What is the point of app directory inside next.js 13? - authentication

I am trying to set up next-auth inside next.js 13. In order to be able to use the useSession in app directory, I have to convert the page to a client page by using use client.
Then I need to wrap _app.js with SessionProvider and layout file in app directory
export default function App({
Component,
pageProps: { session, ...pageProps },
}) {
return (
<SessionProvider session={session}>
<Component {...pageProps} />
</SessionProvider>
)
}
and RootLayout in app component
export default function RootLayout({ children }) {
return (
<html>
<head />
<body>
<SessionProvider>{children}</SessionProvider>
</body>
</html>
);
}
Now I am repeating myself twice and I have to convert server page to a client if I want to use next-auth. Is there still any benefit of using app directory in this project? In the future, I might have a similar setup for different purposes.

Related

attribute binding in vue 3

I'm new to Vue and currently trying to dynamically change the video or image source link by passing the data in through a prop. I created a component with specific template structure that I would like to pass in the source from the main app.js page. I've tried binding it in both areas but unsure if I'm doing it correctly. I tried using regular divs and stuff to embed the video in app.js and it shows the content perfectly.
parent element contains 'Video' component-
<Video theme="IL" :vidSrc="srcIL.vid"></Video>
import Video from "./components/Video.vue";
export default {
name: "App",
components: {
Video
},
data() {
return {
srcIL: {
vid: "./assets/invi-lines/invisible-lines-film.mp4"
}
};
}
child 'Video component'
<template>
<div class="introVid top">
<video controls :src="vidSrc"></video>
</div>
</template>
<script>
export default {
props: ["theme", "vidSrc"]
};
</script>
This seems like you have it set up properly, and it is hard to know exactly what is causing the issues from the info provided, but I'm going to make a guess that it might be that the asset is not getting bundled.
I tried using regular divs and stuff to embed the video in app.js and it shows the content perfectly
I suspect you had something like:
<video controls src="./assets/invi-lines/invisible-lines-film.mp4"></video>
which would have taken the resource from the assets and packaged it for use.
see relative-path-imports for details.
You can try forcing these to load using require somewhere in the project, which will force the compiler to copy the asset, but really, if you have dynamic assets (assuming there's more than a handful and they can change) you should have them in the public folder already, not in the source folder. So my recommendation is that you move the dynamic assets to the public folder (assuming that was your issue to begin with)

Vue.js - Embed Swagger UI inside a Vue component?

I have a form in my Vue component which uploads the api file. Now I want to render the contents of the file like this:
I have imported swagger client library: https://github.com/swagger-api/swagger-ui.
Now, here
is an example of how you do it in a static page. But I need to do it inside a Vue component (or Quasar, specifically), so I do it like that:
Register swagger-ui inside my register components file:
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="swagger-ui.css">
Now it is available as:
this.swaggerUI({})
anywhere in my components. Inside my component I have a div in a template to render the api file:
<template>
<q-form>here lies q-file element, submit button and other stuff</q-form>
<div id="swagger-ui"></div>
</template>
In the mentioned question he had something like:
<script>
window.onload = function() {
const ui = SwaggerUIBundle({
url: "https://yourserver.com/path/to/swagger.json",
dom_id: '#swagger-ui',
presets: [
SwaggerUIBundle.presets.apis,
SwaggerUIStandalonePreset
]
})
window.ui = ui
}
</script>
Here's the difference: first of all, no window.onload, I must render it on submit button. Then, I deal with an uploaded file stored in my model, so no URL here. Now, I don't get how to make it work with locally stored file, when I try with the remote url, it gives me:
vue.esm.js?a026:628 [Vue warn]: Error in v-on handler: "Invariant Violation: _registerComponent(...): Target container is not a DOM element."
I was getting a similar error (Target container is not a DOM element) trying to use a static swagger spec. Instead of using window.onload, I found that Vue has the mounted() function, so this Vue 3 file worked for me:
<template>
<div class="swagger" id="swagger"></div>
</template>
<script>
import SwaggerUI from 'swagger-ui';
import 'swagger-ui/dist/swagger-ui.css';
export default {
name: "Swagger",
mounted() {
const spec = require('../path/to/my/spec.json');
SwaggerUI({
spec: spec,
dom_id: '#swagger'
})
}
}
</script>
This one appeared to be a simple yet very unobvious typo: in windows.onload function:
dom_id: '#swagger-ui',
must instead be
dom_id: 'swagger-ui',
without hash sign, that's it!

Using ports with elm-app

I'm trying to use ports with elm-app. Previously I used elm-live and a vanilla setup, and was able to insert ports like this:
index.html
<body>
<noscript>
You need to enable JavaScript to run this app.
</noscript>
<div id="root"></div>
<script>
window.addEventListener("load", function(event) {
var app = Elm.Main.fullscreen(localStorage.session || null);
app.ports.storeSession.subscribe(function(session) {
localStorage.session = session;
});
...
This worked, and elm-live seemed to embed elm.js in the <head> of index.html.
When I try to use this setup for ports with create-elm-app, however, the compiled javascript is embedded at the bottom of the <body>, so adding the <script> as I did results in this:
(index):68 Uncaught ReferenceError: Elm is not defined
at (index):68
What is the best way to embed the JS ports?
The halfzebra/create-elm-app project sets things up a little differently. You'll have to modify the src/index.js file like the example shows in the documentation on Javascript Interop
import './main.css';
import { Main } from './Main.elm';
import registerServiceWorker from './registerServiceWorker';
var app = Main.embed(document.getElementById('root'));
registerServiceWorker();
// ports related code
app.ports.windowTitle.subscribe(function(newTitle){
window.document.title = newTitle;
});

How to run SystemJs module when view loads

I have a component that loads a javascript module that builds on Bootstrap.js and Jquery to automatically build a table of contents for a page based on H1,H2,... headers. The component code is as follows:
import { bindable, bindingMode, customElement, noView } from 'aurelia-framework';
#noView()
#customElement('scriptinjector')
export class ScriptInjector {
#bindable public url;
#bindable public isLocal;
#bindable public isAsync;
#bindable({ defaultBindingMode: bindingMode.oneWay }) protected scripttag;
private tagId = 'bootTOCscript';
public attached() {
if (this.url) {
this.scripttag = document.createElement('script');
if (this.isAsync) {
this.scripttag.async = true;
}
if (this.isLocal) {
System.import(this.url);
return;
} else {
this.scripttag.setAttribute('src', this.url);
}
document.body.appendChild(this.scripttag);
}
}
public detached() {
if (this.scripttag) {
this.scripttag.remove();
}
}
}
Essentially for those not familiar with Aurelia, this simply uses SystemJs to load the bootstrap-toc.js module from my app-bundle wherever I put this on my view:
<scriptinjector url="lib/bootstrap-toc.js" is-local.bind='true'></scriptinjector>
My problem is that although this works perfectly when I first load the view, subsequent visits don't generate a TOC (table of contents). I have checked that Aurelia is in fact calling System.Import each time the view is loaded, but it seems that once a module has been imported once, it is never imported again (the code from the bundle never runs a second time).
Does anyone know how I can unload/reload/reset/rerun the module when I re-enter the view?
Ok, so after days of fighting with this I have figured out an acceptable solution that keeps all the functionality of the TOC library and requires as few changes to the skeleton project and the target library as I could manage. Forget the script injector above.
In the index.html, do as follows:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<title>Holdings Manager</title>
<!--The FontAwesome version is locked at 4.6.3 in the package.json file to keep this from breaking.-->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="jspm_packages/npm/font-awesome#4.6.3/css/font-awesome.min.css">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles/styles.css">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
</head>
<body aurelia-app="main" data-spy="scroll" data-target="#toc">
<div class="splash">
<div class="message">Holdings Manager</div>
<i class="fa fa-spinner fa-spin"></i>
</div>
<!-- The bluebird version is locked at 4.6.3 in the package.json file to keep this from breaking -->
<!-- We include bluebird to bypass Edge's very slow Native Promise implementation. The Edge team -->
<!-- has fixed the issues with their implementation with these fixes being distributed with the -->
<!-- Windows 10 Anniversary Update on 2 August 2016. Once that update has pushed out, you may -->
<!-- consider removing bluebird from your project and simply using native promises if you do -->
<!-- not need to support Internet Explorer. -->
<script src="jspm_packages/system.js"></script>
<script src="config.js"></script>
<script src="jspm_packages/npm/bluebird#3.4.1/js/browser/bluebird.min.js"></script>
<script src="jspm_packages/npm/jquery#2.2.4/dist/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script src="jspm_packages/github/twbs/bootstrap#3.3.7/js/bootstrap.min.js"></script>
<script>
System.import('core-js').then(function() {
return System.import('polymer/mutationobservers');
}).then(function() {
System.import('aurelia-bootstrapper');
}).then(function() {
System.import('lib/bootstrap-toc.js');
});
</script>
</body>
</html>
This is assuming you have installed bootstrap using jspm (which brings in jquery as a dependency). This also assumes you have put the javascript library (the one you want to incorporate, bootstrap-toc in my case) in your src/lib folder and that you have configured your bundling to include js files from your source folder.
Next, if your library has a self executing anonymous function defined, you need to take that code and move it inside the 'attached' method of the viewmodel where you want the library to be applied. So in this case, I have a 'help' view with a bunch of sections/subsections that I wanted a TOC generated for, so the code looks like:
import { singleton } from 'aurelia-framework';
#singleton()
export class Help {
public attached() {
$('nav[data-toggle="toc"]').each((i, el) => {
const $nav = $(el);
window.Toc.init($nav);
});
}
}
The code inside the 'attached' method above was cut and pasted from the bootstrap-toc.js file and I removed the self-executing anonymous method.
I tried using system.import for the jquery/bootstrap libraries but that made part of the TOC functionality stop working and I have lost my patience to figure out why so those libraries are staying as script references for now.
Also, when you build the project you will get errors :
help.ts(7,7): error TS2304: Cannot find name '$'.
help.ts(9,16): error TS2339: Property 'Toc' does not exist on type 'Window'.
These do not cause problems at runtime since both $ and Toc will be defined before the view is ever instantiated. You can solve these build errors with this solution here.

React server-side and client side rendering not seamless

First the page was rendered by the server, then on client/ browser side, the Javascript script re-render the whole page!
I don't think this is how it's supposed to be since it's very bad user experience.
One thing I noticed is that the data-reactid attribute of my root element as rendered by server is some hash like .2t5ll4229s and all the children has that as prefix e.g. .2t5ll4229s.0 (the first child). Whereas, on the browser side, the data-reactid is .0 for the root element and .0.0 for the first child.
If data-reactid is really the culprit here, is there a way to set it a value of choice like eric123 for both client side and server side.
If data-reactid is not the culprit here, how do I go about making server and client side rendering of React seamless i.e. only certain elements should be re-rendered by the client side, not everything!?
My index-server-local.html template:
...
<body>
<div id="content" class="container-fluid wrapper no-padding-left no-padding-right">
{{{reactHtml}}}
</div>
<script src="bundle.js"></script>
</body>
...
My server.js:
server.get('*', function (req, res) {
console.log('request url', req.url);
log.debug('routes are', JSON.stringify(routes));
res.header("Access-Control-Allow-Origin", "*");
match({routes, location: req.url}, (error, redirectLocation, renderProps) => {
if (renderProps) {
let htmlStr = React.renderToString(<RoutingContext {...renderProps} />);
res.render('index-server-local', { reactHtml: htmlStr });
}
}
My browser.js:
React.render(<Router history={history} routes={routeConfig} />, document.getElementById('content'));
I'm using react-router 1.0.0 and React 0.13.3.
We need serialize data(or state) in server side, and send it to client side to deserialize, otherwise, the data in client side is different with the moment server render it. it will reload for sure.
One exception: pure static page, in this case React recommend us use renderToStaticMarkup
Similar to renderToString, except this doesn't create extra DOM attributes such as data-react-id, that React uses internally. This is useful if you want to use React as a simple static page generator, as stripping away the extra attributes can save lots of bytes.
So, how we serialize - deserialize?
Here is a simple version:
in your index-server-local.html template:
<script src="bundle.js"></script>
to:
<script dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{{{__html: 'window.__data=' + JSON.stringify({key: 'value'})}}}} />
<script src="bundle.js"></script>
And in client side, we can use __datadata now. how to map the data to your component it's based on your choice.
I recommend Reudx for this:
createStore(browserHistory, initialState)
And then
<Provider store={store}>
{ component }
</Provider>