i have an application in C# and i use a Kinect sensor for speech recognition.
It is possible to set the Culture in it-IT??
I think the problem is in the method GetKinectRecognizer() becouse in this method i set the property for the Speech Recognition.
Now i have this method
//riconoscimento vocale
private SpeechRecognitionEngine RiconoscimentoVocale()
{
RecognizerInfo ri = GetKinectRecognizer();
SpeechRecognitionEngine sre;
try
{
sre = new SpeechRecognitionEngine(ri.Id);
}
catch
{
this.Close();
return null;
}
//vengono aggiunte la parole grammaticali da riconoscere
var grammar = new Choices();
grammar.Add("rosso");
grammar.Add("aiuto");
grammar.Add("caduto");
//creo il vocabolario delle parole
var vocabolario = new GrammarBuilder { Culture = ri.Culture };
vocabolario.Append(grammar);
// Create the actual Grammar instance, and then load it into the speech recognizer.
var g = new Grammar(vocabolario);
//carico la grammatica
sre.LoadGrammar(g);
//aggiungo l'evento per il riconoscimento delle parole
sre.SpeechRecognized += this.RiconoscimentoParole;
return sre;
}
private static RecognizerInfo GetKinectRecognizer()
{
//Console.WriteLine("recognizer info ");
Func<RecognizerInfo, bool> matchingFunc = r =>
{
Console.WriteLine("recognizer info " + r.Culture.Name);
string value;
r.AdditionalInfo.TryGetValue("Kinect", out value);
return "True".Equals(value, StringComparison.InvariantCultureIgnoreCase) && "en-US".Equals(r.Culture.Name, StringComparison.InvariantCultureIgnoreCase);
};
return SpeechRecognitionEngine.InstalledRecognizers().Where(matchingFunc).FirstOrDefault();
}
Can we help me?
I'm assuming that you've installed the Italian language pack, as that's a prerequisite. Then, in your GetKinectRecognizer method, you need to change
return "True".Equals(value, StringComparison.InvariantCultureIgnoreCase) && "en-US".Equals(r.Culture.Name, StringComparison.InvariantCultureIgnoreCase);
to
return "True".Equals(value, StringComparison.InvariantCultureIgnoreCase) && "it-IT".Equals(r.Culture.Name, StringComparison.InvariantCultureIgnoreCase);
Also, your function seems very similar to the code in this question, which had its own problems, so you may not be out of the woods yet.
But the general outline is there - you need to return the ID of an Italian recognizer (which you must install).
Related
I'm trying to remove/add the groups from security of a document in FileNet using CPE API. I am able to remove wihtout any issues. However, when I try to add the groups that are missing, by inheriting from document class, groups get added without full permissions. For example, I remove "author" group and when I try to add the same group back, it does not have all the permissions.
Remove groups:
AccessPermissionList apl = doc.get_Permissions();
Iterator iter = apl.iterator();
while (iter.hasNext())
{
AccessPermission ap = (AccessPermission)iter.next();
if(ap.get_GranteeName().contains("group name")){
iter.remove();
}
}
doc.set_Permissions(apl);
doc.save(RefreshMode.NO_REFRESH);
Add groups:
DocumentClassDefinition docClassDef = Factory.DocumentClassDefinition.fetchInstance(os, classID, null);
AccessPermissionList docClassApl = docClassDef.get_Permissions();
Iterator docClassApliter = docClassApl.iterator();
for(Object obj : docClassApl)
{
AccessPermission ap = (AccessPermission)obj;
if(!apl.contains(ap)){
apl.add(ap);
}
}
doc.set_Permissions(apl);
doc.save(RefreshMode.NO_REFRESH);
RESOLVED:
Had to use DefaultInstanceSecurity rather than regular security as the permissions in both instances were different. So just updated the following line of code:
AccessPermissionList docClassApl = docClassDef.get_DefaultInstancePermissions();
You need to set AccessMask too. Like below:
AccessPermission ap;
ap.set_AccessMark ( new Integer (AccessLevel.FULL_CONTROL_DOCUMENT_AS_INT));
//AccessLevel.WRITE_DOCUMENT_AS_INT
//AccessLevel.MAJOR_VERSION_DOCUMENT_AS_INT
Version 5.2.0 onwards, AccessLevel is deprecated but you can give it a try. AccessRight is the replacement now. Refer this.
Update
public static void setPermissions(Document doc) throws IOException {
//In cpetarget.properties file
//cpetarget.security=Administrator:FULL_CONTROL,p8admin:MODIFY_PROPERTIES
InputStream input = new FileInputStream("cpetarget.properties");
java.util.Properties prop = new java.util.Properties();
prop.load(input);
List<String> strList = new ArrayList<String>(Arrays.asList(prop.getProperty("cpetarget.security").split(",")));
AccessPermissionList apl = doc.get_Permissions();
Iterator<AccessPermission> itr = apl.iterator();
List<AccessPermissionList> oldPermissionsList = new ArrayList<AccessPermissionList>();
oldPermissionsList.addAll(apl);
// Remove all your old permissions here
apl.removeAll(oldPermissionsList);
// Add all your new permissions here
try {
for (String str : strList) {
String[] strArray = str.split(":");
AccessPermission permission = Factory.AccessPermission.createInstance();
permission.set_GranteeName(strArray[0]);
permission.set_AccessType(AccessType.ALLOW);
permission.set_InheritableDepth(new Integer(0));
//permission.set_InheritableDepth(new Integer(0)); // this object only
//permission.set_InheritableDepth(new Integer(-1));this object and all children
//permission.set_InheritableDepth(new Integer(1)); this object and immediate children
if (strArray[1].equalsIgnoreCase("FULL_CONTROL")) {
permission.set_AccessMask(new Integer(AccessLevel.FULL_CONTROL_DOCUMENT_AS_INT));
//permission.set_AccessMask(AccessRight.MAJOR_VERSION_AS_INT);
}
if (strArray[1].equalsIgnoreCase("READ_ONLY")) {
permission.set_AccessMask(new Integer(AccessLevel.VIEW_AS_INT));
}
if (strArray[1].equalsIgnoreCase("MODIFY_PROPERTIES")) {
permission.set_AccessMask(new Integer(AccessLevel.WRITE_DOCUMENT_AS_INT));
}
if (strArray[1].equalsIgnoreCase("MAJOR_VERSIONING")) {
permission.set_AccessMask(new Integer(AccessLevel.MAJOR_VERSION_DOCUMENT_AS_INT));
}
AccessPermissionList permissions = doc.get_Permissions();
permissions.add(permission);
doc.set_Permissions(permissions);
doc.save(RefreshMode.REFRESH);
System.out.println("Done");
}
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
I am working on a multilingual ASP.NET MVC application (MVC4).
I want to make my resource file strings to be editable at runtime without recompiling the application and without app pool recycling And it doesn't look possible with .resx file, so I migrate to store string resources in Database.
I have to Get Each Label/String Resource From Database, so there will be more hits to database for each request. How to fix that?
I have googled around and someone suggests to load the resource in a dictionary and store it as application variable, at login/Sign In page and use that dictionary as resource instead of database hit.
I am confused, what will be effective approach.Can someone guide me in right direction to avoid more database hits?
Any help/suggestions will be highly appreciated.
Thanks
I ran into the same concerns using .resx files for localization. They just did not work well when the persons doing the translation were not programmers. Now, we have a translation page in our admin area. Works great.
One area which we still don't have a good solution for are the data annotations, which still use the .resx files. I have trimmed the source below to remove any references to our actual database structures or tables.
There is a fallback to using the underlying .resx file, if an entry does not exist in the database. If there is not an entry in the .resx file, I split the word whenever a capitol letter is found ( CamelSpace is a string extension method ).
Lastly, depending on your implementation, you may need to remove the context caching, especially if you are caching out of process.
A few examples of usage:
#LanguageDb.Translate("Enter your first name below","FirstNamePrompt")
#LanguageDb.Me.FirstName
#String
.Format(LanguageDb
.Translate(#"You can be insured for
{0} down and {1} payments of {2}"),
Model.Down,Model.NumPayments,
Model.InstallmentAmount)
public class LanguageDb : DynamicObject
{
public static dynamic Me = new LanguageDb();
private LanguageDb() { }
public static string Translate(string englishPhrase, string resourceCode = null)
{
return GetTranslation(englishPhrase, resourceCode) ?? englishPhrase;
}
public override bool TryGetMember(GetMemberBinder binder, out object result)
{
result = GetTranslation(binder.Name);
return true;
}
private static string GetTranslation(string resourceName, string resourceCode = null)
{
resourceCode = resourceCode ?? resourceName;
if (resourceCode.Contains(" ") || resourceCode.Length > 50)
{
resourceCode = resourceName.GetHashCode().ToString(CultureInfo.InvariantCulture);
}
var lang = (string)HttpContext.Current.Request.RequestContext.RouteData.Values["lang"] ?? "en";
// cache entries for an hour
var result = Get(subagent + "_" + lang + "_" + resourceCode, 3600, () =>
{
// cache a datacontext object for 30 seconds.
var context = Get("_context", 30, () => new YourDataContext()) as YourDataContext;
var translation = context.Translations.FirstOrDefault(row => row.lang == lang && row.Code == resourceCode);
if (translation == null)
{
translation = new Lookup {
Code = resourceCode,
lang = lang,
Value = Language.ResourceManager.GetString(resourceName, Language.Culture)
?? resourceName.CamelSpace()
};
context.Translations.Add(translation);
context.SaveChanges();
}
return translation.Value;
});
return result;
}
public override bool TrySetMember(SetMemberBinder binder, object value)
{
// ignore this
return true;
}
public static T Get<T>(string cacheId, int secondsToCache, Func<T> getItemCallback) where T : class
{
T item = HttpRuntime.Cache.Get(cacheId) as T;
if (item == null)
{
item = getItemCallback();
if (secondsToCache > 0)
{
HttpRuntime.Cache.Insert(
cacheId, item, null, Cache.NoAbsoluteExpiration,
new TimeSpan(0, 0, secondsToCache), CacheItemPriority.Normal, null);
}
else
{
HttpRuntime.Cache.Insert(cacheId, item);
}
}
return item;
}
}
I am trying to create a dynamic form with input text and command button. Everything works fine. But when I click on the command button, the action listener is never called. Please suggest what I am doing wrong or if this is a bug with PF or Mojarra. The code is below
panel = new Panel();
panel.setHeader("Test");
InputText text = new InputText();
final String binding = "#{roleCreateForm.role.name}";
text.setValueExpression("value",
createValueExpression(binding, String.class));
panel.getChildren().add(text);
CommandButton button = new CommandButton();
button.setValue("Save");
MethodExpression me = createMethodExpression("#{roleCreateForm.save}");
button.addActionListener(new MethodExpressionActionListener(me));
panel.getChildren().add(button);
Also the createXXXExpression are below
private MethodExpression createMethodExpression(String action) {
final Class<?>[] paramTypes = new Class<?>[0];
MethodExpression methodExpression = getExpressionFactory()
.createMethodExpression(getELContext(),action, null, paramTypes);
return methodExpression;
}
private ValueExpression createValueExpression(String binding,
Class<String> clazz) {
final ValueExpression ve = getExpressionFactory()
.createValueExpression(getELContext(), binding, String.class);
return ve;
}
public static ELContext getELContext() {
return FacesContext.getCurrentInstance().getELContext();
}
public static ExpressionFactory getExpressionFactory() {
return getApplication().getExpressionFactory();
}
public static Application getApplication() {
return FacesContext.getCurrentInstance().getApplication();
}
My form bean is below
public void save() {
logger.info("Saving role - {}" , role);
}
I am using
Primefaces 3.2, Mojarra 2.1.7, Tomcat 7, JDK 6 , Ubuntu 11
Here is my modified code
Yes I have seen that you have pointed out this as the common mistake. But here is my modified code. This does not work either.
public Panel getPanel() {
if (panel == null) {
panel = new Panel();
panel.setHeader("Test");
panel.setId("dynapanel");
InputText text = new InputText();
text.setId("dynatext");
final String binding = "#{roleCreateForm.role.name}";
text.setValueExpression("value", createValueExpression(binding, String.class));
panel.getChildren().add(text);
CommandButton button = new CommandButton();
button.setValue("Save");
MethodExpression me = getExpressionFactory().createMethodExpression(getELContext(), "#{roleCreateForm.save}", void.class, new Class[0]);
AjaxBehavior ajaxBehavior = new AjaxBehavior();
//ajaxBehavior.setListener( me );
ajaxBehavior.addAjaxBehaviorListener( new AjaxBehaviorListenerImpl( me ) );
button.addClientBehavior( "submit", ajaxBehavior);
panel.getChildren().add(button);
}
return panel;
}
As far as I remember, if you want to invoke a method in your backing bean, use a MethodExpression as a Listener of your AjaxBehaviour:
AjaxBehavior ab1 = new AjaxBehavior();
ExpressionFactory ef = ctx.getApplication().getExpressionFactory();
MethodExpression me1 = ef.createMethodExpression(ctx.getELContext(),
expression,//Your ELExpression #{roleCreateForm.save}
expectedReturnType, //In your case null
expectedParamTypes); //If you receive parameters put new Class[]{Object.class});
ab1.setListener(me1);
button.addClientBehavior( "submit", ab1);
CommandButton btn = ((CommandButton) FacesContext.getCurrentInstance().getViewRoot().findComponent("full id of button"));
try{
FacesContext context = FacesContextWrapper.getCurrentInstance();
MethodExpressionActionListener methodExpression = new MethodExpressionActionListener(context.getApplication().getExpressionFactory()
.createMethodExpression(context.getELContext(),"#{bean.method}", null, new Class[] {ActionEvent.class}));
btn.addActionListener(methodExpression);
}catch(Exception exc){
exc.printStackTrace();
}
and createMethodExpression :
public static MethodExpression createMethodExpression(String expression, Class<?> returnType, Class<?>... parameterTypes) {
FacesContext facesContext = FacesContext.getCurrentInstance();
return facesContext.getApplication().getExpressionFactory().createMethodExpression(
facesContext.getELContext(), expression, returnType, parameterTypes);
}
This works for me ;)
I'm wanting to have a simple duck typing example in C# using dynamic objects. It would seem to me, that a dynamic object should have HasValue/HasProperty/HasMethod methods with a single string parameter for the name of the value, property, or method you are looking for before trying to run against it. I'm trying to avoid try/catch blocks, and deeper reflection if possible. It just seems to be a common practice for duck typing in dynamic languages (JS, Ruby, Python etc.) that is to test for a property/method before trying to use it, then falling back to a default, or throwing a controlled exception. The example below is basically what I want to accomplish.
If the methods described above don't exist, does anyone have premade extension methods for dynamic that will do this?
Example: In JavaScript I can test for a method on an object fairly easily.
//JavaScript
function quack(duck) {
if (duck && typeof duck.quack === "function") {
return duck.quack();
}
return null; //nothing to return, not a duck
}
How would I do the same in C#?
//C# 4
dynamic Quack(dynamic duck)
{
//how do I test that the duck is not null,
//and has a quack method?
//if it doesn't quack, return null
}
If you have control over all of the object types that you will be using dynamically, another option would be to force them to inherit from a subclass of the DynamicObject class that is tailored to not fail when a method that does not exist is invoked:
A quick and dirty version would look like this:
public class DynamicAnimal : DynamicObject
{
public override bool TryInvokeMember(InvokeMemberBinder binder, object[] args, out object result)
{
bool success = base.TryInvokeMember(binder, args, out result);
// If the method didn't exist, ensure the result is null
if (!success) result = null;
// Always return true to avoid Exceptions being raised
return true;
}
}
You could then do the following:
public class Duck : DynamicAnimal
{
public string Quack()
{
return "QUACK!";
}
}
public class Cow : DynamicAnimal
{
public string Moo()
{
return "Mooooo!";
}
}
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var duck = new Duck();
var cow = new Cow();
Console.WriteLine("Can a duck quack?");
Console.WriteLine(DoQuack(duck));
Console.WriteLine("Can a cow quack?");
Console.WriteLine(DoQuack(cow));
Console.ReadKey();
}
public static string DoQuack(dynamic animal)
{
string result = animal.Quack();
return result ?? "... silence ...";
}
}
And your output would be:
Can a duck quack?
QUACK!
Can a cow quack?
... silence ...
Edit: I should note that this is the tip of the iceberg if you are able to use this approach and build on DynamicObject. You could write methods like bool HasMember(string memberName) if you so desired.
Try this:
using System.Linq;
using System.Reflection;
//...
public dynamic Quack(dynamic duck, int i)
{
Object obj = duck as Object;
if (duck != null)
{
//check if object has method Quack()
MethodInfo method = obj.GetType().GetMethods().
FirstOrDefault(x => x.Name == "Quack");
//if yes
if (method != null)
{
//invoke and return value
return method.Invoke((object)duck, null);
}
}
return null;
}
Or this (uses only dynamic):
public static dynamic Quack(dynamic duck)
{
try
{
//invoke and return value
return duck.Quack();
}
//thrown if method call failed
catch (RuntimeBinderException)
{
return null;
}
}
Implementation of the HasProperty method for every IDynamicMetaObjectProvider WITHOUT throwing RuntimeBinderException.
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Dynamic;
using Microsoft.CSharp.RuntimeBinder;
using System.Linq.Expressions;
using System.Runtime.CompilerServices;
namespace DynamicCheckPropertyExistence
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
dynamic testDynamicObject = new ExpandoObject();
testDynamicObject.Name = "Testovaci vlastnost";
Console.WriteLine(HasProperty(testDynamicObject, "Name"));
Console.WriteLine(HasProperty(testDynamicObject, "Id"));
Console.ReadLine();
}
private static bool HasProperty(IDynamicMetaObjectProvider dynamicProvider, string name)
{
var defaultBinder = Binder.GetMember(CSharpBinderFlags.None, name, typeof(Program),
new[]
{
CSharpArgumentInfo.Create(
CSharpArgumentInfoFlags.None, null)
}) as GetMemberBinder;
var callSite = CallSite<Func<CallSite, object, object>>.Create(new NoThrowGetBinderMember(name, false, defaultBinder));
var result = callSite.Target(callSite, dynamicProvider);
if (Object.ReferenceEquals(result, NoThrowExpressionVisitor.DUMMY_RESULT))
{
return false;
}
return true;
}
}
class NoThrowGetBinderMember : GetMemberBinder
{
private GetMemberBinder m_innerBinder;
public NoThrowGetBinderMember(string name, bool ignoreCase, GetMemberBinder innerBinder) : base(name, ignoreCase)
{
m_innerBinder = innerBinder;
}
public override DynamicMetaObject FallbackGetMember(DynamicMetaObject target, DynamicMetaObject errorSuggestion)
{
var retMetaObject = m_innerBinder.Bind(target, new DynamicMetaObject[] {});
var noThrowVisitor = new NoThrowExpressionVisitor();
var resultExpression = noThrowVisitor.Visit(retMetaObject.Expression);
var finalMetaObject = new DynamicMetaObject(resultExpression, retMetaObject.Restrictions);
return finalMetaObject;
}
}
class NoThrowExpressionVisitor : ExpressionVisitor
{
public static readonly object DUMMY_RESULT = new DummyBindingResult();
public NoThrowExpressionVisitor()
{
}
protected override Expression VisitConditional(ConditionalExpression node)
{
if (node.IfFalse.NodeType != ExpressionType.Throw)
{
return base.VisitConditional(node);
}
Expression<Func<Object>> dummyFalseResult = () => DUMMY_RESULT;
var invokeDummyFalseResult = Expression.Invoke(dummyFalseResult, null);
return Expression.Condition(node.Test, node.IfTrue, invokeDummyFalseResult);
}
private class DummyBindingResult {}
}
}
impromptu-interface seems to be a nice Interface mapper for dynamic objects... It's a bit more work than I was hoping for, but seems to be the cleanest implementation of the examples presented... Keeping Simon's answer as correct, since it is still the closest to what I wanted, but the Impromptu interface methods are really nice.
The shortest path would be to invoke it, and handle the exception if the method does not exist. I come from Python where such method is common in duck-typing, but I don't know if it is widely used in C#4...
I haven't tested myself since I don't have VC 2010 on my machine
dynamic Quack(dynamic duck)
{
try
{
return duck.Quack();
}
catch (RuntimeBinderException)
{ return null; }
}
Have not see a correct answer here, MS provides an example now with casting to a dictionary
dynamic employee = new ExpandoObject();
employee.Name = "John Smith";
employee.Age = 33;
foreach (var property in (IDictionary<String, Object>)employee)
{
Console.WriteLine(property.Key + ": " + property.Value);
}
// This code example produces the following output:
// Name: John Smith
// Age: 33
Do anyone have good ideas of how to modify the toolbar for the WinForms version of the ReportViewer Toolbar?
That is, I want to remove some buttons and varius, but it looks like the solution is to create a brand new toolbar instead of modifying the one that is there.
Like, I had to remove export to excel, and did it this way:
// Disable excel export
foreach (RenderingExtension extension in lr.ListRenderingExtensions()) {
if (extension.Name == "Excel") {
//extension.Visible = false; // Property is readonly...
FieldInfo fi = extension.GetType().GetField("m_isVisible", BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.NonPublic);
fi.SetValue(extension, false);
}
}
A bit trickysh if you ask me..
For removing toolbarbuttons, an possible way was to iterate through the Control array inside the ReportViewer and change the Visible property for the buttons to hide, but it gets reset all the time, so it is not an good way..
WHEN do MS come with an new version btw?
Yeap. You can do that in a little tricky way.
I had a task to add more scale factors to zoom report. I did it this way:
private readonly string[] ZOOM_VALUES = { "25%", "50%", "75%", "100%", "110%", "120%", "125%", "130%", "140%", "150%", "175%", "200%", "300%", "400%", "500%" };
private readonly int DEFAULT_ZOOM = 3;
//--
public ucReportViewer()
{
InitializeComponent();
this.reportViewer1.ProcessingMode = ProcessingMode.Local;
setScaleFactor(ZOOM_VALUES[DEFAULT_ZOOM]);
Control[] tb = reportViewer1.Controls.Find("ReportToolBar", true);
ToolStrip ts;
if (tb != null && tb.Length > 0 && tb[0].Controls.Count > 0 && (ts = tb[0].Controls[0] as ToolStrip) != null)
{
//here we go if our trick works (tested at .NET Framework 2.0.50727 SP1)
ToolStripComboBox tscb = new ToolStripComboBox();
tscb.DropDownStyle = ComboBoxStyle.DropDownList;
tscb.Items.AddRange(ZOOM_VALUES);
tscb.SelectedIndex = 3; //100%
tscb.SelectedIndexChanged += new EventHandler(toolStripZoomPercent_Click);
ts.Items.Add(tscb);
}
else
{
//if there is some problems - just use context menu
ContextMenuStrip cmZoomMenu = new ContextMenuStrip();
for (int i = 0; i < ZOOM_VALUES.Length; i++)
{
ToolStripMenuItem tsmi = new ToolStripMenuItem(ZOOM_VALUES[i]);
tsmi.Checked = (i == DEFAULT_ZOOM);
//tsmi.Tag = (IntPtr)cmZoomMenu;
tsmi.Click += new EventHandler(toolStripZoomPercent_Click);
cmZoomMenu.Items.Add(tsmi);
}
reportViewer1.ContextMenuStrip = cmZoomMenu;
}
}
private bool setScaleFactor(string value)
{
try
{
int percent = Convert.ToInt32(value.TrimEnd('%'));
reportViewer1.ZoomMode = ZoomMode.Percent;
reportViewer1.ZoomPercent = percent;
return true;
}
catch
{
return false;
}
}
private void toolStripZoomPercent_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
ToolStripMenuItem tsmi = sender as ToolStripMenuItem;
ToolStripComboBox tscb = sender as ToolStripComboBox;
if (tscb != null && tscb.SelectedIndex > -1)
{
setScaleFactor(tscb.Items[tscb.SelectedIndex].ToString());
}
else if (tsmi != null)
{
if (setScaleFactor(tsmi.Text))
{
foreach (ToolStripItem tsi in tsmi.Owner.Items)
{
ToolStripMenuItem item = tsi as ToolStripMenuItem;
if (item != null && item.Checked)
{
item.Checked = false;
}
}
tsmi.Checked = true;
}
else
{
tsmi.Checked = false;
}
}
}
Get the toolbar from ReportViewer control:
ToolStrip toolStrip = (ToolStrip)reportViewer.Controls.Find("toolStrip1", true)[0]
Add new items:
toolStrip.Items.Add(...)
There are a lot of properties to set which buttons would you like to see.
For example ShowBackButton, ShowExportButton, ShowFindControls, and so on. Check them in the help, all starts with "Show".
But you are right, you cannot add new buttons. You have to create your own toolbar in order to do this.
What do you mean about new version? There is already a 2008 SP1 version of it.
Another way would be to manipulate the generated HTML at runtime via javascript. It's not very elegant, but it does give you full control over the generated HTML.
For VS2013 web ReportViewer V11 (indicated as rv), the code below adds a button.
private void AddPrintBtn()
{
foreach (Control c in rv.Controls)
{
foreach (Control c1 in c.Controls)
{
foreach (Control c2 in c1.Controls)
{
foreach (Control c3 in c2.Controls)
{
if (c3.ToString() == "Microsoft.Reporting.WebForms.ToolbarControl")
{
foreach (Control c4 in c3.Controls)
{
if (c4.ToString() == "Microsoft.Reporting.WebForms.PageNavigationGroup")
{
var btn = new Button();
btn.Text = "Criteria";
btn.ID = "btnFlip";
btn.OnClientClick = "$('#pnl').toggle();";
c4.Controls.Add(btn);
return;
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
I had this question for al ong time I I found the answer after a long tie and the main source of kowledge I used was this webpega: I'd like to thank you all guys adding the code that allowed me to do it and a picture with the result.
Instead of using the ReportViewer Class, you need to create a new classs, in my case, I named it ReportViewerPlus and it goes like this:
using Microsoft.Reporting.WinForms;
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.IO;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Windows.Forms;
namespace X
{
class ReportViewerPlus : ReportViewer
{
private Button boton { get; set; }
public ReportViewerPlus(Button but) {
this.boton = but;
testc(this.Controls[0]);
}
public ReportViewerPlus()
{
}
private void testc(Control item){
if(item is ToolStrip)
{
ToolStripItemCollection tsic = ((ToolStrip)item).Items;
tsic.Insert(0, new ToolStripControlHost(boton));
return;
}
for (int i = 0; i < item.Controls.Count; i++)
{
testc(item.Controls[i]);
}
}
}
}
You have to add the button directly in the constructor of the class and you can configure the button in your designer.
Here's a pic of the result, not perfect, but enough to go(safe link I swear, but I can't post my own pics, don't have enough reputation).
http://prntscr.com/5lfssj
If you look carefully in the code of the class, you'd see more or less how it works and you could make your changes and make it possible to establish it in other site of the toolbar.
Thank you so much for helping me in the past, I hope this helps lots of people!
Generally you are suppose to create your own toolbar if you want to modify it. Your solution for removing buttons will probably work if that is all you need to do, but if you want to add your own you should probably just bite the bullet and build a replacement.
You may modify reportviewer controls by CustomizeReportToolStrip method.
this example remove Page Setup Button, Page Layout Button in WinForm
public CustOrderReportForm() {
InitializeComponent();
CustomizeReport(this.reportViewer1);
}
private void CustomizeReport(Control reportControl, int recurCount = 0) {
Console.WriteLine("".PadLeft(recurCount + 1, '.') + reportControl.GetType() + ":" + reportControl.Name);
if (reportControl is Button) {
CustomizeReportButton((Button)reportControl, recurCount);
}
else if (reportControl is ToolStrip) {
CustomizeReportToolStrip((ToolStrip)reportControl, recurCount);
}
foreach (Control childControl in reportControl.Controls) {
CustomizeReport(childControl, recurCount + 1);
}
}
//-------------------------------------------------------------
void CustomizeReportToolStrip(ToolStrip c, int recurCount) {
List<ToolStripItem> customized = new List<ToolStripItem>();
foreach (ToolStripItem i in c.Items) {
if (CustomizeReportToolStripItem(i, recurCount + 1)) {
customized.Add(i);
}
}
foreach (var i in customized) c.Items.Remove(i);
}
//-------------------------------------------------------------
void CustomizeReportButton(Button button, int recurCount) {
}
//-------------------------------------------------------------
bool CustomizeReportToolStripItem(ToolStripItem i, int recurCount) {
Console.WriteLine("".PadLeft(recurCount + 1, '.') + i.GetType() + ":" + i.Name);
if (i.Name == "pageSetup") {
return true;
}
else if (i.Name == "printPreview") {
return true;
}
return false; ;
}