I have a big dataframe its about 200k of rows and 3 columns (x, y, z). Some rows doesn't have y,z values and just have x value. I want to make a new column that first set of data with z value be 1,second one be 2,then 3, etc. Or make a multiIndex same format.
Following image shows what I mean
Like this image
I made a new column called "NO." and put zero as initial value. Then
I tried to record the index of where I want the new column get a new value. with following code
df = pd.read_fwf(path, header=None, names=['x','y','z'])
df['NO.']=0
index_NO_changed = df.index[df['z'].isnull()]
Then I loop through it and change the number:
for i in range(len(index_NO_changed)-1):
df['NO.'].iloc[index_NO_changed[i]:index_NO_changed[i+1]]=i+1
df['NO.'].iloc[index_NO_changed[-1]:]=len(index_NO_changed)
But the problem is I get a warning that "
A value is trying to be set on a copy of a slice from a DataFrame
I was wondering
Is there any better way? Is creating multiIndex instead of adding another column easier considering size of dataframe?
Related
I have two Dataframes, one containing my data read in from a CSV file and another that has the data grouped by all of the columns but the last and reindexed to contain a column for the count of the size of the groups.
df_k1 = pd.read_csv(filename, sep=';')
columns_for_groups = list(df_k1.columns)[:-1]
k1_grouped = df_k1.groupby(columns_for_groups).size().reset_index(name="Count")
I need to create a series such that every row(i) in the series corresponds to row(i) in my original Dataframe but the contents of the series need to be the size of the group that the row belongs to in the grouped Dataframe. I currently have this, and it works for my purposes, but I was wondering if anyone knew of a faster or more elegant solution.
size_by_row = []
for row in df_k1.itertuples():
for group in k1_grouped.itertuples():
if row[1:-1] == group[1:-1]:
size_by_row.append(group[-1])
break
group_size = pd.Series(size_by_row)
I have a pyspark dataframe and I want to perform calculation as
for i in range(0,(length-1)):
x[i] = (x[i-1] - y[i-1]) * np.exp(-(t[i] -t[i-1])/v[i-1]) + y[i-1]
Where x,y,t and v are lists of float type columns created using
x = df.select(‘col_x’).rdd.flatMap(lambda x:x).collect()
And similarly y,t and v for respective columns.
This method works but not efficiently for data in bulk.
I want to perform this calculation in pyspark dataframe column. I want to update x column after every row and then use that updated value for calculating next row.
I have created columns to get previous row using lag as
df = df.withColumn(prev_val_x),F.lag(df.x,1).over(my_window)
And then calculating and updating x as -
df = df.withColumn(‘x’,(col(‘prev_val_x’) - col(‘prev_val_y’))
but it does not update the value with previous row value.
Creating lists for 4 columns using collect() takes a lot of time thus gives a memory error. Therefore, want to calculate within the dataframe column itself. Let column x has values as- 4.38,0,0,0,…till the end. X column only has value in its first row and then has 0 filled in all rows. Y,t and v has float values in it.
How do I proceed with this?
Any help would be appreciated!
I had a dataset, and I want to create a new data frame from a column in the original one. Chessdata is the original data frame and hizlisatranc is the one that I'm trying to create.
However, it raises a keyerror. I couldn't fix it. Can someone please help?
for i in range(len(chessdata)):
a = chessdata.newtime[i]
if float(6)<=a<float(25):
hızlısatranç.append(chessdata.iloc[i])
else:
continue
you can filter the df, with values in a range of value1 to value 2, so that only the rows that meet that condition are left. You can assign that to a new df like so:
df_new = df_old[(df_old['column']>value1) & (df_old['column']<value2)]
I have a task to compare two dataframe with same columns name but different size, we can call it previous and current. I am trying to get the difference between (previous and current) in the Quantity and Booked Columns and highlight it as yellow. The common key between the two dataframe would be the 'SN' columns
I have coded out the following
for idx, rows in df_n.iterrows():
if rows["Quantity"] == rows['Available'] + rows['Booked']:
continue
else:
rows["Quantity"] = rows["Quantity"] - rows['Available'] - rows['Booked']
df_n.loc[idx, 'Quantity'].style.applymap('background-color: yellow')
# pdb.set_trace()
if (df_o['Booked'][df_o['SN'] == rows["SN"]] != rows['Booked']).bool():
df_n.loc[idx, 'Booked'].style.apply('background-color: yellow')
I realise I have a few problems here and need some help
df_n.loc[idx, 'Quantity'] returns value instead of a dataframe type. How can I get a dataframe from one cell. Do I have to pd.DataFrame(data=df_n.loc[idx, 'Quantity'], index=idx, columns ='Quantity'). Will this create a copy or will update the reference?
How do I compare the SN of both dataframe, looking for a better way to compare. One thing I could think of is to use set index for both dataframe and when finished using them, reset them back?
My dataframe:
Previous dataframe
Current Dataframe
df_n.loc[idx, 'Quantity'] returns value instead of a dataframe type.
How can I get a dataframe from one cell. Do I have to
pd.DataFrame(data=df_n.loc[idx, 'Quantity'], index=idx, columns
='Quantity'). Will this create a copy or will update the reference?
To create a DataFrame from one cell you can try: df_n.loc[idx, ['Quantity']].to_frame().T
How do I compare the SN of both dataframe, looking for a better way to
compare. One thing I could think of is to use set index for both
dataframe and when finished using them, reset them back?
You can use df_n.merge(df_o, on='S/N') to merge dataframes and 'compare' columns.
I am trying to preset the dimensions of my data frame in pandas so that I can have 500 rows by 300 columns. I want to set it before I enter data into the dataframe.
I am working on a project where I need to take a column of data, copy it, shift it one to the right and shift it down by one row.
I am having trouble with the last row being cut off when I shift it down by one row (eg: I started with 23 rows and it remains at 23 rows despite the fact that I shifted down by one and should have 24 rows).
Here is what I have done so far:
bolusCI = pd.DataFrame()
##set index to very high number to accommodate shifting row down by 1
bolusCI = bolus_raw[["Activity (mCi)"]].copy()
activity_copy = bolusCI.shift(1)
activity_copy
pd.concat([bolusCI, activity_copy], axis =1)
Thanks!
There might be a more efficient way to achieve what you are looking to do, but to directly answer your question you could do something like this to init the DataFrame with certain dimensions
pd.DataFrame(columns=range(300),index=range(500))
You just need to define the index and columns in the constructor. The simplest way is to use pandas.RangeIndex. It mimics np.arange and range in syntax. You can also pass a name parameter to name it.
pd.DataFrame
pd.Index
df = pd.DataFrame(
index=pd.RangeIndex(500),
columns=pd.RangeIndex(300)
)
print(df.shape)
(500, 300)