working fine.
My problem is, that I don't want requests to be executed if a previous Request failed 5 times,
BUT I also dont want the thread to end.
I just want the current thread iteration to end,
so that the next iteration of the thread can start again with the 1st request (if the thread is meant to be repeated).
How do I realize that within the BeanShell Assertion?
Here is just a short extract of my code where i want the solution to have
badResponseCounter is being increased for every failed try of the request, this seems to work so far. Afterwards, the variable gets resetted.
if (badResponseCounter = 5) {
badResponseCounter = 0;
// Stop current iteration
}
I already checked the API, methods like setStopTest() or setStopThread() are given, but nothing for quitting the current iteration. I also need the preference "continue" in the thread group, as otherwise the entire test will stop after 1 single request failed.
Any ideas of how to do this?
In my opinion the easiest way is using following combination:
If Controller to check ${JMeterThread.last_sample_ok} and badResponseCounter variables
Test Action Sampler as a child of If Controller configured to "Go to next loop iteration"
Try this.
ctx.setRestartNextLoop(true);
if the thread number is 2, i tried to skip. I get the below result as i expected (it does not call b-2). It does not kill the thread either.
I'm having an issue where I'm preaty not sure how to resolve this and I want to know what is the best approach I should consider in order to achieve this task.
We are developping an application VB.net 2.0 and SQL 2005. Users are allowed to cancel a reception based on a purchase which may contains many received goods. But, during the process of cancellation, some questions are asked to users such as "Do you want to cancel Good #1". If yes, delete. Then, "Do you want to cancel Good #2", no, do not delete and one another question (if received item is issued, a process must be made manualy by the user). And, at the end, if all goods were successfully cancelled, we have to cancel the reception itself. But sometime, if an error occurs or some conditions occurs once asked to user in this process, we want to cancel any actions made from the beginning and make it back to his original state. So I thought about Transaction.
I know there is Transaction for SQL which can be used and I know good enough how to use it, but I can't realy use this as user must perform actions which possibly cancel this transaction.
I also remembered TransactionScope from .NET 2.X and over which can achieve something similar and I also know as well how to use it. The problem comes with TransactionScope and MSDTC. When using this, we still getting an error which said :
Network access for Distributed Transaction Manager (MSDTC) has been disabled. Please enable DTC for network access in the security configuration for MSDTC using the Component Services Administrative tool.
I've tried what is describe here in another stack post and it works great... until user restard their computer. EVERY time users restart their computer, they must put value back. Plus, per default, no computer have this value set to On. At least on 10 computers bases, none were activated. There is something like 300 computers on which this program is installed so it's surely not the good things to consider neither.
So anyone have an idea of how I can acheive this? Is there anything else doing transaction via code which I can use?
NOTE1 : I know some would say, first ask conditions to user and maintain values in memory. Once done, if everything went well, go with delete. But what if an error occurs when deleting let's say, goods #4? And how can I give to a store procedure a dynamic list of goods to be deleted?
NOTE2 : Sorry for my english, I usualy talk french.
NOTE3 : Any exemple in C# can be provide also as I know both VB and C#.
Assuming you already have similar stored procedure to manage cancelation:
create proc CancelGood (#goodID int)
as
SET NOCOUNT ON
SET XACT_ABORT ON
begin transaction
update table1 set canceled = 1
where GoodID = #GoodID
update table2 set on_stock = on_stock + 1
where GoodID = #GoodID
commit transaction
VB code adds a string to some canceledGoods list if user selects 'Oui'. I'm not familiar with VB.Net; in c# it would look like:
canceledGoods.Add (string.Format("exec dbo.CancelGood {0}", goodID));
Than, if there is at least one string in canceledGoods, build and execute batch:
batch = "BEGIN TRANSACTION" +
" BEGIN TRY " +
string.Join (Environment.NewLine, canceledGoods.ToArray()) +
" END TRY" +
" BEGIN CATCH " +
" -- CODE TO CALL IF THERE WAS AN ERROR" +
" ROLLBACK TRANSACTION" +
" RETURN" +
" END CATCH" +
" -- CODE TO CALL AFTER SUCCESSFULL CANCELATION OF ALL GOODS" +
" COMMIT TRANSACTION"
conn.ExecuteNonQuery (batch);