Related
I am stuck with some data manipulation.
This is a small portion of the input data (df):
site=c("C000-C002","C420-C421,C424")
histology=c("9835-9836","9811-9812,9837")
category=c("Leukemia","Leukemia")
df=data.frame(site,histology,category)
And this is what I want the processed data to look like:
You may assume Site and Histology are both 4-digit after text splitting.
In case anyone is interested, the full data table is here
Please help with the text processing, or if anyone knows an existing processed package or database in a similar format as the image, that would be great too.
Thank you very much.
I don't know R language. So I tried with Javascript as following.
function mapStartEnd(start, end) {
let list = [];
let info = {};
const siteStart = start.match(/([A-Z])(\d{3})/);
if (siteStart) {
const siteEnd = end.match(/([A-Z])(\d{3})/);
info = {
type: "site",
prefix: siteStart[1],
numLength: 3,
from: parseInt(siteStart[2], 10),
to: parseInt(siteEnd[2], 10),
};
}
const histologyStart = start.match(/\d{4}/);
if (histologyStart) {
const histologyEnd = end.match(/\d{4}/);
info = {
type: "histology",
prefix: "",
numLength: 4,
from: parseInt(histologyStart[0], 10),
to: parseInt(histologyEnd[0], 10),
};
}
const categoryStart = start.match(/[A-Z][a-z]+/);
if (categoryStart) {
const categoryEnd = end.match(/[A-Z][a-z]+/);
info = {
type: "category",
prefix: "",
numLength: 0,
from: categoryStart[0],
to: categoryEnd[0],
};
}
if (!info.numLength) {
list = [info.from, info.to];
} else {
for (let i = info.from; i <= info.to; i++) {
list.push(info.prefix + i.toString().padStart(info.numLength, "0"));
}
}
return list;
}
function c(list) {
return list.map((list2) => {
return list2.split(",").reduce((prev, cur) => {
const [start, end] = cur.split("-");
if (!end) prev.push(start);
else prev = [...prev, ...mapStartEnd(start, end)];
return prev;
}, []);
});
}
function map3(sites, histologys, categorys) {
let list = [];
for (let i = 0; i < sites.length; i++) {
const site = sites[i];
for (let j = 0; j < histologys.length; j++) {
const histology = histologys[j];
for (let k = 0; k < categorys.length; k++) {
const category = categorys[k];
// JSON format
// list.push({ site, histology, category });
// CSV format
list.push(`${site},${histology},${category}`);
}
}
}
return list;
}
function frame(sites, histologys, categorys) {
let list = [];
for (let i = 0; i < sites.length; i++) {
const site = sites[i];
const histology = histologys[i];
const category = categorys[i];
list = [...list, ...map3(site, histology, category)];
}
return list;
}
const site = c(["C000-C002", "C420-C421,C424"]);
const histology = c(["9835-9836", "9811-9812,9837"]);
const category = c(["Leukemia", "Leukemia"]);
const df = frame(site, histology, category);
console.log(df);
Result:
[
"C000,9835,Leukemia",
"C000,9836,Leukemia",
"C001,9835,Leukemia",
"C001,9836,Leukemia",
"C002,9835,Leukemia",
"C002,9836,Leukemia",
"C420,9811,Leukemia",
"C420,9812,Leukemia",
"C420,9837,Leukemia",
"C421,9811,Leukemia",
"C421,9812,Leukemia",
"C421,9837,Leukemia",
"C424,9811,Leukemia",
"C424,9812,Leukemia",
"C424,9837,Leukemia"
]
https://jsfiddle.net/dnu2g0vr/
I'm trying to print qz tray from javascript.
I have barcode with number in ascending order 1,2,3,4, 5 and so on.
I looping the seq correctly . but when printed out, it was not in order.
setTimeout("directPrint2()",1000);
function sleep(milliseconds) {
var start = new Date().getTime();
for (var i = 0; i < 1e7; i++) {
if ((new Date().getTime() - start) > milliseconds){
break;
}
}
}
function directPrint2(){
var data;
var xhttp;
var v_carton = "' || x_str_carton ||'";
var carton_arr = v_carton.split('','');
var v1 = "' ||
replace(x_zebra_printer_id, '\', '|') ||
'".replace(/\|/g,"\\");
if(v1 == ""){
alert("Please setup ZPL Printer");
}
else{
xhttp=new XMLHttpRequest();
xhttp.onreadystatechange = function() {
if (this.readyState == 4 && this.status == 200) {
data = [ toNative(this.responseText) ];
printZPL(data, v1);
}
};
for (var j = 0; j < carton_arr.length; j++){
var url = "' || x_wms_url ||
'WWW_URL.direct_print_label?in_carton_no="+toValidStr(carton_arr[j]);
xhttp.open("GET", url, false);
xhttp.send();
sleep(5000);
}
}
};
',
'javascript'
What's missing from your example:
I do not see any looping logic in the example calling the printZPL function,
printZPL isn't a QZ Tray function and you're missing the code snippet which it calls. Usually this would be qz.print(config, data);.
Regardless of the missing information, the qz.print(...) API is ES6/Promise/A+ based meaning if you want to call qz.print multiple times in a row you need to use a Promise-compatible technique. (e.g. .then(...) syntax) between your print calls as explained in the Chaining Requests guide.
To avoid this, you can concatenate all ZPL data into one large data array. Be careful not to spool too much data at once.
If you know exactly how many jobs you'll be appending, you can hard-code the promise chain:
qz.websocket.connect()
.then(function() {
return qz.printers.find("zebra"); // Pass the printer name into the next Promise
})
.then(function(printer) {
var config = qz.configs.create(printer); // Create a default config for the found printer
var data = ['^XA^FO50,50^ADN,36,20^FDRAW ZPL EXAMPLE^FS^XZ']; // Raw ZPL
return qz.print(config, data);
})
.catch(function(e) { console.error(e); });
Finally, if you do NOT know in advanced how many calls to qz.print(...) you can use a Promise loop as explained in the Promise Loop guide.
function promiseLoop() {
var data = [
"^XA\n^FO50,50^ADN,36,20^FDPRINT 1 ^FS\n^XZ\n",
"^XA\n^FO50,50^ADN,36,20^FDPRINT 2 ^FS\n^XZ\n",
"^XA\n^FO50,50^ADN,36,20^FDPRINT 3 ^FS\n^XZ\n",
"^XA\n^FO50,50^ADN,36,20^FDPRINT 4 ^FS\n^XZ\n"
];
var configs = [
{ "printer": "ZDesigner LP2844-Z" },
{ "printer": "ZDesigner LP2844-Z" },
{ "printer": "ZDesigner LP2844-Z" },
{ "printer": "ZDesigner LP2844-Z" }
];
var chain = [];
for(var i = 0; i < data.length; i++) {
(function(i_) {
//setup this chain link
var link = function() {
return qz.printers.find(configs[i_].printer).then(function(found) {
return qz.print(qz.configs.create(found), [data[i_]]);
});
};
chain.push(link);
})(i);
//closure ensures this promise's concept of `i` doesn't change
}
//can be .connect or `Promise.resolve()`, etc
var firstLink = new RSVP.Promise(function(r, e) { r(); });
var lastLink = null;
chain.reduce(function(sequence, link) {
lastLink = sequence.then(link);
return lastLink;
}, firstLink);
//this will be the very last link in the chain
lastLink.catch(function(err) {
console.error(err);
});
}
Note: The Promise Loop is no longer needed in QZ Tray 2.1. Instead, since 2.1, an array of config objects and data arrays can be provided instead.
i'm trying re-organised a list of data. I have given each li a unique key, but still, no luck!
I have had this working before exactly like below, think i'm cracking up!
let app = new Vue({
el: '#app',
data: {
list: [
{ value: 'item 1', id: '43234r' },
{ value: 'item 2', id: '32rsdf' },
{ value: 'item 3', id: 'fdsfsdf' },
{ value: 'item 4', id: 'sdfg543' }
]
},
methods: {
randomise: function() {
let input = this.list;
for (let i = input.length-1; i >=0; i--) {
let randomIndex = Math.floor(Math.random()*(i+1));
let itemAtIndex = input[randomIndex];
input[randomIndex] = input[i];
input[i] = itemAtIndex;
}
this.list = input;
}
}
});
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/vue/dist/vue.js"></script>
<div id="app">
<ul>
<li v-for="item in list" :key="item.id">{{ item.value }}</li>
</ul>
Randomize
</div>
Edit:
Thanks for the answers, to be honest the example I provided may not have been the best for my actual issue I was trying to solve. I think I may have found the cause of my issue.
I'm basically using a similar logic as above, except i'm moving an array of objects around based on drag and drop, this works fine with normal HTML.
However, i'm using my drag and drop component somewhere else, which contains ANOTHER component and this is where things seem to fall apart...
Would having a component within another component stop Vue from re-rendering when an item is moved within it's data?
Below is my DraggableBase component, which I extend from:
<script>
export default {
data: function() {
return {
dragStartClass: 'drag-start',
dragEnterClass: 'drag-enter',
activeIndex: null
}
},
methods: {
setClass: function(dragStatus) {
switch (dragStatus) {
case 0:
return null;
case 1:
return this.dragStartClass;
case 2:
return this.dragEnterClass;
case 3:
return this.dragStartClass + ' ' + this.dragEnterClass;
}
},
onDragStart: function(event, index) {
event.stopPropagation();
this.activeIndex = index;
this.data.data[index].dragCurrent = true;
this.data.data[index].dragStatus = 3;
},
onDragLeave: function(event, index) {
this.data.data[index].counter--;
if (this.data.data[index].counter !== 0) return;
if (this.data.data[index].dragStatus === 3) {
this.data.data[index].dragStatus = 1;
return;
}
this.data.data[index].dragStatus = 0;
},
onDragEnter: function(event, index) {
this.data.data[index].counter++;
if (this.data.data[index].dragCurrent) {
this.data.data[index].dragStatus = 3;
return;
}
this.data.data[index].dragStatus = 2;
},
onDragOver: function(event, index) {
if (event.preventDefault) {
event.preventDefault();
}
event.dataTransfer.dropEffect = 'move';
return false;
},
onDragEnd: function(event, index) {
this.data.data[index].dragStatus = 0;
this.data.data[index].dragCurrent = false;
},
onDrop: function(event, index) {
if (event.stopPropagation) {
event.stopPropagation();
}
if (this.activeIndex !== index) {
this.data.data = this.array_move(this.data.data, this.activeIndex, index);
}
for (let index in this.data.data) {
if (!this.data.data.hasOwnProperty(index)) continue;
this.data.data[index].dragStatus = 0;
this.data.data[index].counter = 0;
this.data.data[index].dragCurrent = false;
}
return false;
},
array_move: function(arr, old_index, new_index) {
if (new_index >= arr.length) {
let k = new_index - arr.length + 1;
while (k--) {
arr.push(undefined);
}
}
arr.splice(new_index, 0, arr.splice(old_index, 1)[0]);
return arr; // for testing
}
}
}
</script>
Edit 2
Figured it out! Using the loop index worked fine before, however this doesn't appear to be the case this time!
I changed the v-bind:key to use the database ID and this solved the issue!
There are some Caveats with arrays
Due to limitations in JavaScript, Vue cannot detect the following changes to an array:
When you directly set an item with the index, e.g. vm.items[indexOfItem] = newValue
When you modify the length of the array, e.g. vm.items.length = newLength
To overcome caveat 1, both of the following will accomplish the same as vm.items[indexOfItem] = newValue, but will also trigger state updates in the reactivity system:
Vue.set(vm.items, indexOfItem, newValue)
Or in your case
randomise: function() {
let input = this.list;
for (let i = input.length-1; i >=0; i--) {
let randomIndex = Math.floor(Math.random()*(i+1));
let itemAtIndex = input[randomIndex];
Vue.set(input, randomIndex, input[i]);
Vue.set(input, i, itemAtIndex);
}
this.list = input;
}
Here is an working example: Randomize items fiddle
Basically I changed the logic of your randomize function to this:
randomize() {
let new_list = []
const old_list = [...this.list] //we don't need to copy, but just to be sure for any future update
while (new_list.length < 4) {
const new_item = old_list[this.get_random_number()]
const exists = new_list.findIndex(item => item.id === new_item.id)
if (!~exists) { //if the new item does not exists in the new randomize list add it
new_list.push(new_item)
}
}
this.list = new_list //update the old list with the new one
},
get_random_number() { //returns a random number from 0 to 3
return Math.floor(Math.random() * 4)
}
randomise: function() { let input = this.list;
for (let i = input.length-1; i >=0; i--) {
let randomIndex = Math.floor(Math.random()*(i+1));
let itemAtIndex = this.list[randomIndex];
Vue.set(this.list,randomIndex,this.list[i])
this.list[randomIndex] = this.list[i];
this.list[i] = itemAtIndex;
} this.list = input;
}
Array change detection is a bit tricky in Vue. Most of the in place
array methods are working as expected (i.e. doing a splice in your
$data.names array would work), but assigining values directly (i.e.
$data.names[0] = 'Joe') would not update the reactively rendered
components. Depending on how you process the server side results you
might need to think about these options described in the in vue
documentation: Array Change Detection.
Some ideas to explore:
using the v-bind:key="some_id" to have better using the push to add
new elements using Vue.set(example1.items, indexOfItem, newValue)
(also mentioned by Artokun)
Source
Note that it works but im busy so i cant optimize it, but its a little bit too complicted, i Edit it further tomorrow.
Since Vue.js has some caveats detecting array modification as other answers to this question highlight, you can just make a shallow copy of array before randomazing it:
randomise: function() {
// make shallow copy
let input = this.list.map(function(item) {
return item;
});
for (let i = input.length-1; i >=0; i--) {
let randomIndex = Math.floor(Math.random()*(i+1));
let itemAtIndex = input[randomIndex];
input[randomIndex] = input[i];
input[i] = itemAtIndex;
}
this.list = input;
}
I want to retrieve the values of marked dates how can I get all the marked dates where marked value is true from this object:
alert(JSON.stringify(this.state._markedDates))
{"2018-09-26":{"marked":true}, "2018-09-27":{"marked":false}, "2018-09-29":{"marked":true}}
Expected Result :
{"2018-09-26","2018-09-29"}
I tried the following but datelist is still empty:
for(var i=0; i<this.state._markedDates.length ; i++)
{
if(this.state._markedDates[i].marked == true)
{
this.state.datesList.push(_markedDates[i])
}
}
let dates = {
"2018-09-26":{"marked":true},
"2018-09-27":{"marked":false},
"2018-09-29":{"marked":true}
}
let markedDates=[];
Object.keys(dates).map(date => {
if(dates[date].marked){ markedDates.push(date)}
})
console.log(markedDates)
There are different ways of approaching this, you could filter them for example as below:
let dates = ["2018-09-26":{"marked":true}, "2018-09-27":{"marked":false}, "2018-09-29":{"marked":true}];
let filtered = dates.filter( date => {
if(date.marked === true) {
return date;
}
});
// filtered = {"2018-09-26":{"marked":true}, "2018-09-29":{"marked":true}};
This is how you can get all of the dates where marked = true.
Then you can do
let keyNames = Object.keys(filtered);
console.log(keyNames); // Outputs ["2018-09-26","2018-09-29"]
As a for loop
let markedDates = [];
for(var i=0; i<this.state._markedDates.length; i++)
{
if(this.state._markedDates[i].marked === true)
{
markedDates.push(_markedDates[i])
}
}
this.setState({ObjectIWantToSet: markedDates})
let dates = []
let obj = {"2018-09-26":{"marked":true}, "2018-09-27":{"marked":false}, "2018-09-29":{"marked":true}}
for(date in obj)
{
if(a[date]["marked"])
{
dates.push(date)
}
}
console.log(dates)
I think that, bydefault renderer always refer to its calling object as scope. and we do not have to define anything but in my grid i have different behaviour.
I have to define rendere function runtime.
I make column object and for each column i assign renderer.
for (var i = 0; i < columns.length; i++) {
newRenderer = function (v, m, r, rI, cI, s)
{
if(this.originalRend) <<<<<-----------------
// "this" is not object of column but whole page.
{
//then call original}
else {
// call new renderer
}
}
columns[i].originalRend = columns[i].renderer;
columns[i].renderer = newRenderer;
}
In my newRenderer function "THIS" does not refer to column object. WHY?????
and how to do that????
You should be able to use scope as a config option of the column, and that will be used by the renderer:
{
renderer: function(val){
return val.trim();
},
scope: this
}
Or, in the case of your code:
for (var i = 0; i < columns.length; i++) {
newRenderer = function (v, m, r, rI, cI, s)
{
if(this.originalRend) <<<<<-----------------
// "this" is not object of column but whole page.
{
//then call original}
else {
// call new renderer
}
}
//THIS LINE ADDED:
columns[i].scope = columns[i];
columns[i].originalRend = columns[i].renderer;
columns[i].renderer = newRenderer;
}
See docs here: http://docs.sencha.com/extjs/4.1.3/#!/api/Ext.grid.column.Column-cfg-scope
Scope does not work as column or this.
The best way is to overrite prepareData method of header container.
Ext.override(Ext.grid.header.Container, {
prepareData: function(data, rowIdx, record, view, panel) {
//console.log("we r in prepare Data");
var me = this,
obj = {},
headers = me.gridDataColumns || me.getGridColumns(),
headersLn = headers.length,
dirtyCls = me.dirtyCls,
colIdx = 0,
header,
headerId,
renderer,
value,
metaData,
store = panel.store;
for (; colIdx < headersLn; colIdx++) {
metaData = {
tdCls: '',
style: ''
};
header = headers[colIdx];
headerId = header.id;
renderer = header.renderer;
value = data[header.dataIndex];
if (typeof renderer == "function") {
value = renderer.call(
//--------change made below.------------------
header.scope || header || me.ownerCt,
//----------------end-------------------------
value,
// metadata per cell passing an obj by reference so that
// it can be manipulated inside the renderer
metaData,
record,
rowIdx,
colIdx,
store,
view
);
}
// <debug>
if (metaData.css) {
// This warning attribute is used by the compat layer
obj.cssWarning = true;
metaData.tdCls = metaData.css;
delete metaData.css;
}
// </debug>
if (me.markDirty) {
obj[headerId + '-modified'] = record.isModified(header.dataIndex) ? dirtyCls : '';
}
obj[headerId+'-tdCls'] = metaData.tdCls;
obj[headerId+'-tdAttr'] = metaData.tdAttr;
obj[headerId+'-style'] = metaData.style;
if (typeof value === 'undefined' || value === null || value === '') {
value = header.emptyCellText;
}
obj[headerId] = value;
}
return obj;
},
}