The datasheet of the OV2640 camera mentions the possibility to mirror or flip the image (see "REG04"). For my application it is, however, crucial to know the location of each pixel. Since the camera also crops the 1632x1232 sensor to a smaller, e.g., 1600x1200 image, the order of operations is important.
So does the camera first crop the image to the 1600x1200 window and mirror/flip it afterwards, or does the mirror/flip happen before the windowing?
Related
I am creating a simple photo filter app for OS X and I am displaying a photo on an NSImageView (actually two photos on top of each other with two NSImageViews, but the question still applies for a single view too). Everything works super, but when I try to resize the window that contains the NSImageViews, the window (which also resizes the NSImageViews) resizes very slowly, at about less than 1fps, creating a negative impact on the user experience. I want resizing windows to be as smooth as possible. When I disable resizing the image views, the window resizes smoothly, so the cause of the slowdown is those NSImageViews.
I'm loading 20-megapixel images from my DSLR. When I scale them down to a reasonable size for screen (e.g. 1024x768), they scale smoothly, so the problem is the way NSImageView renders the images. It (I assume as the result of this behavior) tries to re-render 20MP image every time it needs to redraw it into whatever the target frame of the view is.
How can I make NSImageView rescale more smoothly? Should I feed it with a scaled-down version of my images? I don't want to do that as it's a photo editing app that also targets retina display screens and the viewport would actually be quite large. I can do it, but it's my final option. Other than scaling down, how can I make NSImageView resize faster?
I believe part of the solution your are looking for is in NSImage's representations. You can add many representations to an image with addRepresentation: I believe there is some intelligent selection done when drawing. In your case, I think you would need to add both representations (the scaled-down and the full resolution bitmap) to NSImage. I strongly suspect drawRect: should pick the low resolution version. I would make sure "scale up or down" is selected in NSImageView, because the default is scale down only, which may force your full resolution image to be used most of the time. There are some discussion in Apple's documentation regarding "matching" under "Setting the Image Representation Selection Criteria" in NSImage, although at first sight this may not be sufficient.
Then, whenever you need to do something with the full image, you would request the full resolution image by going through the representations ([NSImage representations] returns an array of NSImageRep).
I'm developing an ipad application about 2d drawing.
I need a UIView.frame size of 4000x4000. But if I set a frame with size 4000x4000 the application
crash since i get memory warning.
Right night I'm using 1600*1000 frame size and the user can add new object (rectangle) on frame. User can also translate fram along x and y axis using pan gesture in order to see or add new object.
Have you got some suggestion? how can I tackle this problem?
thanks
Well, I would suggest what is used in video games for a long time - creating a tiled LOD mechanism, where only when you zoom in toward specific tiles, they are rendered at an increasing resolution, while when zoomed out, you only render lower resolution.
If the drawing in based on shapes (rectangles, points, lines, or anything can be represented by simple vector data) there is no reason to create a UIView for the entire size of the drawing. You just redraw the currently visible view as the user pans across the drawing using the stored vector data. There is no persistent bitmapped representation of the drawing.
If using bitmap data for drawing (i.e. a Photoshop type of app) then you'll likely need to use a mechanism that caches off-screen data into secondary storage and loads it back onto the screen as the user pans across it. In either case, the UIView only needs to be as big as the physical screen size.
Sorry I don't have any iOS code examples for any of this - take this as a high-level abstraction and work from there.
Sounds like you want to be using UIScrollView.
I just noticed an interesting thing while attempting to update my app for the new iPad Retina display, every coordinate in Interface Builder is still based on the original 1024x768 resolution.
What I mean by this is that if I have a 2048x1536 image to have it fit the entire screen on the display I need to set it's size to 1024x768 and not 2048x1536.
I am just curious is this intentional? Can I switch the coordinate system in Interface Builder to be specific for Retina? It is a little annoying since some of my graphics are not exactly 2x in either width or height from their originals. I can't seem to set 1/2 coordinate numbers such as 1.5 it can either be 1 or 2 inside of Interface Builder.
Should I just do my interface design in code at this point and forget interface builder? Keep my graphics exactly 2x in both directions? Or just live with it?
The interface on iOS is based on points, not pixels. The images HAVE to be 2x the size of the originals.
Points Versus Pixels In iOS there is a distinction between the coordinates you specify in your drawing code and the pixels of the
underlying device. When using native drawing technologies such as
Quartz, UIKit, and Core Animation, you specify coordinate values using
a logical coordinate space, which measures distances in points. This
logical coordinate system is decoupled from the device coordinate
space used by the system frameworks to manage the pixels on the
screen. The system automatically maps points in the logical coordinate
space to pixels in the device coordinate space, but this mapping is
not always one-to-one. This behavior leads to an important fact that
you should always remember:
One point does not necessarily correspond to one pixel on the screen.
The purpose of using points (and the logical coordinate system) is to
provide a consistent size of output that is device independent. The
actual size of a point is irrelevant. The goal of points is to provide
a relatively consistent scale that you can use in your code to specify
the size and position of views and rendered content. How points are
actually mapped to pixels is a detail that is handled by the system
frameworks. For example, on a device with a high-resolution screen, a
line that is one point wide may actually result in a line that is two
pixels wide on the screen. The result is that if you draw the same
content on two similar devices, with only one of them having a
high-resolution screen, the content appears to be about the same size
on both devices.
In your own drawing code, you use points most of the time, but there
are times when you might need to know how points are mapped to pixels.
For example, on a high-resolution screen, you might want to use the
extra pixels to provide extra detail in your content, or you might
simply want to adjust the position or size of content in subtle ways.
In iOS 4 and later, the UIScreen, UIView, UIImage, and CALayer classes
expose a scale factor that tells you the relationship between points
and pixels for that particular object. Before iOS 4, this scale factor
was assumed to be 1.0, but in iOS 4 and later it may be either 1.0 or
2.0, depending on the resolution of the underlying device. In the future, other scale factors may also be possible.
From http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#documentation/2DDrawing/Conceptual/DrawingPrintingiOS/GraphicsDrawingOverview/GraphicsDrawingOverview.html
This is intentional on Apple's part, to make your code relatively independent of the actual screen resolution when positioning controls and text. However, as you've noted, it can make displaying graphics at max resolution for the device a bit more complicated.
For iPhone, the screen is always 480 x 320 points. For iPad, it's 1024 x 768. If your graphics are properly scaled for the device, the impact is not difficult to deal with in code. I'm not a graphic designer, and it's proven a bit challenging to me to have to provide multiple sets of icons, launch images, etc. to account for hi-res.
Apple has naming standards for some image types that minimize the impact on your code:
https://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#DOCUMENTATION/UserExperience/Conceptual/MobileHIG/IconsImages/IconsImages.html
That doesn't help you when you're dealing with custom graphics inline, however.
I have a robot and a camera. The robot is just a 3D printer where I changed the extruder for a tool, so it doesn't print but it moves every axis independently. The bed is transparent, and below the bed there is a camera, the camera never moves. It is just a normal webcam (playstation eye).
I want to calibrate the robot and the camera, so that when I click on a pixel on a image provided by the camera, the robot will go there. I know I can measure the translation and the rotation between the two frames, but that will probably return lots of errors.
So that's my question, how can I relate the camera and a robot. The camera is already calibrated using chessboards.
In order to make everything easier, the Z-axis can be ignored. So the calibration will be over X and Y.
It depends of what error is acceptable for you.
We have similar setup where we have camera which looks at some plane with object on it that can be moved.
We assume that the image and plane are parallel.
First lets calculate the rotation. Put the tool in such position that you see it on the center of the image, move it on one axis select the point on the image that is corresponding to tool position.
Those two points will give you a vector in the image coordinate system.
The angle between this vector and original image axis will give the rotation.
The scale may be calculated in the similar way, knowing the vector length (in pixels) and the distance between the tool positions(in mm or cm) will give you the scale factor between the image and real world axis.
If this method won't provide enough accuracy you may calibrate the camera for distortion and relative position to the plane using computer vision techniques. Which is more complicated.
See the following links
http://opencv.willowgarage.com/documentation/camera_calibration_and_3d_reconstruction.html
http://dasl.mem.drexel.edu/~noahKuntz/openCVTut10.html
I am writing a Cocoa application for mac osx. I'm trying to figure out how to determine the size of an image that will be captured by a camera? I would like to know the size of the image that will be captured so I can setup a view with an aspect ratio that won't distort the image. For example, if my view is defined to be 640x360 and my camera captures images that are 640x480, the displayed image looks short and fat. I'm also displaying some other layers over the image and I need the image size to be able to scale and position the layers properly.
I won't know the type of camera that is attached until run-time so I'd like to be able to interrogate the device and get attributes like image size. Thanks for the help...
You are altering the aspect ratio of the image when you capture in 640x360 instead of 640x480 or 320x240. You are doing something similar as a resize, using the whole image and making it a different size.
If you don't want to distort the image, but use only a portion of it you need to do a crop. Some hardware support cropping, others don't and you have to do it in software. Cropping is using only portions of the original image. In your case, you would discard the bottom 120 lines.
Example (from here):
The blue rectangle is the natural, or original image and the red is a crop of it.