I am currently working on capl browser (Vector Cannoe) test modules. I have a requirement where I am performing same set of actions such as testWaitForSignalChange(), testWaitForSignalMatch() as a prerequisite on every Testcase, inside different test modules. is it possible to define these functions in a includes file and import it when required?
Also, is it possible to import testcases from test module to another in Capl?`
Related
I want to use imported functions in TestCafe Scripts (which are basically copied into the test method). To me these scripts would be great to create reusable code snippets.
But I did not find a place where I could import a module which is then added to the import statements in the header of the test file.
An example:
I have a test-function I use for visual regression tests. It basically takes a screenshot of the page and compares it to a screenshot stored on disk. Since this also includes reading and writing files from/to disk using nodes fs API and calling packages like graphicsmagik, it quickly becomes a huge script. I might be able to copy it into a a TestCafe Script block, but it is not reusable and hardly scales.
Is there something I missed?
Of course I could create some command-line task that adds the import line to the top of all generated js files. But the test would only work after someone made them js files and ran my script. It would not be possible to run these tests directly from TestCafe Studio.
You can put your code to a separate module and import it using the Run TestCafe Script:
I have thrift generated code in my project? How do I stop this from affecting my coverage stats? They're dismal.
This help message from go test seems to suggest you can filter the packages you're testing:
-coverpkg pkg1,pkg2,pkg3
Apply coverage analysis in each test to the given list of packages.
The default is for each test to analyze only the package being tested.
Packages are specified as import paths.
Sets -cover.
Another simpler option, and this is what I do, is to import the generated code as a library package that sits outside your code tree, and thus the cover tool ignores it in its stats.
e.g. if your app is github.com/Fuser97381/myproj, put the generated code in github.com/Fuser97381/protocols. Then your code looks like this:
package main
import (
"github.com/Fuser97381/protocols/myproto"
"git.apache.org/thrift.git/lib/go/thrift"
)
...
I wonder if there is a way to use namespaces in the Go language in a similar way as Python does.
In Python if I have the following files containing functions:
/a.py
def foo():
/b.py
def bar():
I can access foo and bar in a third Python file as following:
import a
a1 = a.foo()
import b
b1 = b.bar()
I had some difficulties finding some documentation on namespaces with the Go language.
How are namespaces implemented in go? With package and import? Or is import dedicated to external libraries?
I think I understood that for each package there should be a dedicated directory. I wonder if this is absolutely mandatory, because it can become impractical whenever a high granularity of modules is the best way to engineer a certain idea. In other words, I would like to avoid using one directory per package (for internal use).
Go's equivalent to Python modules are packages. Unlike Python modules that exist as a single file, a Go package is represented by a directory. While a simple package might only include a single source file in the directory, larger packages can be split over multiple files.
So to take your Python example, you could create a file $GOPATH/src/a/a.go with the following contents:
package a
import "fmt"
func Foo() {
fmt.Println("a.Foo")
}
In your main program, you can call the function like so:
package main
import "a"
func main() {
a.Foo()
}
One thing to note is that only exported types and functions in a will be available externally. That is, types and functions whose names begin with a capital letter (which is why I renamed foo to Foo).
If you don't want to set up a Go workspace, you can also use relative paths for your imports. For instance, if you change the import in the main program to import "./a", then the source code for the a package can be located at a/a.go relative to the main program.
Is there a way to open a module in Erlang and then call its functions without using module name prefix?
Like opening an ML structure!
You can use
-import(my_module, [foo/1,bar/2]).
to import individual functions (in my example foo/1 and bar/2) from another module (my_module), see the modules documentation . There is no way of importing all functions from a module, they have to be explicitly listed.
Also see In Erlang how can I import all functions from a module? for an explanation why you shouldn't import functions!
No, you can't! The methods given by #johlo and #stemm are just work-arounds which allow you to not explicitly write the module name but that is all. The -import(...) declaration is a misnomer and doesn't do what you would expect.
Given Erlang's very dynamic handling of code it would be practically meaningless as well. There is no guarantee that at run-time you have the same "other" module as you had at compile-time, or if it is there at all. All code handling, compiling/loading/purging/reloading/etc. , is done on a module basis and there are no inter-module dependencies or optimisations.
Instead of import you can use defining:
-define(SIN(X), math:sin(X)).
my_func(X) -> ?SIN(X).
Is there way where I can use one selenium test file in another test file like an include directive or something?
I do not want to create duplicate files, there is only one change I have to make in an existing test file so I thought if there was a way to use an existing test file ?
Thanks for your reply, I am using Ruby
It depends on what language you use for coding. In java to reuse another selenium test file we use the import directive. If you are using java I can show you a sample pseudocode.
What language are you using?