How to fix CSRF token error in sentry in asp.net core - asp.net-core

I use Sentry to log errors in asp.net core 7, but errors not show in Sentry and I have this error in console log: CSRF Verification Failed A required security token was not found or was invalid. This is my code in program.cs:
public static IWebHost BuildWebHost(string[] args) =>
WebHost.CreateDefaultBuilder(args)
.UseStartup<Startup>()
.UseSentry(o =>
{
o.Dsn = #"http://876a08b927d4efcb98a769314452bbe#192.168.34.80:9000/8";
o.Debug = true;
})
.Build();
I test my code in .net 5 project and I can see logs in sentry panel.

A few things:
You said version 2.1.8 of the Sentry .NET SDK works. However, I don't recommend using that, as it's quite old (released Nov 21, 2020). We have fixed many issues and added many features since then.
You should read through the 2.x to 3.x migration guide.
From the DSN, it appears you are self-hosting the Sentry server. Versions 3.x of the Sentry .NET SDK requires Sentry version 20.6.0 or greater to work correctly. See docs here. The reason is that we now use Sentry's envelope endpoint. I suspect you are using an older version of Sentry.
Additionally, if using Sentry .NET 3.17.0 or greater, you'll either need Sentry 21.9.0 or greater, or will need to set options.SendClientReports = false. (See changelog notes.)
The CSRF failure has been discussed before with regard to using newer Sentry SDKs with older self-hosted Sentry servers.
You may also find that you need to update the configuration or architecture of your self-hosted Sentry server. See the documentation.
There have been other issues on this subject with Sentry self-hosted in the past. You may want to review them, or raise a new issue if necessary.

Related

Could not load file or assembly 'Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.Abstractions, Version=5.0.0.0 in Azure Functions

I have an API and a separate Azure Functions app. I upgraded my API app to .NET 5 and it's working fine. In the API app's solution, I have class library projects that I also reference in my Azure Functions app. These class libraries are netstandard2.1 projects.
Ever since this update -- during which I also updated all my NuGet packages to latest versions -- my Azure Functions app stopped working. I'm getting the following error:
Could not load file or assembly
'Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.Abstractions, Version=5.0.0.0,
Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=adb9793829ddae60'. The system cannot
find the file specified. Value cannot be null. (Parameter 'provider')
I noticed that there were breaking changes involving the Microsoft.Extensions.* packages and their recommendation is to install the package that is causing the issue directly. So I added Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.Abstractions to my Azure Functions manually -- before it was being installed as a dependency of Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration package. Here's the information about this:
https://github.com/dotnet/aspnetcore/issues/21033
The issue still persists. I even tried downgrading Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration in both the API and Functions app, but I'm still getting the same error.
Any idea how to resolve this issue?
Sam's comment should be accepted as correct answer. I try it out to downgrade Microsoft.Extensions* (in my case Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Console) from 5.0.0 to 3.1.0 and the error just gone.
Bravo!
If you are upgrading from .NET Core 3.1 to .NET 6 and you get this error, you need to change the Azure functions version to v4 and it fixes this error.
As a reference, this GitHub link explains exactly why that happens.
And as of now, you either track down the exact versions been referenced or downgrade everything to the latest v3 build.
In a nutshell, Azure Functions SDK already has some dependencies loaded in memory, so your libraries cannot use newer versions of the same libraries.
Adding this answer in case it helps anyone upgrading from .NET 3.1 to .NET 6.0.
First, as per #Jeff's answer, make sure you reference v4 in the Azure Functions project .csproj file:
<AzureFunctionsVersion>v4</AzureFunctionsVersion>
In my case, however, this was already set.
The Azure Function was running fine locally however in Azure DevOps pipeline I was getting the error described by the OP.
I noticed that when debugging the Azure Function locally, the console was outputting:
Azure Functions Core Tools
Core Tools Version: 4.0.3928 Commit hash: 7d1d4a32700695bbf290a871c7492fde84bb767e (64-bit)
Function Runtime Version: 4.0.1.16815
In my case I am actually running the Azure Function in an Azure DevOps pipeline for e2e test purposes. To achieve this, I first install the Azure Function Core Tools on the build agent using this npm command:
npm install azure-functions-core-tools -g
However this installs azure-functions-core-tools#3.0.3904 (version 3.x - NOT the latest version 4.x).
I then installed Azure Function Core Tools (v4), e.g. by installing with this npm command.
npm i -g azure-functions-core-tools#4 --unsafe-perm true
And this (for me) resolved the error.
Whether or not this is your exact scenario, make sure you are using Azure Function Core Tools v4.x if using Azure Function Runtime v4 and .NET 6.
As #binaryDi mentioned in their answer, you need to downgrade packages that reference version 5 of Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.Abstractions.
This can be a bit of a pain, as it doesn't tell you which packages are actually referencing Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.Abstractions package/namespace.
For me, I had to update Microsoft.Extensions.Caching.Memory and Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer to a version before 5. Anything that is referencing dotnet 5 should be downgraded for the Azure Function to run.
I stumbled upon this question while looking for an answer to my problem with upgrading to .NET 6.0. There was no going back, because I've bought a Macbook with an M1 processor and Arm support only works decently in .NET 6.0
Putting <AzureFunctionsVersion>v4</AzureFunctionsVersion> wasn't enough, because that doesn't increase the runtime version on Azure.
My function was already running on version 3.0 and strangely I couldn't select v4.0 in the portal. I had to change the version through the Azure CLI.
More information on how to do that can be found here: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-functions/set-runtime-version?tabs=azurecli
I also ran into this error when upgrading a c# function project from NETCORE 3.1 to .NET 6.
I set the following in the project (.csproj).
<AzureFunctionsVersion>v4</AzureFunctionsVersion>
AND also changed the Application setting value in the Function App - Configuration Section (Azure Portal)
"FUNCTIONS_EXTENSION_VERSION" from "~3" to "~4"
and that fixed it for me.
I also ran into this error when upgrading a c# func project from version 3 to 4.
I had already set <AzureFunctionsVersion>v4</AzureFunctionsVersion> but that didn't solve it.
The answer by #neeohw pointed me to the solution that fixed it for me, but I had to dig a bit further, and this is what fixed it for me:
Do the Azure cli commands as specified here:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-functions/functions-versions?tabs=in-process%2Cv4&pivots=programming-language-csharp#azure
I suggest you read that section for a background understanding, but the commands that ran was these:
az functionapp config appsettings set --settings FUNCTIONS_EXTENSION_VERSION=~4 -n <APP_NAME> -g <RESOURCE_GROUP_NAME>
# For Windows function apps only, also enable .NET 6.0 that is needed by the runtime az functionapp config set --net-framework-version v6.0 -n <APP_NAME> -g <RESOURCE_GROUP_NAME>
The issue was occurring to me, when I was trying to host an upgraded function in Azure functions. The previous version was targeted to netcoreapp3.1, which I upgraded to target net6.0 and, set v4 as Azure Function version.
The error was
"Could not load file or assembly 'Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration', Version=6.0.0.0 in Azure Functions"
After spending couple of hours, I figured that its the startup class that was causing the issue because it was the only place Configuration was used.
Changing the Startup to inherit from FunctionsStartup rather than WebJobsStartup, fixed the issue.
And with slight adjustments, it worked.
[assembly: FunctionsStartup(typeof(Startup))]
...
public class Startup : FunctionsStartup { ...
public override void Configure(IFunctionsHostBuilder builder)
{
var configuration = new ConfigurationBuilder()
.AddEnvironmentVariables()
.Build();
builder.Services.AddSingleton<IHttpContextAccessor, HttpContextAccessor>();
builder.Services.AddHttpClient();
...
}
That's it!
I had the same issue and the configuration for Azure FunctionsVersion was already present.
<AzureFunctionsVersion>v4</AzureFunctionsVersion>
I was able to resolve the issue by downgrading the version of Microsoft.Extensions.Http from 7 to 6
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.Extensions.Http" Version="6.0.0" />
I was this error on my Mac (arm) when I tried to ran my functions (.NET6) locally.
In my case, I tried your solution and the functions still would not start and I still had this log in the console: Could not load file or assembly 'Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.Abstractions, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=adb9793829ddae60'. The system cannot find the file specified..
I realized that I had installed 2 instances of azure tools (v3 with HomeBrew and v4 with npm).
When I run func start to start my functions, I observed that v3 was used. So I uninstalled the v3 tools with HomeBrew to use v4 with npm).
In my case, the reason was Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore version 5.0.2.
I donwgraded it to version 3.1.18.
(Other related packages, such as Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Design, Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer, and Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Tools should also be downgraded to 3.1.18.
I had this error when I used the latest of version Npgsql.EntityFrameworkCore.PostgreSQL which is 5.0.7 as this time of writing. I had to downgrade to 3.1.11 for the current version has a dependency to the 5.0.0.0 version of
Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.Abstractions.

What is the correct package to use for SIgnalR with ASP.NET Core?

I'm trying to use SignalR in an ASP.NET Core web application but I'm struggling to find the correct package to use. In this article, they say to use "Microsoft.AspNetCore.SignalR" (with the help of a NuGet.Config file) but when I do a dotnet restore, I get:
error NU1102: Unable to find package Microsoft.AspNetCore.SignalR.Server with version (>= 0.2.0)
error NU1102: - Found 1 version(s) in nuget.org [ Nearest version: 0.0.1-alpha ]
error NU1102: - Found 0 version(s) in aspnetcidev
I guess the v0.0.1-alpha is not the one I want.
However, I found the package "Gray.Microsoft.AspNetCore.SignalR.Server" and it seems to work but the last published version is from November 2016... That, and the namespace make me think that it's not the package I have to use neither...
I also saw this video that refers to the v1.0.0 version but, of course, I can get it to work...
Anyway, what is the correct package to use in order to use SignalR?
I'm using the prerelease dev package for now.
https://dotnet.myget.org/F/aspnetcore-ci-dev/api/v3/index.json (thank you Pawel)
I also had to get the Microsoft.Extensions.Primitives from there.
Update:
I had to go back to .NET core 1.1 packages since migrating to 2.0 will not work for several reasons. I went back to using the unmaintained Microsoft.AspNetCore.SignalR.Server Version 0.1.0 from here:
https://www.myget.org/F/aspnetmaster/api/v3/index.json
Update:
For a new project I'm successfully using the v.1.0.0-alpha2-final version from nugget.org.
Examples including the JavaScript files can be found here: aspnet/SignalR-samples

IBM Worklight 6.1 - How can I remove the Tealeaf library?

I need to remove the Tealeaf library from my Worklight application in order to have a lighter App (I'm using Eclipse Juno Service Release 2 Build id: 20130225-0426 with WorklightStudioPlugin version 6.1.0.01-20140311-2356 ).
I have modified my project following these steps:
In the application-descriptor.xml's Design view I've removed Optional Features > Analytics
Then I've removed the existing Tealeaf folder under native in iPhone’s environment
Finally I've removed from native\libs the library uicandroid.jar for Android
Is there any other option/configuration to set?
I receive the error below:
TLF_configurator.enable was called, but the required Tealeaf libraries are not present in the classpath.
I haven’t found any details in the official guide. There's only the procedure for adding Tealeaf, not for removing it.
If you remove the Analytics optional feature and rebuild your application/environments, it should have removed everything for you. Just changing the app descriptor XML file is not enough to do so. Did you rebuild your environment after removing the Analytics optional feature?
Also, make sure you are not enabling analytics in your code (by calling WL.Analytics.enable or setting analytics : {enabled : true} in your initOptions.js) and that you are not using the WL.Analytics API in your code.

ServiceStack OpenId AuthProviders on Mono

The problem is that OpenId Auth providers aren't working under Ubuntu 12.04 with nginx/1.1.19, Mono JIT compiler version 3.1.1, fastcgi-mono-server4.exe 2.10.0.0
The ServiceStack references were all pulled via Nuget are at version 3.9.55.0, including ServiceStack.Authentication.OpenId which is attached to DotNetOpenAuth 4.3.0.0
The project is based on the ServiceStack Template CustomPath40 and all of the projects are built under .NET 4 with VS2012 on Win7x64.
Every auth works perfectly fine under IIS8/IIS8 Express. I configured the authproviders in AppHost, emulating the SocialBootstrapApi. Twitter and Facebook auth works just fine on mono, once running:
mozroots --import --ask-remove
that trusts typical mozilla certs.
The OpenId providers will complain about lacking a log4net dll (again, only on mono), but supplying an appropriate log4net dll quiets that error. Now the OpenId providers (Google and Yahoo) both throw an exception:
Method not found: 'System.Security.Cryptography.HashAlgorithm.Dispose'.
[Auth: 07/26/2013 04:21:13]:
[REQUEST: {provider:GoogleOpenId}] System.MissingMethodException: Method not found: 'System.Security.Cryptography.HashAlgorithm.Dispose'. at
DotNetOpenAuth.OpenId.HmacShaAssociation/HmacSha.CreateHasher (byte[]) <0x00017> at
DotNetOpenAuth.OpenId.HmacShaAssociation.CreateHasher () <0x0001b> at
DotNetOpenAuth.OpenId.Association.Sign (byte[]) <0x00034> at
DotNetOpenAuth.OpenId.ChannelElements.SigningBindingElement.GetSignature (DotNetOpenAuth.OpenId.ChannelElements.ITamperResistantOpenIdMessage,DotNetOpenAuth.OpenId.Association) <0x001f3> at
DotNetOpenAuth.OpenId.ChannelElements.SigningBindingElement.ProcessIncomingMessage (DotNetOpenAuth.Messaging.IProtocolMessage) <0x00133> at
DotNetOpenAuth.Messaging.Channel.ProcessIncomingMessage (DotNetOpenAuth.Messaging.IProtocolMessage) <0x001b1> at
DotNetOpenAuth.OpenId.ChannelElements.OpenIdChannel.ProcessIncomingMessage (DotNetOpenAuth.Messaging.IProtocolMessage) <0x000f3> at
DotNetOpenAuth.Messaging.Channel.ReadFromRequest (System.Web.HttpRequestBase) <0x00359> at
DotNetOpenAuth.OpenId.RelyingParty.OpenIdRelyingParty.GetResponse (System.Web.HttpRequestBase) <0x00053> at
DotNetOpenAuth.OpenId.RelyingParty.OpenIdRelyingParty.GetResponse () <0x0006f> at
ServiceStack.Authentication.OpenId.OpenIdOAuthProvider.Authenticate (ServiceStack.ServiceInterface.IServiceBase,ServiceStack.ServiceInterface.Auth.IAuthSession,ServiceStack.ServiceInterface.Auth.Auth) <0x00693> at
ServiceStack.ServiceInterface.Auth.AuthService.Authenticate (ServiceStack.ServiceInterface.Auth.Auth,string,ServiceStack.ServiceInterface.Auth.IAuthSession,ServiceStack.ServiceInterface.Auth.IAuthProvider) <0x0004f> at
ServiceStack.ServiceInterface.Auth.AuthService.Post (ServiceStack.ServiceInterface.Auth.Auth) <0x00247> at
ServiceStack.ServiceInterface.Auth.AuthService.Get (ServiceStack.ServiceInterface.Auth.Auth) <0x00013> at
(wrapper dynamic-method) object.lambda_method (System.Runtime.CompilerServices.Closure,object,object) <0x0004f> at
ServiceStack.ServiceHost.ServiceRunner`1<ServiceStack.ServiceInterface.Auth.Auth>.Execute (ServiceStack.ServiceHost.IRequestContext,object,ServiceStack.ServiceInterface.Auth.Auth) <0x001de>
The obvious problem would be the one detailed here: https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3375, but this is marked as resolved over a year ago in 2.10.x, while I built this 3.1.1 from tagged source last week.
How can I remedy this exception and get the OpenId Auth providers working on Mono?
You claim to have installed Mono 3.1.1, but you didn't install xsp with the scripts that you used to install this new version of Mono.
This means then, that when you installed xsp from packages, you pulled in Mono 2.x as a dependency of it. So you thought you had uninstalled mono from packages, and installed a new Mono, but you were actually having 2 versions of Mono at the same time.
When running xsp from packages, you where running the binary located at /usr, which means it was using the old mono (not the new one that you installed in /usr/local).
Even if you're running mono-fastcgi-server4 instead of the xsp server, both servers codebase is common: the xsp repo, which you need to install alongside Mono: http://github.com/xsp

DotNetOpenAuth not working for oauth2

I downloaded the latest package through Nuget, and installed using the package manager.
Issues:
1) First, I did not see DotNetOpenAuth.OAuth2 in the references. I had to google around like a wild child to get this through another nuget install
2) After doing that, the IAuthorizationServerHost interface is not being recognized.
I am just getting started using DotNetOpenAuth2, but the lack of proper steps and documentation is frankly a turn off. Not everyone using this has built an authorization server before. Any help in getting me up and running is greatly appreciated
If you still want to use NuGet, you can try out DotNetOpenAuth.Ultimate http://nuget.org/packages/DotNetOpenAuth.Ultimate
A single assembly that adds OpenID 1.1/2.0, OAuth 1.0(a)/2.0, & InfoCard authentication and authorization functionality for client and server applications.
PM> Install-Package DotNetOpenAuth.Ultimate
Turns out that downloading it manually, and then adding the dll manually fixes my issues.