I'm testing a graphQL endpoint. I want to keep the query separate from the feature file so that it can be reused elsewhere. The query has an embedded string which I want to pass in variables from my examples, however, I can't seem to update the query.
Here is the feature file:
Here is the query file:
Any help would be appreciated, thanks.
I think best practice is to read the query part alone as a text file, and then form the JSON within the test. Your JSON is actually not well-formed because JSON does not allow line-feeds within values, that's why you have the red squiggly line in your screen shot.
Refer articles like this: https://www.katk.dev/graphql-karate
Best practice is to use the variables in the JSON in addition to the query. If not, be aware that you can do placeholder substitution in plain-text using Karate: https://github.com/karatelabs/karate#replace
Also read this part of the documentation: https://github.com/karatelabs/karate#dont-parse-treat-as-raw-text
Related
I know how to call specific scenario from another feature file and pass parameters along. But is there a way I can do it while checking for condition using 'if'?
For instance:
* if (role=="SME"||role=="BA") karate.call('classpath:rough/utility.feature#checkDisabled'){element: #(elem)}
If this is the wrong implementation as what I get from the console. Please suggest me a way how can i achieve this in karate?
Thanks
When you use karate.call() put the second argument inside the round brackets. This is pure JS and "Karate-style" embedded expressions will not work.
* if (role=="SME"||role=="BA") karate.call('classpath:rough/utility.feature#checkDisabled', {element: elem})
Please take some time to read this part of the docs: https://github.com/karatelabs/karate#call-vs-read
What is the difference between reading the properties from payload. for example there is a property in the payload which is named as con_id. when i read this property like this #[payload.con_id] then it is coming as null. where as #[payload.'con_id'] is returning the value.
few other notations which i know of is #[payload['con_id']] or #[json:con_id]
which one should be used at which scenario? if there are any special cases to use any specific notation then please let me know the scenario also.
Also, what is the common notation that has to be used from a mule soft platform supported point of view.
In Mule 3 any of those syntax are valid. Except the json: evaluator is for querying json documents where as the others are for querying maps/objects. Also the json: evaluator is deprecated in Mule 3 in favor of transforming to a map and using the MEL expressions below.
payload.property
payload.'property'
payload['property']
The reason the first fails in your case, is beacaue of the special character '_'. The underscore forces the field name to be wrapped in quotes.
Typically the . notation is preferred over the [''] as its shorter for accessing map fields. And then simply wrap property names in '' for any fields with special chars.
Note in Mule 4, you don't need to transform to a map/object first. Dataweave expression replace MEL as the expression language and allow you to directly query json or any type of payload without transforming to a map first.
I'd like to be able to specify a string, let's say
NSString * pathPattern = /api/elements/:id/subelement/:type
and call a simple function
[pathPattern build:#{#":id" => id, #"subelement" => subelement}]
to generate the URL path.
Obviously I can build a simple category to do this, but does something exist that handles such things in a generic way, and maybe has additional useful features for this kind of thing that I haven't thought of at this time?
Yes, RestKit already injects parameters into path patterns. Internally it uses SOCKit to perform this parameterisation.
It actually uses exactly the format you have in the question and where the parameter names match keys on the supplied object for mapping.
The path pattern can also be used during response mapping to take values back out of the request URL.
I'm currently working on my first major project in clojure and have run into a question regarding coding style and the most "clojure-esque" way of doing something. Basically I have a function I'm writing which takes in a data structure and a template that the function will try to massage the data structure into. The template structure will look something like this:
{
:key1 (:string (:opt :param))
:key2 (:int (:opt :param))
:key3 (:obj (:tpl :template-structure))
:key4 (:list (:tpl :template-structure))
}
Each key is an atom that will be searched for in the given data structure, and it's value will be attempted to be matched to the type given in the template structure. So it would look for :key1 and check that it's a string, for instance. The return value would be a map that has :key1 pointing to the value from the given data structure (the function could potentially change the value depending on the options given).
In the case of :obj it takes in another template structure, and recursively calls itself on that value and the template structure, and places the result from that in the return. However, if there's an error I want that error returned directly.
Similarly for lists I want it to basically do a map of the function again, except in the case of an error which I want returned directly.
My question is what is the best way to handle these errors? Some simple exception handling would be the easiest way, but I feel that it's not the most functional way. I could try and babysit the errors all the way up the chain with tons of if statements, but that also doesn't seem very sporting. Is there something simple I'm missing or is this just an ugly problem?
You might be interested in schematic, which does pretty similar stuff. You can see how it's used in the tests, and the implementation.
Basically I defined an error function, which returns nil for correctly-formatted data, or a string describing the error. Doing it with exceptions instead would make the plumbing easier, but would make it harder to get the detailed error messages like "[person: [first_name: expected string, got integer]]".
Aside from getting any real work done, I have an itch. My itch is to write a view engine that closely mimics a template system from another language (Template Toolkit/Perl). This is one of those if I had time/do it to learn something new kind of projects.
I've spent time looking at CoCo/R and ANTLR, and honestly, it makes my brain hurt, but some of CoCo/R is sinking in. Unfortunately, most of the examples are about creating a compiler that reads source code, but none seem to cover how to create a processor for templates.
Yes, those are the same thing, but I can't wrap my head around how to define the language for templates where most of the source is the html, rather than actual code being parsed and run.
Are there any good beginner resources out there for this kind of thing? I've taken a ganer at Spark, which didn't appear to have the grammar in the repo.
Maybe that is overkill, and one could just test-replace template syntax with c# in the file and compile it. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc136756.aspx#S2
If you were in my shoes and weren't a language creating expert, where would you start?
The Spark grammar is implemented with a kind-of-fluent domain specific language.
It's declared in a few layers. The rules which recognize the html syntax are declared in MarkupGrammar.cs - those are based on grammar rules copied directly from the xml spec.
The markup rules refer to a limited subset of csharp syntax rules declared in CodeGrammar.cs - those are a subset because Spark only needs to recognize enough csharp to adjust single-quotes around strings to double-quotes, match curley braces, etc.
The individual rules themselves are of type ParseAction<TValue> delegate which accept a Position and return a ParseResult. The ParseResult is a simple class which contains the TValue data item parsed by the action and a new Position instance which has been advanced past the content which produced the TValue.
That isn't very useful on it's own until you introduce a small number of operators, as described in Parsing expression grammar, which can combine single parse actions to build very detailed and robust expressions about the shape of different syntax constructs.
The technique of using a delegate as a parse action came from a Luke H's blog post Monadic Parser Combinators using C# 3.0. I also wrote a post about Creating a Domain Specific Language for Parsing.
It's also entirely possible, if you like, to reference the Spark.dll assembly and inherit a class from the base CharGrammar to create an entirely new grammar for a particular syntax. It's probably the quickest way to start experimenting with this technique, and an example of that can be found in CharGrammarTester.cs.
Step 1. Use regular expressions (regexp substitution) to split your input template string to a token list, for example, split
hel<b>lo[if foo]bar is [bar].[else]baz[end]world</b>!
to
write('hel<b>lo')
if('foo')
write('bar is')
substitute('bar')
write('.')
else()
write('baz')
end()
write('world</b>!')
Step 2. Convert your token list to a syntax tree:
* Sequence
** Write
*** ('hel<b>lo')
** If
*** ('foo')
*** Sequence
**** Write
***** ('bar is')
**** Substitute
***** ('bar')
**** Write
***** ('.')
*** Write
**** ('baz')
** Write
*** ('world</b>!')
class Instruction {
}
class Write : Instruction {
string text;
}
class Substitute : Instruction {
string varname;
}
class Sequence : Instruction {
Instruction[] items;
}
class If : Instruction {
string condition;
Instruction then;
Instruction else;
}
Step 3. Write a recursive function (called the interpreter), which can walk your tree and execute the instructions there.
Another, alternative approach (instead of steps 1--3) if your language supports eval() (such as Perl, Python, Ruby): use a regexp substitution to convert the template to an eval()-able string in the host language, and run eval() to instantiate the template.
There are sooo many thing to do. But it does work for on simple GET statement plus a test. That's a start.
http://github.com/claco/tt.net/
In the end, I already had too much time in ANTLR to give loudejs' method a go. I wanted to spend a little more time on the whole process rather than the parser/lexer. Maybe in version 2 I can have a go at the Spark way when my brain understands things a little more.
Vici Parser (formerly known as LazyParser.NET) is an open-source tokenizer/template parser/expression parser which can help you get started.
If it's not what you're looking for, then you may get some ideas by looking at the source code.