We are trying to solve this issue with an apostrophe in liquid syntax.
We've this value - 'products':'bags' in the variable and we would like to split it and remove the apostrophe.
{% assign values = field | remove: "'" | split: ":" %}
But this is not working.
Any help would be appreciated.
This looks ok to me. When I do
{% assign values = "'products':'bags' " | remove: "'" | split: ":" %}
{% for word in values %}
{{ word }}
{% endfor %}
I get
products
bags
What did you want to be different?
Related
I am trying to make an array which already has some tags.. I want to loop through each product in cart and add the tags to the array. The {{tag }} part is working but its not getting assigned to the array..
{% assign finalTaglist = "apples, oranges, peaches" | split: ", " %}
{% for item in cart.items %}
<p>
{% for tag in item.product.tags %}
{{tag}}
{% assign finalTaglist = finalTaglist | concat: tag %}
{% endfor%}
</p>
{% endfor%}
<p>Final Tag List : {{finalTaglist}}</p>`
`
concat is used for joining arrays, but your code is trying to add a string to an array, hence why it doesn't work.
Start with an empty string, and use append to add on to the string, not forgetting your separator. Once built, use split to create the array, then you can append to another array if required.
Something along these lines (not tested, just winging it, but you get the idea..)
{% assign finalTaglist = 'apples,oranges,peaches' | split: ',' %}
{% assign newTagList = '' %}
{% for item in cart.items %}
{% for tag in item.product.tags %}
{% assign newTagList = newTagList | append: ',' | append: tag %}
{% endfor%}
{% endfor%}
{% assign newTagList = newTagList | remove_first: ',' | split: ',' %}
{% assign joinedTagLists = finalTaglist | concat: newTagList %}
In my shopify store, I am using SuperFields in order to customize my site, though my question isn't about the app. On one of my pages, I need the value for the following:
variant.metafields.sf_{{ collection.title | downcase }}[meta_tag_key]
The value should be 0 or 1. If I evaluate the statement directly, such as:
{if variant.metafields.sf_{{ collection.title | downcase }}[meta_tag_key] =1%}
It throws an error when I render the page: Unexpected character '{'
I've also tried the following:
{% capture defaultImage %}variant.metafields.sf_{{ collection.title | downcase }}[meta_tag_key]{% endcapture %}
{% assign test = defaultImage %}
But 'test' is considered nil and doesn't return any value. I have tried to search for answers here and on the shopify forum, but, as my clumsy post title suggests, I'm having a hard time concisely searching for a solution to this problem. Any help is greatly appreciated.
You can try :
{% assign metafield-key = collection.title | downcase | prepend: "sf_" %}
{% assign key = variant.metafields[metafield-key][meta_tag_key] %}
{% if key == 1 %}
Do the twist !
{% endif %}
You are missing a % sign in your code. Hence the error message. Your if statement started with {% and not just {
If you working in liquid then you have to use {% %} for defining any variable & also for condition in shopify. You can't use { this.
i am trying to split the string in template using custom template filter. But i got an error
TemplateSyntaxError at /job/16/
'for' statements should use the format 'for x in y': for skill in form.instance.skills | split : ","
Here it is my filter
#register.filter(name='split')
def split(value, key):
"""
Returns the value turned into a list.
"""
return value.split(key)
this is my template
<h4>Skills</h4>
{% for skill in form.instance.skills | split : "," %}
{{ skill }}
{% endfor %}
Thanks
Split is a custom filter, don't forget to create your filter, and to load it in your HTML page.
Documentation for Django 4.0: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/4.0/howto/custom-template-tags/
<h4>Skills</h4>
{% with form.instance.skills|split:"," as skills %}
{% for skill in skills %}
{{ skill }}<br>
{% endfor %}
{% endwith %}
For extract character string, use filter cut:
Phone
this removes the scripts from the string.
The direct for loop works too, you just have to remove the spaces in the syntax:
<h4>Skills</h4>
{% for skill in form.instance.skills|split:"," %}
{{ skill }}
{% endfor %}
I'm using Shopify and want to hook into customer tags, however they are case sensitive. So {% if customer.tags contains "wholesale" %} is not the same as {% if customer.tags contains "Wholesale" %}. My client may or may not stick to one case when applying tags so I want to guard against that in the future.
I would like to take an array, customer.tags, and convert all of the values to lowercase. I'm trying to work out the logic but am having trouble.
I want to put customer.tags into a new array which isn't working.
{% assign newArray = customer.tags %}
{{ newArray }}
What am I doing wrong?
You could use the downcase filter for this:
{% assign contains_wholesale = false %}
{% for tag in customer.tags %}
{% assign lowercase_tag = tag | downcase %}
{% if lowercase_tag == 'wholesale' %}
{% assign contains_wholesale = true %}
{% endif %}
{% endfor %}
Note: downcase just works for ASCII characters. If you need to search for strings with accented letters or other Unicode characters then this won't be enough.
if you would like to keep customer.tags as an array so you can keep using contains in a simple if statement (like your example). You could also chain a couple of liquid filters together to turn all of the strings within the array to lowercase.
Example:
{% assign lowercaseTags = customer.tags | join: ',' | downcase | split: ',' %}
{% assign randomString = 'WholeSale' | downcase %}
{% if lowerCaseTags contains randomString %}
{% comment %}
Will now match regardless of case sensitivity
{% endcomment %}
{% endif %
Explanation:
Join filter: Turn the array into a string seperated by ,
Downcase filter: make the whole string lowercase
Split filter: opposite of join, recreates the array from the string based on the character used in join ,
Another solution as you use the "contains" operator would be to skip the "w".
Something like {% if customer.tags contains 'holesale' %} should work.
I have a field in my settings.html where I am expecting the user to input multiple paragraphs separated by two newline characters. I would like to split this string of input into an array of strings, each representing a paragraph.
I would like to do something like this:
{% assign paragraphs = settings.intro | split: '\n' %}
{% for paragraph in paragraphs %}
<p>
{{ paragraph }}
</p>
{% endfor %}
I can't seem to figure out how to refer to the newline character in Liquid. How can I go about doing this? Is there some kind of work around?
Try this:
{% assign paragraphs = settings.intro | newline_to_br | split: '<br />' %}
{% for paragraph in paragraphs %}<p>{{ paragraph }}</p>{% endfor %}
#josh-browns answer got me pretty much there and might be enough for most instances. However, I had some blank paragraphs coming through from user generated double lines.
Denilson Sá Maia comment of strip_newlines did not help with my markdown processor so I checked if each line was empty manually before outputting the paragraph.
{% for paragraph in paragraphs %}
{% assign paragraph-length = paragraph | number_of_words %}
{% if paragraph-length > 0 %}
<p>{{ paragraph }}</p>
IMAGE HERE
{% endif %}
{% endfor %}
This doesn't solve the blanks in the array, for that I iterated over the array to create a new one, with only valid content. It would be really nice if there was a filter that worked on arrays, not just hashes.
{% assign all-paragraphs = content | strip | newline_to_br | strip_newlines | split: "<br />" %}
{% assign paragraphs = site.emptyArray %}
{% for paragraph in all-paragraphs %}
{% if paragraph and paragraph != "" and paragraph != site.emptyArray %}
{% assign paragraphs = paragraphs | push: paragraph %}
{% endif %}
{% endfor %}
If you do, in fact, need Shopify to split by newlines for any reason where you don't iterate with a for loop afterwards, it is indeed possible:
{% assign paragraphs = settings.intro | split: '
' %}
{% for paragraph in paragraphs %}
<p>
{{ paragraph }}
</p>
{% endfor %}
ie. you need to type an explicit newline into your source code.
This is due to the way Liquid works, quoting from the documentation about Types:
Liquid does not convert escape sequences into special characters.