I am using EF Core in .NET 7 and I can't cache HashSet in EF Plus, so every time I need to iterating all items in that case:
var emailAlreadyExist = dbContext.Users.Select(c => c.Email).FromCache().Contains(newEmail);
Maybe is there some way how can I cache HashSet?
Something like:
var emailAlreadyExist = dbContext.Users.Select(c => c.Email).DeferredHashSet().FromCache().Contains(newEmail);
Related
Following this problem with filtering Include in EF Core:
stackoverflow question
is this something that will be possible in EF 3.0?
This is now possible, using .Net 5:
var blogs = context.Blogs
.Include(e => e.Posts.Where(p => p.Title.Contains("Cheese")))
.ToList();
By default, EF Core doesn't support to filter in the Include method.
Disclaimer: I'm the owner of the project Entity Framework Plus
The EF+ Query IncludeFilter (free and open source) allows easily filter included entities.
The ThenInclude is not yet supported but you just have to include the last filter to have the same behavior.
Example:
_dbContext.User
.IncludeFilter(x=>x.UserRoles)
.IncludeFilter(x=>x.UserRoles.SelectMany(y => y.Roles.Where(z => z.Active)))
I am trying to get a QueryOver working using a Projection on a many-to-one.
The class "Post" has a property many-to-one "Creator".
Using
session.QueryOver(Of Post).
Select(Projections.
Property(of Post)(Function(x) x.Creator).
WithAlias(Function() postAlias.Creator)).
TransformUsing(Transformers.AliasToBean(Of Post)()).
List()
works BUT each creator is retrieved by a single query rather than using a join like it is done when not using a select/projection. So if there are 5 posts with 5 different creators, 6 queries will be run 1 for the list of posts and 5 for the creators.
I tried to get it working using a JoinAlias but nothing really did the job.
I already searched for a solution, but all solutions I found did use the Linq-Provider which does not really fit since the actual "field list" is passed via a parameter.
Does anyone know if there is a solution to this other than the linq provider?
There is a solution, we can use projections for many-to-one and then custom result transformer.
DISCLAIMER: I can read VB syntax but do not have enough courage to write... I expect that you can read C# and convert it into VB....
So we can have projection like this:
// aliases
Post root = null;
Creator creator = null;
// projection list
var columns = Projections.ProjectionList();
// root properties
columns.Add(Projections.Property(() => root.ID).As("ID"));
columns.Add(Projections.Property(() => root.Text).As("Text"));
// reference properties
columns.Add(Projections.Property(() => creator.ID).As("Creator.ID"));
columns.Add(Projections.Property(() => creator.FirstName).As("Creator.FirstName"));
// so our projections now do have proper ALIAS
// alias which is related to domain model
// (because "Creator.FirstName" will be use in reflection)
var query = session.QueryOver<Post>(() => root)
.JoinAlias(() => root.Creator, () => creator)
.Select(columns)
Now we would need smart Transformer, our own custome one (plugability is power of NHibernate). Here you can find one:
public class DeepTransformer
And we can continue like this
var list = query
.TransformUsing(new DeepTransformer<Post>())
.List<Post>()
Check also this:
Fluent NHibernate - ProjectionList - ICriteria is returning null values
NHibernate AliasToBean transformer associations
I used Entity Framework to create a prototype for a project and now that it's working I want to make the program ready for production.
I face many challenges with EF, the biggest one being the concurrency management (it's a financial software).
Given that it seems to have no way to handle pessimistic concurrency with EF, I have to switch to stored procs in SQL.
To be honest I'm a bit afraid of the workload that may represent.
I would like to know if anybody have been in the same situation before and what is the best strategy to convert a .net code using EF to raw SQL.
Edit:
I'm investigating CLR but it's not clear if pessimistic concurency can be manage with it. is it an option more interesting than TSQl in this case ? It would allow me to reuse part of my C# code and structure of function calling another functions, if I understand well.
I was there and the good news is you don't have to give up Entity Framework if you don't want to. The bad news is you have to update the database yourself. Which isn't as hard as it seems. I'm currently using EF 5 but plan to go to EF 6. I don't see why this still wouldn't work for EF 6.
First thing is in the constructor of the DbContext cast it to IObjectContextAdapter and get access to the ObjectContext. I make a property for this
public virtual ObjectContext ObjContext
{
get
{
return ((IObjectContextAdapter)this).ObjectContext;
}
}
Once you have that subscribe to the SavingChanges event - this isn't our exact code some things are copied out of other methods and redone. This just gives you an idea of what you need to do.
ObjContext.SavingChanges += SaveData;
private void SaveData(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
var context = sender as ObjectContext;
if (context != null)
{
context.DetectChanges();
var tsql = new StringBuilder();
var dbParams = new List<KeyValuePair<string, object>>();
var deletedEntites = context.ObjectStateManager.GetObjectStateEntries(EntityState.Deleted);
foreach (var delete in deletedEntites)
{
// Set state to unchanged - so entity framework will ignore
delete.ChangeState(EntityState.Unchanged);
// Method to generate tsql for deleting entities
DeleteData(delete, tsql, dbParams);
}
var addedEntites = context.ObjectStateManager.GetObjectStateEntries(EntityState.Added);
foreach (var add in addedEntites)
{
// Set state to unchanged - so entity framework will ignore
add.ChangeState(EntityState.Unchanged);
// Method to generate tsql for added entities
AddData(add, tsql, dbParams);
}
var editedEntites = context.ObjectStateManager.GetObjectStateEntries(EntityState.Modified);
foreach (var edit in editedEntites)
{
// Method to generate tsql for updating entities
UpdateEditData(edit, tsql, dbParams);
// Set state to unchanged - so entity framework will ignore
edit.ChangeState(EntityState.Unchanged);
}
if (!tsql.ToString().IsEmpty())
{
var dbcommand = Database.Connection.CreateCommand();
dbcommand.CommandText = tsql.ToString();
foreach (var dbParameter in dbParams)
{
var dbparam = dbcommand.CreateParameter();
dbparam.ParameterName = dbParameter.Key;
dbparam.Value = dbParameter.Value;
dbcommand.Parameters.Add(dbparam);
}
var results = dbcommand.ExecuteNonQuery();
}
}
}
Why we set the entity to unmodified after the update because you can do
var changed properties = edit.GetModifiedProperties();
to get a list of all the changed properties. Since all the entities are now marked as unchanged EF will not send any updates to SQL.
You will also need to mess with the metadata to go from entity to table and property to fields. This isn't that hard to do but messing the metadata does take some time to learn. Something I still struggle with sometimes. I refactored all that out into an IMetaDataHelper interface where I pass it in the entity type and property name to get the table and field back - along with caching the result so I don't have to query metadata all the time.
At the end the tsql is a batch that has all the T-SQL how we want it with the locking hints and containing the transaction level. We also change numeric fields from just being set to nfield = 10 but to be nfield = nfield + 2 in the TSQL if the user updated them by 2 to avoid the concurrency issue as well.
What you wont get to is having SQL locked once someone starts to edit your entity but I don't see how you would get that with stored procedures as well.
All in all it took me about 2 solid days to get this all up and running for us.
I've got a pretty complex object graph that I want to load in one fell
swoop.
Samples have Daylogs which have Daylog Tests which have Daylog
Results
Daylog Tests have Testkeys, Daylog Results have Resultkeys, and
TestKeys have Resultkeys.
I'm using the QueryOver API and Future to run these all as one query,
and all the data that NHibernate should need to instantiate the entire
graph IS being returned, verfied by NHProf.
public static IList<Daylog> DatablockLoad(Isession sess,
ICollection<int> ids)
{
var daylogQuery = sess.QueryOver<Daylog>()
.WhereRestrictionOn(dl => dl.DaylogID).IsIn(ids.ToArray())
.Fetch(dl => dl.Tests).Eager
.TransformUsing(Transformers.DistinctRootEntity)
.Future<Daylog>();
sess.QueryOver<DaylogTest>()
.WhereRestrictionOn(dlt =>
dlt.Daylog.DaylogID).IsIn(ids.ToArray())
.Fetch(dlt => dlt.Results).Eager
.Inner.JoinQueryOver<TestKey>(dlt => dlt.TestKey)
.Fetch(dlt => dlt.TestKey).Eager
.Inner.JoinQueryOver<ResultKey>(tk => tk.Results)
.Fetch(dlt => dlt.TestKey.Results).Eager
.Future<DaylogTest>();
sess.QueryOver<DaylogResult>()
.Inner.JoinQueryOver(dlr => dlr.DaylogTest)
.WhereRestrictionOn(dlt =>
dlt.Daylog.DaylogID).IsIn(ids.ToArray())
.Fetch(dlr => dlr.ResultKey).Eager
.Fetch(dlr => dlr.History).Eager
.Future<DaylogResult>();
var daylogs = daylogQuery.ToList();
return daylogs;
}
However, I still end up with proxies to represent the relationship
between Testkey and ResultKey, even though I'm specifically loading
that relationship.
I think this entire query is probably representative of a poor
understanding of the QueryOver API, so I would like any and all advice
on it, but primarily, I'd like to understand why I get a proxy and not
a list of results when later I try to get
daylogresult.resultkey.testkey.results.
Any help?
The answer was to call NHibernateUtil.Initialize on the various objects. Simply pulling the data down does not mean that NHibernate will hydrate all the proxies.
You have to load all your entities in one QueryOver clause to get rid of proxies. But in this case you will have a lot of joins in your query, so I recommend to use lazy loading with batching.
Here is what I am trying:
IQueryable query = this.MyRepository.GetShippingCollection();
IList<SomeListType> myList = query.Where(x => x.Settings
.Where(y => y.SelectorID.Equals(5))
.Count() > 0)
.OrderBy(x => x.Order)
.ToList();
Produces this error:
could not resolve property: Settings.ID
If I do it this way it works, but causes over 3,000 queries on my SQL Server:
IList<SomeListType> myList = this.MyRepository.GetShippingCollection().ToList();
myList = myList.Where(x => x.Settings
.Where(y => y.SelectorID.Equals(5))
.Count() > 0)
.OrderBy(x => x.Order)
.ToList();
I know the solution resides within using a "Join".
I have been looking at examples for the last couple hours and can only find Join examples within the Mapping file. I am also finding examples for "ICriteria".
I don't want to have to create seporate entries for all my complex queries in the mapping file so the join within that file will not work.
Since I am using Fluent NHibernate, I am not using "ICriteria". I am using "IQueryable". How do you join multiple tables within "IQueryable"?
Any help with this would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
If the second query is executing 3,000 queries, it is almost certainly lazy-loading the Settings collection. As you iterate over the list, you access this collection, and each time NHibernate goes back to the database to fetch it. Try setting the fetch mode for the Settings property to eager load in the mapping.
Beyond that, the LINQ provider could be an issue. What version of NHibernate are you using? The 2.x LINQ provider has some real limitations. It has been reimplemented in the 3.0 trunk, but you'll have to download and compile it from the source.
By the way, ICriteria vs IQueryable is not related to Fluent NHibernate. Criteria API and LINQ are two providers through which you can create queries. Fluent NHibernate is an alternative way to perform configuration.