react-native-youtube-iframe (framework) is authorized for youtube? - react-native

Is it safe to use it at my job in company? My boss said that his friend took block on all videos on the site because he was using unauthorized resources to play them and took a huge damage...
I have been searching a long time for this question and I have nothing

Related

Verification Google OAuth2 concert scren with the apps for personal use only

I recently asked this question and user's #DalmTo and #Sergio NH they gave me an exhaustive answer for which I thank them very much.
Moving forward to question, we started publishing the application, and its verification was not required, since no scope was added (here it is a little unclear why the requests worked in an application with a test mode in which these scope were not added (google drive, google sheet and google ads)).
However, this time the application in the "In Production" mode began to give us an "Unverified app screen" (see Unverified app screen). We decided that we still need to add scope to the list, and, of course, that the scope list (their list is described above) requires verification by Google.
We started filling in the necessary fields, while studying the Google documentation at the same time, and came across the following information (see block Verification process -> What are the requirements for verification?):
Apps not applicable for verification
Apps for internal use only
(single domain use) Apps for personal use only Apps that are Gmail
SMTP plugins for WordPress Apps that are in development or
staging/testing
Apps for personal use only
And this is just our case: we have already received permission from Google Ads and are just generating simple reports that we want to integrate with Google Sheet. I.e., this is an elementary script that works within this account (however, we still need to request the first concert screen, even for this developer account) and cannot be distributed to any other accounts.
But when adding our scope, Google requires us to pass verification, forcing us to fill in the required fields, in the form of domains and their verification via the Search Console (we have already done this and this stage does not cause difficulties) and links to Youtube videos - where we must show how scope is used.
And just this stage is not clear. We do not allow other people's accounts to connect to this application, and the software does not have any interface, it is just a script that receives data from Google Ads and saves it to Google Sheet (creating a file via Google Drive). We have described all this in the scope usage description field. But the link to the Youtube video is require field, and we sincerely do not understand why (considering our case) we should record something, and most importantly, what exactly we should record in this case. If the documentation itself says that in our case we do not even need a verification.
Maybe we did not understand something and now we are doing it wrong? We will be glad to receive any tips from experts working with Google Cloud Console and apologize in advance for broken English.
We also apologize in advance to the StackOverflow community that we have to publish such elementary (which we are absolutely sure of from our side) questions here. We come here from Google Cloud Console - > Support - > Community support, and we must first try to publish posts in the Google Groups specified there, but they simply do not answer us, apparently considering our questions too elementary and not worthy of attention (however, these same questions in Google Groups are moderated) (for example, the previous question). And we are no longer able to contact any other support. Once again, we apologize for having to ask about this here.
It is true that if your app is a single use app then you do not need to be verified.
However if you don't get your app verified then there will be some restrictions.
you will see the unverified app screen
your refresh tokens will probably only be good for two weeks.
In the case of the YouTube api uploaded videos will be suck private.
If you can live with those points then you don't need to verify your app and you can continue as is.
If on the other hand you don't want to see the unverified app screen and you want a refresh token that will last longer then two weeks. You will need to verify your app. Yes, Even if your app is a console application running as a job some where you still show the consent screen. This is the YouTube video you will need to show Google. Show the consent screen popping up show the URL bar and then show your script running. You also need to set up the homepage and privacy policy screens. Yes i 100% agree with you that this is silly.
When you go though the process. Explain to google that this is a single use script running as a job some where.
Unfortunately when Google changed it so that Refresh tokens expire for unverified apps they pretty much tied the hands of all developers who are running such single user scripts. We now have to get our apps verified if we don't want to have to request a new refresh token every two weeks.
If your program needs to access the requested scopes of the Google account privacy, even though the user is yourself, you also need to provide a youtube video to demonstrate how you use this program. The auditor cannot guarantee whether you will make this program public.

Workaround for SoundCloud and its lack of client ids

my company hosts a lot of audio on SoundCloud. We never had a client id. Now we want to start collecting data but I can't use the SDK without that id which, of course, SoundCloud stopped giving out over a year ago (and has not done anything to offer alternatives). Does anyone have any experience with, or a workaround for, this?
Had roughly the same problem.
You could use your browsers client_id to query the API.
Just navigate to a track page in a Browser, hit F12, open the Networking tab and click play. Look out for requests containing a client_id and copy that.
I did this a while ago (3-4 Months), and they're still working.
Con: You can't access OAuth and private stuff, just public content.

In Amazon Mechanical Turk, Batch HITs remain in mTurk website UI Manager after approving HITs with API

I am currently creating a Batch Project via the Amazon Mechanical Turk website (http://requester.mturk.com). After all the HITs have been completed, I download the CSV and approve or reject the hits.
I am then iterating through the CSV and using the mTurk API to call ApproveAssignment or RejectAssignment on the AssignmentId for each row.
When looking as a Worker (in which I completed my own HITs for testing), I see that HITs have been properly approved or rejected. However when looking as the requester it appears that none of the assignments have been approved or denied and the batch project looks like it is still waiting to be reviewed.
Any thoughts? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
This is a known issue. Once you operate on a HIT via the API, the batch interface no long works correctly.
The Manage HITs Individually page should still be updated correctly, though.

Monitor twitter hashtags in realtime with common search api?

I've been working with the twitter search api, retrieving tweets with a php script run by a cron job, 3 or 4 times per hour.
All works fine, I can save some fields from the resulting tweets into mySQL for doing some research, contests, and accounting.
I begun experiencing some "trouble" some days ago when some hashtag hit Global Trending Topic, and the saved tweets werent't reflecting the real quantity of tweets We could see through search, etc.
So:
1- Should I use instead the twitter Streaming API?
2- Should I contact api AT twitter.com and request special permissions for my app or username?
3- Finally, is there a working way to acchieve this "realtime" monitoring script that can give more accurate and real results?
Thanks a lot in advance
Got a reply from twitter api staff...
It seems I should use STREAMING API, and they point me to this url
https://dev.twitter.com/docs/streaming-api/methods#track
Hope it is useful for others

How to make a Tag cloud app that post on a website?

I want to make an app where the users can post messages that will be displayed on a website. The users would need to create a username and password to be able to post.
The app would be like a twitter, but only be able to post through the app and read the last few posts and not be able to write private messages.
The website would function like a huge cloud of thoughts where everyone could go and read what others have written. Once the post hit the cloud, they can't be deleted. Only me could delete posts.
All posts would have different color and font size, it would look like a huge tag cloud on the website.
How do I make an app and a website like this?
David H
The tutorial application for Google Application Engine is an unstyled version of what you describe. They'll even host it for you for free (up to a non-trivial level of usage).
The tag cloud creation is not so very hard but without knowing your preferred language it is hard to point you to helpful libraries (there are plenty out there).
Getting people to use it will be the hard part.
added in response to comment:
Good luck on your endeavor. I would be surprised if you weren't able to learn everything you need to know and have a working web app by the time school starts. I found a simple stand alone web cloud creation library that explains what it does and will run on GAE. So now even that part is in place for you.
I'm tempted to make some pathetic reference to the sorts of computing that I did prior to high school, but I expect that you probably have SD data cards have more computational power than I had available to me. Kids these days! ;)