I am trying to write a statement to find matching values from two different tables and set table 1 suppression to 1 if person_id from table 2 matches person_id from table 1 in SQL.
Table 1 = id_num, person_id, phone_number, supression
table 2 = person_id, uid
So if person_id from table 2 matches person_id from table 1 it should set each record to 1 in suppression column in table 1.
Sample data and dbms would be needed to give a reliable answer, but the general gist is like this
-- for mySql, syntax will vary by dbms
update table1
inner
join table2
on table1.personid = table2.personid
set table1.suppression = 1;
http://sqlfiddle.com/#!9/42dbf6
Thank you for the first suggestion. I ended up going with the below
update in_12768_load1_all set "suppression" = '1' from (select * from "sup1027") as a where a."person_id" = in_12768_load1_all."person_id";
I thought I explained my question pretty well. No clue why someone would down arrow this.
Related
I am trying to create a table that has columns called user_id and top5_foods (binary column). I currently have two tables, one has all of the user_ids and the foods associated with those user_ids and one table that only contains the top5 foods according to a type of calculation to select the top5 foods.
The table that I am trying to create if to have the column of the user_id and if at least one of their favorite foods is in the top_5_food table, put the value of the top5_foods as 1 and if not, 0.
Something like the following:
user_id top5_foods
----------------------
34223 1
43225 0
34323 1
I have tried to use the CASE command but it just duplicated the user_ids and mark 1 or 0 whenever it finds a food that is in the top_5_foods table. But I don't want it to duplicate. Could you please help ?
Thank you very much
If I understand correctly, a left join and aggregation:
select uf.user_id,
(count(t.food_id) > 0) as top5_foods
from user_foods uf left join
top5_foods t
on uf.food_id = t.food_id
group by uf.user_id;
Setup: Postgresql table with a customer_id and a request_id column (+ additional not relevant data).
The rows with customer_id set to NULL work as a fallback/default.
Example what the table looks like:
Goal: I want to select all rows from the table for a given customer (e.g. where customer_id = 2).
For any existent request_id: If there are no entries for the given customer, return the fallback rows (where customer is null).
So the result should look like this:
Any idea how to write the select statement for postgresql? I'm kind of stuck and couldn't really find anything helpful so far. Thanks!
This is a strange requirement.
select t.*
from t
where t.customer_id = 2 or
(t.customer_id is null and
not exists (select 1 from t t2 where t2.request_id = t.request_id and t2.customer_id = 2)
);
For performance, I would recommend an index on (request_id, customer_id).
It is a little bit tricky for me so I need your help :)
I want to update the column Relevant to 0 WHERE Contract_Status_Code is 10 OR the Date_Contract_start YEAR is the same AND the Ranking_Value is lower than the other one ON all records that have the same VIN.
So I want to compare all records which have the same VIN.
Few examples to illustrate it:
I have there two records with the VIN = 123456. One of them (ID = 6847) has a higher Ranking_Value (7) than the other one (3). The YEAR is the same as well so I want to update the column relevant to 0 where the ID is 8105.
Two records with the VIN = 654321. Both of them have the same Ranking_Value but the record with the id = 11012 has the value 10 for the column Contract_Status_Code so I want to update the relevant column to 0 where the ID = 11012.
The last two records... They have the VIN = 171819. The first one (ID = 11578) has the higher Ranking_Value. But they have a different year where the contract has started. So I don't want to update both.
It is also possible that there are three or four records with the same VIN.
I hope you understand my problem. I'm from Germany so sorry for my English :)
By considering your ID column as unique or Identity column, I can suggest you the below query for your solution:
With cte
As
(Select a.Id, a.VIN From Table a
Join (Select max(Ranking_Value) ranks,VIN From Table Group By VIN, Year(Date_Contract_start)) b
on a.VIN=b.VIN And a.Ranking_Value = b.ranks)
update table
set Relevant = 0
where (Contract_Status_Code = 10) Or
ID Not In (Select id from cte)
update table1
set Relevant = 0
where Contract_Status_Code = 10
or (VIN,Year,Ranking_value) not in(
select VIN,Year,max(Ranking_Value)
from table1
group by VIN,Year
)
I have a single table of activities, some labelled 'Assessment' (type_id of 50) and some 'Counselling' (type_id of 9) with dates of the activities. I need to compare these dates to find how long people wait for counselling after assessment. The table contains rows for many people, and that is the primary key of 'id'. My problem is how to produce a result row with both the assessment details and the counselling details for the same person, so that I can compare the dates. I've tried joining the table to itself, and tried nested subqueries, I just can't fathom it. I'm using Access 2010 btw.
Please forgive my stupidity, but here's an example of joining the table to itself that doesn't work, producing nothing (not surprising):
Table looks like:
ID TYPE_ID ACTIVITY_DATE_TIME
----------------------------------
1 9 20130411
1 v 50 v 20130511
2 9 20130511
3 9 20130511
In the above the last two rows have only had assessment so I want to ignore them, and just work on the situation where there's both assessment and counselling 'type-id'
SELECT
civicrm_activity.id, civicrm_activity.type_id,
civicrm_activity.activity_date_time,
civicrm_activity_1.type_id,
civicrm_activity_1.activity_date_time
FROM
civicrm_activity INNER JOIN civicrm_activity AS civicrm_activity_1
ON civicrm_activity.id = civicrm_activity_1.id
WHERE
civicrm_activity.type_id=9
AND civicrm_activity_1.type_id=50;
I'm actually wondering whether this is in fact not possible to do with SQL? I hope it is possible? Thank you for your patience!
Sounds to me like you only want to get the ID numbers where you have a TYPE_ID entry of both 9 and 50.
SELECT DISTINCT id FROM civicrm_activity WHERE type_id = '9' AND id IN (SELECT id FROM civicrm_activity WHERE type_id = '50');
This will give you a list of id's that has entries with both type_id 9 and 50. With that list you can now go and get the specifics.
Use this SQL for the time of type_id 9
SELECT activity_date_time FROM civicrm_activity WHERE id = 'id_from_last_sql' AND type_id = '9'
Use this SQL for the time of type_id 50
SELECT activity_date_time FROM civicrm_activity WHERE id = 'id_from_last_sql' AND type_id = '50'
Your query looks OK to me, too. The one problem might be that you use only one table alias. I don't know, but perhaps Access treats the table name "specially" such that, in effect, the WHERE clause says
WHERE
civicrm_activity.type_id=9
AND civicrm_activity.type_id=50;
That would certainly explain zero rows returned!
To fix that, use an alias for each table. I suggest shorter ones,
SELECT A.id, A.type_id, A.activity_date_time,
B.type_id, B.activity_date_time
FROM civicrm_activity as A
JOIN civicrm_activity as B
ON A.id = B.id
WHERE A.type_id=9
AND B.type_id=50;
2 records in above image are from Db, in above table Constraint are (SID and LINE_ITEM_ID),
SID and LINE_ITEM_ID both column are used to find a unique record.
My issues :
I am looking for a query it should fetch the recored from DB depending on conditions
if i search for PART_NUMBER = 'PAU43-IMB-P6'
1. it should fetch one record from DB if search for PART_NUMBER = 'PAU43-IMB-P6', no mater to which SID that item belong to if there is only one recored either under SID =1 or SID = 2.
2. it should fetch one record which is under SID = 2 only, from DB on search for PART_NUMBER = 'PAU43-IMB-P6', if there are 2 items one in SID=1 and other in SID=2.
i am looking for a query which will search for a given part_number depending on Both SID 1 and 2, and it should return value under SID =2 and it can return value under SID=1 only if the there are no records under SID=2 (query has to withstand a load of Million record search).
Thank you
Select *
from Table
where SID||LINE_ITEM_ID = (
select Max(SID)||Max(LINE_ITEM_ID)
from table
where PART_NUMBER = 'PAU43-IMB-P6'
);
If I understand correctly, for each considered LINE_ITEM_ID you want to return only the one with the largest value for SID. This is a common requirement and, as with most things in SQL, can be written in many different ways; the best performing will depend on many factors, not least of which is the SQL product you are using.
Here's one possible approach:
SELECT DISTINCT * -- use a column list
FROM YourTable AS T1
INNER JOIN (
SELECT T2.LINE_ITEM_ID,
MAX(T2.SID) AS max_SID
FROM YourTable AS T2
GROUP
BY T2.LINE_ITEM_ID
) AS DT1 (LINE_ITEM_ID, max_SID)
ON T1.LINE_ITEM_ID = DT1.LINE_ITEM_ID
AND T1.SID = DT1.max_SID;
That said, I don't recall seeing one that relies on the UNION relational operator. You could easily rewrite the above using the INTERSECT relational operator but it would be more verbose.
Well in my case it worked something like this:
select LINE_ITEM_ID,SID,price_1,part_number from (
(select LINE_ITEM_ID,SID,price_1,part_number from Table where SID = 2)
UNION
(select LINE_ITEM_ID,SID,price_1,part_number from Table SID = 1 and line_item_id NOT IN (select LINE_ITEM_ID,SID,price_1,part_number from Table SID = 2)))
This query solved my issue..........