I have a table called Inventory with the below columns
item warehouse date sequence number value
111 100 2019-09-25 12:29:41.000 1 10
111 100 2019-09-26 12:29:41.000 1 20
222 200 2019-09-21 16:07:10.000 1 5
222 200 2019-09-21 16:07:10.000 2 10
333 300 2020-01-19 12:05:23.000 1 4
333 300 2020-01-20 12:05:23.000 1 5
Expected Output:
item warehouse date sequence number value
111 100 2019-09-26 12:29:41.000 1 20
222 200 2019-09-21 16:07:10.000 2 10
333 300 2020-01-20 12:05:23.000 1 5
Based on item and warehouse, i need to pick latest date and latest sequence number of value.
I tried with below code
select item,warehouse,sequencenumber,sum(value),max(date) as date1
from Inventory t1
where
t1.date IN (select max(date) from Inventory t2
where t1.warehouse=t2.warehouse
and t1.item = t2.item
group by t2.item,t2.warehouse)
group by t1.item,t1.warehouse,t1.sequencenumber
Its working for latest date but not for latest sequence number.
Can you please suggest how to write a query to get my expected output.
You can use row_number() for this:
select *
from (
select
t.*,
row_number() over(
partition by item, warehouse
order by date desc, sequence_number desc, value desc
) rn
from mytable t
) t
where rn = 1
I have a scenario where I need to find the start date and end date from multiple rows which are tied by continued_from and continued_to date fields in Oracle.
result should look like
ID STARTDATE ENDDATE
-- ---------- ----------
3 01/01/1000 12/31/9999
ID STARTDATE ENDDATE CONT_FROM_ID CONT_TO_ID
-- ---------- ---------- ------------ -----------
1 01/01/1000 10/10/1999 NULL 2
2 10/10/1999 11/11/2000 1 3
3 11/11/2000 12/31/9999 2 NULL
Oracle's hierarchical query syntax makes it easy to walk the tree from parent to child. The analytical lead() and lag() functions track the next and previous IDs.
select c23.id
, c23.startdate
, c23.enddate
, lag(c23.id) over (partition by p23.id order by c23.id) as cont_from_id
, lead(c23.id) over (partition by p23.id order by c23.id) as cont_to_id
from p23
join c23 on p23.startdate <= c23.startdate
and p23.enddate >= c23.enddate
order by c23.id
/
Here is a test using your sample data:
SQL> select c23.id
2 , c23.startdate
3 , c23.enddate
4 , lag(c23.id) over (partition by p23.id order by c23.id) as cont_from_id
5 , lead(c23.id) over (partition by p23.id order by c23.id) as cont_to_id
6 from p23
7 join c23 on p23.startdate <= c23.startdate
8 and p23.enddate >= c23.enddate
9 order by c23.id
10 /
ID STARTDATE ENDDATE CONT_FROM_ID CONT_TO_ID
---------- --------- --------- ------------ ----------
1 01-JAN-00 10-OCT-99 2
2 10-OCT-99 11-NOV-00 1 3
3 11-NOV-00 31-DEC-99 2
SQL>
subject_ID Date Test_id value
------- --------- ----- -----
1 1/1/2000 A 50
1 1/1/2000 B 10
1 1/2/2000 A 55
1 1/2/2000 B 09
2 1/1/2000 A 51
2 1/1/2000 B 13
2 1/2/2000 A 48
2 1/2/2000 B 08
Hi All,
I have a question about the scenario above. As you see I have test results that comes daily for each subjects. I'm trying to find a way to select the lowest value for each test in defined period of time so final table will be like this
subject_ID Date Test_id value
------- --------- ----- -----
1 1/1/2000 A 50
1 1/2/2000 B 09
2 1/2/2000 A 48
2 1/2/2000 B 08
I'm not sure what technology you are using, but assuming SQL something using a GROUP BY will work.
SELECT subject_ID
, Date
, Test_id
, MIN(value)
FROM YourTable
GROUP BY subject_ID
, Date
, Test_id
ANSI standard SQL supports the row_number() function. With this function, you ca do:
select t.*
from (select t.*,
row_number() over (partition by subject_id, test_id order by value asc) as seqnum
from t
) t
where seqnum = 1;
I have a Table called "MIVTable" which has the following records,
MIVID Quantity Value
------ ---------- --------
14 10 3000
14 20 3500
14 15 2000
15 20 3000
15 50 7500
16 25 2000
Here, I need to store the above Table into two tables such as "HeaderTbl" and "DetailTbl" based on the MIVID as follows:
HeaderTbl:
HID MIVID TotalQuantity TotalValue
----- ------- ------------- -----------
1 14 45 8500
2 15 70 10500
3 16 25 2000
Here HID is the Primary Key with Identity Column.
DetailTbl:
HID MIVID Quantity Value
----- ------- ------------ -------
1 14 10 3000
1 14 20 3500
1 14 15 2000
2 15 20 3000
2 15 50 7500
3 16 25 2000
Suppose, if the MIVTable contains 4 different MIVID means, then 4 row should be created based on the MIVID on the HeaderTbl. How to do this?
To insert records in HeaderTbl from MIVTable use this: (HID should be auto increment)
INSERT INTO HeaderTbl
([MIVID], [TotalQuantity], [TotalValue])
SELECT MIVID, SUM(Quantity), SUM(Value) FROM MIVTable GROUP BY MIVID;
To insert records in DetailTbl from HeaderTbl and MIVTable use this:
INSERT INTO DetailTbl
([HID], [MIVID], [Quantity], [Value])
SELECT H.HID, M.*
FROM HeaderTbl H
INNER JOIN MIVTable M
ON H.MIVID = M.MIVID;
Look at this SQLFiddle
Here you need to use INSERT INTO SELECT statement to insert data from one table to another. You can also use JOIN in such statement as I did it for DetailTbl.
You would generate the HeaderTbl using RANK() SQL Server function, as follows:
SELECT RANK() OVER (ORDER BY MIVID) as HID, MIVID, TotalQuantity, TotalValue
FROM
(
SELECT
MIVID,
SUM(Quantity) as TotalQuantity,
SUM(Value) as TotalValue
FROM MIVTable GROUP BY MIVID
) AS A
and the Detail table using the ROW_NUMBER() SQL Server function, as follows:
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY MIVID) AS HID,
MIVID,
Quantity,
Value
FROM MIVTable
In oracle, the LISTAGG function allows me to use it analytically with a OVER (PARTITION BY column..) clause. However, it does not support use of windowing with the ROWS or RANGE keywords.
I have a data set from a store register (simplified for the question). Note that the register table's quantity is always 1 - one item, one transaction line.
TranID TranLine ItemId OrderID Dollars Quantity
------ -------- ------ ------- ------- --------
1 101 23845 23 2.99 1
1 102 23845 23 2.99 1
1 103 23845 23 2.99 1
1 104 23845 23 2.99 1
1 105 23845 23 2.99 1
I have to "match" this data to a table in an special order system where items are grouped by quantity. Note that the system can have the same item ID on multiple lines (components ordered may be different even if the item is the same).
ItemId OrderID Order Line Dollars Quantity
------ ------- ---------- ------- --------
23845 23 1 8.97 3
23845 23 2 5.98 2
The only way I can match this data is by order id, item id and dollar amount.
Essentially I need to get to the following result.
ItemId OrderID Order Line Dollars Quantity Tran ID Tran Lines
------ ------- ---------- ------- -------- ------- ----------
23845 23 1 8.97 3 1 101;102;103
23845 23 2 5.98 2 1 104;105
I don't specifically care if the tran lines are ordered in any way, all I care is that the dollar amounts match and that I don't "re-use" a line from the register in computing the total on the special order. I don't need the tran lines broken out into a table - this is for reporting purposes and the granularity never goes back down to the register transaction line level.
My initial thinking was that I can do this with analytic functions to do a "best match" to identify the the first set of rows that match to the dollar amount and quantity in the ordering system, giving me a result set like:
TranID TranLine ItemId OrderID Dollars Quantity CumDollar CumQty
------ -------- ------ ------- ------- -------- -------- ------
1 101 23845 23 2.99 1 2.99 1
1 102 23845 23 2.99 1 5.98 2
1 103 23845 23 2.99 1 8.97 3
1 104 23845 23 2.99 1 11.96 4
1 105 23845 23 2.99 1 14.95 5
So far so good. But I then try to add LISTAGG to my query:
SELECT tranid, tranline, itemid, orderid, dollars, quantity,
SUM(dollars) OVER (partition by tranid, itemid, orderid order by tranline) cumdollar,
SUM(quantity) OVER (partition by tranid, itemid, orderid order by tranline) cumqty
LISTAGG (tranline) within group (order by tranid, itemid, orderid, tranline) OVER (partition by tranid, itemid, orderid)
FROM table
I discover that it always returns a full agg instead of a cumulative agg:
TranID TranLine ItemId OrderID Dollars Quantity CumDollar CumQty ListAgg
------ -------- ------ ------- ------- -------- -------- ------ -------
1 101 23845 23 2.99 1 2.99 1 101;102;103;104;105
1 102 23845 23 2.99 1 5.98 2 101;102;103;104;105
1 103 23845 23 2.99 1 8.97 3 101;102;103;104;105
1 104 23845 23 2.99 1 11.96 4 101;102;103;104;105
1 105 23845 23 2.99 1 14.95 5 101;102;103;104;105
So this isn't useful.
I would much prefer to do this in SQL if at all possible. I am aware that I can do this with cursors & procedural logic.
Is there any way to do windowing with the LISTAGG analytic function, or perhaps another analytic function which would support this?
I'm on 11gR2.
The only way I can think of to achieve this is with a correlated subquery:
WITH CTE AS
( SELECT TranID,
TranLine,
ItemID,
OrderID,
Dollars,
Quantity,
SUM(dollars) OVER (PARTITION BY TranID, ItemID, OrderID ORDER BY TranLine) AS CumDollar,
SUM(Quantity) OVER (PARTITION BY TranID, ItemID, OrderID ORDER BY TranLine) AS CumQuantity
FROM T
)
SELECT TranID,
TranLine,
ItemID,
OrderID,
Dollars,
Quantity,
CumDollar,
CumQuantity,
( SELECT LISTAGG(Tranline, ';') WITHIN GROUP(ORDER BY CumQuantity)
FROM CTE T2
WHERE T1.CumQuantity >= T2.CumQuantity
AND T1.ItemID = T2.ItemID
AND T1.OrderID = T2.OrderID
AND T1.TranID = T2.TranID
GROUP BY tranid, itemid, orderid
) AS ListAgg
FROM CTE T1;
I realise this doesn't give the exact output you were asking for, but hopefully it is enough to overcome the problem of the cumulative LISTAGG and get you on your way.
I've set up an SQL Fiddle to demonstrate the solution.
In your example, your store register table contains 5 rows and your special order system table contains 2 rows. Your expected result set contains the two rows from your special order system table and all "tranlines" of your store register table should be mentioned in the "Tran Line" column.
This means you need to aggregate those 5 rows to 2 rows. Meaning you don't need the LISTAGG analytic function, but the LISTAGG aggregate function.
Your challenge is to join the rows of the store register table to the right row in the special order system table. You were well on your way by calculating the running sum of dollars and quantities. The only step missing is to define ranges of dollars and quantities by which you can assign each store register row to each special order system row.
Here is an example. First define the tables:
SQL> create table store_register_table (tranid,tranline,itemid,orderid,dollars,quantity)
2 as
3 select 1, 101, 23845, 23, 2.99, 1 from dual union all
4 select 1, 102, 23845, 23, 2.99, 1 from dual union all
5 select 1, 103, 23845, 23, 2.99, 1 from dual union all
6 select 1, 104, 23845, 23, 2.99, 1 from dual union all
7 select 1, 105, 23845, 23, 2.99, 1 from dual
8 /
Table created.
SQL> create table special_order_system_table (itemid,orderid,order_line,dollars,quantity)
2 as
3 select 23845, 23, 1, 8.97, 3 from dual union all
4 select 23845, 23, 2, 5.98, 2 from dual
5 /
Table created.
And the query:
SQL> with t as
2 ( select tranid
3 , tranline
4 , itemid
5 , orderid
6 , sum(dollars) over (partition by itemid,orderid order by tranline) running_sum_dollars
7 , sum(quantity) over (partition by itemid,orderid order by tranline) running_sum_quantity
8 from store_register_table srt
9 )
10 , t2 as
11 ( select itemid
12 , orderid
13 , order_line
14 , dollars
15 , quantity
16 , sum(dollars) over (partition by itemid,orderid order by order_line) running_sum_dollars
17 , sum(quantity) over (partition by itemid,orderid order by order_line) running_sum_quantity
18 from special_order_system_table
19 )
20 , t3 as
21 ( select itemid
22 , orderid
23 , order_line
24 , dollars
25 , quantity
26 , 1 + lag(running_sum_dollars,1,0) over (partition by itemid,orderid order by order_line) begin_sum_dollars
27 , running_sum_dollars end_sum_dollars
28 , 1 + lag(running_sum_quantity,1,0) over (partition by itemid,orderid order by order_line) begin_sum_quantity
29 , running_sum_quantity end_sum_quantity
30 from t2
31 )
32 select t3.itemid "ItemID"
33 , t3.orderid "OrderID"
34 , t3.order_line "Order Line"
35 , t3.dollars "Dollars"
36 , t3.quantity "Quantity"
37 , t.tranid "Tran ID"
38 , listagg(t.tranline,';') within group (order by t3.itemid,t3.orderid) "Tran Lines"
39 from t3
40 inner join t
41 on ( t.itemid = t3.itemid
42 and t.orderid = t3.orderid
43 and t.running_sum_dollars between t3.begin_sum_dollars and t3.end_sum_dollars
44 and t.running_sum_quantity between t3.begin_sum_quantity and t3.end_sum_quantity
45 )
46 group by t3.itemid
47 , t3.orderid
48 , t3.order_line
49 , t3.dollars
50 , t3.quantity
51 , t.tranid
52 /
ItemID OrderID Order Line Dollars Quantity Tran ID Tran Lines
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------------------
23845 23 1 8.97 3 1 101;102;103
23845 23 2 5.98 2 1 104;105
2 rows selected.
Regards,
Rob.