How to build rootfs.tar from RHEL UBI image (pulled with podman) - windows-subsystem-for-linux

If I pull a RHEL UBI image like so (On Windows using cygwin and podman),
$podman pull registry.access.redhat.com/ubi8/ubi
Is there a command I can run on the host system (Windows) to create a file on the host (Windows) that would be a rootfs.tar of the UBI image that was pulled?
I want to then use that rootfs.tar to run on the Windows host under WSL2.
If anyone has done this or if there is another way to fetch the UBI image as a rootfs.tar, it would be greatly helpful.

I did this with docker containers but it should be the same thing:
podman export -o rootfs.tar <container-numeric-id>
Then import the rootfs.tar in WSL with:
wsl --import <DistributionName aka RHEL> <Install location aka c:\wsl\RHEL> <FileName aka rootfs.tar>
Here is a link to the documentation: podman-export
Bare in mind that, depending on the container you used and what you want to achieve with it, you may need to take some additionally steps to make it a fully working WSL distro like installing the sudo package, creating a new user and setting up /etc/wsl.conf to someting like this:
## wsl.conf
[automount]
enabled = true
mountfstab = true
root = /mnt/
options = metadata,uid=1000,gid=1000,umask=0022,fmask=11,case=off
[network]
generatehosts = true
generateresolvconf = true
hostname = RHEL
[interop]
enabled = true
appendwindowspath = true
[user]
default = <your_new_user_name>
You can find details about wsl.conf here wsl-config

Related

How to change Docker's default Image storage location in WSL2?

How can I change the default location for storing Docker images in Windows? I currently have Docker installed on my C: drive, and the images are stored in the following location:
C:\Users\xxxxx\AppData\Local\Docker\wsl\data.
I want to change the default location to my D: drive. I am using WSL2 as the backend for Docker, and I have read that I can use the .wslconfig file to configure Docker. However, I am not sure how to set up the .wslconfig file to change the default image location. My WSL2 installation is located on my D: drive, which I installed from the Microsoft Store.
I'm using Docker version 20.10.21 and these are wsl specs
WSL version: 1.0.3.0
Kernel version: 5.15.79.1
WSLg version: 1.0.47
MSRDC version: 1.2.3575
Direct3D version: 1.606.4
DXCore version: 10.0.25131.1002-220531-1700.rs-onecore-base2-hyp
Windows version: 10.0.22000.1335
I'm using Ubuntu distro in WSL, and Docker Desktop v.4.15.0
I tried making some changes in .wslconfig but there was no option for storage or something.
Caveats/Preface:
I've tried this and it works, but I cannot guarantee that long-term it will continue to work. There's the potential that something will break when Docker Desktop upgrades in the future.
In general I don't recommend registry hacks, but I'm not aware of another way to do this. Other than the previous caveat, this seems fairly safe.
No, there's no .wslconfig option for changing the location of a distribution.
With that in mind, here's what I did to move docker-desktop-data to the D: drive:
Create the directory. I'll use D:\wsl\docker-desktop-data as an example.
Stop Docker Desktop by right-clicking on the status bar icon and Quit Docker Desktop.
From PowerShell:
wsl --shutdown
Confirm the location (BasePath) and registry key (PSChildName) of the docker-desktop-data via:
Get-ChildItem HKCU:\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Lxss\ |
ForEach-Object {
(Get-ItemProperty $_.PSPATH)
} | Where-Object {
$_.DistributionName -eq "docker-desktop-data"
}
Move ext4.vhdx from the BasePath directory identified above to the D:\wsl\docker-desktop-data directory.
In regedit, navigate to:
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Lxss
Find the subkey matching the PSChildName from above.
Modify the BasePath to point to \\?\D:\wsl\docker-desktop-data
Restart Docker Desktop
Test that your existing images are still available by running one of them.

Where is locate pidfile | docker for windows | docker.pid

I would like to have docker inside docker for use CI-agent. But for it I need to share docker.pid file inside docker container and I can't find that file in this path C:\ProgramData\docker.pid and even I try to add this in docker daemon config:
{
...
"pidfile": "C:\\docker.pid",
...
}
And after a restart, that file didn't appear.
Could you please help me?
Also tried different variant in config file like "C:\docker.pid", "C:/docker.pid". The same behavior.
The docker logs is clean about creating or removing docker.pid file.
Software info
Windows Version: 10 1809 build 17763
Docker for Windows Version: 2.0.0.2 31259
Expected behavior
Create pid file in path C:\docker.pid
Actual behavior
The file is absent
Also created an issue in github
https://github.com/docker/for-win/issues/3741
I found a way to run Docker inside docker.
These two topics help me:
https://forums.docker.com/t/solved-using-docker-inside-another-container/12222/3
Bind to docker socket on Windows
I needed docker.sock file and it locate //var/run/docker.sock so
-v //var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock
resolve my problem.

Change bash.exe with multiple linux subsystems on windows

I first installed a Ubuntu linux subsystem with the windows store.
I then installed the hyper terminal for windows like explained in this tutorial : https://medium.com/#ssharizal/hyper-js-oh-my-zsh-as-ubuntu-on-windows-wsl-terminal-8bf577cdbd97
Like it is written in the tutorial I put C:\\Windows\\System32\\bash.exe in the hyper configuration file.
However, afterwards, I installed another linux subsystem, Wlinux.
So now I have two subsytems located here
Wlinux : C:\Users\martinpc\AppData\Local\Packages\WhitewaterFoundryLtd.Co....
Ubuntu : C:\Users\martinpc\AppData\Local\Packages\CanonicalGroupLimited.UbuntuonWindows_7...
However, when I open the hyper terminal, It seem like I can only access the files of the ubuntu distrib and not the Wlinux. Therefore, I would like to know how I can point Hyper to Wlinux and not Ubuntu anymore. Thank you for your answer.
First of all, bash.exe has been deprecated. You should use wsl.exe in command lines. Check your installed distributions in WSL with wslconfig.exe /list /all command. Alternatively, for Windows 10 version 1903 and above, wsl.exe --list --all command can be used. Choose the distribution that you want to connect with HyperJS Terminal emulator. Open up Hyper.js configuration with Ctrl + , or open %UserProfile%\.hyper.js in any text editor. Edit the shell configuration from these two named values:
shell: 'C:\\Windows\\System32\\wsl.exe',
shellArgs: ['--distribution', 'Your-Distro-Name'],
Alternatively, you can use wslconfig.exe /setdefault <DistributionName> command to change default distribution. With this step, you can skip the shellArgs line in .hyper.js configuration file.

Vagrant stuck in "Waiting for VM to Boot"

I want to preface this question by mentioning that I have indeed looked over most if not all vagrant "Waiting for VM to Boot" troubleshooting threads:
Things I've tried include:
vagrant failed to connect VM
https://superuser.com/questions/342473/vagrant-ssh-fails-with-virtualbox
https://github.com/mitchellh/vagrant/issues/410
http://vagrant.wikia.com/wiki/Usage
http://scotch.io/tutorials/get-vagrant-up-and-running-in-no-time
And more.
Here's how I setup my Vagrant:
Note: We are using Vagrant 1.2.2 since we do not at the moment have time to change configs to newer versions. I am also using VirtualBox 4.2.26.
My office has an /official/ folder which includes things such as Vagrantfile inside. Inside my Vagrantfile are these custom settings:
config.vm.box = "my_box"
config.ssh.private_key_path = "~/.ssh/github_rsa"
config.ssh.forward_agent = true
config.ssh.forward_x11 = true
config.ssh.max_tries = 300
config.vm.provision :shell, :inline => "/etc/init.d/networking restart"
I installed our custom box (called package.box) via vagrant box add my_box absolute_path/package.box which went without a hitch.
Running vagrant up, I would look at the "preview" of the VirtualBox, and it would simply be stuck at the login page. My Terminal would also only say: Waiting for VM to boot. This can take a few minutes. As far as I know, this is an SSH issue. Or my private key issues, though in my Vagrantfile I explicitly pointed to my private key location.
Interesting Notes:
Running dhclient within the VirtualBox GUI, it says command no found. Running sudo dhclient eth0 was one of the suggested fixes.
This fix: https://superuser.com/a/343775/298915 of "modify the /etc/rc.local file to include the line sh /etc/init.d/networking restart just before exit 0." did nothing to fix the issue.
Conclusion:
Having tried to re-install everything thinking I messed up a file, it did not seem to ameliorate the issue. I am unable to work with this issue. Could someone give me some insight?
So after around twelve hours of dejected troubleshooting, I was able to (finally) get the VM to boot.
Setup your private/public keys using the link provided. My box is a Debian Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64, so instead of /root/.ssh/id_rsa.pub, you have to use /home/vagrant/.ssh/id_rsa.pub (and the respective id_rsa path for the private key).
Note: make sure your files have the right permissions. Check using ls -l path, and change using chmod. Your machine may not have /home/vagrant/.ssh/authorized_keys, so generate that file with touch /home/vagrant/.ssh/authorized_keys.
Boot your VM using the VirtualBox GUI using (through either Vagrantfile boot-GUI command, or starting your VM using VirtualBox). Login using vagrant and vagrant when prompted.
Within the GUI, manually start dhclient using sudo dhclient eth0 -v. Why is it off by default? I have no idea. I found out that it was off when I tried to wget the private/public keys in the tutorial above, but was unable to.
Go to your local machine's command line and reload vagrant using vagrant reload. It should boot, and no longer hang at "Waiting for VM to Boot."
This worked for me. Though it may be different for other machines, for whatever reason Vagrant likes to break.
Suggestion: can this be saved as a script so we don't need to manually do this everytime?
EDIT: Update to the latest version of Vagrant, and you will never see this issue again. About time, huh?

"The machine with the name 'c6401' was not found configured for this Vagrant environment." Error

I plan to work with Apache Ambari. To start, I've done everything according to https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AMBARI/Quick+Start+Guide. But whenever I try to start vms, I get following error:
The machine with the name 'c6401' was not found configured for
this Vagrant environment.
Had this error today on mac and decided to update this post with the solution that worked for me.
Steps
Delete all redundant machine folders ./.vagrant/machines (.vagrant folder is a hidden folder within the repo)
Run vagrant global-status --prune command in the root of the project
Destroy vagrant setup vagrant destroy
Ensure no related machine exists in the virtualbox UI
Run vagrant up again
cheers!
Please open the VagrantFile under the centos6.4 directory and verify if you see contents like this:
config.vm.define :c6401 do |c6401|
# uncomment the line below to set up the ambari dev environment
# c6401.vm.provision :shell, :path => "dev-bootstrap.sh"
c6401.vm.hostname = "c6401.ambari.apache.org"
c6401.vm.network :private_network, ip: "192.168.64.101"
end
I had faced a similar issue. The problem was that I had deleted the Vagrantfile that comes by default with ambari-vagrant.git and had run 'vagrant init', which creates a standard template file that doesn't have any reference to c6401 machine.
If you are on the same boat, just do a
git checkout centos6.4/VagrantFile
from under ambari-vagrant directory and try re-running
vagrant up c6401