Setup: OTP 26. IntelliJ 2022.3.1 with plugins Erlang 0.11.1162 and Makefile 223.8214.6
Code under preview: The test suite ct_netconfc_SUITE. We could run it from CLI using the command make common_test_test ARGS="-suite ct_netconfc_SUITE".
Goal: I want to debug test suite ct_netconfc_SUITE.
I have set breakpoints in the code. I have created a configuration using Run-->Edit Configurations for the make command specified above. I tried to debug using Run-->Debug-->Makefile-->Run. It successfully runs the configuration. But it did not stop at the breakpoint.
How to stop at the breakpoint?
Other than IntelliJ, what are the other options to debug an Erlang application with Makefile?
Installed Plugins
Debug Configurations created for the make command
Debugging command
I think you can use io:format function to debug what you want in the code, for example, print out List attribute:
io:format("I_want_to_print_this_List_~p", [List]).
In erlang, not like other programming languages (java, c#, c++) that can add breakpoints in there, with erlang if you have a million processes are running every second and over a hundred functions, that means impossible to add breakpoins to debug one by one.
As the comment of MadScientist, Makefile just helps us stop/start/build... application or which tool or script.
Related
Due to:
extensive usage of code auto-generation (notably for the .isa instruction and decoder sublanguage)
scons symlinking sources into the build tree, and in particular symlinking src/arch/ARCH to src/ARCH
it becomes very hard to setup Eclipse to work well with gem5.
Has anyone managed to achieve a good setup? Especially interested in Linux hosts.
I have achieved a very good setup with the following horrendous hack: define the Eclipse project inside the build/ARM directory itself!
This is done by creating a "New makefile project with existing code" in the build directory. You will also want to fix the C++ standard library as mentioned at: How to solve "Unresolved inclusion: <iostream>" in a C++ file in Eclipse CDT?
This works amazingly because the way the gem5 build system works as of May 2020, the build/ARM directory contains exactly the final compilation tree, including all the source symlinks and autogenerated code,.
This setup is not perfect because there is still some C++ stuff in build/ outside of ARM, e.g. ext, but 99% of the time we don't care about those, and I can perfectly navigate key autogenerated code such as instructions and decoder.
I then just build via the command line normally with scons.
Humongous autogenerated files like exec-ns.cc.inc turn on Eclipse's large file limited mode. Notably, if you want to jump to a definition, Ctrl + click does not work for me, so I just copy the symbol of interest and Ctrl + Shift + T to go to its definition.
I don't usually bother to try GDB step debug gem5 through Eclipse and use it mostly for code navigation, since GDB Dashboard tends to work well enough for me, and I often need to do new log collection runs and I sometimes use reverse debugging when things get serious.
But I have tested step debugging through Eclipse, and it did work normally (no reason not to I guess), you just have to set it up in exactly the same was as for any other C++ application with a Makefile, i.e. basically tell eclipse the Binary name and the desired CLI on the debug configurations.
You have of course as usual to choose between a gem5.debug debug build or a gem5.opt build, where the .debug build is about 10-20x slower but gives greater debug visibility. In general, if the time to reach the point of interest in a debug build starts to annoy you however, what you tend to really want is to do use reverse debugging.
This is also mentioned at: https://cirosantilli.com/linux-kernel-module-cheat/#gem5-eclipse-configuration
Tested in Eclipse 2020-03.
Background:
I've been using Eclipse for a while and am trying out Intellij now.
I checked out my project from Git (via Intellij) and recognized it as a gradle project. Its created the WAR(& the exploded WAR) all of which are fine.
Question:
When I was using Eclipse, I used the command:
gradlew -Penv=Development :my_webapp:assemble
This used to do a few things including creating a environment.properties file that my dev specific env could use (for selecting database instances etc) based off of -Penv=Development...I'd like the Intellij gradle build to do the same... What's a way to configure Intellij's gradle process to do these custom things or provide same features as provided by this specific command line tool (Note - the code for this is already written in build.gradle file)...
I looked at some of Intellij's docs, but could not find an answer to this.
EDIT:
I've found the solution, for anyone interested - read on...
Seeking guidance from #Stanislav, I was able to add the property as follows:
In your server's run configuration (Run/Debug Configuration -->Your server's config(Jetty etc), there is a section called Before launch, which should have Make/Build Gradle already included
Hit the + sign -->Run Gradle Task --> Select your gradle project (i.e. the web app) --> Select the task (most likely loadEnvironmentConfiguration) --> set the script parameters such as -Penv=Development, hit OK
Move this to before the Build Gradle function (by using the up arrow - to the right of + sign you hit in step 2)
It seems, that you need to create your specific run or debug configuration. You can read about it in official IntelliJ Idea help. All you need, is to modify your configuration for the task you need, by providing the argument -Penv=Development, since it is running with gradle.
You may also need to define Gradle instance, which will be used via settings, if the defaul wrapper wont work for you. You can find almost all you need in the the official help.
When building the project from command line using mvn clean install everything builds without any issues.
When running some tests that use precompiled C libraries from IntelliJ, tests fail with java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError
I may be completely off here, but does IntelliJ not see the .so file? Is so, how can it be added please?
Shared library fails to load with UnsatisfiedLinkError if:
it's not in the working directory configured in the test run configuration.
it's not in PATH environment (on Mac Terminal and GUI apps have different environment, see this answer). Run IDEA from the Terminal open -a /Applications/IntelliJ\ IDEA\ 12.app/ to make environment the same.
it's not in the location specified using -Djava.library.path VM option.
.so depends on some other library that is not found for any of the 1-3 reasons (or the dependency of that dependency is not found, etc).
I followed Apple's instructions to set up Unit Testing in my project. I followed the directions for making them dependent, so the tests run with every build of my main project. This works, and when my tests pass, the application runs; when they don't, I get build errors on the lines of the unit tests that failed.
I would like, however, to be able to step through my application code when the tests are failing, but can't get Xcode (3.2.5) configured properly. The project is a Mac project, not iOS.
I tried the instructions here and here, but execution never stopped at the breakpoints I set, neither in the the unit test code or in my application code. After following the first set of instructions, the breakpoints I set turned yellow with blue outlines, and I don't know what that meant, either. What do I need to do to step through my tests?
Update
I found another page attempting to solve this problem (here) by adding arguments and environment variables to my main executable, but again, those didn't cause execution to stop at my breakpoints. I also noticed that my test's (copious) log statements aren't showing up in my Debugger Console, either.
I also found out that the yellow breakpoints mean the code there can't be found at runtime. These are in my test case class, so that definitely seems to explain why those aren't firing.
I usually have no problem debugging my OCTest tests with Xcode 3.2, including halting at breakpoints.
The basic idea is to tell gdb to launch otest with your bundle as argument. You will do that by adding /Developer/Tools/otest as a custom executable to your Xcode project, then your OCTest bundle name as the sole argument (choose "Edit Active Executable otest" in the Project menu, and in the second tab add a line with Foo.octest in the top box to debug the Foo test).
Now if you hit the debug button it will start debugging your test bundle right now, and will stop at the declared breakpoints (if you hit build and debug it might not start if the test does not pass). Also note that you will maybe have to set an environment variable to YES to disable garbage collection (in the bottom box of the same "Arguments" tab), otest will tell you exactly which if you need.
If you did everything above and are still unable do step into your test code, this might either be because it is compiled with debug symbol generation turned off - check your debug build settings, but most likely because the test code is not recompiled at all. I say most likely, since your logs are not showing in the console, NSLog should write in the Xcode console. Clean your build and bin folders manually, sometimes when you change a path or a name you end up loading obsolete code. You might also want to check that the file has not jumped out of the test target (is the failing test in the same not-logging file ?).
I have a variant of what Hiedi Utley posted at http://hiediutley.wordpress.com/2011/03/08/xcode3-debugging-ios-unit-tests/. What I did not like about it is the duplication of unit test bundle targets, one that contained a Run Script phase to execute the unit tests after building, and another that did not run the unit tests. I had noticed in the Get Info pane for the Run Script phase the toggle "Run script only when installing" and thought that that would be a way to toggle between running the unit tests in normal mode and running them in the debugger.
As per Hiedi's instructions, create a new Executable item, say LogicTestsGDB. Configure it like so:
General Tab:
Path: Developer/usr/bin/otest (No leading /)
Path Type: Relative to Current SDK
Set the working directory to: Build Products directory
Arguments Tab:
Arguments: Your UnitTest Bundle (eg. LogicTests.octest)
Variables to be set in the environment
DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH ... : ${BUILD_PRODUCTS_DIR}:${DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH}
DYLD_FRAMEWORK_PATH . : ${SDKROOT}/Developer/Library/Frameworks
DYLD_ROOT_PATH ...... : ${SDKROOT}
IPHONE_SIMULATOR_ROOT : ${SDKROOT}
OBJC_DISABLE_GC : YES
DYLD_NEW_LOCAL_SHARED_REGIONS : YES
DYLD_NO_FIX_PREBINDING : YES
CFFIXED_USER_HOME : ${HOME}/Library/Application Support/iPhone Simulator/
Done. Now to debug your unit tests,
Expose the bundle's build phases and double-click on the Run Script phase.
Check the Run script only when installing option
Set the Active Target to be the unit test bundle (eg. LogicTests.octest).
Set the Active Executable to be the new executable created (eg. LogicTestsGDB)
Click Build and Debug
To run normally, executing unit tests as part of the build phase of the application:
Expose the bundle's build phases and double-click on the Run Script phase.
Uncheck the Run script only when installing option
Set the Active Target to be the application being built
Set the Active Executable to be the application being built
To automate the steps above, I created a simple AppleScript script that toggles between the two states:
property kApplicationName : "MyApp" -- name of the normal application to build
property kUnitTestName : "LogicTests" -- name of the bundle target to debug
property kUnitTestRunner : "LogicTestGDB" -- name of the executable to use when debugging the unit test bundle
tell application "Xcode"
tell the active project document
set theTarget to first target whose name is kUnitTestName
set thePhase to first run script phase of theTarget
if name of active target is kApplicationName then
set active target to theTarget
set theExecutable to first executable whose name is kUnitTestRunner
set active executable to theExecutable
set run only when installing of thePhase to true
else
set theTarget to first target whose name is kApplicationName
set active target to theTarget
set theExecutable to first executable whose name is kApplicationName
set active executable to theExecutable
set run only when installing of thePhase to false
end if
return "Targeting " & (name of active executable)
end tell
end tell
I also tried the solutions in the links you provided with, but none worked for me, too. But then I found this one: http://hiediutley.wordpress.com/2011/03/08/xcode3-debugging-ios-unit-tests/ -- it works like a charm :) Fresh stuff, too.
develop your unit tests so they wrap a program which resides in a project which has a target, then just open the dependent project and work in it. this would likely be a project with a library and an executable which calls through the library (2 targets). then you can just open the project and debug, while your unit tests in the dependency would then call through this library. this is a more modular approach.
good luck
The only thing that ended up working for me was upgrading to Xcode 4. It integrates beautifully. There was a little bit of pain in moving over to it, but now that it's over with, the integration is great. I'm fully able to step through my tests and application code.
I have looked at build result for a simple hello world console app to see command line for compilation. Why is it so complex ? How can I then automate things if it is such complex ?
If you intend to automate builds of Xcode projects, use xcodebuild(1).
Your xcodeproj file contains all of the settings that you would need to specify on the command line if you were to call gcc directly. If you run xcodebuild all you need to do is specify your xcodeproj file, the target, the configuration, and the SDK to use. Everything else is done automatically.
Run "man xcodebuild" for more information.
XCode specifies an immense number of command line options for the compiler and linker with fully qualified path names. When working at the command line you'll frequently use defaults instead of specifying all the options the IDE does. Make or some other build tool is your friend for automation.