I am trying to update some old static icon references to use the official fontawesome-wordpress plugin shortcode.
Via wordpress editor (pasting the shortcode in) this works fine.
However via an sql find replace operation... not so much.
Old reference in wp_content (updating the value "accordion-toggle-plus")
"accordion-toggle-style":"accordion-toggle-plus",
New desired shortcode reference to replace it with in wp_content:
[icon name="chevron-down" prefix="fas"]
My sql statement:
UPDATE
wp_posts
SET
post_content = REPLACE(post_content, 'accordion-toggle-plus', '[icon name="chevron-down" prefix="fas"]');
result actually breaks the whole block that it is being output in but in the database it shows (seemingly) correctly:
"accordion-toggle-style":"[icon name="chevron-down" prefix="fas"]",
However obviously something to do with the output of this shortcode is breaking the block - I understand that it is probably to do with use of unescaped special characters, and i have tried various combinations of delimiters to no avail.
Some things i have tried below.
No difference
'\[icon name=\"chevron-down\" prefix=\"fas\"]'
doesnt break the block but also doesnt fire shortcode, just outputs string:
'\U+005Bicon name=\u0022chevron-down\u0022 prefix=\u0022fas\u0022\U+005D'
and
'[icon name=\u0022chevron-down\u0022 prefix=\u0022fas\u0022]'
Ive also tried various combinations of the above but i just dont understand what is happening in the sql update statement that is different from pasting the shortcode manually in the editor (works). Interestingly pasting the shortcode in via my database inspector in phpstorm also works.
Update: realised the reason the escaped shortcode breaks the block is that for some reason, when inserting it wordpress also adds a random
<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p></p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
tag within the block tags that breaks it (its a custom block).
Related
I want to use the value of my variable in Go template as-is but Go is adding extra quotes around it. E.g., for a Go template like
{{.Site}}:{{.Port}}/{{.Path}}
I want to get the output as
Mysite:3000/from/here
but the template is giving me the following instead:
"Mysite":"3000"/"from/here"
So,
How can I fix it (get rid of all the extra quotes or better suspend them all)? See https://play.golang.org/p/uKpgXdLv5gM
Go template also changed "orgId=1&refresh=30s" to orgId=1\u0026refresh=30s, how to avoid that?
Moreover, if I add https:// to the front of my url, the output is truncated. How to fix that as well?
Finally, is it possible to escape "`" within "`"?
As per Go HTML template doc:
HTML templates treat data values as plain text which should be encoded so they can be safely embedded in an HTML document. The escaping is contextual, so actions can appear within JavaScript, CSS, and URI contexts.
The security model used by this package assumes that template authors are trusted, while Execute's data parameter is not. More details are provided below.
It means JavaScript escaping is enabled whenever the go HTML template engine detects that it is within a <script> tag, (i.e., it has nothing to do with whether using regular " or not as the first commenter thinks). So
to get the output as
Mysite:3000/from/here
instead of:
"Mysite":"3000"/"from/here"
Do not wrap it with <script> & </script> tag.
Do the concatenation after template Execute().
Again, with <script> & </script> tag wrapped around, I'm getting:
var url = `"Mysite":"3000"/"from/here"/${othervars}?"orgId=1\u0026refresh=30s"`
vs. without <script> & </script> tag wrapped around it, I'm getting:
var url = `Mysite:3000/from/here/${othervars}?orgId=1&refresh=30s`
Just what I need.
However, my actual case is that I'm using go HTML template engine to process my .html template files, so I cannot really do the concatenation afterwards, as everything is defined in the .html template file. So, just as Martin Gallagher has shown in his code, for such case, using template function seems to be the only option.
But even that might not be a viable option, as this is what I'm getting out of Martin's code:
var url = "Mysite:3000\/from\/here?orgId=1\u0026refresh=30s"
It is still not exactly what I wanted:
var url = `Mysite:3000/from/here/${othervars}?orgId=1&refresh=30s`
So maybe with such case, it indeed has no ideal solution.
so basically I have a bunch of HTML strings in a MySQL table and I am trying to display then through EJS.
For instance, I have a string that looks like this is a link with some <code>code</code> next to it. In my code I try to display it in that way.
<%- listOfStrings["myString"] -%>
However, as you probably guessed when reading the title, the string seems to be escaped when displaying on the screen.
What's even weirder to me is that I have two tables with such strings, and it works for the first one, while it doesn't for the second one. One difference though, is that the first one is hardcoded, while the second one can be edited through some tool on my website. Encoding is utf32_unicode_ci for both tables, if that matters.
For debugging purposes I tried to store the aforementioned strings in a js variable and display them in the console: then it seems like <and > characters are all escaped for some reason. Is there an explanation to this behavior, and if so how to fix it so that HTML renders correctly?
Thanks for your help!
You can try it :
<%=listOfStrings["myString"]%>
I have some records in a CMS that include HTML fragments with custom tags for a widget tool. The maker of the CMS has apparently updated their CMS without providing proper data conversion. Their widgets use keys for layout based on screen width such as block_lg, block_md, block_sm. The problem kicks in with the fact they used to have a block_xs and they have now shifted them all -- dropping the block_xs and instead placing a block_xl on the other end.
We don't really use these things, but their widget configurations do. What this means for us is the values for each key are identical. The problem occurs when the updated CMS code is looking for the 'block_xl' in any widget definition tags, it can't find it and errors out.
What I'm thinking then is that the new code will appear to 'ignore' the block_xs due to how it reads the tags. (and similarly, the old code will ignore block_xl) Since the values for each are identical, I need to basically read any widget definition and add a block_xl value to it matching the value of [any one of] the other width parameters.
Since the best place order-wise would be 'before' the block_lg value, it's probably easiest to do it as follows:
Replace any thing matching posix style regex matching /block_lg(="\d+,\d+")/ with: block_xl="$1" block_lg="$1"
Or whatever the equivalent of that would be.
Example of an existing CMS block with multiple widget definitions:
<div>{{widget type="CleverSoft\CleverBlock\Block\Widget"
widget_title="The Album" classes="highlight-bottom modish greenfont font52 fontlight"
enable_fullwidth="0" block_ids="127" lazyload="0"
block_lg="127,12," block_md="127,12," block_sm="127,12," block_xs="127,12,"
template="widget/block.phtml" scroll="0" background_overlay_o="0"}}</div>
<!-- Image Block -->
<div>{{widget type="CleverSoft\CleverBlock\Block\Widget"
widget_title="What’s Your Favorite Cover Style?"
classes="zoo-widget-style2 modish grey font26 fontlight"
enable_fullwidth="0" block_ids="126" lazyload="0"
block_lg="126,12," block_md="126,12," block_sm="126,12," block_xs="126,12,"
template="widget/block.phtml" scroll="0" background_overlay_o="0"}}</div>
What I would prefer to end up with from the above (adding block_xl):
<div>{{widget type="CleverSoft\CleverBlock\Block\Widget"
widget_title="The Album" classes="highlight-bottom modish greenfont font52 fontlight"
enable_fullwidth="0" block_ids="127" lazyload="0"
block_xl="127,12," block_lg="127,12," block_md="127,12," block_sm="127,12," block_xs="127,12,"
template="widget/block.phtml" scroll="0" background_overlay_o="0"}}</div>
<!-- Image Block -->
<div>{{widget type="CleverSoft\CleverBlock\Block\Widget"
widget_title="What’s Your Favorite Cover Style?"
classes="zoo-widget-style2 modish grey font26 fontlight"
enable_fullwidth="0" block_ids="126" lazyload="0"
block_xl="126,12," block_lg="126,12," block_md="126,12," block_sm="126,12," block_xs="126,12,"
template="widget/block.phtml" scroll="0" background_overlay_o="0"}}</div>
I know how to do it in php and if necessary, I will just replace it on my local DB and write an sql script to update the modified records, but the html blocks can be kind of big in some cases. It would be preferable, if it is possible, to make the substitutions right in the SQL but I'm not sure how to do it or if it's even possible to do.
And yes, there can be more than one instance of a widget in any given cms page or block. (i.e. there may be a need for more than one such substitutions with different local 'values' assigned to the block_lg)
If anyone can help me do it in SQL, it would be greatly appreciated.
for reference, the tables effected are called cms_page and cms_block, the name of the row in both cases is content
SW
In my project Mockito.times(1) is often used when verifying mocks:
verify(mock, times(1)).call();
This is redundant since Mockito uses implicit times(1) for verify(Object), thus the following code does exactly what the code above does:
verify(mock).call();
So I'm going to write an a structural search drive inspection to report such cases (let's say, named something like Mockito.times(1) is redundant). As I'm not an expert in IntelliJ IDEA structural search, my first attempt was:
Mockito.times(1)
Obviously, this is not a good seach template because it ignores the call-site. Let's say, I find it useful for the following code and I would not like the inspection to trigger:
VerificationMode times = Mockito.times(1);
// ^ unwanted "Mockito.times(1) is redundant"
So now I would like to define the context where I would like the inspection to trigger. Now the inspection search template becomes:
Mockito.verify($mock$, Mockito.times(1))
Great! Now code like verify(mock, times(1)).call() is reported fine (if times was statically imported from org.mockito.Mockito). But there is also one thing. Mockito.times actually comes from its VerificationModeFactory class where such verification modes are grouped, so the following line is ignored by the inspection:
verify(mockSupplier, VerificationModeFactory.times(1)).get();
My another attempt to fix this one was something like:
Mockito.verify($mock$, $times$(1))
where:
$mock$ is still a default template variable;
$times$ is a variable with Text/regexp set to times, Whole words only and Value is read are set to true, and Expression type (regexp) is set to (Times|VerificationMode) -- at least this is the way I believed it should work.
Can't make it work. Why is Times also included to the regexp? This is the real implementation of *.times(int), so, ideally, the following line should be reported too:
verify(mockSupplier, new Times(1)).get();
Of course, I could create all three inspection templates, but is it possible to create such a template using single search template and what am I missing when configuring the $times$ variable?
(I'm using IntelliJ IDEA Community Edition 2016.1.1)
Try the following search query:
Mockito.verify($mock$, $Qualifier$.times(1))
With $Qualifier$ text/regexp VerificationModeFactory|Mockito and occurrences count 0,1 (to find it when statically imported also).
To also match new Times(1) you can use the following query:
Mockito.verify($mock$, $times$)
With $times$ text/regexp .*times\s*\(\s*1\s*\) and uncheck the Case sensitive checkbox.
I'm very new to OpenRefine, so please bear with me if i have made a simple mistake.
I'm parsing a HTML website to gather some date.
Everything went fine with fetching the individual pages, but now the parsing of the HTML fails.
I'm creating a new column, based on the one holding all the page's HTML. I'm trying to get to the data in a specific DIV[20].
In the"create column based on this column" window it gives me a preview when using value.parseHtml().select("DIV")[20] , which results in exactly what i need... executing it gives me nothing but blank cells.
it even tells me that it is "filling 0 rows with grel:value.parseHtml().select("DIV")[20]"
Any clue what i'm doing wrong here?
You just need to finalize with .toString() to output the JSON.org object AS a string.
This is explained on our wiki here: https://github.com/OpenRefine/OpenRefine/wiki/StrippingHTML#extract-html-attributes-text-links-with-integrated-grel-commands
I also updated the select() function with that example: https://github.com/OpenRefine/OpenRefine/wiki/GREL-Other-Functions#selectelement-e-string-s