X-Code 12, MacoS + M1.
Missing 64-bit support. iOS apps submitted to the App Store must include 64-bit support and be built with the iOS 8 SDK or later. We recommend using the default "Standard Architectures" build setting for "Architectures" in Xcode, to build a single binary with both 32-bit and 64-bit support. With err
enter image description here
Change Build Active Architecture Only to No in Release, Clean Build folder and Archive again:
This will force Xcode to build the 64bit binary regardless of what device is connected.
Related
I have MacOS-X - 10.7 and Xcode - 4.6.2 and made a Mac application. The client side machine is also MacOS-X - 10.7. But in my mac application there was a small error with NSNumberFormatter which when I was changing, Xcode was crashing. So I edited the code in latest Xcode and OSX. And then I made the binary of it and run in MacOS-x - 10.7, its working fine. But the source code is no more opening in Xcode - 4.6.2. Its asking for the latest version of Xcode. My question is will the binary will work fine in older version of OS-X even if it is developed in latest Xcode?
The version of OS X which your application will run on is dictated by the OS X Deployment Target in the project settings. If that is set to support 10.7, then it doesn't matter which version of OS X you built it on: the built application will work on 10.7 and later.
This setting will also set the minimum allowed OS in the Info.plist, so people trying to run the build on earlier OSes will see an alert instead of the app just crashing.
More information on setting the deployment target and building for different OS versions with SDKs is available in the Apple documentation:
https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/documentation/DeveloperTools/Conceptual/cross_development/Configuring/configuring.html
When I create a new OS X application project, I noticed many target options those confuse me quite a lot:
(1) The top-left setting of Xcode window:
(2) The "Base SDK":
(3) "Deployment Target":
(4) Architectures:
Here comes my questions:
For (2) and (3), I think it was clearer to understand. These are what I comprehend:
(2) This identifies what I develop with.
(3) This identifies what OS version my application will be used on.
Please tell me whether I am right...
But I could not understand (1). I just know that if I select 32-bit here, I could not use ARC.
Neither with (4), what are they? Are they represent the bit-width of the CPU? What was the difference between (1) and (4)?
I'll explain your items out of order.
The Base SDK
This defines the largest set of APIs you can use. You can use anything that existed as of the version number identified here. For example, if you use the 10.8 SDK, you can use -[NSColor CGColor] (introduced in 10.8), but not -[NSData base64EncodedDataWithOptions:] (first public in 10.9).
(Of course, you can also use anything older than that version.)
Accordingly, the SDK version is also known as the “max[imum] allowed” version in the Availability macros.
The SDK version also sometimes becomes important when Apple changes the behavior of an API. When they do that, they sometimes keep the old behavior around for applications linked with older SDKs. This is called an “on-or-after check”, as in “checks whether you're on 10.8 [SDK] or later”. (The concept and term pre-date Xcode having SDKs for each OS version. It used to just go by whatever OS you were running Xcode and building on.)
The Deployment Target
This is the minimum OS version you require. If something was removed in a prior version (rare, but it happens), you can't use it.
This tends to affect link-time and run-time things more than compile-time things. For example, ARC won't work if your deployment target is 10.5 or earlier.
Accordingly, the Deployment Target is also known as the “min[imum] required” version in the Availability macros.
The Info.plist can also specify a minimum OS version. Nowadays, this is set by default and it's set by macro expansion to the Deployment Target.
The Architectures build setting
Different CPUs have different architectures. Essentially, they fit into broad categories, such as:
PowerPC 32-bit (ppc)
PowerPC 64-bit (ppc64)
Intel 32-bit (i386)
Intel 64-bit (x86_64)
ARM 32-bit
ARM 64-bit
(PowerPC architectures aren't supported anymore. You can add them to the Architectures list, as ppc and ppc64, but Xcode will just ignore them.)
Macs nowadays have Intel processors. Almost all Intel Macs have 64-bit processors. You only need to worry about 32-bit Intel if you want to support Macs all the way back to 2006. That's probably more hassle than it's worth.
iOS devices run ARM processors, and most are still 32-bit. The A7 (iPhone 5S, iPad Air, iPad Mini with Retina Display) is 64-bit. But, if you run on an iOS Simulator, it's running on your Mac (it's a Simulator, not an emulator), so it'll target an Intel architecture (formerly always i386, but probably can now be x86_64 if needed).
The “top-left setting of Xcode window”
This is the build scheme and run destination. (Yes, it's two separate things in one pop-up menu. Actually, it's two separate pop-up menus in one control. Try it.)
“My Mac 64-bit” is the run destination. You'll be running the 64-bit version of your app on your Mac, not in an iOS Simulator or on an iOS device. Your choice for a Mac app is merely which architecture you want to run, and they should behave the same (this is, obviously, something you sometimes need to test).
iOS apps have more choices here. Some apps are iPhone-only, some are iPad-only, some are universal, and some may be set to build for both 32-bit and 64-bit architectures. You'll have a Simulator offered for each combination of form factor and architecture (e.g., iPhone Simulator 64-bit) you can run on. You'll also have the option to run your app on any iOS device that's connected and enabled for development (you get this prompt when you plug in the device in Xcode's sight).
TL;DR
Deployment Target is the lowest OS version your app will run on.
Base SDK is the highest OS version you can use stuff from. If it didn't exist yet, it doesn't exist at all for you.
Architectures are the set of hardware your app will run on.
Run Destination is the hardware you're going to run it on from within Xcode.
Just like with most OSes these days you can develop either a 32bit or a 64bit application. The "bitness" refers mostly to how memory addresses are structured (either using 32bit allowing so at most 4GB to address or 64bit (computation left as an exercise to the reader)). However the choosen architecture usually has more implications (like the missing ARC support for 32bit apps) but also how wide CPU registers are, how much memory a structure uses in RAM etc.
OS X also supports socalled fat binaryies that is, a bundle containing both 32bit and 64bit variants of your application. This is however only needed if you normally prefer to run 64bit code, but want your app also to run on OS versions that only support 32bit.
In XCode you can define for what architecture to build your project, either 32bit only, 64bit only or a fat bundle. In the project settings you can set what is allowed and in the top bar in XCode you can quickly switch between the allowed architectures (your questions 1 and 4).
The base SDK determines what you want to use to compile your application. If you select for instance 10.7 you cannot use new APIs that were introduced in 10.8 or 10.9 (which might perfectly be ok if you want your application to run on earlier OS versions only). However if you want to dynamically use new features if they are availble you'd select the latest OS as base SDK and check in code what OS you are running on and only use new features if they are available. It is totally ok to compile an application with access to new features and run it on older systems if you don't use the new APIs there (they are late-bound and hence only crash when you access them the first time and they are not available).
The deployment target determines the minimum OS version your application needs to run properly. This is a runtime check done when the application is started. The OS will refuse to start an application that is made for a later version.
I've just downloaded libogg from http://www.xiph.org/downloads/ (http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/ogg/libogg-1.3.0.tar.gz) and I'm now trying to compile the Ogg.xcodeproj project provided in that package. When I try to build, I get the following error:
The run destination My Mac 64-bit is not valid for Running the scheme 'Ogg'.
The scheme 'Ogg' contains no buildables that can be built for the SDKs supported by the run destination My Mac 64-bit. Make sure your targets all specify SDKs that are supported by this version of Xcode.
I get a similar error if I attempt to build the static library instead of the framework:
The run destination My Mac 64-bit is not valid for Running the scheme 'libogg (static)'.
The scheme 'libogg (static)' contains no buildables that can be built for the SDKs supported by the run destination My Mac 64-bit. Make sure your targets all specify SDKs that are supported by this version of Xcode.
Again, this is just opening the project in Xcode 4.3.2 for the first time and attempting to build. I've made no changes to the project file at all.
Can anyone point me in the direction of a solution to get this to compile?
In my case, the Xcode project was linking against an old SDK on an old architecture (OS X 10.5 PPC, whereas I have OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion x64).
To fix this in Xcode 5, select the top-level project in Xcode (the top-most node in the project folder pane, with the blue "A" icon) followed by the Project. Change Architectures to something suitable for your current system, such as Native Architecture of Build machine and change Base SDK to an SDK currently installed in your Xcode environment, such as OS X 10.8.
Here is a screenshot of my project to help you find those settings (following the highlighted parts: kisshelper > kisshelper > Architectures):
I'm trying to create a universal Automator action for Mac OS X 10.5 & above. Under architectures I have set "i386 ppc" and when compiled, Finder sees the binary as "Universal". Automator however says that the action is not universal and won't run it. (when hitting "Build & Go" in Xcode it works)
Am I missing something here?
If your Mac is an Intel Mac, check if Automator is running as 64 bit process (Activity Monitor can tell you that). If it is, it may not be able to load a binary that contains 32 bit only. In that case your binary must have been compiled for three architectures, i386, ppc and x86_64. Note, however, that in SDK 10.5, Cocoa was not available for x86_64, so you will have to use SDK 10.6 for the x86_64 variant, while keeping SDK 10.5 for the i386 and ppc variants. That is easily possible, though, you can create a custom build setting, named SDKROOT_x86_64, which will override the default SDK setting (named SDKROOT), but only when building for the architecture x86_64. The value should be the absolute path to the SDK (I'm not sure if the shortcuts Apple usually uses for this setting will also work for a custom override).
I have build an universal binary with xcode 2.4 using sdk10.4 on Mac 10.4.4, when I'm trying to invoke the application in 10.3.9 PPC machine,the application is not getting invoked, saying it is not able to find the libcurl.3.dylib.
Since 10.3.9 has only libcurl.2.dylib the application is not getting invoked?
But according to Universal binary definition, the universal binary build using 10.4sdk should run in the MAC OS prior to 10.4?
What am I missing? Y my application is trying to load libcurl.3.dylib instead of libcurl.2.dylib?
(FYI: In the xcode.proj I'm linking libcurl.dylib, which is the alias name for libcurl
Sorry, but "Universal" means the binary can run on different processors (x86, PowerPC), but it does not mean it can run on earlier versions of Mac OS. This article gives details on building a "Universal" binary that can also run on Mac OS X 10.3.