I am trying to detect the tree species in an images using Faster R-CNN Inception ResNet V2 1024x1024. Problem is that the model cannot detect all the trees in an image. setting the value of first_stage_max_proposals to 1500, only slightly helps. Also adjusting the values of grid_anchor_generator, max_detections_per_class and max_total_detections has not significant effect. Can anyone help me ? Which parameters should I adjust ?
Here is my model config file and one image where model missed most of the trees
enter image description here
# Faster R-CNN with Inception Resnet v2 (no atrous)
# Sync-trained on COCO (with 8 GPUs) with batch size 16 (800x1333 resolution)
# Initialized from Imagenet classification checkpoint
# TF2-Compatible, *Not* TPU-Compatible
#
# Achieves 39.6 mAP on COCO
model {
faster_rcnn {
num_classes: 7
image_resizer {
fixed_shape_resizer {
height: 867
width: 867
}
}
feature_extractor {
type: 'faster_rcnn_inception_resnet_v2_keras'
}
first_stage_anchor_generator {
grid_anchor_generator {
scales:[0.1,0.4,0.45,0.5,0.6,0.7,0.8,0.90,1.0,
1.2,1.25,1.3,1.35,1.4,1.45,1.5,1.6,1.8,1.90,1.95,2.0,
2.2,2.25,2.3,2.35,2.4,2.45,2.5,2.6,2.8,2.90,2.95,3.0,
3.2,3.25,3.3,3.35,3.4,3.45,3.5,3.6,3.8,3.90,3.95,4.0,
4.2,4.25,4.3,4.35,4.4,4.45,4.5,4.6,4.8,4.90,4.95,5.0,
5.2,5.25,5.3,5.35,5.4,5.45,5.5,5.6,5.8,5.90,5.95,6.0,
6.2,6.25,6.3,6.35,6.4,6.45,6.5,6.6,6.8,6.90,6.95,7.0,
7.2,7.25,7.3,7.35,7.4,7.45,7.5,7.6,7.8,7.90,7.95,8.0,
8.2,8.25,8.3,8.35,8.4,8.45,8.5,8.55,8.6,8.8,8.90,8.95,9.0
]
aspect_ratios: [0.2,0.5,0.75,1.0,1.25,1.3,1.35,1.4,1.45,1.5,1.6,1.7,1.75,1.8,1.9,1.95,2.0,2.25,2.5,2.75,3.0,3.5,4.0]
height_stride: 16
width_stride: 16
}
}
first_stage_box_predictor_conv_hyperparams {
op: CONV
regularizer {
l2_regularizer {
weight: 0.0
}
}
initializer {
truncated_normal_initializer {
stddev: 0.01
}
}
}
first_stage_nms_score_threshold: 0.0
first_stage_nms_iou_threshold: 0.4
first_stage_max_proposals: 300
first_stage_localization_loss_weight: 2.0
first_stage_objectness_loss_weight: 1.0
initial_crop_size: 17
maxpool_kernel_size: 1
maxpool_stride: 1
second_stage_box_predictor {
mask_rcnn_box_predictor {
use_dropout: false
dropout_keep_probability: 1.0
fc_hyperparams {
op: FC
regularizer {
l2_regularizer {
weight: 0.0
}
}
initializer {
variance_scaling_initializer {
factor: 1.0
uniform: true
mode: FAN_AVG
}
}
}
}
}
second_stage_post_processing {
batch_non_max_suppression {
score_threshold: 0.0
iou_threshold: 0.25
max_detections_per_class: 100
max_total_detections: 700
}
score_converter: SOFTMAX
}
second_stage_localization_loss_weight: 2.0
second_stage_classification_loss_weight: 1.0
}
}
train_config: {
batch_size: 2
num_steps: 25000
optimizer {
momentum_optimizer: {
learning_rate: {
cosine_decay_learning_rate {
learning_rate_base: 0.0008
total_steps: 25000
warmup_learning_rate: 0.00001
warmup_steps: 2000
}
}
momentum_optimizer_value: 0.9
}
use_moving_average: false
}
gradient_clipping_by_norm: 10.0
fine_tune_checkpoint_version: V2
fine_tune_checkpoint: "faster_rcnn_inception_resnet_v2_1024x1024_coco17_tpu-8/checkpoint/ckpt-0"
fine_tune_checkpoint_type: "detection"
}
train_input_reader: {
label_map_path: "images/labelmap.pbtxt"
tf_record_input_reader {
input_path: "train.record"
}
}
eval_config: {
metrics_set: "coco_detection_metrics"
use_moving_averages: false
batch_size: 1;
}
eval_input_reader: {
label_map_path: "images/labelmap.pbtxt"
shuffle: false
num_epochs: 1
tf_record_input_reader {
input_path: "test.record"
}
}
I am training tensorflow object detection API model on the custom dataset i.e. License plate dataset. My goal is to deploy this model to the edge device using tensorflow lite so I can't use any RCNN family model. Because, I can't convert any RCNN family object detection model to tensorflow lite model (this is the limitation from tensorflow object detection API). I am using ssd_mobilenet_v2_coco model to train the custom dataset. Following is the code snippet of my config file:
model {
ssd {
num_classes: 1
box_coder {
faster_rcnn_box_coder {
y_scale: 10.0
x_scale: 10.0
height_scale: 5.0
width_scale: 5.0
}
}
matcher {
argmax_matcher {
matched_threshold: 0.5
unmatched_threshold: 0.5
ignore_thresholds: false
negatives_lower_than_unmatched: true
force_match_for_each_row: true
}
}
similarity_calculator {
iou_similarity {
}
}
anchor_generator {
ssd_anchor_generator {
num_layers: 6
min_scale: 0.2
max_scale: 0.95
aspect_ratios: 1.0
aspect_ratios: 2.0
aspect_ratios: 0.5
aspect_ratios: 3.0
aspect_ratios: 0.3333
}
}
image_resizer {
fixed_shape_resizer {
height: 300
width: 300
}
}
box_predictor {
convolutional_box_predictor {
min_depth: 0
max_depth: 0
num_layers_before_predictor: 0
use_dropout: false
dropout_keep_probability: 0.8
kernel_size: 1
box_code_size: 4
apply_sigmoid_to_scores: false
conv_hyperparams {
activation: RELU_6,
regularizer {
l2_regularizer {
weight: 0.00004
}
}
initializer {
truncated_normal_initializer {
stddev: 0.03
mean: 0.0
}
}
batch_norm {
train: true,
scale: true,
center: true,
decay: 0.9997,
epsilon: 0.001,
}
}
}
}
feature_extractor {
type: 'ssd_mobilenet_v2'
min_depth: 16
depth_multiplier: 1.0
conv_hyperparams {
activation: RELU_6,
regularizer {
l2_regularizer {
weight: 0.00004
}
}
initializer {
truncated_normal_initializer {
stddev: 0.03
mean: 0.0
}
}
batch_norm {
train: true,
scale: true,
center: true,
decay: 0.9997,
epsilon: 0.001,
}
}
}
loss {
classification_loss {
weighted_sigmoid {
}
}
localization_loss {
weighted_smooth_l1 {
}
}
hard_example_miner {
num_hard_examples: 3000
iou_threshold: 0.99
loss_type: CLASSIFICATION
max_negatives_per_positive: 3
min_negatives_per_image: 3
}
classification_weight: 1.0
localization_weight: 1.0
}
normalize_loss_by_num_matches: true
post_processing {
batch_non_max_suppression {
score_threshold: 1e-8
iou_threshold: 0.6
max_detections_per_class: 100
max_total_detections: 100
}
score_converter: SIGMOID
}
}
}
train_config: {
batch_size: 24
optimizer {
rms_prop_optimizer: {
learning_rate: {
exponential_decay_learning_rate {
initial_learning_rate: 0.004
decay_steps: 800720
decay_factor: 0.95
}
}
momentum_optimizer_value: 0.9
decay: 0.9
epsilon: 1.0
}
}
fine_tune_checkpoint: "/home/sach/DL/Pycharm_Workspace/TF1.14/License_Plate_F-RCNN/dataset/experiments/training_SSD/ssd_mobilenet_v2_coco_2018_03_29/model.ckpt"
fine_tune_checkpoint_type: "detection"
num_steps: 150000
data_augmentation_options {
random_horizontal_flip {
}
}
data_augmentation_options {
ssd_random_crop {
}
}
}
train_input_reader: {
tf_record_input_reader {
input_path: "/home/sach/DL/Pycharm_Workspace/TF1.14/License_Plate_F-RCNN/dataset/records/training.record"
}
label_map_path: "/home/sach/DL/Pycharm_Workspace/TF1.14/License_Plate_F-RCNN/dataset/records/classes.pbtxt"
}
eval_config: {
num_examples: 488
num_visualizations : 488
}
eval_input_reader: {
tf_record_input_reader {
input_path: "/home/sach/DL/Pycharm_Workspace/TF1.14/License_Plate_F-RCNN/dataset/records/testing.record"
}
label_map_path: "/home/sach/DL/Pycharm_Workspace/TF1.14/License_Plate_F-RCNN/dataset/records/classes.pbtxt"
shuffle: false
num_readers: 1
}
I have total 1932 images (train images: 1444 and val images: 448). I have trained the model for 150000 steps. Following is the output from tensorboard:
DetectionBoxes Precision mAP#0.5 IOU: After 150K steps, the object detection model accuracy (mAP#0.5 IOU) is ~0.97 i.e. 97%. Which seems to be fine at the moment.
Training Loss: After 150K steps, the training loss is ~1.3. This seems to be okay.
Evaluation/Validation Loss: After 150K steps, the evaluation/validation loss is ~3.90 which is pretty high. However, there is huge difference between training and evaluation loss. Is there any overfitting exist? How can I overcome this problem? In my point of view, training and evaluation loss should be close to each other.
How can I reduce validation/evaluation loss?
I am using the default config file so by default use_dropout: false. Should I change it to use_dropout: true in case overfitting exist?
What should be the acceptable range of training and validation loss for object detection model?
Please share your views. Thanking you!
There are several reasons for overfitting problem In Neural networks, by looking at your config file, I would like to suggest a few things to try to avoid overfitting.
use_dropout: true so that it makes the Neurons less sensitive to minor changes in the weights.
Try increasing iou_threshold in batch_non_max_suppression.
Use l1 regularizer or combination of l1 and l2 regularizer.
Change the optimizer to Nadam or Adam Optimizers.
Include more Augmentation techniques.
You can also use Early Stopping to track your accuracy.
Alternatively, you can observe the Tensorboard visualization, take the weights before the step where the validation loss starts increasing.
I hope trying these steps will resolve the overfitting issue of your model.
I'm using tensorflow object detection api. The problem with this api is that it exports frozen graph for inference. I can't use that graph for serving. So, as a work around I followed the tutorial here. But when I'm trying to export the graph I'm getting following error:
InvalidArgumentError (see above for traceback): Restoring from
checkpoint failed. This is most likely due to a mismatch between the
current graph and the graph from the checkpoint. Please ensure that
you have not altered the graph expected based on the checkpoint.
Original error:
Assign requires shapes of both tensors to match. lhs shape= [1024,4]
rhs shape= [1024,8]
[[node save/Assign_258 (defined at
/home/deploy/models/research/object_detection/exporter.py:67) =
Assign[T=DT_FLOAT,
_class=["loc:#SecondStageBoxPredictor/BoxEncodingPredictor/weights"], use_locking=true, validate_shape=true,
_device="/job:localhost/replica:0/task:0/device:GPU:0"](SecondStageBoxPredictor/BoxEncodingPredictor/weights,
save/RestoreV2/_517)]] [[{{node save/RestoreV2/_522}} =
_SendT=DT_FLOAT, client_terminated=false, recv_device="/job:localhost/replica:0/task:0/device:GPU:0",
send_device="/job:localhost/replica:0/task:0/device:CPU:0",
send_device_incarnation=1, tensor_name="edge_527_save/RestoreV2",
_device="/job:localhost/replica:0/task:0/device:CPU:0"]]
The error says there is a mismatch in the graph. A possible cause might be that I'm using pretrained graph for training which might have 4 classification and my model has 8 classification. (hence mismatch of shape). There is a similar issue for deeplab model and their solution for their
specific model was to start the training with --initialize_last_layer=False and --last_layers_contain_logits_only=False parameters. But tensorflow object detection doesn't have that parameters. So, how should I proceed ? Also, is there any other way of serving tensorflow object detection api ?
My config file looks like this:
model {
faster_rcnn {
num_classes: 1
image_resizer {
fixed_shape_resizer {
height: 1000
width: 1000
resize_method: AREA
}
}
feature_extractor {
type: "faster_rcnn_inception_v2"
first_stage_features_stride: 16
}
first_stage_anchor_generator {
grid_anchor_generator {
height_stride: 16
width_stride: 16
scales: 0.25
scales: 0.5
scales: 1.0
scales: 2.0
aspect_ratios: 0.5
aspect_ratios: 1.0
aspect_ratios: 2.0
}
}
first_stage_box_predictor_conv_hyperparams {
op: CONV
regularizer {
l2_regularizer {
weight: 0.0
}
}
initializer {
truncated_normal_initializer {
stddev: 0.00999999977648
}
}
}
first_stage_nms_score_threshold: 0.0
first_stage_nms_iou_threshold: 0.699999988079
first_stage_max_proposals: 300
first_stage_localization_loss_weight: 2.0
first_stage_objectness_loss_weight: 1.0
initial_crop_size: 14
maxpool_kernel_size: 2
maxpool_stride: 2
second_stage_box_predictor {
mask_rcnn_box_predictor {
fc_hyperparams {
op: FC
regularizer {
l2_regularizer {
weight: 0.0
}
}
initializer {
variance_scaling_initializer {
factor: 1.0
uniform: true
mode: FAN_AVG
}
}
}
use_dropout: false
dropout_keep_probability: 1.0
}
}
second_stage_post_processing {
batch_non_max_suppression {
score_threshold: 0.0
iou_threshold: 0.600000023842
max_detections_per_class: 100
max_total_detections: 300
}
score_converter: SOFTMAX
}
second_stage_localization_loss_weight: 2.0
second_stage_classification_loss_weight: 1.0
}
}
train_config {
batch_size: 8
data_augmentation_options {
random_horizontal_flip {
}
}
optimizer {
adam_optimizer {
learning_rate {
manual_step_learning_rate {
initial_learning_rate: 0.00010000000475
schedule {
step: 40000
learning_rate: 3.00000010611e-05
}
}
}
}
use_moving_average: true
}
gradient_clipping_by_norm: 10.0
fine_tune_checkpoint: "/home/deploy/models/research/object_detection/faster_rcnn_inception_v2_coco_2018_01_28/model.ckpt"
from_detection_checkpoint: true
num_steps: 60000
max_number_of_boxes: 100
}
train_input_reader {
label_map_path: "/home/deploy/models/research/object_detection/Training_carrot_060219/carrot_identify.pbtxt"
tf_record_input_reader {
input_path: "/home/deploy/models/research/object_detection/Training_carrot_060219/train.record"
}
}
eval_config {
num_visualizations: 100
num_examples: 135
eval_interval_secs: 60
use_moving_averages: false
}
eval_input_reader {
label_map_path: "/home/deploy/models/research/object_detection/Training_carrot_060219/carrot_identify.pbtxt"
shuffle: true
num_epochs: 1
num_readers: 1
tf_record_input_reader {
input_path: "/home/deploy/models/research/object_detection/Training_carrot_060219/test.record"
}
sample_1_of_n_examples: 1
}
When exporting models for tf serving, the config file and checkpoint files should correspond to each other.
The problem is when exporting the custom trained model, you were using the old config file with new checkpoint files.
I am working on training the object detector with a custom dataset designed to detect the head of a plant. I am using the "Faster R-CNN with Resnet-101 (v1)" that was originally designed for the pet dataset.
I modified the config file to match my dataset (1875 training/375 eval) of images that 275x550 in size. I converted all record files. And the pipeline file is shown below.
I trained on a gpu overnight for 100k steps and the actual evaluation results look really good. It detects all the plant heads and the data is really useful.
The issue is the actual metrics. When checking the tensorboard logs for the eval, all the metrics increase until 30k steps and then drop again making a nice hump in the middle. This goes for the loss, mAP, and precision results.
Why is this result happening? I assumed that if you keep training, the metrics should just flatten out to a line and not just decrease downwards again.
mAP Evaluation: https://imgur.com/a/hjobr6c
Loss Evaluation: https://imgur.com/a/EY8Afqc
# Faster R-CNN with Resnet-101 (v1) originally for Oxford-IIIT Pets Dataset. Modified for wheat head detection
# Users should configure the fine_tune_checkpoint field in the train config as
# well as the label_map_path and input_path fields in the train_input_reader and
# eval_input_reader. Search for "" to find the fields that
# should be configured.
model {
faster_rcnn {
num_classes: 1
image_resizer {
keep_aspect_ratio_resizer {
min_dimension: 275
max_dimension: 550
}
}
feature_extractor {
type: 'faster_rcnn_resnet101'
first_stage_features_stride: 16
}
first_stage_anchor_generator {
grid_anchor_generator {
scales: [0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0]
aspect_ratios: [0.5, 1.0, 2.0]
height_stride: 16
width_stride: 16
}
}
first_stage_box_predictor_conv_hyperparams {
op: CONV
regularizer {
l2_regularizer {
weight: 0.0
}
}
initializer {
truncated_normal_initializer {
stddev: 0.01
}
}
}
first_stage_nms_score_threshold: 0.0
first_stage_nms_iou_threshold: 0.7
first_stage_max_proposals: 300
first_stage_localization_loss_weight: 2.0
first_stage_objectness_loss_weight: 1.0
initial_crop_size: 14
maxpool_kernel_size: 2
maxpool_stride: 2
second_stage_box_predictor {
mask_rcnn_box_predictor {
use_dropout: false
dropout_keep_probability: 1.0
fc_hyperparams {
op: FC
regularizer {
l2_regularizer {
weight: 0.0
}
}
initializer {
variance_scaling_initializer {
factor: 1.0
uniform: true
mode: FAN_AVG
}
}
}
}
}
second_stage_post_processing {
batch_non_max_suppression {
score_threshold: 0.0
iou_threshold: 0.6
max_detections_per_class: 100
max_total_detections: 300
}
score_converter: SOFTMAX
}
second_stage_localization_loss_weight: 2.0
second_stage_classification_loss_weight: 1.0
}
}
train_config: {
batch_size: 1
optimizer {
momentum_optimizer: {
learning_rate: {
manual_step_learning_rate {
initial_learning_rate: 0.0003
schedule {
step: 900000
learning_rate: .00003
}
schedule {
step: 1200000
learning_rate: .000003
}
}
}
momentum_optimizer_value: 0.9
}
use_moving_average: false
}
gradient_clipping_by_norm: 10.0
fine_tune_checkpoint: "object_detection/faster_rcnn_resnet101_coco_11_06_2017/model.ckpt"
from_detection_checkpoint: true
load_all_detection_checkpoint_vars: true
# Note: The below line limits the training process to 200K steps, which we
# empirically found to be sufficient enough to train the pets dataset. This
# effectively bypasses the learning rate schedule (the learning rate will
# never decay). Remove the below line to train indefinitely.
num_steps: 200000
data_augmentation_options {
random_horizontal_flip {
}
}
}
train_input_reader: {
tf_record_input_reader {
input_path: "object_detection/data_wheat/train.record-?????-of-00010"
}
label_map_path: "object_detection/data_wheat/wheat_label_map.pbtxt"
}
eval_config: {
metrics_set: "coco_detection_metrics"
num_examples: 375
}
eval_input_reader: {
tf_record_input_reader {
input_path: "object_detection/data_wheat/val.record-?????-of-00010"
}
label_map_path: "object_detection/data_wheat/wheat_label_map.pbtxt"
shuffle: false
num_readers: 1
}
This is a standard case of overfitting: your model is memorizing the training data and lost its ability to generalize on unseen data.
For cases like this one you have two options:
early stopping: monitor the validation metrics and as soon as the metrics become constants and/or starts decreasing stop the training
add regularization to the model (and also do early stopping anyway)
I trained the object detector to detect car in high resolution imagery base on tensorflow object detect api. I use crops of image as train set but want it to detect cars in full image. but my model can only works on small chips of satellite imagery. I have noticed that image will be resized before feeding to the model in config. but how can I change the parameter or model to help it can detect on large image?
here is my config file to train faster rcnn
model {
faster_rcnn {
num_classes: 1
image_resizer {
keep_aspect_ratio_resizer {
min_dimension: 600
max_dimension: 1024
}
}
feature_extractor {
type: 'faster_rcnn_resnet101'
first_stage_features_stride: 16
}
first_stage_anchor_generator {
grid_anchor_generator {
scales: [0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0]
aspect_ratios: [0.5, 1.0, 2.0]
height_stride: 16
width_stride: 16
}
}
first_stage_box_predictor_conv_hyperparams {
op: CONV
regularizer {
l2_regularizer {
weight: 0.0
}
}
initializer {
truncated_normal_initializer {
stddev: 0.01
}
}
}
first_stage_nms_score_threshold: 0.0
first_stage_nms_iou_threshold: 0.7
first_stage_max_proposals: 300
first_stage_localization_loss_weight: 2.0
first_stage_objectness_loss_weight: 1.0
initial_crop_size: 14
maxpool_kernel_size: 2
maxpool_stride: 2
second_stage_box_predictor {
mask_rcnn_box_predictor {
use_dropout: false
dropout_keep_probability: 1.0
fc_hyperparams {
op: FC
regularizer {
l2_regularizer {
weight: 0.0
}
}
initializer {
variance_scaling_initializer {
factor: 1.0
uniform: true
mode: FAN_AVG
}
}
}
}
}
second_stage_post_processing {
batch_non_max_suppression {
score_threshold: 0.0
iou_threshold: 0.6
max_detections_per_class: 100
max_total_detections: 300
}
score_converter: SOFTMAX
}
second_stage_localization_loss_weight: 2.0
second_stage_classification_loss_weight: 1.0
}
}
train_config: {
batch_size: 1
optimizer {
momentum_optimizer: {
learning_rate: {
manual_step_learning_rate {
initial_learning_rate: 0.0003
schedule {
step: 0
learning_rate: .0003
}
schedule {
step: 900000
learning_rate: .00003
}
schedule {
step: 1200000
learning_rate: .000003
}
}
}
momentum_optimizer_value: 0.9
}
use_moving_average: false
}
it can detect on small size of image
it cannot detect on larger image