I have a Qlikview expression that I want it to not be affected by any selections EXCEPT two specific fields: Year & Month.
My Expression is:
Sum(Aggr(IF(Duration = 0.5 , 0.5,
IF(DayName = 'Sat',0,
IF(DayName = 'Sun',0,
RangeSum(
Count({<Key = {"=Len(Trim([Date From])) > 0"}>}DISTINCT Name),
Avg({<Key = {"=Len(Trim([Date From])) = 0"}>}0))))), Name, ADate))
I know you can use something like; {1<Year = $:: Year>} & {1<Month = $:: Month>} to accomplish this but I cant quite get it right.
There's a few ways to accomplish this, but if you're sure you want the expression to consider only the two fields you mentioned, I like to start with the total set of all data and filter to just the ones you want.
You are basically there, depending on what expression you want restricted you'd use {1<Year = $:: Year>} or {1<Month = $:: Month>} like you said in any place you want restricted. The 1 set identifier will start with the total set of all data in the application, then the set modifiers, Year and Month will be set based on selection in the default state designated by the $ set identifier.
So something like this should work I think:
Sum({1<Year=$::Year, Month=$::Month>}
Aggr(
IF( Duration = 0.5 , 0.5,
IF(DayName = 'Sat', 0,
IF(DayName = 'Sun', 0,
RangeSum({
Count({<Key = {"=Len(Trim([Date From])) > 0"}>} DISTINCT Name),
Avg({<Key = {"=Len(Trim([Date From])) = 0"}>} 0 )
)
)
)
),
Name, ADate)
)
You may have to add this to your count and avg expressions as well.
I am confused about this expression: Avg({<Key = {"=Len(Trim([Date From])) = 0"}>} 0 ). It is averaging 0. Is that right?
Related
I have a more complex query, but I will give a simple example. In SSRS same input but need different outputs:
select * from myTable where
case
when :PAR1 = 'hour' then myTable.hour = :PAR1
when :PAR1 = 'Mounth' then myTable.Mounth = :PAR1
end
How to make it?
I'm try to
case length(:PAR1)
when 18 then hour: = PAR1
..
always a mistake..
You don't need a CASE expression here:
SELECT *
FROM myTable
WHERE (:PAR1 = 'hour' AND hour = :PAR1) OR
(:PAR1 = 'Mounth' AND Mounth = :PAR1);
Code you posted doesn't make sense to me; are you sure that :PAR1 is used everywhere? I'd expect something like this instead
select *
from mytable
where (:PAR1 = 'hour' and hour = :PAR2)
or (:PAR1 = 'Mounth' and mounth = :PAR2)
-------
maybe not :PAR2, but
certainly not :PAR1
Also, when you're dealing with hours, what is mounth? Shouldn't that be month?
I'm currently building a feature that requires me to loop over an hash, and for each key in the hash, dynamically modify an SQL query.
The actual SQL query should look something like this:
select * from space_dates d
inner join space_prices p on p.space_date_id = d.id
where d.space_id = ?
and d.date between ? and ?
and (
(p.price_type = 'monthly' and p.price_cents <> 9360) or
(p.price_type = 'daily' and p.price_cents <> 66198) or
(p.price_type = 'hourly' and p.price_cents <> 66198) # This part should be added in dynamically
)
The last and query is to be added dynamically, as you can see, I basically need only one of the conditions to be true but not all.
query = space.dates
.joins(:price)
.where('date between ? and ?', start_date, end_date)
# We are looping over the rails enum (hash) and getting the key for each key value pair, alongside the index
SpacePrice.price_types.each_with_index do |(price_type, _), index|
amount_cents = space.send("#{price_type}_price").price_cents
query = if index.positive? # It's not the first item so we want to chain it as an 'OR'
query.or(
space.dates
.joins(:price)
.where('space_prices.price_type = ?', price_type)
.where('space_prices.price_cents <> ?', amount_cents)
)
else
query # It's the first item, chain it as an and
.where('space_prices.price_type = ?', price_type)
.where('space_prices.price_cents <> ?', amount_cents)
end
end
The output of this in rails is:
SELECT "space_dates".* FROM "space_dates"
INNER JOIN "space_prices" ON "space_prices"."space_date_id" = "space_dates"."id"
WHERE "space_dates"."space_id" = $1 AND (
(
(date between '2020-06-11' and '2020-06-11') AND
(space_prices.price_type = 'hourly') AND (space_prices.price_cents <> 9360) OR
(space_prices.price_type = 'daily') AND (space_prices.price_cents <> 66198)) OR
(space_prices.price_type = 'monthly') AND (space_prices.price_cents <> 5500)
) LIMIT $2
Which isn't as expected. I need to wrap the last few lines in another set of round brackets in order to produce the same output. I'm not sure how to go about this using ActiveRecord.
It's not possible for me to use find_by_sql since this would be dynamically generated SQL too.
So, I managed to solve this in about an hour using Arel with rails
dt = SpaceDate.arel_table
pt = SpacePrice.arel_table
combined_clauses = SpacePrice.price_types.map do |price_type, _|
amount_cents = space.send("#{price_type}_price").price_cents
pt[:price_type]
.eq(price_type)
.and(pt[:price_cents].not_eq(amount_cents))
end.reduce(&:or)
space.dates
.joins(:price)
.where(dt[:date].between(start_date..end_date).and(combined_clauses))
end
And the SQL output is:
SELECT "space_dates".* FROM "space_dates"
INNER JOIN "space_prices" ON "space_prices"."space_date_id" = "space_dates"."id"
WHERE "space_dates"."space_id" = $1
AND "space_dates"."date" BETWEEN '2020-06-11' AND '2020-06-15'
AND (
("space_prices"."price_type" = 'hourly'
AND "space_prices"."price_cents" != 9360
OR "space_prices"."price_type" = 'daily'
AND "space_prices"."price_cents" != 66198)
OR "space_prices"."price_type" = 'monthly'
AND "space_prices"."price_cents" != 5500
) LIMIT $2
What I ended up doing was:
Creating an array of clauses based on the enum key and the price_cents
Reduced the clauses and joined them using or
Added this to the main query with an and operator and the combined_clauses
I have an issue that I'm hoping you can help me with. I am trying to create charting data for performance of an application that I am working on. The first step for me to perform two select statements with my feature turned off and on.
SELECT onSet.testName,
avg(onSet.elapsed) as avgOn,
0 as avgOff
FROM Results onSet
WHERE onSet.pll = 'On'
GROUP BY onSet.testName
union
SELECT offSet1.testName,
0 as avgOn,
avg(offSet1.elapsed) as avgOff
FROM Results offSet1
WHERE offSet1.pll = 'Off'
GROUP BY offSet1.testName
This gives me data that looks like this:
Add,0,11.4160277777777778
Add,11.413625,0
Delete,0,4.5245277777777778
Delete,4.0039861111111111,0
Evidently union is not the correct feature. Since the data needs to look like:
Add,11.413625,11.4160277777777778
Delete,4.0039861111111111,4.5245277777777778
I've been trying to get inner joins to work but I can't get the syntax to work.
Removing the union and trying to put this statement after the select statements also doesn't work. I evidently have the wrong syntax.
inner join xxx ON onSet.testName=offset1.testName
After getting the data to be like this I want to apply one last select statement that will subtract one column from another and give me the difference. So for me it's just one step at a time.
Thanks in advance.
-KAP
I think you can use a single query with conditional aggregation:
SELECT
testName,
AVG(CASE WHEN pll = 'On' THEN elapsed ELSE 0 END) AS avgOn,
AVG(CASE WHEN pll = 'Off' THEN elapsed ELSE 0 END) AS avgOff
FROM Results
GROUP BY testName
I just saw the filemaker tag and have no idea if this work there, but on MySQL I would try something along
SELECT testName, sum(if(pll = 'On',elapsed,0)) as sumOn,
sum(if(pll = 'On',1,0)) as numOn,
sum(if(pll ='Off',elapsed,0)) as sumOff,
sum(if(pll ='Off',1,0)) as numOff,
sumOn/numOn as avgOn,
sumOff/numOff as avgOff
FROM Results
WHERE pll = 'On' or pll='Off'
GROUP BY testName ;
If it works for you then this should be rather efficient as you do not need to join. If not, thumbs pressed that this triggers another idea.
The difficulty you have with the join you envisioned is that the filtering in the WHERE clause is performed after the join was completed. So, you would still not know what records to use to compute the averages. If the above is not implementable with FileMaker then check if nested queries work. You would then
SELECT testName, on.avg as avgOn, off.avg as avgOff
FROM ( SELECT ... FROM Results ...) as on, () as off
JOIN on.testName=off.testName
If that is also not possible then I would look for temporary tables.
OK guys... thanks for the help again. Here is the final answer. The statement below is FileMaker custom function that takes 4 arguments (platform, runID, model and user count. You can see the sql statement is specified. FileMaker executeSQL() function does not support nested select statements, does not support IF statements embedded in select statements (calc functions do of course) and finally does not support the SQL keyword VALUES. FileMaker does support the SQL keyword CASE which is a little more powerful but is a bit wordy. The select statement is in a variable named sql and result is placed in a variable named result. The ExecuteSQL() function works like a printf statement for param text so you can see the swaps do occur.
Let(
[
sql =
"SELECT testName, (sum( CASE WHEN PLL='On' THEN elapsed ELSE 0 END)) as sumOn,
sum( CASE WHEN PLL='On' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) as countOn,
sum( CASE WHEN PLL='Off' THEN elapsed ELSE 0 END) as sumOff,
sum( CASE WHEN PLL='Off' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) as countOff
FROM Results
WHERE Platform = ?
and RunID = ?
and Model = ?
and UserCnt = ?
GROUP BY testName";
result = ExecuteSQL ( sql ; "" ; ""
; platform
; runID
; model
; userCnt )
];
getAverages ( Result ; "" ; 2 )
)
For those interested the custom function looks like this:
getAverages( result, newList, pos )
Let (
[
curValues = Substitute( GetValue( data; pos ); ","; ¶ );
sumOn = GetValue( curValues; 2 ) ;
countOn = GetValue( curValues; 3 );
sumOff = GetValue( curValues; 4 );
countOff = GetValue( curValues; 5 );
avgOn = sumOn / countOn;
avgOff = sumOff / countOff
newItem = ((avgOff - avgOn) / avgOff ) * 100
];
newList & If ( pos > ValueCount( data); newList;
getAverages( data; If ( not IsEmpty( newList); ¶ ) & newItem; pos + 1 ))
)
I faced the following requirement. The following query is called by a procedure. The value p_pac_code is the input parameter of the procedure.
The requirement is the query should have an additional condition sp_sbsp.SUBSPCLTY_CODE!='C430 if the p_pac_code value is '008'.
For any other p_pac_code value, it should run as it is below. Is there way to do this by adding an additional condition in the WHERE clause?
As for now, I have done this using IF.....ELSE using the query two times separately depending on p_pac_code value. But I am required to find a way to do with just adding a condition to this single query.
SELECT ptg.group_cid
FROM PRVDR_TYPE_X_SPCLTY_SUBSPCLTY ptxss,
PT_X_SP_SSP_STATUS pxsst ,
pt_sp_ssp_x_group ptg,
group_x_group_store gg,
specialty_subspecialty sp_sbsp,
treatment_type tt,
provider_type pt
WHERE
pt.PRVDR_TYPE_CODE = ptxss.PRVDR_TYPE_CODE
AND tt.TRTMNT_TYPE_CODE = pxsst.TRTMNT_TYPE_CODE
AND ptxss.PRVDR_TYPE_X_SPCLTY_SID = pxsst.PRVDR_TYPE_X_SPCLTY_SID
AND tt.TRTMNT_TYPE_CODE = p_pac_code
AND TRUNC(SYSDATE) BETWEEN TRUNC(PXSST.FROM_DATE) AND TRUNC(PXSST.TO_DATE)
AND ptg.prvdr_type_code =ptxss.prvdr_type_code
AND ptg.spclty_subspclty_sid = ptxss.spclty_subspclty_sid
AND ptxss.spclty_subspclty_sid = sp_sbsp.spclty_subspclty_sid
AND ptg.spclty_subspclty_sid = sp_sbsp.spclty_subspclty_sid
AND ptg.status_cid = 2
AND ptg.group_cid = gg.group_cid
AND gg.group_store_cid = 16
AND gg.status_cid = 2;
Thanks in advance.
You can simply add a condition like this:
... and (
( sp_sbsp.SUBSPCLTY_CODE!='C430' and p_pac_code = '008')
OR
NVL(p_pac_code, '-') != '008'
)
This can be re-written in different ways, this one is quite self-explanatory
Just add:
AND NOT ( NVL( sp_sbsp.SUBSPCLTY_CODE, 'x' ) = 'C430'
AND NVL( p_pac_code value, 'x' ) = '008' )
to the where clause.
The NVL function is used so that it will match NULL values (if they exist in your data); otherwise, even though NULL does not match C430 you will still find that NULL = 'C430' and NULL <> 'C430' and NOT( NULL = 'C430' ) will all return false.
Quite easy. Add the following condition:
AND (sp_sbsp.SUBSPCLTY_CODE != 'C430' OR p_pac_code value != '008')
(don't forget the parenthesis)
Just sharing
SELECT ptg.group_cid
FROM PRVDR_TYPE_X_SPCLTY_SUBSPCLTY ptxss
WHERE
pt.PRVDR_TYPE_CODE = ptxss.PRVDR_TYPE_CODE
&&((tt.TRTMNT_TYPE_CODE = pxsst.TRTMNT_TYPE_CODE)
or (tt.TRTMNT_TYPE_CODE = pxsst.TRTMNT_TYPE_CODE))
just use the parenthesis to specify where the conditionmust implement.
I'm having some trouble figuring out why the SQL query below isn't working ... when members_only is set to 0, it's still showing them...
SELECT *
FROM reports
WHERE story = "1"
OR barebones = "1"
AND members_only = "1"
It depends on your data, but you may not be aware that AND has higher precedence in SQL than OR, so your query really evaluates to this:
SELECT *
FROM reports
WHERE story = '1'
OR (barebones = '1' AND members_only = '1')
Consider using different brackets per the other answers to explicitly declare your intentions
Use brackets to distinguish your clarify the WHERE-condition.
SELECT *
FROM reports
WHERE (story = '1' OR barebones = '1')
AND members_only = '1'
I would say because it reads the query as:
WHERE (story = '1') OR (barebones = '1' AND members_only = '1')
since story = '1', the condition is satisfied
OR clauses can be tricky - you often need to explicitly tell the query where it belongs. I assume, you want this:
WHERE (story = '1' OR barebones = '1') AND members_only = '1'
Missing parenthesis?
Did you want to do something like this:
SELECT *
FROM reports
WHERE (story = "1" OR barebones = "1") AND members_only = "1"
You are missing parenthesis.
The following code will work, assuming members_only HAS to be "1", but only story or barebones has to be "1".
SELECT *
FROM reports
WHERE
(story = "1" OR barebones = "1")
AND members_only = "1"
You should read up on TSQL Operator Precedence
In your original code, assume the following:
store = 1
barebones = 1
*members_only* = 0
Due to Operator Precedence, barebones and *members_only* is evaluated first, and evaluates to false.
Following this, the result of the first boolean evaluation (false) (also known as The Right Side) is compared to (story = "1") (also known as The Left Side).
The Right Side evaluates to false, but The Left Side evaluates to true.
Since the final boolean compression uses the OR operator, the end result is a TRUE, thus that record is indeed returned, no matter the value of either barebones or *members_only*, since The Left Side always evaluates to True.