I use Kepware to get data from machine and I got this error, maybe you have an idea what it could mean? Is it related to dead time in configuration?
Attaching photos :
enter image description here
enter image description here
Waiting for your answers.
I think it's related to death time in the configuration but I'm not should if I could change it and it will not break.
Related
We are sending lots and lots of FCM Messages to our millions of users. As the message is triggered by an external event (Kick off in a football match) we sent many messages at the same time.
Sometimes the sending of an FCM message fails and we get an error message like this:
<H1>302 Moved</H1> The document has moved
<A HREF="https://fcm.googleapis.com/batch?
google_abuse=GOOGLE_ABUSE_EXEMPTION%3DID%....3B+expires%3DTue,+22-Nov-
2022+19:04:17+GMT">here</A>. </BODY></HTML>
(I removed some text for privacy reasons.)
For sending the messages we use
implementation 'com.google.firebase:firebase-admin:9.1.0'
We got thousands of error messages like this in one minute. In the next minute everthing worked fine again.
I have search the internet for information about it. But i couldn't find any abuse rules for FCM. Does anybody has information about this kind of error?
firebaser here
At first glance, your project may be getting throttled, but it may also be another problem in the API calls or the FCM backend. It’ll be challenging to pinpoint or even narrow down what is the specific cause of the error on a public forum without going into project-specific details. I would recommend reaching out to Firebase support as they can offer personalized help. Please provide the latest request and response (with timestamp) you have so they can check what happened to the message delivery.
Apparently Fabric Beta can sometimes have some internal error where it cannot resend invites. But then five minutes later (just now) when I went back it did work. During the time it fails and gives the flash/toast/popup error in the title, there's nothing else that tells the user what they can do about it. I guess if I have a question it would be, is this something Fabric will fix UX wise?
I'm using this FIX automation tool called VeriFIX to validate FIX messages. The problem I'm facing is, in my script I'm expecting an acknowledgement message from server in different session but there's a synchronization issue here.
The comes before my script arrives in that session and hence my scripts then keeps on waiting indefinitely for the message which has already being sent by the server.
Can anyone help me out on how to overcome this synchronization issue of VeriFIX, there are very limited options available with the tool and I couldn't find any thing useful.
What Sumbad is saying is the expected message has been received before the script has moved onto the step that expects the message.
To overcome this with veriFix Sumbad you should de-select the box that clears the queue after the last sucessfully received message.
I am currently working on getting a location of a vehicle to a server. I am using TK103 as my GPS device. It is sending ##,imei:<my_imei>,A; to the server when the server is started.
This is the only document of the protocol I could find on internet: https://web.archive.org/web/20140401000000*/http://www.zhyichina.com/en/gpstracking/gprs-data-protocol.xls
I followed it. But it does not work properly. It needs to send "ON" command many times to work and any of other commands did not work. Could you please help me to identify the problem.
When you get message like ##,imei:123456789012345,A; you need to respond with LOAD.
When you receive just IMEI number like 123456789012345; you need to respond with ON.
Here you can find the source code of the decoder for this protocol:
https://github.com/tananaev/traccar/blob/master/src/org/traccar/protocol/Gps103ProtocolDecoder.java
hi
I cannot see any explanation of the implementation of the collapse_key.
I think i understand what it does but not how it do it!
Android Cloud to Device Messaging Framework
I have a C2DM framework set up and sending 4 types of messages to many phones.
String messages very basic looks kind of like this:
type:name:uuid
type:name:uuid:number
type:uuid:id
If the phone is off many of this can get piled up waiting for phone on-line.
as far as i can tell my system works but what will the collapse_key do for me here?
addEncodedParameter(sb, "collapse_key", "no_ide_what_to_put_here");
You mentioned retrying the same message 3 times and using the same key value. It doesn't really have to be the same message. If you've got a message that indicates the current price of a stock, for instance, and you really only care about the latest price, then you could send different messages with the same key. When the device comes back online, it only gets the latest price quote message.
This may have been what you were saying already, but wanted to make it clear it's not only for "retrying sending same message".
I found this text: “collapse key” used for overriding old messages with the same key on the Google C2DM servers" I think if im retrying sending same message 3 times I must use same key value right. Google cloud server will send the latest msg with the same key value
...but be aware of the following (from http://code.google.com/intl/sv-SE/android/c2dm/):
"Note that since there is no guarantee of the order in which messages get sent, the "last" message may not actually be the last message sent by the application server."
But maybe this is not an issue if you don't generate a lot of messages.