I need to update document parameters via REST API.
I've tried using the following:
PUT .../raylight/v1/documents/33903/parameters/3
with the following json payload
{
"parameters":{
"parameter": {
"id": 3,
"answer": {
"values": {
"value": [
"2019/9"
]
}
}
}
}
}
But the returned answer shows unmodified parameters:
{
"parameter": {
"#optional": "false",
"#type": "prompt",
...
"id": 3,
...
"answer": {
...
"info": {
...
"previous": {
"value": [
"2015\/12"
]
}
},
"values": {
"value": [
"2015\/12"
]
}
}
}
}
How can I properly set new prompt parameters?
Do:
PUT .../raylight/v1/documents/33903/parameters
instead of:
PUT .../raylight/v1/documents/33903/parameters/3
Adding a parameter ID at the end performs a different function: it returns the list of parameters that are dependent upon the one provided. You have only one in this case, and it's returning itself. Leave it off, to refresh the document.
Related
I have a scenario where I need to call a secondary feature file that contains an API call where the response is a JSON object. However, I need to call this scenario multiple times, so I am using karate.repeat to achieve this. However, the resulting response is a malformed JSON that I cannot traverse.
This is what I am doing:
* def fun = function(i){ return karate.call('abc.feature#abc', value)}
* def loop = karate.repeat(2, fun)
* karate.log(loop)
The response I get is:
{
"Total_packages1": {
"package1": {
"tags": [
"kj21",
"j1",
"sj2",
"z1"
],
"expectedResponse": [
{
"firstName": "Name",
"lastName": "lastName",
"purchase": [
{
"title": "title",
"category": [
"a",
"b",
"c"
]
}
]
}
]
}
}
}
{
"Total_packages2": {
"package2": {
"tags": [
"kj212",
"j12",
"sj22",
"z12"
],
"expectedResponse": [
{
"firstName": "Name2",
"lastName": "lastName2",
"purchase": [
{
"title": "title2",
"category": [
"a2",
"b2",
"c2"
]
}
]
}
]
}
}
}
As you can see, Total_packages2 starts malformed. I need to grab the "tags" values from each package, however, I cannot simply do Total_packages1.package1.tags like I could with a single response in the JSON.
If I cannot achieve what I need by karate.repeat, is there another method that is recommended for looping like this? I haven't found anything in the documentation for this particular scenario.
Don't use karate.repeat() use call with a JSON array. Read this part of the docs: https://github.com/karatelabs/karate#data-driven-features
What I am trying to accomplish is accessing a single item in my database. I set up my indexing but when I query it, I get back an empty object.
Accessing it like this shows an empty object
https://yourapp.firebaseio.com/ticket.json?orderBy=%22TicketNumber%22&equalTo=2240
{
"-N6sEsiL25tQSzlNjvc4": {
"form": {
"Company": "Test",
"CompanyInvolved": "Test",
"DateCompleted": "2022-07-27T21:51:00.000Z",
"DateDepartShop": "2022-07-19T15:43:00.000Z",
"DateDepartSite": "2022-07-21T18:47:00.000Z",
"Details": "D2",
"ItemCode": "IC2",
"MoreDetails": [
[
{
"Details": "D1",
"ItemCode": "IC1",
"Quantity": "Q1"
}
]
],
"Quantity": "Q2",
"RecievedBy": "Test",
"Signature": "file:///Users/arod/Library/Developer/CoreSimulator/Devices/4498CCA0-C6F4-4E9F-BCAE-19ADB385E758/data/Containers/Data/Application/F0A9086E-A773-43C3-861F-91D3666AB627/Library/Caches/ExponentExperienceData/%2540arod1207%252FAOS/sign.png",
"ThirdParty": true,
"TicketNumber": 2240,
"TimeArriveShop": "2022-07-21T21:51:00.000Z",
"TimeArriveSite": "2022-07-19T18:47:00.000Z",
"TimeDepartShop": "2022-07-19T18:43:00.000Z",
"TimeDepartSite": "2022-07-21T18:51:00.000Z",
"TodaysDate": "2022-07-20T15:43:00.000Z"
}
},
My rules are as followed
{
"rules": {
".read": "true",
".write": "true",
"ticket": {
".indexOn": "TicketNumber"
}
}
}
Since the value you want to index lives under form/TicketNumber of each direct child node of the ticket path, that is also what you must define the index for.
So:
{
"rules": {
".read": "true",
".write": "true",
"ticket": {
".indexOn": "form/TicketNumber"
}
}
}
Same: that form/TicketNumber is also the path you need to specify for the orderBy parameter of your query.
There are multiple keys present in x.details[0].user so how to compare in such condition. It works fine where there is only one key while when there are more than one key it fails with error as there are multiple keys for user.
Please guide
* def array =
"""
{
"type": "1",
"array": 2,
"details": [
{
"path": "path",
"user": {
"school": {
"name": [
{
"value": "this is school",
"codeable": {
"details": [
{
"hello": "yty",
"condition": "check1"
}
],
"text": "123S"
}
}
]
},
"sample": "test1",
"id": "22222"
},
"data": {
"check": "abc"
}
},
{
"path": "path",
"user": {
"school": {
"name": [
{
"value": "this is school",
"codeable": {
"details": [
{
"hello": "def",
"condition": "check2"
}
],
"text": "123O"
}
}
]
},
"sample": "test",
"id": "11111"
},
"data": {
"check": "xyz"
}
}
]
}
"""
* def lookup = { 'check1': 'yty', 'check2': 'def' }
* match each array.details contains { user: { school: { name[0]: { codeable: { details[0]: { hello: '#(lookup[_$.user.school.name[0].codeable.details[0].condition])' } } } } } }
I have tried multiple ways but not sure how to make it work when there are more than one keys getting returned.
First let me say this. Please, please do not try to be "too clever" in your tests. Read this please: https://stackoverflow.com/a/54126724/143475
Just have simple tests that test for specific, predictable responses and stop there. The maximum complexity should be match contains, that's it. What you are trying to do is in my opinion a waste of time, and will just cause grief for anyone who tries to maintain these tests in future.
That said, I'm giving you a completely different approach here. There are a few different ways, this is just one. Here we attack the problem piece by piece instead of trying to write one massive match.
* def allXyz = array.details.filter(x => x.data.check == 'xyz')
* match each allXyz..details == [{ hello: 'def', condition: 'check2' }]
You should be able to extend this to do all the weird assertions that you want. If you are wondering what allXyz..details does, you can print it like this:
* def temp = $allXyz..details
* print temp
I'm trying to use UpdateRecord 1.9.0 processor to modify a JSON but it does not replace the values as I want.
this is the source message
{
"type": "A",
"ids": [{
"id": "1",
"value": "abc"
}, {
"id": "2",
"value": "def"
}, {
"id": "3",
"value": "ghi"
}
]
}
and the wanted output
{
"ids": [{
"userId": "1",
}, {
"userId": "2",
}, {
"userId": "3",
}
]
}
I have configured the processor as follows
processor config
Reader:
reader
Schema registry:
schema
writer:
writer
And it works, the output is a JSON without the field 'type' and the ids have the field 'userId' instead 'id' and 'value'.
To fill the value of userId, I defined the replace strategy and the property to replace:
strategy
But the output is wrong. The userId is always filled with the id of the last element in the array:
{
"ids": [{
"userId": "3"
}, {
"userId": "3"
}, {
"userId": "3"
}
]
}
I think the value of the expression is ok because if I try to replace only one record it works fine (/ids[0]/userId, ..id)
Nifi docs has a really similar example (example 3):
https://nifi.apache.org/docs/nifi-docs/components/org.apache.nifi/nifi-standard-nar/1.7.1/org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.UpdateRecord/additionalDetails.html
But it does not work for me.
What am I doing wrong?
thanks
Finally I have used JoltJSONTransform processor instead UpdateRecord
JoltJSONTransform
template:
[
{
"operation": "shift",
"spec": {
"ids":{
"*":{
"id": "ids[&1].userId"
}
}
}
}
]
Easier than UpdateRecord
I've successfully created my Knowledgebase using API.
But I forgot to add some alternative questions and metadata for one of the pairs.
I've noticed PATH method in the API to update the Knowledebase, so updating kb is supported.
I've created a payload which looked like this:
{
"add": {
},
"delete": {
},
"update": {
"qnaList": [
{
"id": 1,
"answer": "Answer",
"source": "link_to_source",
"questions": [
"Question 1?",
"Question 2?"
],
"metadata": [
{
"name": "oldMetadata",
"value": "oldMetadata"
},
{
"name": "newlyAddedMetaData",
"value": "newlyAddedMetaData"
}
]
}]}
}
I get back the following response HTTP 202 Accepted:
{
"operationState": "NotStarted",
"createdTimestamp": "2018-05-21T07:46:52Z",
"lastActionTimestamp": "2018-05-21T07:46:52Z",
"userId": "user_uuid",
"operationId": "operation_uuid"
}
So, looks like it worked. But in reality, this request doesn't take any affect.
When I check operation details, it returns me the following:
{
"operationState": "Succeeded",
"createdTimestamp": "2018-05-21T07:46:52Z",
"lastActionTimestamp": "2018-05-21T07:46:54Z",
"resourceLocation": "/knowledgebases/kb_uuid",
"userId": "user_uuid",
"operationId": "operation_uuid"
}
What am I doing wrong? And how should I update my kb via API properly?
Please help
I had the same problem, I discovered that it was necessary to have all the data of the json even if they were not used.
In your case you need "name" and "urls" in the "update" section and "Delete" in "update/qnaList/questions" section:
{
"add": {},
"delete": {},
"update": {
"name": "nameofKbBase", //this
"qnaList": [
{
"id": 2370,
"answer": "DemoAnswerEdit",
"source": "CustomSource",
"questions": {
"add": [
"DemoQuestionEdit"
],
"delete": [] //this
},
"metadata": { }
}
],
"urls": [] //this
}
}