I have an SQL table already, the format of which I just want duplicating for testing purposes. I tried the following:
DECLARE #Counter AS INT(1)
WHILE ( #Counter <= 10)
BEGIN
CREATE TABLE my_new_big_table
AS (SELECT * FROM my_table)
SET #Counter = #Counter +1
END;
However I encounter an error with 'DECLARE'
ParseException:
[PARSE_SYNTAX_ERROR] Syntax error at or near 'DECLARE'(line 1, pos 0)
Is this the best approach to duplicate an existing table?
Your approach seems wrong. With a CREATE TABLE statement in the loop, you'd try to create the same table ten times.
Here is a solution in pure SQL that I hope will work for you. I take the original table and cross join it with 10 generated rows, so as to get the original rows tenfold.
CREATE TABLE my_new_big_table AS
SELECT t.*
FROM my_table t
CROSS JOIN VALUES (1),(2),(3),(4),(5),(6),(7),(8),(9),(10) v(i);
Related
I need to insert the value from the table T1 to another table t2 where t1 is truncate and load and any values can come after load. So how to use Loop to insert data into T2. It should happen automatically no manual intervention should required so can't Use table value parameter.
Suppose table1 has column Id
Id
---
4
7
15
I have to insert the data into table 2.
I have used this code:
DECLARE #counter INT = (SELECT MIN(CAST(ID AS INT)) FROM Table1);
WHILE #counter <= (SELECT COUNT(CAST(ID AS INT)) FROM Table1)
BEGIN
INSERT INTO TABLE2 (ID)
VALUES (#Counter)
SET #counter = (SELECT ID FROM table1 WHERE #counter = ID)
END
How to set the counter or pick the value from table1.Id value can come differently every time?
Please help
In the absence of any further detail, it seems you could simply rewrite your query as the below:
INSERT INTO Table2 (ID)
SELECT ID
FROM Table1;
There is no need for a loop (WHILE/CURSOR) for what you have here. SQL is a Query Language, and excels are set based operations. What SQL isn't good at is iterative ones, and whenever a CURSOR or WHILE is used, I would suggest it is almost always being misused; this certainly appears to be one of those times. A WHILE or CURSOR, for a even slightly larger dataset would be significantly slower, probably by 1,000s of times so, than the simple statement above.
Not sure of your logic and its almost always better to use set based solutions but here is a TSQL loop solution. I left out the casting which you may have to use:
declare #curid int
declare #previd int
select #curid= min([ID]) from Table1 ;
while ##rowcount > 0
begin
INSERT INTO TABLE2 (ID) VALUES (#curid)
set #previd=#curid
select #curid= min([ID])
from Table1
where [ID]> #previd;
end
I have a large SQL Server 2012 Database which I am querying 3 tables to create a result set of 5 fields.
I want to repeat this query in a WHILE - loop and "UNION ALL" the result sets obtained in each loop. This iteration will be on a variable: #this_date which will increment over the past 6 years and stop at today's date.
At each iteration a different results set will be obtained by the SELECT.
So I am trying to code the Stored Procedure as follows:
Declare #the_date as Date,
#to_date as Date
-- I setup the above dates, #the_date being 6 years behind #to_date
-- Want to loop for each day over the 6-year period
WHILE (#the_date <= #to_date)
BEGIN
-- the basic select query looks like this
Select Table1.Field-1, Table2.Field-2 ...
FROM Table1
Inner Join Table2 ...
On ( ..etc.. )
-- the JOIN conditions are based on table.attributes which are compared with
-- #the_date to get a different result set each time
-- now move the date up by 1
DateAdd(Day, +1, #the_date)
-- want to concatenate the result sets
UNION ALL
END
The above gives me a syntax error:
Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'Union'.
Any ideas on a solution to my problem would be welcome
- thanks.
Don't use a UNION. You can't in a loop anyway. Instead store the results of each iteration in a temp table or a table variable and select from the temp table / table variable instead.
DECLARE #the_date as Date,
#to_date as Date
CREATE TABLE #t (Col1 VARCHAR(100))
WHILE (#the_date <= #to_date)
BEGIN
INSERT #t (Col1) SELECT ... etc
DateAdd(Day, +1, #the_date)
END
SELECT Col1 FROM #t
That said, if you provide some sample data and expected results we might be able to help you with a more efficient set-based solution. You should avoid iterative looping in RDBMS whenever possible.
This is probably a very simple question, but my attempts to search for an answer are thwarted by Google finding answers showing how to reuse a query by making a stored procedure instead. I want to reuse the results of a query inside a stored procedure.
Here's a cut-down example where I've chopped out NOCOUNT, XACT_ABORT, TRANSACTION, TRY, and much of the logic.
CREATE PROCEDURE Do_Something
#userId UNIQUEIDENTIFIER
AS
BEGIN
DELETE FROM LikedItems
WHERE likedItemId IN
(
SELECT Items.id FROM Items
WHERE Items.userId = #userId
)
DELETE FROM FollowedItems
WHERE followedItemId IN
(
SELECT Items.id FROM Items
WHERE Items.userId = #userId
)
END
What is the syntax to reuse the results of the duplicated nested SELECT rather than doing it twice?
You can INSERT result of the SELECT into a temporary table or table variable, but it doesn't automatically mean that the overall performance would be better. You need to measure it.
Temp Table
CREATE PROCEDURE Do_Something
#userId UNIQUEIDENTIFIER
AS
BEGIN
CREATE TABLE #Temp(id int);
INSERT INTO #Temp(id)
SELECT Items.id
FROM Items
WHERE Items.userId = #userId;
DELETE FROM LikedItems
WHERE likedItemId IN
(
SELECT id FROM #Temp
)
DELETE FROM FollowedItems
WHERE followedItemId IN
(
SELECT id FROM #Temp
)
DROP TABLE #Temp;
END
Table variable
CREATE PROCEDURE Do_Something
#userId UNIQUEIDENTIFIER
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE #Temp TABLE(id int);
INSERT INTO #Temp(id)
SELECT Items.id
FROM Items
WHERE Items.userId = #userId;
DELETE FROM LikedItems
WHERE likedItemId IN
(
SELECT id FROM #Temp
)
DELETE FROM FollowedItems
WHERE followedItemId IN
(
SELECT id FROM #Temp
)
END
You can declare a table variable to store the results of the select and then simply query that.
CREATE PROCEDURE Do_Something
#userId UNIQUEIDENTIFIER
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE #TempItems TABLE (id int)
INSERT INTO #TempItems
SELECT Items.id FROM Items
WHERE Items.userId = #userId
DELETE FROM LikedItems
WHERE likedItemId IN
(
SELECT id FROM #TempItems
)
DELETE FROM FollowedItems
WHERE followedItemId IN
(
SELECT id FROM #TempItems
)
END
If the subquery is fast and simple - no need to change anything. Item's data is in the cache (if it was not) after the first query, locks are obtained. If the subquery is slow and complicated - store it into a table variable and reuse by the same subquery as listed in the question.
If your question is not related to performance and you are beware of copy-paste: there is no copy-paste. There is the same logic, similar structure and references - yes, you will have almost the same query source code.
In general, it is not the same. Some rows could be deleted from or inserted into Items table after the first query unless your are running under SERIALIZABLE isolation level. Many different things could happen during first delete, between first and second delete statements. Each delete statement also requires it's own execution plan - thus all the information about tables affected and joins must be provided to SERVER anyway. You need to filter by the same source again - yes, you provide subquery with the same source again. There is no "twice" or "reuse" of a partial code. Data collected by a complicated query - yes, it can be reused (without running the same complicated query - by simple querying from prepared source) via temp tables/table variables as mentioned before.
I have to create a function in a SQL Server trigger for generating random numbers after insert. I want to update the column with that generated random number please help what I have missed in my code.
If you know other ways please suggest a way to complete my task.
This my SQL Server trigger:
ALTER TRIGGER [dbo].[trgEnquiryMaster]
ON [dbo].[enquiry_master]
AFTER INSERT
AS
declare #EnquiryId int;
declare #ReferenceNo varchar(50);
declare #GenReferenceNo NVARCHAR(MAX);
select #EnquiryId = i.enquiry_id from inserted i;
select #ReferenceNo = i.reference_no from inserted i;
BEGIN
SET #GenReferenceNo = 'CREATE FUNCTION functionRandom (#Reference VARCHAR(MAX) )
RETURNS VARCHAR(MAX)
As
Begin
DECLARE #r varchar(8);
SELECT #r = coalesce(#r, '') + n
FROM (SELECT top 8
CHAR(number) n FROM
master..spt_values
WHERE type = P AND
(number between ascii(0) and ascii(9)
or number between ascii(A) and ascii(Z)
or number between ascii(a) and ascii(z))
ORDER BY newid()) a
RETURNS #r
END
'
EXEC(#GenReferenceNo)
-- SET NOCOUNT ON added to prevent extra result sets from
-- interfering with SELECT statements.
SET NOCOUNT ON
-- update statements for trigger here
UPDATE enquiry_master
SET reference_no ='updated'
WHERE enquiry_id = #EnquiryId
END
To generate random numbers, just call CRYPT_GEN_RANDOM which was introduced in SQL Server 2008:
SELECT CRYPT_GEN_RANDOM(5) AS [Hex],
CONVERT(VARCHAR(20), CRYPT_GEN_RANDOM(5), 2) AS [HexStringWithout0x],
CONVERT(VARCHAR(20), CRYPT_GEN_RANDOM(10)) AS [Translated-ASCII],
CONVERT(NVARCHAR(20), CRYPT_GEN_RANDOM(20)) AS [Translated-UCS2orUTF16]
returns:
Hex HexStringWithout0x Translated-ASCII Translated-UCS2orUTF16
0x4F7D9ABBC4 0ECF378A7A ¿"bü<ݱØï 붻槬㟰添䛺⯣왚꒣찭퓚
If you are ok with just 0 - 9 and A - F, then the CONVERT(VARCHAR(20), CRYPT_GEN_RANDOM(5), 2) is all you need.
Please see my answer on DBA.StackExchange on a similar question for more details:
Password generator function
The UPDATE statement shown in the "Update" section of that linked answer is what you want, just remove the WHERE condition and add the JOIN to the Inserted pseudo-table.
The query should look something like the following:
DECLARE #Length INT = 10;
UPDATE em
SET em.[reference_no] = rnd.RandomValue
FROM dbo.enquiry_master em
INNER JOIN Inserted ins
ON ins.enquiry_id = em.enquiry_id
CROSS APPLY dbo.GenerateReferenceNo(CRYPT_GEN_RANDOM((em.[enquiry_id] % 1) + #Length)) rnd;
And since the function is slightly different, here is how it should be in order to get both upper-case and lower-case letters:
CREATE FUNCTION dbo.GenerateReferenceNo(#RandomValue VARBINARY(20))
RETURNS TABLE
WITH SCHEMABINDING
AS RETURN
WITH base(item) AS
(
SELECT NULL UNION ALL SELECT NULL UNION ALL SELECT NULL UNION ALL
SELECT NULL UNION ALL SELECT NULL UNION ALL SELECT NULL
), items(item) AS
(
SELECT NULL
FROM base b1
CROSS JOIN base b2
)
SELECT (
SELECT TOP (LEN(#RandomValue))
SUBSTRING('1234567890QWERTYUIOPASDFGHJKLZXCVBNMqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnm',
(CONVERT(TINYINT, SUBSTRING(#RandomValue, 1, 1)) % 62) + 1,
1) AS [text()]
FROM items
FOR XML PATH('')
) AS [RandomReferenceNo];
GO
And please follow the usage shown above, passing in CRYPT_GEN_RANDOM((em.[enquiry_id] % 1) + #Length), not: CRYPT_GEN_RANDOM(#RefferenceNOLength).
Other notes:
#marc_s already explained the one-row vs multiple-rows flaw and how to fix that.
not only is a trigger not the place to create a new object (i.e. the function), that function wouldn't have worked anyway since the call to newid() (in the ORDER BY) is not allowed in a function.
You don't need to issue two separate SELECTs to set two different variables. You could do the following:
SELECT #EnquiryId = i.enquiry_id,
#ReferenceNo = i.reference_no
FROM TableName i;
Passing strings into a function requires quoting those strings inside of single-quotes: ASCII('A') instead of ASCII(A).
UPDATE
The full Trigger definition should be something like the following:
ALTER TRIGGER [dbo].[trgEnquiryMaster]
ON [dbo].[enquiry_master]
AFTER INSERT
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE #Length INT = 10;
UPDATE em
SET em.[reference_no] = rnd.RandomValue
FROM dbo.enquiry_master em
INNER JOIN Inserted ins
ON ins.enquiry_id = em.enquiry_id
CROSS APPLY dbo.GenerateReferenceNo(
CRYPT_GEN_RANDOM((em.[enquiry_id] % 1) + #Length)
) rnd;
END;
A trigger should be very nimble and quick - it is no place to do heavy and time-intensive processing, and definitely no place to create new database objects since (a) the trigger is executed in the context of the code causing it to fire, and (b) you cannot control when and how often the trigger is fired.
You need to
define and create your function to generate that random value during database setup - once, before any operations are executed on the database
rewrite your trigger to take into account that multiple rows could be inserted at once, and in that case, the Inserted table will contain multiple rows which all have to be handled.
So your trigger will look something like this (with several assumptions by me - e.g. that enquiry_id is the primary key on your table - you need this to establish the INNER JOIN between your data table and the Inserted pseudo table:
ALTER TRIGGER [dbo].[trgEnquiryMaster]
ON [dbo].[enquiry_master]
AFTER INSERT
AS
-- SET NOCOUNT ON added to prevent extra result sets from
-- interfering with SELECT statements.
SET NOCOUNT ON
-- update statements for trigger here
UPDATE enq
SET reference_no = dbo.GenerateRandomValue(.....)
FROM enquiry_master enq
INNER JOIN inserted i ON enq.enquiry_id = i.enquiry_id
I'm not sure if this is something I should do in T-SQL or not, and I'm pretty sure using the word 'iterate' was wrong in this context, since you should never iterate anything in sql. It should be a set based operation, correct? Anyway, here's the scenario:
I have a stored proc that returns many uniqueidentifiers (single column results). These ids are the primary keys of records in a another table. I need to set a flag on all the corresponding records in that table.
How do I do this without the use of cursors? Should be an easy one for you sql gurus!
This may not be the most efficient, but I would create a temp table to hold the results of the stored proc and then use that in a join against the target table. For example:
CREATE TABLE #t (uniqueid int)
INSERT INTO #t EXEC p_YourStoredProc
UPDATE TargetTable
SET a.FlagColumn = 1
FROM TargetTable a JOIN #t b
ON a.uniqueid = b.uniqueid
DROP TABLE #t
You could also change your stored proc to a user-defined function that returns a table with your uniqueidentifiers. You can joing directly to the UDF and treat it like a table which avoids having to create the extra temp table explicitly. Also, you can pass parameters into the function as you're calling it, making this a very flexible solution.
CREATE FUNCTION dbo.udfGetUniqueIDs
()
RETURNS TABLE
AS
RETURN
(
SELECT uniqueid FROM dbo.SomeWhere
)
GO
UPDATE dbo.TargetTable
SET a.FlagColumn = 1
FROM dbo.TargetTable a INNER JOIN dbo.udfGetUniqueIDs() b
ON a.uniqueid = b.uniqueid
Edit:
This will work on SQL Server 2000 and up...
Insert the results of the stored proc into a temporary table and join this to the table you want to update:
INSERT INTO #WorkTable
EXEC usp_WorkResults
UPDATE DataTable
SET Flag = Whatever
FROM DataTable
INNER JOIN #WorkTable
ON DataTable.Ket = #WorkTable.Key
If you upgrade to SQL 2008 then you can pass table parameters I believe. Otherwise, you're stuck with a global temporary table or creating a permanent table that includes a column for some sort of process ID to identify which call to the stored procedure is relevant.
How much room do you have in changing the stored procedure that generates the IDs? You could add code in there to handle it or have a parameter that lets you optionally flag the rows when it is called.
Use temporary tables or a table variable (you are using SS2005).
Although, that's not nest-able - if a stored proc uses that method then you can't dumpt that output into a temp table.
An ugly solution would be to have your procedure return the "next" id each time it is called by using the other table (or some flag on the existing table) to filter out the rows that it has already returned
You can use a temp table or table variable with an additional column:
DECLARE #MyTable TABLE (
Column1 uniqueidentifer,
...,
Checked bit
)
INSERT INTO #MyTable
SELECT [...], 0 FROM MyTable WHERE [...]
DECLARE #Continue bit
SET #Continue = 1
WHILE (#Continue)
BEGIN
SELECT #var1 = Column1,
#var2 = Column2,
...
FROM #MyTable
WHERE Checked = 1
IF #var1 IS NULL
SET #Continue = 0
ELSE
BEGIN
...
UPDATE #MyTable SET Checked = 1 WHERE Column1 = #var1
END
END
Edit: Actually, in your situation a join will be better; the code above is a cursorless iteration, which is overkill for your situation.