I have two tables in Bigquery from two different data sources, lets say x and y. I want to join these two tables on os_name, tracker_name, date, country columns. For that i am using concat function and joining like this:
full outer join x on concat(x.date,x.os_name,x.tracker_name, x.country) = concat(y.date,y.os_name,y.tracker_name,y.country_code)
as a query result common columns also gets duplicated. like in the result there is os_name and os_name_1, country_code, country_code_1 etc. columns. I don't want that. Final columns should be as in the example below in Final Table Schema.
I want to return all records from both sides. For example if there is no match in table y
y_install, and y_purcase will be 0, and vice versa.
X TABLE SCHEMA:
os_name,
tracker_name,
date ,
country
install
purchase
Y TABLE SCHEMA:
os_name,
tracker_name,
date,
country,
y_install,
y_purchase
Final Table Schema required:
os_name,
tracker_name,
date ,
country
install
purchase,
y_install,
y_purchase
I am going to schedule the query and write results to destination table at given interval.
Can you help me out with this query.
Regarding the final table, I don't understand whether you want to return first NON NULL result or whether you want to have e.g. an array which will contain both results from both tables in case both tables a valid value. In my sample table, do you want row 1,2 (actually the same thing) or 3?
row_number
x_install
y_install
final_table_install
1
23
50
23
2
NULL
50
50
3
23
50
[23,50]
It comes out that What I wanted to use was union all. First, I added the non-common columns to the two tables so that the schemas of the two tables are equal. So I was able to vertically merge tables using union all. Thanks for trying to help out anyway.
Related
I am trying to create a table that has columns called user_id and top5_foods (binary column). I currently have two tables, one has all of the user_ids and the foods associated with those user_ids and one table that only contains the top5 foods according to a type of calculation to select the top5 foods.
The table that I am trying to create if to have the column of the user_id and if at least one of their favorite foods is in the top_5_food table, put the value of the top5_foods as 1 and if not, 0.
Something like the following:
user_id top5_foods
----------------------
34223 1
43225 0
34323 1
I have tried to use the CASE command but it just duplicated the user_ids and mark 1 or 0 whenever it finds a food that is in the top_5_foods table. But I don't want it to duplicate. Could you please help ?
Thank you very much
If I understand correctly, a left join and aggregation:
select uf.user_id,
(count(t.food_id) > 0) as top5_foods
from user_foods uf left join
top5_foods t
on uf.food_id = t.food_id
group by uf.user_id;
I have a list of 12 strings (strings of numbers) that I need to compare to an existing table in Oracle. However I don't want to create a table just to do the compare; that takes more time than it is worth.
select
column_value as account_number
from
table(sys.odcivarchar2list('27001', '900480', '589358', '130740',
'807958', '579813', '1000100462', '656025',
'11046', '945287', '18193', '897603'))
This provides the correct result.
Now I want to compare that list of 12 against an actual table with account numbers to find the missing values. Normally with two tables I would do a left join table1.account_number = table2.account_number and table two results will have blanks. When I attempt that using the above, all I get are the results where the two records are equal.
select column_value as account_number, k.acct_num
from table(sys.odcivarchar2list('27001',
'900480',
'589358',
'130740',
'807958',
'579813',
'1000100462',
'656025',
'11046',
'945287',
'18193',
'897603'
)) left join
isi_owner.t_known_acct k on column_value = k.acct_num
9 match, but 3 should be included in table1 and blank in table2
Thoughts?
Sean
I have 2 tables: DisconnectionsData and DisconnectionsVoice.
both of them have columns: WeekNum,Month,Quarter,Year,IncomeLost and ID.
the names of the columns are different between the 2 tables, but the data inside them is parallel (Quarter and QuarterNumber is literally the same).
my wish is to FULL JOIN both tables into one table with only 6 columns.
i cant figure out how to make an alias, for example: how do i merge DisconnectionsData.Quarter and DisconnectionsVoice.QuarterNumber
into one column with the alias name of QuarterOfDisconnection.
that the desired result:
thank you.
You don't specify which sql are you using? You can try below.
SELECT *
FROM DisconnectionsData
UNION ALL
SELECT *
FROM DisconnectionsVoice
I am working on SQL Sever and I want to assign unique Id's to rows being pulled from those three tables, but the id's should not overlap.
Let's say, Table one contains cars data, table two contains house data, table three contains city data. I want to pull all this data into a single table with a unique id to each of them say cars from 1-100, house from 101 - 200 and city from 300- 400.
How can I achieve this using only select queries. I can't use insert statements.
To be more precise,
I have one table with computer systems/servers host information which has id from 500-700.
I have another tables, storage devices (id's from 200-600) and routers (ids from 700-900). I have already collected systems data. Now I want to pull storage systems and routers data in such a way that the consolidated data at my end should has a unique id for all records. This needs to be done only by using SELECT queries.
I was using SELECT ABS(CAST(CAST(NEWID() AS VARBINARY) AS INT)) AS UniqueID and storing it in temp tables (separate for storage and routers). But I believe that this may lead to some overlapping. Please suggest any other way to do this.
An extension to this question:
Creating consistent integer from a string:
All I have is various strings like this
String1
String2Hello123
String3HelloHowAreYou
I Need to convert them in to positive integers say some thing like
String1 = 12
String2Hello123 = 25
String3HelloHowAreYou = 4567
Note that I am not expecting the numbers in any order.Only requirement is number generated for one string should not conflict with other
Now later after the reboot If I do not have 2nd string instead there is a new string
String1 = 12
String3HelloHowAreYou = 4567
String2Hello123HowAreyou = 28
Not that the number 25 generated for 2nd string earlier can not be sued for the new string.
Using extra storage (temp tables) is not allowed
if you dont care where the data comes from:
with dat as (
select 't1' src, id from table1
union all
select 't2' src, id from table2
union all
select 't3' src, id from table3
)
select *
, id2 = row_number() over( order by _some_column_ )
from dat
I have numerical data related to clinical information from people with a particular disease recorded in an specific column ('Lab') from Table A.
I need to get a Table B with 30 rows and 50 columns.
The columns of Table B should be random samples from the values contained in column 'Lab' (nearly 3300 registers).
I am able to get a table with one column using:
SELECT Lab FROM Table_A sample (1) WHERE Lab IS NOT NULL;
Is it possible make a query using the SELECT command that results in Table B with all its 50 columns without the need of getting its columns one by one?
You can use the RAND operator with ORDER BY, like this:
SELECT * FROM Table_A ORDER BY RAND( ) LIMIT 0 , 30