I'm working on a CMake-based project that contains both C++ and CUDA source files, and has some headers meant to be included by both languages.
For these header files, I'd like to see the result of highlighting and syntax checking as close as possible to what NVCC, the CUDA compiler, would see, so for example, I'd like to have the preprocessor symbol __CUDACC__ be defined.
It's important to me that CMake does not have such a symbol defined, because it's really an internal symbol of the NVCC toolchain that I need for syntax-checking purposes.
I've tried "Tools->C++->Additional preprocessor directives" and it seems to have no effect. I've also tried a file named CMakeLists.txt.config which seems to have no effect either.
I'd love a suggestion for this.
To reiterate, I'm looking for a way to set a define (CPP symbol) visible to to the syntax-checking system only.
After further digging I found an attribute specific to the Clang analyzer that is defined during the analysis performed for syntax checking but not during compilation.
Note that this is purely because my project compiles with GCC, while QT Creator's syntax checking runs through Clang.
// GCC and NVCC don't have __has_feature(), so we provide a fallback
#ifndef __has_feature
# define __has_feature(x) 0
#endif
#if __has_feature(attribute_analyzer_noreturn)
# define IN_CLANG_ANALYZER 1
#else
# define IN_CLANG_ANALYZER 0
#endif
This allows a clumsy hack as follows, which may or may not be useful, depending on one's needs. Pretty much the idea is that much like you'd
have Clang observe your code even if you compile with GCC, this achieves
something similar for files inteded to be used with NVCC.
#if IN_CLANG_ANALYZER and !defined(__CUDACC__)
# define __CUDACC__
# include <cuda_device_runtime_api.h>
# include <optix_device.h>
#endif
However the substantial problem remains that when compiling with Clang, all the above falls flat on its face, because clang++, the compiler, also defines the same feature as enabled.
What's needed to fix this is some kind of macro defined in the analyzer but not in Clang, and so far I've found none like this.
At first I had hoped __clang_analyzer__ would fit this need,
but according to my version of Qt Creator (6.0.2) the macro is not defined
during syntax checking, so we're back to square one.
Related
I have a Fortran code which has been made to work on CPUs, but I need to accelerate it using GPUs and I chose to do that with OpenACC.
This code uses FFTW libraries when compiled with gfortran. However, as you may know, these libraries cannot be used with nvfortran. So, I have to go with cufft libraries.
Therefore, I used this conversion giude. The problem is, fftw allows users to build a Fortran module with iso_c_binding including the file fftw.f, while cufft does not have this kind of feature and you need to include the cufft.h header.
When compiling with nvfortran (I use -cpp, -Mfree, -lcufft and -l cufftw flags, checked the include and lib directories given to -I and -L flags) I get many errors:
The paths in all the #include inside the cufft.h file are wrong and I had to change them manually
All the comments ("//") in the header files are seen as errors (had to remove them manually)
“Label field of continuation line is not blank” errors everywhere in header files, starting from line 2 (in lines 1 I solved that giving 7 spaces - but didn’t I use -Mfree for that?)
Please help me, I don’t think that the right way to do so is to change files manually…
Thanks in advance for helping
You cannot include headers for the C programming language in Fortran source code. Instead use the Fortran interfaces to any libraries you need (provided such interfaces exist).
We ship a cuFFT interface module with the compilers. You should just be able to add "use cufft".
Full documentation can be found at: https://docs.nvidia.com/hpc-sdk/compilers/fortran-cuda-interfaces/index.html#cf-fft-runtime
Example codes are shipped with the NVHPC SDK which can be found in the "<INSTALL_DIR>/Linux_x86_64/<RELEASE>/examples/CUDA-Libraries/cuFFT/"" directory
This question already has an answer here:
What is the modern method for setting general compile flags in CMake?
(1 answer)
Closed 1 year ago.
I want to use CMake to create modular embedded C++ software. I separated hal-drivers static library, some common-utils library and top target device depends on those two what is marked using target_link_libraries like this:
target_link_libraries(device
PRIVATE
hal-drivers
common-utils
)
It is easy to propagate compile definitions and option up in "dependency ladder" using commands like this:
target_compile_definitions(hal-drivers
INTERFACE
STM32F415xx
USE_HAL_DRIVER
)
This way any target utilising hal-drivers header files will preprocess those headers correctlym, and I found this CMake scripts feature (propagation of "settings") great, but it is not the point of this question.
The question is how should I propagate common compiler options like for example -fdata-sections or -Wall for every target in my project? I know I can
create dummy (no source and no header files, just compile options) interface target which will be consumed by every other target in project but this looks like a workaround...
specify mentioned compiler options for every target separatly, since I have only about 5 targets, but it will be very problematic to maintain.
In my commercial work project (50 targets) my boss ended up with an ugly compromise: setting common compile options in top CMakeLists.txt as cached variable and then applying this variable in all targets manually, but we dont like it at all.
Bear in mind: I do have solutions that work, I am interested in recomended solutions. Also I am using Professional CMake: A Practical Guide 9th Edition on daily basis (its a great book), but I failed to found answer on my question in this book.
I found an answer.
I guess my whining about lack of elegant solution is due to my attachment to syntactic sugar like target_compile_options, but the thing is CMake evolved in hardship and not every CMake feature is pretty, but it works.
There is an answer: https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/variable/CMAKE_LANG_FLAGS.html
The flags in this variable will be passed to the compiler before those in the per-configuration CMAKE_<LANG>_FLAGS_<CONFIG> variant, and before flags added by the add_compile_options() or target_compile_options() commands.
So I have to append my custom options to this special CMake variable like this:
project(Device C CXX ASM)
set(CMAKE_C_FLAGS "${CMAKE_C_FLAGS} -fdata-sections")
This way it will flood all targets with fdata-sections.
Leaving this thread as interesting note.
I was having trouble with the linker for the embedded arm gcc compiler, and I found a tutorial somewhere online saying that I could fix my linker errors in arm-none-eabi-gcc by including the argument -specs=nosys.specs, which worked for me, and it was able to compile my code.
My chip is an ATSAM7SE256 microcontroller, which to my understanding is an arm7tdmi processor using the armv4t and thumb instruction sets, and I've been compiling my code using:
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv4t -mtune=arm7tdmi -specs=nosys.specs -o <exe_name>.elf <input_files>
And the code compiles with no issue, but I have no idea if it's doing what I think it's doing.
What is the significance of a spec file? What other values can you set with -specs=, and in what situations would you want to? Is nosys.specs the value I want for a completely embedded arm microcontroller?
It is documented at: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-11.1.0/gcc/Overall-Options.html#Overall-Options
It is a file containing switches to override standard defaults for various build components such as the compiler, assembler and linker. For example it can be used to replace the default C library.
I have never seen it used; typically bare-metal embedded system builds explicitly specify --nostdlib then explicitly link the required library. It could be used for environment specific build environments to link other default code such as an RTOS I guess. Personally I'd rather make all that explicit on the command line that hiding it in a file somewhere.
Essentially it applies the switches specified in the file as if they were defaults, so can be used to define defaults for specific build and execution environments.
The format of the specs file is documented at https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-11.1.0/gcc/Spec-Files.html#Spec-Files
Without seeing both the linker errors and the content of the nosys.specs file in this case it is difficult to say how or why it solved your linker problem. The alternative solution of course would be to apply whatever switches are in the specs file directly.
I'm using CMake for a moderate-sized Fortran project; sometimes I build it with gfortran, other times with ifort. When I want to do a debug build, the compiler flags are different; I'd like to have CMake automatically check which compiler is being used and set the flags accordingly.
It looks like this answer shows how to do the same thing for different C++ compilers. There's an example of how to check compilers with Fortran, using
if (Fortran_COMPILER_NAME MATCHES "gfortran.*")
However, this fails to invoke the conditional, because CMake has decided to use f95. Of course, f95 happens to alias to gfortran, but CMake doesn't detect that.
What's the right way to do this?
You can use also use CMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER_ID:
if ("${CMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER_ID}" MATCHES "Intel")
# something
elseif("${CMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER_ID}" MATCHES "GNU")
# something else
endif
Best way is to read file CMakeDetermineFortranCompiler.cmake and related files referenced from it.
Rather than trying to special case for different compilers you should actually test that your compiler supports the flags you want to set using check_fortran_compiler_flag like so:
include(CheckFortranCompilerFlag)
check_fortran_compiler_flag("-my-flag" _my_flag)
if(_my_flag)
set(CMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS "${CMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS} -my-flag")
endif()
This is both safer and (I think) simpler because you don't need the implied knowledge of which compiler (and version) supports which flag.
It's simple. Only indicate the full path of compiler installed e.g.gfortran. the code: cmake -DCMAKE_fortran_PATH=/usr/bin/gfortran
I am trying to link a statically created .a library with another piece of C code.
However, in the final executable several symbols (function names) are are found missing when seen with the nm command. This is due to the fact that the linker (gcc being called) is stripping the symbols which are not referenced in the other piece of C code that is being linked with the library. The function symbol that I am trying to find with the nm command is visible in the .a library.
How can I make the linker not strip the symbols omitted this way?
Compile in gcc with -dynamic to force the compiler to include all symbols. But make sure that's what you really want, since it's wasteful.
Might be useful for some static factory patterns.
Generally, the linker does strip out other symbols - mainly for
Reduce the final size of the executable
Speed up the execution of the program
There are two trains of thoughts here:
When you use the option -O as part of the gcc command line, that is optimizing the code and thus all debugging information gets stripped out, and hence the linker will automatically do the same.
When you use the option -g as part of the gcc command line, that includes all debugging information so that the executable can be loaded under the debugger with symbols intact.
In essence those two are mutually exclusive - you cannot have both combined.
So it depends on which switches did you use for this to happen. Usually, -g switch is for internal debugging and testing prior to public release. The opposite would be something like this -O2 which makes the compiler smart enough to generate a executable that would be considered optimized such as removing dead variables, unrolling loops and so on.
Hope this helps and gives you the hint
Normally you need to call some registration function in your application to generate such a reference. Of course if you don't have access to the code of the first library, you can only use the -g option as described by tommieb75.