I'm probably missing something very obvious since I hadn't come across this question or an answer...but is it possible to allow for tab completion when a user is prompted to enter a mandatory parameter value, when they forgot to include the mandatory parameter?
Take the below sample code, if a user runs Test-TabComplete -number tab completion obviously works as expected. But, if the user runs Test-TabComplete without -number and they're prompted to enter a number, tab completion won't work. The HelpMessage will at least give the user some assistance, but tab completion would be great. I'm assuming I'm meant to do something with argumentcompleter? But the ultimate goal is to accomplish tab completion in a dynamic parameter, so I'm not too sure how to use argumentcompleter there, either.
function Test-TabComplete
{
param
(
[Parameter(
Mandatory,
Position = 1,
HelpMessage = "Enter: 1, 2, 3"
)]
[validateset(1,2,3)]
[int]$number
)
}
Related
I'm trying to find a way to to exclude one field input in my form that is disabled and contains the value of a users ID number
I would like to know how I can tweak this.$refs.form.reset(); because it works perfectly but it clears EVERYTHING and I wish to contain the ID value and resets the rest of the fields like name surname age income etc
The reason why I the ID is important is that the user gives this in a sign-up step at the start and this form that I am talking about is located somewhere else to complete his profile I don't want to ask the user again to type his ID in again.
If anyone knows how to accomplish this it would be a great help
The reset method of the form simply looks at all the inputs bound to it and resets each one within a loop then empties the error bag, observe:
reset (): void {
this.inputs.forEach(input => input.reset())
this.resetErrorBag()
},
There's no reason you can't do the same, except for when they're disabled:
resetForm() {
this.$refs.form.inputs.forEach(input => {
if (!input.disabled) {
input.reset()
}
})
this.$refs.form.resetErrorBag() // necessary to remove validation errors after the field values are removed
}
Then you can call that function (against your Vue instance, not your VForm) with this.resetForm() and it should work out the way you want.
Disclaimer: Can't test it at the moment. input.disabled may not be readily available and may require further inspection of the input element.
I'm obviously missing something and hoping someone might be able to help.
I've an Interactive Grid, and a button.
When the button is pressed the dynamic action on the button has 2 steps.
Action 1 - Execute Javascript to take a value from one of the IG cells and put it into a page item.
Action 2 - Confirm Action - Are you sure you wish to delete &P10_JOB_ID.
I've made the page item, &P10_JOB_ID, visible and I can see the value has correctly been changed to the value from the IG.
I write P10_JOB_ID into a database table - I get the correct value
But the confirm message isn't picking up the correct value from P10_JOB_ID.
Namely it uses the value in P10_JOB_ID when the page starts, but then as I move around the IG pressing the button and changing the value of P10_JOB_ID, the text in the confirm message never changes.
Can anyone suggest what I might have missed, I'm baffled.
Thanks a lot
Substitutions like &P10_JOB_ID. are made when the page is rendered, not dynamically, so reflect the value at time of page load.
You will need to use Javascript to perform the conform action, something like:
apex.page.confirm ('Are you sure you wish to delete ' + $v('P10_JOB_ID') + '?', 'DELETE');
$v is an APEX Javascript function that returns the current value of a page item.
I used 'DELETE' as an example of a request value; you may want to do something different here.
Ok - having the setting of value and confirm as 2 separate actions is what causes the problem.
As per fac586
That is the expected behaviour. Static text substitutions are performed once during page show processing. They are not evaluated dynamically in the browser at runtime as values change.
Drop the second action and extend the first to display the confirm dialog using the apex.message.confirm JS API method, accessing the item value using the $v shorthand method.
I'm automating e2e tests with Protractor on an angular app.
However, I have an issue when sending keys on input fields.
The sendKeys would miss few characters everytime so I found a workaround :
static sendKeys(value, element){
value.split('').forEach((c) => element.sendKeys(c));
}
This works well but it takes more than 3 times the time the original sendKeys function would.
Well no problem my tests are still functionnal right ?
My app now has new fields with scripts behind them.
One of them is a datepicker input, you can either choose from the datePicker or type it manually. However, for today's date you would type 09022018 and the slashes are automatically appended at the right place (like so 09/02/2018). If you were to enter a wrong date the field is cleared.
Now back to the problem : it seems that both my implementation of sendKeys and the original one loose focus after each submitted key. This means that I can't enter a valid date in the input field as it's cleared after each simulated keypress.
I could use browser.executeScript to fix it but I wouldn't be able to test the functionnality adding slashes. Also, as you type, the datepicker is still open and refreshes after each keypress, you can select a date from it at any time and that is also a feature I want to test.
Thanks in advance
Use executeScript to set the date in backgrond, then use sendKeys to enter a space or Tab at the end to trigger the Keyborad event which will check the input and format the input with slash
function enterDate(date) {
var script = 'arguments[0].value=arguments[1]';
// input box for date
var dateBox = element(by.xxx(yyy));
browser.executeScript(script, dateBox, date);
dateBox.sendKeys(" ");
// or try send Tab
dateBox.sendKeys(protractor.Key.TAB);
}
enterDate('09022018');
You can try this solution on other fields you fixed but take 3 more time.
I'm baffled by this and hoping someone can explain this behavior to me.
I have a sample apex app here https://apex.oracle.com/pls/apex/f?p=126734:2 (admin credentials: username: guest pw: cubsarechamps).
I just want to enter a value on page 2 in text field P2_SOURCE and then click the button and be redirected to page 3 and have the value from P2_SOURCE populate P3_TARGET. I know that I need to set the value of P2_SOURCE in session and so I created a 'lose focus' dynamic action with a plsql process of null that also submits P2_SOURCE.
After I enter '123' in P2_SOURCE I tab out of the field to trigger the DA, and then I click session in my developer toolbar and I can see that the value of P2_SOURCE is indeed '123'. Then I click my button to go to page 3 but nothing is passed to P3_TARGET (unless I actually submit my page first, which I shouldn't have to do, right?).
So my question is why P2_SOURCE isn't being passed to P3_TARGET. The item is set in session state so why is &P2_SOURCE. passing a null value when there is a value set in session? Can I not use page item substitutions unless I actually submit my page? The documentation seems to indicate this is supported functionality.
My button setup is like this:
Substitution Strings are evaluated when the page is loaded and so, it is NULL in your case as the page item contains no value in the beginning. I would either use Dynamic Action with JavaScript Expression or Branch Process.
How can I create test cases according to my requirement.
Example:
I have a form with many fields. There is one field name Father's Name, now I want that the user should insert only string in this field, no numeric values should be accepted.
I wanna carry out such cases and do testing using the tool. How can I do this in TestComplete?
So, you want to validate that the tested application correctly handles the situation when forbidden characters are entered in the field, right? If so, then the exact solution depends on what the application does when a forbidden character is entered:
1) The app shows an error box. In this case, make your test enter a forbidden char and check for the error box existence using the appropriate Wait* method (WaitWindow, WaitNamedChild, etc.). Short example from the top of my head (did not run the code):
var TextToEnter="First 123Name";
EditBox.Keys(TextToEnter);
// As a rule, validationg is performed when the focus changes
EditBox.Keys("[Tab]");
var ErrorBox = MainWnd.WaitNamedChild("wndErrorDlg", 5000);
if (ErrorBox.Exists)
Log.Message("Succeeded - the error box is shown");
else
Log.Error("Failed - no error box detected");
2) The app does not show any error, but just ignores the forbidden chars making them not to appear in the edit box. In this case, just compare the actual text against the expected text. Something like this:
var TextToEnter="First 123Name";
var TextToExpect="First Name";
EditBox.Keys(TextToEnter);
if (EditBox.wText == TextToExpect)
Log.Message("Succeeded");
else
Log.Error("Failed");
I hope this helps.