I have the use case where an array can optionally contain items, but each item when present needs to comply to its own defined schema. I tried this:
{
"plugins": {
"type": "array",
"items": [
{
"$ref": "plugins/oidc/oidc_apigw-plugin-schema.json"
},
{
"$ref": "plugins/oidc/oidc_websso-plugin-schema.json"
}
]
}
}
but it does not meet the requirements, since it is expecting those two items in that specific order. It must be something related to this https://json-schema.org/understanding-json-schema/reference/conditionals.html, but I have no idea how to apply it correctly. Here my attempt:
{
"plugins": {
"type": "array",
"items": [
{
"type": "object"
}
],
"dependentSchemas": {
"oidc_apigw": {
"$ref": "plugins/oidc/oidc_apigw-plugin-schema.json"
},
"oidc_websso": {
"$ref": "plugins/oidc/oidc_websso-plugin-schema.json"
}
}
}
}
You can use the contains keyword to specify "this schema should match, but the item can appear anywhere in the list". Combine it with minContains if you want to indicate that the item should appear more than once.
https://json-schema.org/understanding-json-schema/reference/array.html
Related
I have a JSON Schema using draft 2020-12 and I am trying to use an if-else subschema to check that a particular property exists based on the value of another property. Below is the if statement I am currently using. There are more properties but I have have omitted them for the sake of brevity. They are identical except the type of the property in the then statement is different. They are all wrapped in an allOf array:
{
"AValue": {
"allOf": [
{
"if": {
"$ref": "#/$defs/ValueItem/properties/dt",
"const": "type1"
},
"then": {
"properties": {
"string": { "type": "string" }
},
"required": ["string"]
}
}
]
}
}
The #/$defs/ValueItem/properties/dt being referred to is here:
{
"ValueItem": {
"properties": {
"value": {
"$ref": "#/$defs/AValue"
},
"dt": {
"$ref": "#/$defs/DT"
}
},
"additionalProperties": false
}
}
#/$defs/DT is here:
{
"DT": {
"type": "string",
"enum": [
"type1",
"type2",
"type3",
"type4"
]
}
}
I expected that when dt is encountered in a JSON instance document, the validator will check if the value of dt is type1 and then validate that an additional property called string is also present and is of type string. However, what actually happens is the validator complains that "Property 'string' has not been defined and the schema does not allow additional properties".
I assume that this is because the condition in the if statement evaluates to false so the subschema is never applied. However, I am unsure why that would be as I followed the example here when creating the if-then-else block. The only thing I can think of that is different is the use of $ref which I have in my schema but it is not in the example.
I found this answer which makes me think that it is possible to use $ref in an if statement but is it possible to use a ref that points to another ref or am I thinking about it incorrectly?
I have also tried removing the $ref from the if statement like below but it still doesn't work. Is it because of the $ref in the properties?
{
"AValue": {
"properties": {
"dt": {
"$ref": "#/$defs/DT"
}
},
"required": [
"dt"
],
"allOf": [
{
"if": {
"properties": {
"dt": {
"const": "type1"
}
}
},
"then": {
"properties": {
"string": {
"type": "string"
}
}
}
}
]
}
}
The problem is not cascading the $ref keywords. The const keyword at the if statement is not applied to the target of the $ref, but to the current location in the JSON input data. In this case to "AValue". To check if the property "dt" is of value "type1" at this point, you would need an if like this (simple solution with no $ref):
"if": {
"properties": {
"dt": {
"const": "type1"
}
},
"required": [ "dt" ]
}
Edit: Showing complete JSON Schema and error in JSONBuddy with $ref:
Running ajv-cli as part of my automated testing scripts to make sure my mock data is up to date.
./node_modules/.bin/ajv -s ./test-data/manifest.schema.json -d ./test-data/fleet.manifest.json
./test-data/fleet.manifest.json valid
But the data isn't valid.
manifest.schema.json:
{
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
"definitions": {
"ManifestHistoryItem": {
"properties": {
"id": {
"default": [
"assetCatalog",
"Roster"
],
"items": {
"type": "string"
},
"type": "array"
},
"name": {
"default": "",
"type": "string"
}
},
"required": [
"id",
"name"
],
"type": "object"
}
}
}
fleet.manifest.json:
{
"namee": "Epic Space Battles"
}
(it's missing the required "id" property, and "name" is misspelled)
Schema is generated from "typescript-json-schema": "^0.54.0" from a typescript model and evaluated via "ajv-cli": "^5.0.0".
Your schema declares definitions, but it doesn't reference them anywhere. You need to add a "$ref": "#/definitions/ManifestHistoryItem" at the root.
{
"definitions": {
"ManifestHistoryItem": { ... }
},
"$ref": "#/definitions/ManifestHistoryItem"
}
Either that or you can just get rid of the definitions wrapper altogether and just have the { ... } part from above.
Effectively what's happening is you've defined an empty schema, which applies no constraints, meaning all instances (data) pass.
I have a jsonschema definition definition-1.json like below. I have a property called inputs of type array which refers anyOf definitions like
"inputs": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"anyOf": [
{
"$ref": "#/definitions/stringParameter"
},
{
"$ref": "#/definitions/numberParameter"
},
{
"$ref": "#/definitions/booleanParameter"
},
{
"$ref": "#/definitions/jsonParameter"
},
{
"$ref": "#/definitions/fileParameter"
}
]
}
}
Then the parameter definitions defined like below in the same jsonschema definition-1.json
"definitions": {
"stringParameter": {
"type": "object",
"required": [
"name",
"description",
"datatype"
]
}
...
}
Now I want to reference this parameter definitions in my other schema dummy-1.json like below
{
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema",
"$id": "dummy-1.json",
"allOf": [
{
"type": "object",
"required": [
"definition_data"
],
"properties": {
"definition_data": {
"type": "object",
"required": [
"inputs"
],
"properties": {
"type": "array",
"inputs": {
"items": {
"allOf": [
{
"prop1": {
"$ref": "#/definitions/stringParameter"
}
},
{
"prop2": {
"$ref": "#/definitions/numberParameter"
}
}
]
}
}
}
}
}
},
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"definition_data": {
"$ref": "definition-1.json"
}
}
}
]
}
This doesn't looks like working. prop1 will validate successfully for any properties part of other parameter definition too , even though in dummy-1.json I explicitly referred #/definitions/stringParameter .
I can understand inputs in definition-1.json accepts anyOf all parameter definitions. But want to know how we can achieve 1:1 parameter definition mapping for dummy-1.json .
If my understanding is correct, you want to refer from dummy-1.json to subschemas defined in definitions-1.json. To do that, you have to specify the URI of definition-1.json and append the pointer of the subschema in it, like:
dummy-1.json:
{
"$ref": "uri-of-definitions-1.json#/definitions/stringParameter"
}
Note that the URI to be set is quite specific to the json schema library you are using. Usually an absolute https:// URL works, but it isn't always convenient to work with. Maybe a relative path can work for you as well (like ./definition-1.json#/definitions/stringParameter)
I defined in the schema a validType, where every attribute should have text and annotation .
I want to add additional constraints to refine the text of course must follow "pattern":"[a-z]{2}[0-9]{2}". Is there any way I can apply the constraint directly without copy&paste the content of the validType?
Schema:
{
"type": "object",
"definition": {
"validType": {
"description": "a self-defined type, can be complicated",
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"text": {
"type": "string"
},
"annotation": {
"type": "string"
}
}
},
"properties": {
"name": {
"$ref": "#/definitions/validType"
},
"course": {
"$ref": "#/definitions/validType"
}
}
}
}
Data:
{"name":{
"text":"example1",
"annotation":"example1Notes"},
"course":{
"text":"example2",
"annotation":"example2Notes"}}
The expected schema for course should work as this:
{"course": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"text": {
"type": "string",
"pattern":"[a-z]{2}[0-9]{2}"
},
"annotation": {
"type": "string"
}
}
}}
But instead of repeating the big block of validType, I am expecting something similar to the format below:
{"course": {
"$ref": "#/definitions/validType"
"text":{"pattern":"[a-z][0-9]"}
}}
Yup! You can add constraints but you cannot modify the constraints you reference.
To add constraints, you need to understand that $ref for draft-07 and previous is the only allowed key in a subschema when it exsits. Other keys are ignored if it exists.
As such, you need to create two subschemas, one of which has your reference, and the other your additional constraint.
You then wrap these two subschemas in an allOf.
Here's how that would look...
{
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
"properties": {
"course": {
"allOf": [
{
"$ref": "#/definitions/validType"
},
{
"properties": {
"text": {
"pattern": "[a-z][0-9]"
}
}
}
]
}
}
}
Have a play using https://jsonschema.dev
For example a schema for a file system, directory contains a list of files. The schema consists of the specification of file, next a sub type "image" and another one "text".
At the bottom there is the main directory schema. Directory has a property content which is an array of items that should be sub types of file.
Basically what I am looking for is a way to tell the validator to look up the value of a "$ref" from a property in the json object being validated.
Example json:
{
"name":"A directory",
"content":[
{
"fileType":"http://x.y.z/fs-schema.json#definitions/image",
"name":"an-image.png",
"width":1024,
"height":800
}
{
"fileType":"http://x.y.z/fs-schema.json#definitions/text",
"name":"readme.txt",
"lineCount":101
}
{
"fileType":"http://x.y.z/extended-fs-schema-video.json",
"name":"demo.mp4",
"hd":true
}
]
}
The "pseudo" Schema note that "image" and "text" definitions are included in the same schema but they might be defined elsewhere
{
"id": "http://x.y.z/fs-schema.json",
"definitions": {
"file": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"name": { "type": "string" },
"fileType": {
"type": "string",
"format": "uri"
}
}
},
"image": {
"allOf": [
{ "$ref": "#definitions/file" },
{
"properties": {
"width": { "type": "integer" },
"height": { "type": "integer"}
}
}
]
},
"text": {
"allOf": [
{ "$ref": "#definitions/file" },
{ "properties": { "lineCount": { "type": "integer"}}}
]
}
},
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"name": { "type": "string"},
"content": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"allOf": [
{ "$ref": "#definitions/file" },
{ *"$refFromProperty"*: "fileType" } // the magic thing
]
}
}
}
}
The validation parts of JSON Schema alone cannot do this - it represents a fixed structure. What you want requires resolving/referencing schemas at validation-time.
However, you can express this using JSON Hyper-Schema, and a rel="describedby" link:
{
"title": "Directory entry",
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"fileType": {"type": "string", "format": "uri"}
},
"links": [{
"rel": "describedby",
"href": "{+fileType}"
}]
}
So here, it takes the value from "fileType" and uses it to calculate a link with relation "describedby" - which means "the schema at this location also describes the current data".
The problem is that most validators do not take any notice of any links (including "describedby" ones). You need to find a "hyper-validator" that does.
UPDATE: the tv4 library has added this as a feature
I think cloudfeet answer is a valid solution. You could also use the same approach described here.
You would have a file object type which could be "anyOf" all the subtypes you want to define. You would use an enum in order to be able to reference and validate against each of the subtypes.
If the sub-types schemas are in the same Json-Schema file you don't need to reference the uri explicitly with the "$ref". A correct draft4 validator will find the enum value and will try to validate against that "subschema" in the Json-Schema tree.
In draft5 (in progress) a "switch" statement has been proposed, which will allow to express alternatives in a more explicit way.