in this video, https://youtu.be/klBvssJE5Qg I shows you how to spawn enemies outside of a fixed camera. (this is in GDscript by the way) How could I make this work with a moving camera? I wanna make a zombie fighting game with a moving camera and zombies spawning outside that.
I would really appreciate help with this.
I've tried researching on the internet about how to do it, but I just didn't find it.
N/A..................................
After looking at the video, I see they are using this line to spawn:
Global.instance_node(enemy_1, enemy_position, self)
This suggest to me a couple thing:
The position is probably either relative to the self passed as argument or global.
There must be an Autoload called Global that I need to check to make sure.
And the answer is in another castle video.
In the video Godot Wave Shooter Tutorial #2 - Player Shooting we find this code:
extends Node
func instance_node(node, location, parent):
var node_isntance = node.instance()
parent.add_child(node_instance)
node_instance.global_position = location
return node_instance
And thus, we are working with global coordinates global_position. Thus enemy_position is used as global coordinates.
Ok, instead of using enemy_position as global coordinates we are going to use it as local coordinates of the Camera2D (or a child of it). Which means you need a reference to the Camera2D (which I don't know where do you have it).
You could make your code in a child of the Camera2D, or take the transform of the Camera2D using a RemoteTransform2D. Either way, you could then work in its local coordinates. Thus you would do this:
Global.instance_node(enemy_1, to_global(enemy_position), self)
Or you could have a reference by exporting a NodePath (or in the newest Godot you can export a Camera2D) from your script and set it via the inspector. So you can do this:
Global.instance_node(enemy_1, camera.to_global(enemy_position), self)
Where camera is your reference to the Camera2D.
In the following section of Arena.gd:
func _on_Enemy_spawn_timer_timeout():
var enemy_position = Vector2(rand_range(-160, 670), rand_range(-90, 390))
I believe you can add the X and Y coordinates of the camera to their corresponding random ranges in the enemy position Vector2. This will displace the enemy depending on where the camera is currently located.
You can get the position of the camera with this:
get_parent().get_node("Name of your camera").position
When this is all put together:
func _on_Enemy_spawn_timer_timeout():
var enemy_position = Vector2(rand_range(-160, 670) + get_parent().get_node("Name of your camera").position.x, rand_range(-90, 390) + get_parent().get_node("Name of your camera").position.y)
Keep in mind that you might need to displace the values in the following while loop as well. I hope this helps.
Related
I've followed "Procedural Generation in Godot: Dungeon Generation" by KidsCanCode #https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3fwlk1NI-w and find myself unable to debug the current problem.
This specific commit has the code, but I'll try to explain in more detail bellow.
My main scene has a Camera2D node, a generic Node2D calles Rooms and a TileMap, everything is empty.
When the script starts, it runs a
func make_room(_pos, _size):
position = _pos
size = _size
var s = RectangleShape2D.new()
s.custom_solver_bias = 0.5
s.extents = size
$CollisionShape2D.shape = s
A few times and it fills $Rooms using .add_child(r) where r is a instance of the node that has the make_room() function. It will then iterate over $Rooms.get_children() a few times to create a AStar node to link all the rooms:
The magic comes when make_map() is called after afterwards, it fills the map with non-walkable blocks and then it carves the empty spaces, which works fine too:
There is a find_start_room() that is called to find the initial room, it also sets a global variable to the Main script start_room, which is used to write 'Start' on the map using draw_string(font, start_room.position - Vector2(125,0),"start",Color(3,4,8))
When I hit 'esc' it runs this simple code to instance the player:
player = Player.instance()
add_child(player)
player.position = start_room.position + Vector2(start_room.size.x/2, start_room.size.y/2)
play_mode = true
The problem comes when spawning the player. I tried doing some 'blind' fixing, such as adding or subtracting a Vector2(start_room.size.x/2, start_room.size.y/2) to player.position to see if I could make it fall within the room, to no avail.
Turning to the debugger didn't help, as the positions expressed by the variable inspectors don't seem to mean anything.
I tried implementing a simple 'mouse click print location':
print("Mouse Click/Unclick at: ", event.position)
print("Node thing",get_node("/root/Main/TileMap").world_to_map(event.position))
And also a 'start_room' print location:
print(get_node("/root/Main/TileMap").world_to_map(start_room.position))
And a when player moves print location, written directly into the Character script:
print(get_node("/root/Main/TileMap").world_to_map(self.position))
Getting results like the ones bellow:
Mouse Click/Unclick at: (518, 293)
Node thing(16, 9)
(-142, 0)
(-147, -3)
So, the player doesn't spawn on the same position as the start_room and the mouse position information is not the same as anything else.
Why is the player now spawning correctly? How can I debug this situation?
EDIT1: User Theraot mentioned about how the RigidBody2D is doing some weird collisions, and from what I understood, changing their collision behavior should fix the whole thing.
There's a section on the code that -after generating the random rooms- it removes some of the rooms like this:
for room in $Rooms.get_children():
if randf() < cull:
room.queue_free()
else:
room.mode = RigidBody2D.MODE_STATIC
room_positions.append(Vector3(room.position.x, room.position.y, 0))
From what I understand, if the room is randomly selected it will be deleted using queue_free() OR it will be appended to a room_positions for further processing. This means if I shift all the rooms to a different collision layer, the player/character instance would be alone with the TileMap on the same collision layer.
So I just added a simple room.collision_layer = 3 changing this section of the code to
for room in $Rooms.get_children():
if randf() < cull:
room.queue_free()
else:
room.mode = RigidBody2D.MODE_STATIC
room.collision_layer = 3
room_positions.append(Vector3(room.position.x, room.position.y, 0))
It doesn't seem to have changed anything, the player still spawns outside the room.
Do you see the rooms spread outwards?
You didn't write code to move the rooms. Sure, the code gives them a random position. But even if you set their position to Vector2.ZERO they move outwards, avoiding overlaps.
Why? Because these rooms are RigidBody2D, and they do push other physics objects. Such as other rooms or the player character.
That's the problem: These rooms are RigidBody2D, and you put your KinematicBody2D player character on top of one of them. The RigidBody2D pushes it out.
The tutorial you followed is exploiting this behavior of RigidBody2Ds to spread the rooms. However you don't need these RigidBody2D after you are done populating your TileMap.
Instead, you can store the start position in a variable for later placing the player character (you don't need offsets - by the way - the position of the room is the center of the room), and then remove the RigidBody2Ds. If you want to keep the code that writes the text, you would also have to modify it, so it does not fail when the room no longer exists.
Alternatively, you can edit their collision layer and mask so they don't collide with the player character (or anything for that matter, but why would you want these RigidBody2Ds that collide with nothing?).
Addendum post edit: Collision layers and mask don't work as you expect.
First of all, the collision layer and mask are flags. The values of the layers are powers of two (1, 2, 4, 8...). So, when you set it to 3, it is the layer 1 plus the layer 2. So it still collides with a collision mask of 1.
And second, even if you changed the collision layer of the rooms to 2 (so it does not match the collision mask of 1 that the player character has). The player character still has a layer 1 which match the collision mask of the rooms.
See also the proposal Make physics layers and masks logic simple and consistent.
Thus, you would need to change the layer and mask. Both. in such way that they don't collide. For example, you can set layer and mask to 0 (which disable all collisions). The algorithm that populates the TileMap does not use the layer and mask.
Note: for this I am using a program called spritebuilder, which allows me to create a game with less code than would normally be needed. If you know a solution that's just all code, then by all means feel free to share it :)
Also, for this question, I followed a tutorial at this link: Build Your Own Flappy Bird Clone. Just scroll down to the part that says: "Loop the Ground"
So here's my problem. Im currently working on a game, and I created a camera which scrolls vertically long with the character sprite i created, however i need a certain image to loop. When the image leaves the bottom part of the screen I would like it to loop around to the top of the screen, infinitely. For this i created two identical images (in this case its the bark of a tree). One will be on screen, while the other will be offscreen, so as the first image leaves the screen, the second will replace it (seamlessly). I created two objects for the images, and assigned them the name _ground1, and _ground2, and I also created an NSArray in which to store them in. (Please refer to the link above if it is somewhat confusing)
Here is the code that I have:
CCNode *_ground1;
CCNode *_ground2;
NSArray *_grounds;
for (CCNode *ground in _grounds) {
// get the world position of the ground
CGPoint groundWorldPosition = [_physicsNode convertToWorldSpace:ground.position];
// get the screen position of the ground
CGPoint groundScreenPosition = [self convertToNodeSpace:groundWorldPosition];
// if the left corner is one complete width off the screen, move it to the right
if (groundScreenPosition.y <(-1 * ground.contentSize.height)) {
ground.position = ccp(ground.position.x , ground.position.y + 2 * ground.contentSize.height);
}
For some reason when I try this, it doesnt seem to work. what happens is that, the camera will travel vertically as it is meant to do, but the images do not loop. Once the two images leave the bottom of the screen, no new images replace them.
i also done this project as above tutorials. it work fine but you have some mistake to set variable in spritebuilder. in your above code replce code as and try it. you only put less than may be it issue.
if (groundScreenPosition.y <=(-1 * ground.contentSize.height)) {
ground.position = ccp(ground.position.x , ground.position.y + 2 * ground.contentSize.height);
}
You are using CCNode objects as _ground1and _ground2.
CCNode objects usually do not have a contentSize, they will return 0 unless you explicitly set them inSpriteBuilder`.
Make sure that you are using CCSprite objects in SpriteBuilder and in your code.
Also, as a friendly hint you should also consider refactoring (renaming) your sprites with more meaningful names for your use case like _treeBark1 and treeBark2 for example.
I have a circle-shaped dynamic body and I need to resize it during the game (It appears like a point, then it grows to a circle and after that it starts moving). How should I do that?
I have an idea - it's to use some animation (Circle has the same radius, but due to animation it looks like the circle grows), but I'm not sure if it's right way or not. (Besides I don't know how to realize it)
For scaling circle, if you are using sprite just scale it sprite.setScale(float), if your sprite is attached to Box2d Circle-shape then get the Body's shape and set the radius
Shape shape = body.getFixture().getShape;
shape.setRadius(radiusValue);
and if you are using ShapeRenderer just multiply the points of ShapeRenderer.
I assume that you are talking about a Box2D body.
It is not possible to change a circle-shaped fixture with Box2D. Box2D is a rigid body simulator. What you would have to do is destroy the fixture and replace it with a smaller/bigger version of the circle. But this will cause a lot of problems, since you cannot destroy a fixture when there is still a contact for example.
It would be better to keep the circle the same size and just simulate a change in size with an animation of a texture on top.
If you cannot simulate that, then maybe try the following approach: Have several versions of that circle in different sizes and keep them on top of each other. Implement a ContactFilter which will only cause contacts for the one circle which is currently "active".
Inside any Object class with box2d, I use the following for dynamic resizing:
public void resize(float newradius) {
this.body.destroyFixture(this.fixture);
fixtureDef.density = (float) (this.mass/(Math.PI*newradius*newradius));
this.radius = newradius;
CircleShape circle = new CircleShape();
circle.setRadius(newradius);
this.fixtureDef.shape = circle;
circle.dispose();
this.fixture = body.createFixture(fixtureDef);
this.fixture.setUserData(this);
}
You can also see the following topic: How to change size after it has been created
I'm writing program about Kinect skeleton track program.While the Definition of the gesture is written in the program. I want the definition of gesture to be defined by the user.One way of doing this is by DFA. I don't konw how to start with C#. Can any one help?
Try using Lists to store the coordinates of the skeleton's joints (kind of a buffer) and then you could maybe run a DFA. you could define your transitions as a range of coordinates for every direction , and the final state would be when the elements in the buffer are approximativily in the same area.
So in C# you will need to create a datatype to save the sequece of the gesture that will get updated when the user adds one.Lists for buffers as I stated below.
When saving the gesture your code will look like :
While(!Joint_stable && (i < buffer.count() ) )
{
While ((buffer.Joint.ElementAt(i+1).X-buffer.Joint.ElementAt(i)).X>0 && (buffer.Joint.ElementAt(i+1)-buffer.Joint.ElementAt(i).Y )>0 ) //Think about adding tolerence here
{
Gesture.add("Upper_Right");
}
...
}
Just an advice , the kinect sensor is not that accurate so try to establish a kind of tolerance.
I Hope that my answer will help you or at least give you some inspiration :)
I'm having trouble with physics in unity 3d. I'm wanting my ball to bounce off of walls and go another direction. When the ball hits the wall it just bounces straight back. I have tried changing the direction to be orthogonal to the direction it hits the wall but it doesn't change direction. Due to this, the ball just keeps hitting the wall and bouncing straight back.
Secondly, sometimes the ball goes through the wall. The walls have box colliders while the ball has a sphere collider. They all have continuous dynamic as the collision detection mode.
Here's a link to a similar thread:
http://forum.unity3d.com/threads/22063-I-shot-an-arrow-up-in-the-air...?highlight=shooting+arrow
Personally, I would code the rotation using LookAt as GargarathSunman suggests in this link, but if you want to do it with physics, you'll probably need to build the javelin in at least a couple of parts, as the others suggest in the link, and add different drag and angular drag values to each part,perhaps density as well. If you threw a javelin in a vacuum, it would never land point down because air drag plays such an important part (all things fall at the same rate regardless of mass, thank you Sir Isaac Newton). It's a difficult simulation for the physics engine to get right.
Maybe try to get the collider point between your sphere and your wall then catch your rigidbody velocity and revert it by the collision point normal.
an example of a script to do that ---> (put this script on a wall with collider )
C# script:
public class WallBumper : MonoBehaviour
{
private Vector3 _revertDirection;
public int speedReflectionVector = 2;
/***********************************************
* name : OnCollisionEnter
* return type : void
* Make every gameObject with a RigidBody bounce againt this platform
* ********************************************/
void OnCollisionEnter(Collision e)
{
ContactPoint cp = e.contacts[0];
_revertDirection = Vector3.Reflect(e.rigidbody.velocity, cp.normal * -1);
e.rigidbody.velocity = (_revertDirection.normalized * speedReflectionVector);
}
}
I recently has an issue with a rocket going through targets due to speed and even with continuous dynamic collision detection I couldn't keep this from happening a lot.
I solved this using a script "DontGoThroughThings" posted in wiki.unity3d.com. This uses raycasting between current and previous positions and then ensures the frame ends with the colliders connected for messages an OnTrigger event. Has worked everytime since and it's just a matter of attaching the script so super easy to use.
I think the physics answer is as others have suggested to use multiple components with different drag although typically I think you only want a single RigidBody on the parent. Instead of direction using transform.LookAt you could try and calculate using Quaternion.LookRotation from the rigidbody.velocity. Then use Vector3.Angle to find out how much are are off. The greater the angle diference the more force should be experienced and then use RigidBody.ApplyTorque. Maybe use the Sin(angleDifference) * a constant so less force is applied to torque as you approach proper rotation.
Here is some code I used on my rocket although you'll have to substitute some things as I was pointing toward a fixed target and you'll want to use your velocity.
var rotationDirection = Quaternion.LookRotation(lockedTarget.transform.position - this.transform.position);
var anglesToGo = Vector3.Angle(this.transform.rotation.eulerAngles, rotationDirection.eulerAngles);
if (anglesToGo > RotationVelocity)
{
var rotationDirectionToMake = (rotationDirection * Quaternion.Inverse(this.transform.rotation)).eulerAngles.normalized * RotationVelocity;
transform.Rotate(rotationDirectionToMake);
}