Im trying to build a pipeline which ssh's into my server, and executes a bash script. But when i execute the pipeline, it states: bash: line 129: apk: command not found
Why though? Im already specifying to use alpine over my default node image
My runner is configured as a shell executor
image: node:16
build:
only:
- main
script:
- docker build --file Dockerfile --tag $IMAGE_NAME .
push_to_dockerhub:
only:
- main
script:
- docker login --username $DOCKERHUB_USERNAME --password $DOCKERHUB_PASSWORD
- docker push $IMAGE_NAME
deploy:
image: alpine:3.14
only:
- main
before_script:
- apk add openssh-client
- eval $(ssh-agent -s)
- echo "$SSH_PRIVATE_KEY" | tr -d '\r' | ssh-add -
- mkdir -p ~/.ssh
- chmod 700 ~/.ssh
script:
- ssh myusername#$IP_ADDRESS -p 3000 "/home/myusername/deploy.sh && exit"
I need to be able to use apk on this pipeline to add the openssh client and therefore, stablish an ssh connection
The NodeJS default version you get from docker hub's is a Debian-based distribution. Therefore, apt or apt-get must be used as a package management tool.
You must use an alpine-based Node container if you want to use apk (Alpine Package Keeper).
Example image: node:lts-alpine
The NodeJS docker container is built using a variety of versions and underlying Linux distribution. Please click the link to view them, then select what you require based on your requirements.
I'm going through the "Scalable FastAPI Application on AWS" course. My gitlab-ci.yml file is below.
stages:
- docker
variables:
DOCKER_DRIVER: overlay2
DOCKER_TLS_CERTDIR: "/certs"
cache:
key: ${CI_JOB_NAME}
paths:
- ${CI_PROJECT_DIR}/services/talk_booking/.venv/
build-python-ci-image:
image: docker:19.03.0
services:
- docker:19.03.0-dind
stage: docker
before_script:
- cd ci_cd/python/
script:
- docker login -u "$CI_REGISTRY_USER" -p "$CI_REGISTRY_PASSWORD" $CI_REGISTRY
- docker build -t registry.gitlab.com/chris_/talk-booking:cicd-python3.9-slim .
- docker push registry.gitlab.com/chris_/talk-booking:cicd-python3.9-slim
My Pipeline fails with this error:
See https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/commandline/login/#credentials-store
Login Succeeded
$ docker build -t registry.gitlab.com/chris_/talk-booking:cicd-python3.9-slim .
invalid argument "registry.gitlab.com/chris_/talk-booking:cicd-python3.9-slim" for "-t, --tag" flag: invalid reference format
See 'docker build --help'.
Cleaning up project directory and file based variables
ERROR: Job failed: exit code 125
It may or may not be relevant but the Container Registry for the GitLab project says there's a Docker connection error.
Thanks
I created a new GitLab account with a new username and things are working now. The underscore does appear to have been the issue.
hello I'm trying to do a CI / CD integration of zap on gitlab. To do this, I wrote the following code but after running the report is not generated. What to do please.
the scan is well done but the report is not available
test_site:
stage: test
image: owasp/zap2docker-stable
when: always
script:
- mkdir -p /zap/wrk/
- zap-full-scan.py -t https://example.com -r report.html
- cp /zap/wrk/report.html .
artifacts:
when: always
paths: [report.html]
allow_failure: false
I managed to generate the report by adding to the command || true or the -I option but the objective is to generate the report without adding
I have struggled to get this done for more than 2 days. I started with this approach of using image: owasp/zap2docker-stable however then had to go to the vanilla docker commands to execute it.
The reason for that is, if you use -r parameter, zap will attempt to generate the file report.html at location /zap/wrk/. In order to make this work, we have to mount a directory to this location /zap/wrk.
But when you do so, it is important that the zap container is able to perform the write operations on the mounted directory.
So, below is the working solution.
test_site:
stage: test
image: docker:latest
script:
# The folder zap-reports created locally will be mounted to owasp/zap2docker docker container,
# On execution it will generate the reports in this folder. Current user is passed so reports can be generated"
- mkdir zap-reports
- cd zap-reports
- docker pull owasp/zap2docker-stable:latest || echo
- docker run --name zap-container --rm -v $(pwd):/zap/wrk -u $(id -u ${USER}):$(id -g ${USER}) owasp/zap2docker-stable zap-baseline.py -t "https://example.com" -r report.html
artifacts:
when: always
paths:
- zap-reports
allow_failure: true
So the trick in the above code is
Mount local directory zap-reports to /zap/wrk as in $(pwd):/zap/wrk
Pass the current user and group on the host machine to the docker container so the process is using the same user / group. This allows writing of reports on the directory mounted from local host. This is done by -u $(id -u ${USER}):$(id -g ${USER})
Below is the working code with image: owasp/zap2docker-stable
test_site:
variables:
GIT_STRATEGY: none
stage: test
image:
name: owasp/zap2docker-stable:latest
before_script:
- mkdir -p /zap/wrk
script:
- zap-baseline.py -t "https://example.com" -g gen.conf -I -r testreport.html
- cp /zap/wrk/testreport.html testreport.html
artifacts:
when: always
paths:
- zap.out
- testreport.html
I am searching for a way to use kubectl in gitlab.
So far I have the following script:
deploy_to_dev:
stage: deploy
image: docker:dind
environment:
name: dev
script:
- mkdir -p $HOME/.kube
- echo $KUBE_CONFIG | base64 -d > $HOME/.kube/config
- kubectl config view
only:
- develop
But it says that gitlab does not know kubectl. So can you point me in the right direction.
You are using docker:dindimage which does not have the kubectl binary, you should bring your own image with the binary or download it in the process
deploy_to_dev:
stage: deploy
image: alpine:3.7
environment:
name: dev
script:
- apk update && apk add --no-cache curl
- curl -LO https://storage.googleapis.com/kubernetes-release/release/$(curl -s https://storage.googleapis.com/kubernetes-release/release/stable.txt)/bin/linux/amd64/kubectl
- chmod +x ./kubectl && mv ./kubectl /usr/local/bin/kubectl
- mkdir -p $HOME/.kube
- echo -n $KUBE_CONFIG | base64 -d > $HOME/.kube/config
- kubectl config view
only:
- develop
Use image google/cloud-sdk which has a preinstalled installation of gcloud and kubectl.
build:
stage: build
image: google/cloud-sdk
services:
- docker:dind
script:
# Make gcloud available
- source /root/.bashrc
If a GitLab project is configured on GitLab CI, is there a way to run the build locally?
I don't want to turn my laptop into a build "runner", I just want to take advantage of Docker and .gitlab-ci.yml to run tests locally (i.e. it's all pre-configured). Another advantage of that is that I'm sure that I'm using the same environment locally and on CI.
Here is an example of how to run Travis builds locally using Docker, I'm looking for something similar with GitLab.
Since a few months ago this is possible using gitlab-runner:
gitlab-runner exec docker my-job-name
Note that you need both docker and gitlab-runner installed on your computer to get this working.
You also need the image key defined in your .gitlab-ci.yml file. Otherwise won't work.
Here's the line I currently use for testing locally using gitlab-runner:
gitlab-runner exec docker test --docker-volumes "/home/elboletaire/.ssh/id_rsa:/root/.ssh/id_rsa:ro"
Note: You can avoid adding a --docker-volumes with your key setting it by default in /etc/gitlab-runner/config.toml. See the official documentation for more details. Also, use gitlab-runner exec docker --help to see all docker-based runner options (like variables, volumes, networks, etc.).
Due to the confusion in the comments, I paste here the gitlab-runner --help result, so you can see that gitlab-runner can make builds locally:
gitlab-runner --help
NAME:
gitlab-runner - a GitLab Runner
USAGE:
gitlab-runner [global options] command [command options] [arguments...]
VERSION:
1.1.0~beta.135.g24365ee (24365ee)
AUTHOR(S):
Kamil Trzciński <ayufan#ayufan.eu>
COMMANDS:
exec execute a build locally
[...]
GLOBAL OPTIONS:
--debug debug mode [$DEBUG]
[...]
As you can see, the exec command is to execute a build locally.
Even though there was an issue to deprecate the current gitlab-runner exec behavior, it ended up being reconsidered and a new version with greater features will replace the current exec functionality.
Note that this process is to use your own machine to run the tests using docker containers. This is not to define custom runners. To do so, just go to your repo's CI/CD settings and read the documentation there. If you wanna ensure your runner is executed instead of one from gitlab.com, add a custom and unique tag to your runner, ensure it only runs tagged jobs and tag all the jobs you want your runner to be responsible of.
I use this docker-based approach:
Edit: 2022-10
docker run --entrypoint bash --rm -w $PWD -v $PWD:$PWD -v /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock gitlab/gitlab-runner:latest -c 'git config --global --add safe.directory "*";gitlab-runner exec docker test'
For all git versions > 2.35.2. You must add safe.directory within the container to avoid fatal: detected dubious ownership in repository at.... This also true for patched git versions < 2.35.2. The old command will not work anymore.
Details
0. Create a git repo to test this answer
mkdir my-git-project
cd my-git-project
git init
git commit --allow-empty -m"Initialize repo to showcase gitlab-runner locally."
1. Go to your git directory
cd my-git-project
2. Create a .gitlab-ci.yml
Example .gitlab-ci.yml
image: alpine
test:
script:
- echo "Hello Gitlab-Runner"
3. Create a docker container with your project dir mounted
docker run -d \
--name gitlab-runner \
--restart always \
-v $PWD:$PWD \
-v /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock \
gitlab/gitlab-runner:latest
(-d) run container in background and print container ID
(--restart always) or not?
(-v $PWD:$PWD) Mount current directory into the current directory of the container - Note: On Windows you could bind your dir to a fixed location, e.g. -v ${PWD}:/opt/myapp. Also $PWD will only work at powershell not at cmd
(-v /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock) This gives the container access to the docker socket of the host so it can start "sibling containers" (e.g. Alpine).
(gitlab/gitlab-runner:latest) Just the latest available image from dockerhub.
4. Execute with
Avoid fatal: detected dubious ownership in repository at... More info
docker exec -it -w $PWD gitlab-runner git config --global --add safe.directory "*"
Actual execution
docker exec -it -w $PWD gitlab-runner gitlab-runner exec docker test
# ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
# | | | | | |
# (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f)
(a) Working dir within the container. Note: On Windows you could use a fixed location, e.g. /opt/myapp.
(b) Name of the docker container
(c) Execute the command "gitlab-runner" within the docker container
(d)(e)(f) run gitlab-runner with "docker executer" and run a job named "test"
5. Prints
...
Executing "step_script" stage of the job script
$ echo "Hello Gitlab-Runner"
Hello Gitlab-Runner
Job succeeded
...
Note: The runner will only work on the commited state of your code base. Uncommited changes will be ignored. Exception: The .gitlab-ci.yml itself does not have be commited to be taken into account.
Note: There are some limitations running locally. Have a look at limitations of gitlab runner locally.
I'm currently working on making a gitlab runner that works locally.
Still in the early phases, but eventually it will become very relevant.
It doesn't seem like gitlab want/have time to make this, so here you go.
https://github.com/firecow/gitlab-runner-local
If you are running Gitlab using the docker image there: https://hub.docker.com/r/gitlab/gitlab-ce, it's possible to run pipelines by exposing the local docker.sock with a volume option: -v /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock. Adding this option to the Gitlab container will allow your workers to access to the docker instance on the host.
The GitLab runner appears to not work on Windows yet and there is an open issue to resolve this.
So, in the meantime I am moving my script code out to a bash script, which I can easily map to a docker container running locally and execute.
In this case I want to build a docker container in my job, so I create a script 'build':
#!/bin/bash
docker build --pull -t myimage:myversion .
in my .gitlab-ci.yaml I execute the script:
image: docker:latest
services:
- docker:dind
before_script:
- apk add bash
build:
stage: build
script:
- chmod 755 build
- build
To run the script locally using powershell I can start the required image and map the volume with the source files:
$containerId = docker run --privileged -d -v ${PWD}:/src docker:dind
install bash if not present:
docker exec $containerId apk add bash
Set permissions on the bash script:
docker exec -it $containerId chmod 755 /src/build
Execute the script:
docker exec -it --workdir /src $containerId bash -c 'build'
Then stop the container:
docker stop $containerId
And finally clean up the container:
docker container rm $containerId
Another approach is to have a local build tool that is installed on your pc and your server at the same time.
So basically, your .gitlab-ci.yml will basically call your preferred build tool.
Here an example .gitlab-ci.yml that i use with nuke.build:
stages:
- build
- test
- pack
variables:
TERM: "xterm" # Use Unix ASCII color codes on Nuke
before_script:
- CHCP 65001 # Set correct code page to avoid charset issues
.job_template: &job_definition
except:
- tags
build:
<<: *job_definition
stage: build
script:
- "./build.ps1"
test:
<<: *job_definition
stage: test
script:
- "./build.ps1 test"
variables:
GIT_CHECKOUT: "false"
pack:
<<: *job_definition
stage: pack
script:
- "./build.ps1 pack"
variables:
GIT_CHECKOUT: "false"
only:
- master
artifacts:
paths:
- output/
And in nuke.build i've defined 3 targets named like the 3 stages (build, test, pack)
In this way you have a reproducible setup (all other things are configured with your build tool) and you can test directly the different targets of your build tool.
(i can call .\build.ps1 , .\build.ps1 test and .\build.ps1 pack when i want)
I am on Windows using VSCode with WSL
I didn't want to register my work PC as a runner so instead I'm running my yaml stages locally to test them out before I upload them
$ sudo apt-get install gitlab-runner
$ gitlab-runner exec shell build
yaml
image: node:10.19.0 # https://hub.docker.com/_/node/
# image: node:latest
cache:
# untracked: true
key: project-name
# key: ${CI_COMMIT_REF_SLUG} # per branch
# key:
# files:
# - package-lock.json # only update cache when this file changes (not working) #jkr
paths:
- .npm/
- node_modules
- build
stages:
- prepare # prepares builds, makes build needed for testing
- test # uses test:build specifically #jkr
- build
- deploy
# before_install:
before_script:
- npm ci --cache .npm --prefer-offline
prepare:
stage: prepare
needs: []
script:
- npm install
test:
stage: test
needs: [prepare]
except:
- schedules
tags:
- linux
script:
- npm run build:dev
- npm run test:cicd-deps
- npm run test:cicd # runs puppeteer tests #jkr
artifacts:
reports:
junit: junit.xml
paths:
- coverage/
build-staging:
stage: build
needs: [prepare]
only:
- schedules
before_script:
- apt-get update && apt-get install -y zip
script:
- npm run build:stage
- zip -r build.zip build
# cache:
# paths:
# - build
# <<: *global_cache
# policy: push
artifacts:
paths:
- build.zip
deploy-dev:
stage: deploy
needs: [build-staging]
tags: [linux]
only:
- schedules
# # - branches#gitlab-org/gitlab
before_script:
- apt-get update && apt-get install -y lftp
script:
# temporarily using 'verify-certificate no'
# for more on verify-certificate #jkr: https://www.versatilewebsolutions.com/blog/2014/04/lftp-ftps-and-certificate-verification.html
# variables do not work with 'single quotes' unless they are "'surrounded by doubles'"
- lftp -e "set ssl:verify-certificate no; open mediajackagency.com; user $LFTP_USERNAME $LFTP_PASSWORD; mirror --reverse --verbose build/ /var/www/domains/dev/clients/client/project/build/; bye"
# environment:
# name: staging
# url: http://dev.mediajackagency.com/clients/client/build
# # url: https://stg2.client.co
when: manual
allow_failure: true
build-production:
stage: build
needs: [prepare]
only:
- schedules
before_script:
- apt-get update && apt-get install -y zip
script:
- npm run build
- zip -r build.zip build
# cache:
# paths:
# - build
# <<: *global_cache
# policy: push
artifacts:
paths:
- build.zip
deploy-client:
stage: deploy
needs: [build-production]
tags: [linux]
only:
- schedules
# - master
before_script:
- apt-get update && apt-get install -y lftp
script:
- sh deploy-prod
environment:
name: production
url: http://www.client.co
when: manual
allow_failure: true
The idea is to keep check commands outside of .gitlab-ci.yml. I use Makefile to run something like make check and my .gitlab-ci.yml runs the same make commands that I use locally to check various things before committing.
This way you'll have one place with all/most of your commands (Makefile) and .gitlab-ci.yml will have only CI-related stuff.
I have written a tool to run all GitLab-CI job locally without have to commit or push, simply with the command ci-toolbox my_job_name.
The URL of the project : https://gitlab.com/mbedsys/citbx4gitlab
Years ago I build this simple solution with Makefile and docker-compose to run the gitlab runner in docker, you can use it to execute jobs locally as well and should work on all systems where docker works:
https://gitlab.com/1oglop1/gitlab-runner-docker
There are few things to change in the docker-compose.override.yaml
version: "3"
services:
runner:
working_dir: <your project dir>
environment:
- REGISTRATION_TOKEN=<token if you want to register>
volumes:
- "<your project dir>:<your project dir>"
Then inside your project you can execute it the same way as mentioned in other answers:
docker exec -it -w $PWD runner gitlab-runner exec <commands>..
I recommend using gitlab-ci-local
https://github.com/firecow/gitlab-ci-local
It's able to run specific jobs as well.
It's a very cool project and I have used it to run simple pipelines on my laptop.