Cloudflare Error 524 : Connection timeout - cloudflare

Reason behind error524 connection timeout.
How to fix it even though the website havent cover high storage
Server origin that is being used is from India.
website :https://motogenes.com/
trying to fix the error.
pause the running website then again enable to run the website via cloudflare
.

Error 524 is usually related to a connection timeout issue between Cloudflare and the origin server. This means that Cloudflare was unable to establish a connection with the origin server in a timely manner.
It's hard to tell what is the issue without debugging the server, but I would start by checking the firewall and network settings.

In documentation of Cloudflare, they say that you can change value of timeOut but only accounts Entreprice
https://api.cloudflare.com/#zone-settings-get-proxy-read-timeout-setting

Related

Is there any way to increase the cloudflare proxy request timeout limit(524)? [duplicate]

Is it possible to increase CloudFlare's time-out? If yes, how?
My code takes a while to execute and I wasn't planning on Ajaxifying it the coming days.
No, CloudFlare only offers that kind of customisation on Enterprise plans.
CloudFlare will time out if it fails to establish a HTTP handshake after 15 seconds.
CloudFlare will also wait 100 seconds for a HTTP response from your server before you will see a 524 timeout error.
Other than this there can be timeouts on your origin web server.
It sounds like you need Inter-Process Communication. HTTP should not be used a mechanism for performing blocking tasks without sending responses, these kind of activities should instead be abstracted away to a non-HTTP service on the server. By using RabbitMQ (or any other MQ) you can then pass messages from the HTTP element of your server over to the processing service on your webserver.
I was in communication with Cloudflare about the same issue, and also with the technical support of RabbitMQ.
RabbitMQ suggested using Web Stomp which relies on Web Sockets. However Cloudflare suggested...
Websockets would create a persistent connection through Cloudflare and
there's no timeout as such, but the best way of resolving this would
be just to process the request in the background and respond asynchronously, and serve a 'Loading...' page or similar, rather than having the user to wait for 100 seconds. That would also give a better user experience to the user as well
UPDATE:
For completeness, I will also record here that
I also asked CloudFlare about running the report via a subdomain and "grey-clouding" it and they replied as follows:
I will suggest to verify on why it takes more than 100 seconds for the
reports. Disabling Cloudflare on the sub-domain, allow attackers to
know about your origin IP and attackers will be attacking directly
bypassing Cloudflare.
FURTHER UPDATE
I finally solved this problem by running the report using a thread and using AJAX to "poll" whether the report had been created. See Bypassing CloudFlare's time-out of 100 seconds
Cloudflare doesn't trigger 504 errors on timeout
504 is a timeout triggered by your server - nothing to do with Cloudflare.
524 is a timeout triggered by Cloudflare.
See: https://support.cloudflare.com/hc/en-us/articles/115003011431-Troubleshooting-Cloudflare-5XX-errors#502504error
524 error? There is a workaround:
As #mjsa mentioned, Cloudflare only offers timeout settings to Enterprise clients, which is not an option for most people.
However, you can disable Cloudflare proxing for that specific (sub)domain by turning the orange cloud into grey:
Before:
After:
Note: it will disable extra functionalities for that specific (sub)domain, including IP masking and SSL certificates.
As Cloudflare state in their documentation:
If you regularly run HTTP requests that take over 100 seconds to
complete (for example large data exports), consider moving those
long-running processes to a subdomain that is not proxied by
Cloudflare. That subdomain would have the orange cloud icon toggled to
grey in the Cloudflare DNS Settings . Note that you cannot use a Page
Rule to circumvent Error 524.
I know that it cannot be treated like a solution but there is a 2 ways of avoiding this.
1) Since this timeout is often related to long time generating of something, this type of works can be done through crontab or if You have access to SSH you can run a PHP command directly to execute. In this case connection is not served through Cloudflare so it goes as long as your configuration allows it to run. Check it on Google how to run scripts from command line or how to determine them in crontab by using /usr/bin/php /direct/path/to/file.php
2) You can create subdomain that is not added to cloudlflare and move Your script there and run them directly through URL, Ajax call or whatever.
There is a good answer on Cloudflare community forums about this:
If you need to have scripts that run for longer than around 100 seconds without returning any data to the browser, you can’t run these through Cloudflare. There are a couple of options: Run the scripts via a grey-clouded subdomain or change the script so that it kicks off a long-running background process and quickly returns a status which the browser can poll until the background process has completed, at which point the full response can be returned. This is the way most people do this type of action as keeping HTTP connections open for a long time is unreliable and can be very taxing also.
This topic on Stackoverflow is high in SERPs so I decided to write down this answer for those who will find it usefull.
https://support.cloudflare.com/hc/en-us/articles/115003011431-Troubleshooting-Cloudflare-5XX-errors#502504error
Cloudflare 524 error results from a web page taking more than 100 seconds to completely respond.
This can be overridden to (up to) 600 seconds ... if you change to "Enterprise" Cloudflare account. The cost of Enterprise is roughtly $40k per year (annual contract required).
If you are getting your results with curl, you could use the resolve option to directly access your IP, not using the Cloudflare proxy IP:
For example:
curl --max-time 120 -s -k --resolve lifeboat.com:443:127.0.0.1 -L https://lifeboat.com/blog/feed
The simplest way to do this is to increase your proxy waiting timeout.
If you are using Nginx for instance you can simply add this line in your /etc/nginx/sites-availables/your_domain:
location / {
...
proxy_read_timeout 600s; # this increases it by 10mins; feel free to change as you see fit with your needs.
...
}
If the issue persists, make sure you use let's encrypt to secure your server alongside Nginx and then disable the orange cloud on that specific subdomain on Cloudflare.
Here are some resources you can check to help do that
installing-nginx-on-ubuntu-server
secure-nginx-with-let's-encrypt

Is a TLS negotiation failure error proof that connectivity exists?

We are attempting to allow a client to access one of our QA environments. They are seeing the following error in IE:
This page can't be displayed
Turn on TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and TLS 1.2 in Advanced settings and try connecting to https://oursite.com again. if this error persists, it is possible that this site uses an unsupported protocol or cipher suite such as RC4 (link for the details), which is not considered secure. Pelase contact your site administrator.
I am not asking stackoverflow users to solve this problem.
I am asking the following very specific question:
Because we are seeing this error, does this prove that connectivity exists, i.e. our firewall is letting them through? I am thinking if they were blocked at the firewall they would simply get a timeout or perhaps a 403 or 500 error. since they are getting so far as to be able to see what TLS protocols are supported on the web server, I infer that they must be able to communicate with it on OSI levels 1-4. Am I correct? (I need to know whether to engage the networking team, which runs the firewalls, or to engage the application support team, which sets up the TLS configuration).
Note that SSL terminates on our IIS web server (we don't have SSL offloading).
Unfortunately we have port 80 blocked so we can only test on 443; otherwise I would suggest using http access to help isolate the problem.
... if they were blocked at the firewall they would simply get a timeout or perhaps a 403 or 500 error.
In order to send back a 403 or 500 error the firewall must have successfully done the SSL handshake with the client because the HTTP response (which includes the status code, i.e. 403, 500..) will only be sent inside the encrypted connection. There is no way to return a 403 or 500 inside the SSL handshake already.
Typical behavior with a firewall in between would be a timeout (firewalls drops packet) or more likely a connection reset or close (firewall resets or closes the connection). With a simple packet filter firewall it will usually block the TCP connection already, resulting in connection refused. But a firewall using DPI might actually let the TCP connection establish and only block after it gets actual data based on the content of this payload (i.e. application detection).
The last case might result in the error you see. But exactly the same behavior can be seen if there is a problem on the server side where the server simply closes or resets the connection. Some TLS stacks show such behavior (instead of sending back a TLS alert) when they cannot find a shared protocol version or cipher. Insofar you can neither conclude from this error message that the firewall is blocking the connection nor can you conclude that the server is causing the error.

What's disconnecting my Websocket connection? (cloudflare, apache's mod_proxy)

All my websocket connections arrive over the http(s) port and are proxied to the backend WS server:
[client]----[cloudflare]----[Apache 2.4 mod_proxy_wstunnel]----[websocket server]
Once a client connects to my WS server, if no data goes through the socket, the connection is always cut off after exactly 100 seconds.
In the dev environment, with the same client, also using mod_proxy_wstunnel, and the same WS server, this limitation does not occur
If the WS server sends a ping every 60 seconds, the connection is not cut off.
I'd like to know whether anyone has seen documentation about Cloudflare disconnecting quiet WS connections, and whether mod_proxy as it is setup on the server could be the cause. I'm not sure how to get to the bottom of this.
A support tech confirmed to me via email that Cloudflare automatically disconnects websocket connections that remain dormant for 100 seconds.
Cloudflare has 100 seconds timeout.
Only enterprise users of Cloudflare can change this setting.
So the solution is to have some keep-alive to re-open to connection. Alternatively, a much better solution would be not to use CloudFlare at all. It will give you much more flexibility, and you won't have to depend on external third party.
I faced same issue. I changed "proxied" mode to DNS only and bought my own certificate from GoDaddy. After that not facing that issue. Detailed discussion is present here: https://techxperiment.blogspot.com/2020/06/aws-ec2-tomcat-jsr-356-secure.html
I highly suggest that send pings to the connection to avoid disconnecting. Sending pings to the WebSocket connection can help to prevent disconnections.

ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED over SSL

I've been searching and haven't found a solution for this yet.
I have a LAMP server running Centos 5 and cPanel. I have converted the site from http to https. The site works just fine. However, periodically there are ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED errors on my PC only. This happens only over https and only periodically. Port 443 is open on the server.
FTP, Remote MySQL, SSH, and HTTPS connections are refused during that brief period. I've checked the server's firewall to allow my ip and unblock my ip. The ip is allowed and was never blocked.
We have other PCs connected to the same network with no issues during the brief period where only my connection is refused. I've cleared my cookies and cache with no luck. However, when I run a trace route, it stops at the first hop in our network.
Any suggestions with what I need to do or look at?
Do you think it is a server related issue?
Do you think it is an internal network related issue?
Could it be the issuer of the SSL cert?
You're probably running into a full backlog queue. A Windows server will actively refuse a connection if the backlog queue is currently full. The defence is to increase the backlog or speed up the accept loop.

Charles Error Report: How to over come it?

I have recently switched from mac development environment to windows development environment. I was used Chrles proxy extensively to capture network traffic, requests and response details. Right now I have installed Charles proxy version 3.7 in windows 8. How ever I have observed that the website on which I am working is not opening at all with Charles proxy ON. It is showing below exception message. And it is working perfectly for all other websites.
Charles Error Report
Failed to connect to remote host
Charles failed to connect to the remote host. Check that your Internet
connection is ok and that the remote host is accessible. Maybe your
network uses a proxy server to access the Internet? You can configure
Charles to use an external proxy server in the External Proxy
Settings.
The actual exception reported was:
java.net.ConnectException: Connection timed out: connect Charles
Proxy, http://www.charlesproxy.com/
Research that I have done before coming to SE:
I have searched in google with the keyword "Charles Error Report-Failed to connect to remote host". I got couple of links which are related to the above issue.
First link says to check for external proxy setting. I have checked, there are no external proxy settings in my computer.
Second link says open the url in browser and close charles proxy and reopen it. I did that. Still no luck.
How to overcome this issue?
Do you get the same problem with other proxies like Fiddler? If so, it's probably not related to Charles but either a network problem or inability of your application to work with a proxy.
Other causes may be using HTTPS (which can cause certificate errors) or using the loopback address (localhost or 127.0.0.1) which may or may not be ignored by the proxy.
UPDATE
In IE10+ Enhanced Protection Mode prevents untrusted applications from accessing local resources. Pages and sites that are not in the Trusted Zone are considered unstrusted, so they can't connect to any local proxy. Fiddler includes a configuration button to configure Windows 8 to bypass this. You can find a very good explanation of what happens and why here.
In Windows 8, EPM is enabled only for Metro IE. In 8.1 it is enabled by default even for Desktop IE.
You may be able to make Charles work again simply by adding your site's address to the Trusted Zone in IE's security settings, or you can download the EnableLoopBackUtility mentioned in Configure Fiddler for Windows 8 Metro-style applications to allow IE to connect to your site through the local proxy
I have experienced this as a timing or caching related gremlin. For me, in most cases, this is resolved by doing force-reload a few times in the browser. Doing so is slightly different on each platform. In Mac/Chrome, holding down Command + Shift + R for a couple of seconds does the trick. In Win/IE, holding Shift and clicking the reload icon in the address bar a couple of times does it - in theory, Shift + F5 should do the same thing, but it does not work as well.