hi I have some product cat in my database I want to generate inline keyboard from the theme but I want to like this
we have
cat1-ca2-ca3-ca4-ca5
I want to like this
cat1 cat2
cat3 cat4
cat5
I need the loop for this result thanks
When you get the values that you want to show in the keyboard, you need to store these in array. This example was did in Javascript, you must found the equivalent in php code.
If you only have 5 products you don't need a loop, just:
...
{
'reply_markup': JSON.stringify({
keyboard:
[
[{'text': 'cat1'},{'text': 'cat2'}],
[{'text': 'cat3'},{'text': 'cat4'}],
[{'text': 'cat5'}]
],
one_time_keyboard: true,
resize_keyboard: true
})
}
...
If you have undefined products elements you must use a for loop:
var keyboard = [];
var products = ['cat1', 'cat2', 'cat3', 'cat4', 'cat5'];
for (var i = 0; i < products.length; i++) {
keyboard.push([{'text': products[i]}]);
}
...
{
'reply_markup': JSON.stringify({
inline_keyboard: keyboard
})
}
Related
Let's say I have an array of fruits and an empty basket array. I push the fruits to the basket and loop through the basket in the template. I can output the whole array of fruits inside the basket.
<template>
<div v-for="fruit in basket">
<li>{{ fruit }}</li>
</div>
<button #click="addFruit">Add to basket</button>
</template>
<script>
data() {
return {
fruits: ['Orange', 'Apple'],
basket: [],
};
},
methods: {
addFruit() {
this.basket.push(this.fruits);
},
}
</script>
But what if I want each individual fruit to be shown as a list item? As it is right now I output the entire array of fruits.
I know that I can easilly get the individual fruits by saying
<li>{{ fruit[0] }}</li>
But that would not be practical as it requires a lot of manual work.
When I am pushing the fruits, I am looking for a way to also split them up, so that when I fire the addFruit function, I add all the fruits, but I add them as individual items.
I know there are other ways to do this, but I specifially want to know how I do this while keeping the arrays and the push method.
EDIT: I tried to write the fruit example because I wanted to keep it as simple as possible, but I will include my own code then.
In my code, I fetch an array of data from my database. I store the data results in a const called recipients. That is then pushed into an array called defaultTags. So I push an array of data into an empty array, in this case a list of emails and other contact information, which is then outputted as a tag, but what I want is to actually output the data as individual items. So instead of having one big tag that stores the whole array. Eg: [email1, email2, email3], I wish to have a seperate tag for each email in the array.
load() {
switch (this.entityType) {
case 'TENANCY':
userService.getCurrentUser().then(userResult => {
tenancyService.getTenants(this.entityId).then(result => {
const defaultTags = [];
const recipients = result.data
.map(tenant => tenant.legalEntity)
.filter(legalEntity => legalEntity.email || (!legalEntity.email && this.asNotification ? legalEntity.name : null))
.map(legalEntity => ({
emailAddress: legalEntity.email || (!legalEntity.email && this.asNotification ? legalEntity.name.concat(' ', `(${this.$t('letterMail').toLowerCase()})`) : null),
legalEntityId: legalEntity.id
}));
if (recipients.length) {
defaultTags.push(this.setText({description: this.$t('tenants'), recipients}));
}
this.autocompleteItems.push(...defaultTags);
if (this.includeUser) {
defaultTags.push(this.setText({
description: this.$t('user'),
recipients: [{emailAddress: userResult.data.email}]
}));
}
if (this.prefill) {
this.tagsChanged(defaultTags);
}
tenancyService.getUnits(this.entityId).then(result =>
result.data.forEach(unitTenancy => this.addPropertyContactsToAutocompleteItems(unitTenancy.unit.propertyId)));
});
});
break;
case 'UNIT':
unitService.get(this.entityId).then(result =>
this.addPropertyContactsToAutocompleteItems(result.data.propertyId));
break;
case 'PROPERTY':
this.addPropertyContactsToAutocompleteItems(this.entityId);
break;
}
},
I am focusing specifically on this line:
if (recipients.length) {
defaultTags.push(this.setText({description: this.$t('tenants'), recipients}));
}
It outputs the entire fruit items because you are pushing the whole array into the basket array, not the actual items. Saying basket is an array of array, not an array of fruits.
// Instead of this
this.basket.push(this.fruits); // [['Orange', 'Apple']]
// Use array destructuring
this.basket.push(...this.fruits); // ['Orange, 'Apple']
// Or concat
this.basket.concat(this.fruits); // ['Orange, 'Apple']
I'm filtering with vuejs, only the output I want is written in the ".00" span in the comma. how can i do it?
html
1.500 ,00
component
<p class="amount">{{ 1500 | toTL }}</p>
filter
Vue.filter('toTL', function (value) {
return new Intl.NumberFormat('tr-TR', { currency: 'TRY', minimumFractionDigits: 2}).format(value);
});
output
1.500,00
I declared you value in the data() function like so :
data () {
return {
number: '1500,00',
newNumber: [],
}
},
What I did to make this work is make a created function like so :
created() {
this.newNumber = this.number.split(',')
},
Then, in the frontend (your p and span) :
<p>{{ newNumber[0] }}<span>,{{newNumber[1]}}</span></p>
What I did is turn a value into an array by using the split() function.
There is probably a way better solution but this is what I came up with in a short amount of time, I hope it helps.
I have this code:
import {compose, view, lensProp, lensIndex, over, map} from "rambda";
let order = {
lineItems:[
{name:"A", total:33},
{name:"B", total:123},
{name:"C", total:777},
]
};
let lineItems = lensProp("lineItems");
let firstLineItem = lensIndex(0);
let total = lensProp("total");
My goal is to get all the totals of all the lineItems (because I want to sum them). I approached the problem incrementally like this:
console.log(view(lineItems, order)); // -> the entire lineItems array
console.log(view(compose(lineItems, firstLineItem), order)); // -> { name: 'A', total: 33 }
console.log(view(compose(lineItems, firstLineItem, total), order)); // -> 33
But I can't figure out the right expression to get back the array of totals
console.log(view(?????, order)); // -> [33,123,777]
That is my question - what goes where the ????? is?
I coded around my ignorance by doing this:
let collector = [];
function collect(t) {
collector.push(t);
}
over(lineItems, map(over(total, collect)), order);
console.log(collector); // -> [33,123,777]
But I'm sure a ramda-native knows how to do this better.
It is possible to achieve this using lenses (traversals), though will likely not be worth the additional complexity.
The idea is that we can use R.traverse with the applicative instance of a Const type as something that is composable with a lens and combines zero or more targets together.
The Const type allows you to wrap up a value that does not change when mapped over (i.e. it remains constant). How do we combine two constant values together to support the applicative ap? We require that the constant values have a monoid instance, meaning they are values that can be combined together and have some value representing an empty instance (e.g. two lists can be concatenated with the empty list being the empty instance, two numbers can be added with zero being the empty instace, etc.)
const Const = x => ({
value: x,
map: function (_) { return this },
ap: other => Const(x.concat(other.value))
})
Next we can create a function that will let us combine the lens targets in different ways, depending on the provided function that wraps the target values in some monoid instance.
const foldMapOf = (theLens, toMonoid) => thing =>
theLens(compose(Const, toMonoid))(thing).value
This function will be used like R.view and R.over, accepting a lens as its first argument and then a function for wrapping the target in an instance of the monoid that will combine the values together. Finally it accepts the thing that you want to drill into with the lens.
Next we'll create a simple helper function that can be used to create our traversal, capturing the monoid type that will be used to aggregate the final target.
const aggregate = empty => traverse(_ => Const(empty))
This is an unfortunate leak where we need to know how the end result will aggregated when composing the traversal, rather than simply knowing that it is something that needs to be traversed. Other languages can make use of static types to infer this information, but no such luck with JS without changing how lenses are defined in Ramda.
Given you mentioned that you would like to sum the targets together, we can create a monoid instance that does exactly that.
const Sum = x => ({
value: x,
concat: other => Sum(x + other.value)
})
This just says that you can wrap two numbers together and when combined, they will produce a new Sum containing the value of adding them together.
We now have everything we need to combine it all together.
const sumItemTotals = order => foldMapOf(
compose(
lensProp('lineItems'),
aggregate(Sum(0)),
lensProp('total')
),
Sum
)(order).value
sumItemTotals({
lineItems: [
{ name: "A", total: 33 },
{ name: "B", total: 123 },
{ name: "C", total: 777 }
]
}) //=> 933
If you just wanted to extract a list instead of summing them directly, we could use the monoid instance for lists instead (e.g. [].concat).
const itemTotals = foldMapOf(
compose(
lensProp('lineItems'),
aggregate([]),
lensProp('total')
),
x => [x]
)
itemTotals({
lineItems: [
{ name: "A", total: 33 },
{ name: "B", total: 123 },
{ name: "C", total: 777 }
]
}) //=> [33, 123, 777]
Based on your comments on the answer from customcommander, I think you can write this fairly simply. I don't know how you receive your schema, but if you can turn the pathway to your lineItems node into an array of strings, then you can write a fairly simple function:
const lineItemTotal = compose (sum, pluck ('total'), path)
let order = {
path: {
to: {
lineItems: [
{name: "A", total: 33},
{name: "B", total: 123},
{name: "C", total: 777},
]
}
}
}
console .log (
lineItemTotal (['path', 'to', 'lineItems'], order)
)
<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.27.0/ramda.js"></script>
<script> const {compose, sum, pluck, path} = R </script>
You can wrap curry around this and call the resulting function with lineItemTotal (['path', 'to', 'lineItems']) (order), potentially saving the intermediate function for reuse.
Is there a particular reason why you want to use lenses here? Don't get me wrong; lenses are nice but they don't seem to add much value in your case.
Ultimately this is what you try to accomplish (as far as I can tell):
map(prop('total'), order.lineItems)
you can refactor this a little bit with:
const get_total = compose(map(prop('total')), propOr([], 'lineItems'));
get_total(order);
You can use R.pluck to get an array of values from an array of objects:
const order = {"lineItems":[{"name":"A","total":33},{"name":"B","total":123},{"name":"C","total":777}]};
const result = R.pluck('total', order.lineItems);
console.log(result);
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.27.0/ramda.js"></script>
I'm using jquery data tables and I'm assigning an array of values to the initialization of the data table. The table basically looks like this.
based on an an radio button I would like to limit the items that are display in the table and the items that are searched in the table.
For my example it would be based on the "Chart column". I want to limit the table to only show the items that are based on chart "D" or Chart "S". Here is how I'm initializing the table.
if (!$.fn.DataTable.isDataTable( '#fundLookUptbl' ) ) {
fundTable = $('#fundLookUptbl').DataTable( {
data: funds,
columns: [
{ "mData": "chart" },
{ "mData": "fund" },
{ "mData": "orgDefault" },
{ "mData": "progDefault" }
]
} );
var filteredData = fundTable
.columns( [0, 1] )
.data()
.eq( 0 )
.filter( function ( value, index ) {
return value = 'D' ? true : false;
} );
}
This is obviously not working, and the filterData variable is a lousy attempt on trying to make it work. I'm having a hard time understanding the API's. So the question is , How can initialize the table to only show the items that are based on a given chart. I know that I can remove the items of the array but i don't want to do that since I would simple like to be able to switch between chart "D" and "S" but still continue to search through the other columns.
I believe that filtering the column would solve your problem.
table.column(0).search('Bruno').draw()
So you could just filter the column when the radio button selection change
Here is a fiddle example
I´m not sure to be understanding what you want to do but here are some options:
One way is selecting by default value example "s". You can use a dropdown is easier to handled .Then select with jQuery the dafault value "s" on that dropdown and add a function
$("#DropdownId").change(function () {
var chart=$("#DropdownId").val();
});
$.ajax({
url: "url")",//url to reload page with new value
type: "POST",
data: {chart:chart},
success: function (data) {
}
});
});
on this way the filter is on backend. If you want to do something on the row depending of a column value you shoud to add something like this
"fnRowCallback": function (nRow, mData, iDisplayIndex, iDisplayIndexFull) {
if (mData["chart"] =="s") {
return nRow;
}
},
Datatables: custom function inside of fnRowCallback.
Good luck
fundTable.order( [0, 'asc'] );
Try that or look at this particular page for reference:
https://datatables.net/reference/api/order%28%29
Basically orders in pair of columnIndex in either asc(ending) or desc(ending) order.
I have used Node to retrieve a set of results from SQL and they're returned like this;
[
{
"event_id": 111111,
"date_time": "2012-11-16T01:59:07.000Z",
"agent_addr": "127.0.0.1",
"priority": 6,
"message": "aaaaaaaaa",
"up_time": 9015040,
"hostname": "bbbbbbb",
"context": "ccccccc"
},
{
"event_id": 111112,
"date_time": "2012-11-16T01:59:07.000Z",
"agent_addr": "127.0.0.1",
"priority": 6,
"message": "aaaaaaaaa",
"up_time": 9015040,
"hostname": "bbbbbbb",
"context": "ddddddd"
},
]
There are usually a lot of entries in the array and I need to efficiently filter the array to show only the entries that have a context of "ccccccc". I've tried a for loop, but it's incredibly slow.
Any suggesstions?
There is a very simple way of doing that if you want to do that in node and don't want to use sql for that you can user javascript built-in Array.filter function.
var output = arr.filter(function(x){return x.context=="ccccccc"}); //arr here is you result array
The ouput array will contains only objects having context "ccccccc".
Another way of doing what Khurrum said, is with the arrow function. It has the same result but some people prefer that notation.
var output = arr.filter(x => x.context == "ccccccc" );
As suggested by Matt, why not include WHERE context = "ccccccc" in yout SQL query?
Else if you must keep all in maybe use one of the following to filter the results
// Place all "ccccccc" context row in an array
var ccccccc = [];
for (var i = results.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
if(results[i] == 'ccccccc')
ccccccc.push(results[i]);
};
// Place any context in an named array within an object
var contexts = {};
for (var i = results.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
if(contexts[results[i]] == 'undefined')
contexts[results[i]]
contexts[results[i]].push(results[i]);
};
or use the underscore (or similar) filter function.