There is a json result like this below, and I need to check if a specific value is contained in shop_ids, for example, 232323 is contained, while 232324 is not. Is it possible to achieve that with JSON Schema? How?
{
"request":{
"0":{
"cids":{
"0":"a",
"1":"b",
"2":"c",
"3":"d",
"4":"e",
"5":"f",
"6":"g",
"7":"h"
},
"data_type":"1",
"key_type":"1",
"one_item_id":"0",
"queries":{
"0":{
"0":"query1"
},
"1":{
"0":"query2"
}
},
"shop_ids":{
"0":"11111",
"1":"232323",
"2":"33333",
"3":"124151",
"4":"55555",
"5":"12121"
},
"num":"30"
}
}
}
note: the shop_ids may contain more numeric fields, not just 0-5.
I tried "patternProperties", it does work for checking specific key-value but returns fail on other key-value. What I need is just any of "shop_ids" match the specific value is ok.
Related
I have a json with several keys being a number instead of a fixed string. Is there any way I could bypass them in order to access the nested values?
{
"55568509":{
"registers":{
"001":{
"isPlausible":false,
"deviceNumber":"55501223",
"register":"001",
"readingValue":"5295",
"readingDate":"2021-02-25T00:00:00.000Z"
}
}
}
}
My expected output here would be 5295, but since 59668509 can vary from json to json, JSON_QUERY(data, '$."59668509".registers."001".readingValue) would not be an option. I'm not able to use regexp here because this is only a part of the original json, which contains more than this.
UPDATE: full json with multiple occurrences:
This is how my whole json looks like. I would like all the readingValue in brackets, in the example below, my expected output would be [32641, 00964].
WITH test_table ( data ) AS (
SELECT
'{
"session":{
"sessionStartDate":"2021-02-26T12:03:34+0000",
"interactionDate":"2021-02-26T12:04:19+0000",
"sapGuid":"369F01DFXXXXXXXXXX8553F40CE282B3",
"agentId":"USER001",
"channel":"XXX",
"bpNumber":"5551231234",
"contractAccountNumber":"55512312345",
"contactDirection":"",
"contactMethod":"Z08",
"interactionId":"5550848784",
"isResponsibleForPayingBill":"Yes"
},
"payload":{
"agentId":"USER001",
"contractAccountNumber":"55512312345",
"error":{
"55549271":{
"registers":{
"001":{
"isPlausible":false,
"deviceNumber":"55501223",
"register":"001",
"readingValue":"32641",
"readingDate":"2021-02-26T00:00:00.000Z"
}
},
"errors":[
{
"contractNumber":"55501231",
"language":"EN",
"errorCode":"62",
"errorText":"Error Text1",
"isHardError":false
},
{
"contractNumber":"55501232",
"language":"EN",
"errorCode":"62",
"errorText":"Error Text2",
"isHardError":false
}
],
"bpNumber":"5557273667"
},
"55583693":{
"registers":{
"001":{
"isPlausible":false,
"deviceNumber":"555121212",
"register":"001",
"readingValue":"00964",
"readingDate":"2021-02-26T00:00:00.000Z"
}
},
"errors":[
],
"bpNumber":"555123123"
}
}
}
}'
FROM
dual
)
SELECT
JSON_QUERY(data, '$.payload.error.*.registers.*[*].readingValue') AS reading_value
FROM
test_table;
UPDATE 2:
Solved, this would do the trick, upvoting the first comment.
JSON_QUERY(data, '$.payload.error.*.registers.*.readingValue' WITH WRAPPER) AS read_value
As I explained in the comment to your question, if you are getting that result from the JSON you posted, you are not using JSON_QUERY(); you must be using JSON_VALUE(). Either that, or there's something else you didn't share with us.
In any case, let's say you are using JSON_VALUE() with the arguments you showed. You are asking, how can you modify the path so that the top-level attribute name is not hard-coded. That is trivial: use asterisk (*) instead of the hard-coded name. (This would work the same with JSON_QUERY() - it's about JSON paths, not the specific function that uses them.)
with test_table (data) as (
select
'{
"59668509":{
"registers":{
"001":{
"isPlausible":false,
"deviceNumber":"40157471",
"register":"001",
"readingValue":"5295",
"readingDate":"2021-02-25T00:00:00.000Z"
}
}
}
}' from dual
)
select json_value (data, '$.*."registers"."001"."readingValue"'
returning number) as reading_value
from test_table
;
READING_VALUE
-------------
5295
As an aside that is not related to your question in any way: In your JSON you have an object with a single attribute named "registers", whose value is another object with a single attribute "001", and in turn, this object has an attribute named "register" with value "001". Does that make sense to you? It doesn't to me.
I am currently working on an application that uses MongoDB as the data repository. I am mainly concerned about the graphLookup query to establish links between different people, based on what flights they took. My document contains an array field, that in turn contains key value pairs. I need to establish the links based on one of the key:value pairs of that array.
I have already tried some queries of aggregation pipeline with $graphLookup as one of the stages and they have all worked fine. But now that I am trying to use it with an array, I am hitting a blank.
Below is the array field from the first document :
"movementSegments":[
{
"carrierCode":"MO269",
"departureDateTimeMillis":1550932676000,
"arrivalDateTimeMillis":1551019076000,
"departurePort":"DOH",
"arrivalPort":"LHR",
"departurePortText":"HAMAD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT",
"arrivalPortText":"LONDON HEATHROW",
"serviceNameText":"",
"serviceKey":"BA007_1550932676000",
"departurePortLatLong":"25.273056,51.608056",
"arrivalPortLatLong":"51.4706,-0.461941",
"departureWeeklyTemporalSpatialWindow":"DOH_8",
"departureMonthlyTemporalSpatialWindow":"DOH_2",
"arrivalWeeklyTemporalSpatialWindow":"LHR_8",
"arrivalMonthlyTemporalSpatialWindow":"LHR_2"
}
]
The other document has the below field :
"movementSegments":[
{
"carrierCode":"MO269",
"departureDateTimeMillis":1548254276000,
"arrivalDateTimeMillis":1548340676000,
"departurePort":"DOH",
"arrivalPort":"LHR",
"departurePortText":"HAMAD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT",
"arrivalPortText":"LONDON HEATHROW",
"serviceNameText":"",
"serviceKey":"BA003_1548254276000",
"departurePortLatLong":"25.273056,51.608056",
"arrivalPortLatLong":"51.4706,-0.461941",
"departureWeeklyTemporalSpatialWindow":"DOH_4",
"departureMonthlyTemporalSpatialWindow":"DOH_1",
"arrivalWeeklyTemporalSpatialWindow":"LHR_4",
"arrivalMonthlyTemporalSpatialWindow":"LHR_1"
},
{
"carrierCode":"MO270",
"departureDateTimeMillis":1548254276000,
"arrivalDateTimeMillis":1548340676000,
"departurePort":"DOH",
"arrivalPort":"LHR",
"departurePortText":"HAMAD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT",
"arrivalPortText":"LONDON HEATHROW",
"serviceNameText":"",
"serviceKey":"BA003_1548254276000",
"departurePortLatLong":"25.273056,51.608056",
"arrivalPortLatLong":"51.4706,-0.461941",
"departureWeeklyTemporalSpatialWindow":"DOH_4",
"departureMonthlyTemporalSpatialWindow":"DOH_1",
"arrivalWeeklyTemporalSpatialWindow":"LHR_4",
"arrivalMonthlyTemporalSpatialWindow":"LHR_1"
}
]
And I am running the below query :
db.person_events.aggregate([
{ $match: { eventId: "22446688" } },
{
$graphLookup: {
from: 'person_events',
startWith: '$movementSegments.carrierCode',
connectFromField: 'carrierCode',
connectToField: 'carrierCode',
as: 'carrier_connections'
}
}
])
The above query creates an array field in the document, but there are no values in it. As per the expectation, both my documents should get linked based on the carrier number.
Just to be clear about the query, the documents contain an eventId field, and the match pipeline returns one document to me after the match stage.
Well, I don't know how I missed it, but here is the solution to my problem which gives me the required results :
db.person_events.aggregate([
{ $match: { eventId: "22446688" } },
{
$graphLookup: {
from: 'person_events',
startWith: '$movementSegments.carrierCode',
connectFromField: 'movementSegments.carrierCode',
connectToField: 'movementSegments.carrierCode',
as: 'carrier_connections'
}
}
])
I am getting one JSON file from SFTP and trying it to insert into oracle but in the preview section i am getting only one row and only one row inserting into table. I already tried to modify to number to preview rows to 10000 but nothing working out.
{"postal_code":"XX","build_id":"XX","categories":[],"closed":false,"closed_reasons":[],"email":["XX"],"external_link":{"facebook":[],"yelp":[""]},"hq":false,"location":{"lat":xxxxx,"lon":xxxxx},"metro":"Cxxxxx, IL","naics_codes":[{"category_code":"XX","category_description":"XX"},{"category_code":"XX","category_description":"xxxxx "},{"category_code":"XX","category_description":"xxxxx "},{"category_code":xxxxx","category_description":"XX"}],"name":"XX","place_id":"XX","place_ids":["xxx","xx"],"sic_codes":[{"category_code":"XX","category_description":"XX"},{"category_code":"XX","category_description":"XX"}]}
Your example json is:
{
"postal_code":"XX",
"build_id":"XX",
"categories":[],
"closed":false,
"closed_reasons":[],
"email":["XX"],
"external_link":{
"facebook":[],
"yelp":[""]
},
"hq":false,
"location":{
"lat":xxxxx,
"lon":xxxxx
},
"metro":"Cxxxxx, IL",
"naics_codes":[
{
"category_code":"XX",
"category_description":"XX"
},
{
"category_code":"XX",
"category_description":"xxxxx "
},
{
"category_code":"XX",
"category_description":"xxxxx "
},
{
"category_code":xxxxx",
"category_description":"XX"
}
],
"name":"XX",
"place_id":"XX",
"place_ids":["xxx","xx"],
"sic_codes":[
{
"category_code":"XX",
"category_description":"XX"
},
{
"category_code":"XX",
"category_description":"XX"
}
]
}
So, if that's the total values in the response you're getting from the SFTP server, Pentaho is behaving well, because it's only one record. If you want PDI to recognize the fields inside that json, and split it's content, you need to specify the path to each field on the "Path" field available on the "Fields" tab on the "Json Input" step.
Try using the input json file as follows:
{
"data" : [
{"key":"val","key":"val"},
{"key":"val","key":"val"},
{"key":"val","key":"val"},
{"id":"666","name":"jnit"}
]
}
I have a problem when querying mongoDB with nested objects notation:
db.messages.find( { headers : { From: "reservations#marriott.com" } } ).count()
0
db.messages.find( { 'headers.From': "reservations#marriott.com" } ).count()
5
I can't see what I am doing wrong. I am expecting nested object notation to return the same result as the dot notation query. Where am I wrong?
db.messages.find( { headers : { From: "reservations#marriott.com" } } )
This queries for documents where headers equals { From: ... }, i.e. contains no other fields.
db.messages.find( { 'headers.From': "reservations#marriott.com" } )
This only looks at the headers.From field, not affected by other fields contained in, or missing from, headers.
Dot-notation docs
Since there is a lot of confusion about queries MongoDB collection with sub-documents, I thought its worth to explain the above answers with examples:
First I have inserted only two objects in the collection namely: message as:
> db.messages.find().pretty()
{
"_id" : ObjectId("5cce8e417d2e7b3fe9c93c32"),
"headers" : {
"From" : "reservations#marriott.com"
}
}
{
"_id" : ObjectId("5cce8eb97d2e7b3fe9c93c33"),
"headers" : {
"From" : "reservations#marriott.com",
"To" : "kprasad.iitd#gmail.com"
}
}
>
So what is the result of query: db.messages.find({headers: {From: "reservations#marriott.com"} }).count()
It should be one because these queries for documents where headers equal to the object {From: "reservations#marriott.com"}, only i.e. contains no other fields or we should specify the entire sub-document as the value of a field.
So as per the answer from #Edmondo1984
Equality matches within sub-documents select documents if the subdocument matches exactly the specified sub-document, including the field order.
From the above statements, what is the below query result should be?
> db.messages.find({headers: {To: "kprasad.iitd#gmail.com", From: "reservations#marriott.com"} }).count()
0
And what if we will change the order of From and To i.e same as sub-documents of second documents?
> db.messages.find({headers: {From: "reservations#marriott.com", To: "kprasad.iitd#gmail.com"} }).count()
1
so, it matches exactly the specified sub-document, including the field order.
For using dot operator, I think it is very clear for every one. Let's see the result of below query:
> db.messages.find( { 'headers.From': "reservations#marriott.com" } ).count()
2
I hope these explanations with the above example will make someone more clarity on find query with sub-documents.
The two query mechanism work in different ways, as suggested in the docs at the section Subdocuments:
When the field holds an embedded document (i.e, subdocument), you can either specify the entire subdocument as the value of a field, or “reach into” the subdocument using dot notation, to specify values for individual fields in the subdocument:
Equality matches within subdocuments select documents if the subdocument matches exactly the specified subdocument, including the field order.
In the following example, the query matches all documents where the value of the field producer is a subdocument that contains only the field company with the value 'ABC123' and the field address with the value '123 Street', in the exact order:
db.inventory.find( {
producer: {
company: 'ABC123',
address: '123 Street'
}
});
With SQL we can do the following :
select * from x where concat(x.y ," ",x.z) like "%find m%"
when x.y = "find" and x.z = "me".
How do I do the same thing with MongoDB, When I use a JSON structure similar to this:
{
data:
[
{
id:1,
value : "find"
},
{
id:2,
value : "me"
}
]
}
The comparison to SQL here is not valid since no relational database has the same concept of embedded arrays that MongoDB has, and is provided in your example. You can only "concat" between "fields in a row" of a table. Basically not the same thing.
You can do this with the JavaScript evaluation of $where, which is not optimal, but it's a start. And you can add some extra "smarts" to the match as well with caution:
db.collection.find({
"$or": [
{ "data.value": /^f/ },
{ "data.value": /^m/ }
],
"$where": function() {
var items = [];
this.data.forEach(function(item) {
items.push(item.value);
});
var myString = items.join(" ");
if ( myString.match(/find m/) != null )
return 1;
}
})
So there you go. We optimized this a bit by taking the first characters from your "test string" in each word and compared the tokens to each element of the array in the document.
The next part "concatenates" the array elements into a string and then does a "regex" comparison ( same as "like" ) on the concatenated result to see if it matches. Where it does then the document is considered a match and returned.
Not optimal, but these are the options available to MongoDB on a structure like this. Perhaps the structure should be different. But you don't specify why you want this so we can't advise a better solution to what you want to achieve.