I used the tensorflow tf.keras.metrics.MeanSquaredError() metric to evaluate the mean squared error between two numpy arrays. But each time I call mse() it give a different result.
a = np.random.random(size=(100,2000))
b = np.random.random(size=(100,2000))
for i in range(100):
v = mse(a, b).numpy()
plt.scatter(i,v)
print(v)
where I had previously defined mse = tf.keras.metrics.MeanSquaredError() Here is the Output. Any idea what is going wrong?
np.random.random generates random data every run. So, your code should result in different mse, shouldn't it?
run 1:
[0.87148841 0.50221413 0.49858526 ... 0.22311888 0.71320089 0.36298912]
Run 2:
[0.14941241 0.78560523 0.62436783 ... 0.1865485 0.2730567 0.49300401]
Related
I would like to convert the ActorDistributionModel from a trained PPOClipAgent into a Tensorflow Lite model for deployment. How should I accomplish this?
I have tried following this tutorial (see section at bottom converting policy to TFLite), but the network outputs a single action (the policy) rather than the density function over actions that I desire.
I think perhaps something like this could work:
tf.compat.v2.saved_model.save(actor_net, saved_model_path, signature=?)
... if I knew how to set the signature parameter. That line of code executes without error when I omit the signature parameter, but I get the following error on load (I assume because the signature is not set up correctly):
converter = tf.lite.TFLiteConverter.from_saved_model(saved_model_path)
File "/home/ais/salesmentor.ai/MDPSolver/src/solver/ppo_budget.py", line 336, in train_eval
converter = tf.lite.TFLiteConverter.from_saved_model(saved_model_path)
File "/home/ais/.local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/tensorflow/lite/python/lite.py", line 1275, in from_saved_model
raise ValueError("Only support a single signature key.")
ValueError: Only support a single signature key.
This appears to work. I won't accept the answer until I have completed an end-to-end test, though.
def export_model(actor_net, observation_spec, saved_model_path):
predict_signature = {
'action_pred':
tf.function(func=lambda x: actor_net(x, None, None)[0].logits,
input_signature=(tf.TensorSpec(shape=observation_spec.shape),)
)
}
tf.saved_model.save(actor_net, saved_model_path, signatures=predict_signature)
# Convert to TensorFlow Lite model.
converter = tf.lite.TFLiteConverter.from_saved_model(saved_model_path,
signature_keys=["action_pred"])
converter.target_spec.supported_ops = [
tf.lite.OpsSet.TFLITE_BUILTINS, # enable TensorFlow Lite ops.
tf.lite.OpsSet.SELECT_TF_OPS # enable TensorFlow ops.
]
tflite_policy = converter.convert()
with open(os.path.join(saved_model_path, 'policy.tflite'), 'wb') as f:
f.write(tflite_policy)
The solution wraps the actor_net in a lambda because I was unable to figure out how to specify the signature with all three expected arguments. Through the lambda, I convert the function into using a single argument (a tensor). I expect to pass None to the other two arguments in my use case, so there is nothing lost in this approach.
I see you using CartPole as the model simulation, Agent DQN, and Model learning and Evaluation from links provided TF-Agent Checkpointer. For simple understanding, you need to understand about the distributions and your model limits ( less than 6 actions determining at a time ).
Discretes Distribution, answer the question to the points but the links is how they implement AgentDQN on TF- Agent.
temp = tf.random.normal([10], 1, 0.2, tf.float32), mean is one and the standard deviation is 0.2. Overall of result summation product is nearby one and its variance is 0.2, when they have 10 actions to determine the possibility of the result is the same action is 1 from 5 or 0.5. random normal
Coefficient is ladder steps or you understand as IF and ELSE conditions or SWITCH conditions such as at the gap of 0 to 5, 5 to 10, 10 to 15, and continue.
The matrixes product from the Matrix coefficients and randoms is selected 4 - 5 actions sorted by priority, significant and select the most effects in rows.
The ArgMax is 0 to 9 which is actions 0 - 9 that respond to the environment input co-variances.
Sample: To the points, random distributions and selective agents ( we call selective agent maybe the questioner has confused with NN DQN )
temp = tf.random.normal([10], 1, 0.2, tf.float32)
temp = np.asarray(temp) * np.asarray([ coefficient_0, coefficient_1, coefficient_2, coefficient_3, coefficient_4, coefficient_5, coefficient_6, coefficient_7, coefficient_8, coefficient_9 ])
temp = tf.nn.softmax(temp)
action = int(np.argmax(temp))
I want to generate random data in a py_func op, but when I run this code, I get different random data which is expected as the same in this code.
I think the problem come with the tf.data.Dataset.map api. When I get the values of d5, it will run random function twice which d3 and d4 will get different values in this case.
Thanks.
import tensorflow as tf
import numpy as np
def random(x):
def random_(x):
x = np.float32(np.random.rand())
print("run random_")
return x,x
return tf.compat.v1.py_func(
random_,
[x],
[tf.float32, tf.float32],
name="generate_random")
d1 = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices(tf.zeros(10))
d2 = d1.map(random)
d3 = d2.map(lambda x1,x2: x1)
d4 = d2.map(lambda x1,x2: x2)
d5 = tf.data.Dataset.zip( (d3,d4) )
it = d5.make_one_shot_iterator()
fetch = it.get_next()
with tf.Session() as sess:
while True:
X = sess.run(fetch)
print(X)
As per the documentation -
Maps map_func across the elements of this dataset.
This transformation applies map_func to each element of this dataset,
and returns a new dataset containing the transformed elements, in the
same order as they appeared in the input. map_func can be used to
change both the values and the structure of a dataset's elements. For
example, adding 1 to each element, or projecting a subset of element
components.
I think it’s best to see the map function as part of the pipeline. Every time you run map, nothing happens with the data yet. Instead, a chain of operations is made in the background. Note that these transformations are executed lazy. Only when you actually request data from the dataset (like with a for loop and batch), the source data from your dataset are fed through the pipeline. At that time, each map is applied on the image or on the batch.
As an alternative, you can fulfill your requirement as below -
Code -
%tensorflow_version 1.x
import tensorflow as tf
import numpy as np
def random(x):
x = np.float32(np.random.rand())
print("run random_")
return x
a = []
for i in range(10):
a.append(random(i))
d1 = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices(a)
d5 = tf.data.Dataset.zip( (d1,d1) )
it = d5.make_one_shot_iterator()
fetch = it.get_next()
with tf.Session() as sess:
while True:
X = sess.run(fetch)
print(X)
Output -
run random_
run random_
run random_
run random_
run random_
run random_
run random_
run random_
run random_
run random_
WARNING:tensorflow:From <ipython-input-2-ee4ae8ca7ce4>:18: DatasetV1.make_one_shot_iterator (from tensorflow.python.data.ops.dataset_ops) is deprecated and will be removed in a future version.
Instructions for updating:
Use `for ... in dataset:` to iterate over a dataset. If using `tf.estimator`, return the `Dataset` object directly from your input function. As a last resort, you can use `tf.compat.v1.data.make_one_shot_iterator(dataset)`.
(0.6963448, 0.6963448)
(0.92889917, 0.92889917)
(0.054273304, 0.054273304)
(0.3719434, 0.3719434)
(0.33791015, 0.33791015)
(0.873847, 0.873847)
(0.66726416, 0.66726416)
(0.77356577, 0.77356577)
(0.4188753, 0.4188753)
(0.8886825, 0.8886825)
Hope this answers your question. Happy Learning.
The following code results in a very unhelpful error:
import tensorflow as tf
x = tf.Variable(tf.constant(0.), name="x")
with tf.Session() as s:
val = s.run(x.assign(1))
print(val) # 1
val = s.run(x, {x: 2})
print(val) # 2
val = s.run(x.assign(1), {x: 0.}) # InvalidArgumentError
tensorflow.python.framework.errors_impl.InvalidArgumentError: Input 0 of node Assign_1 was passed float from _arg_x_0_0:0 incompatible with expected float_ref.
How did I get this error?
Why do I get this error?
Here's what I could infer.
How did I get this error?
This error is seen when attempting to perform the following two operations in a single session run:
A Tensorflow variable is assigned a value
That same variable is also passed a value as part of the feed_dict
This is why the first 2 runs succeed (they both don't simultaneously attempt to perform both these operations).
Why do I get this error?
I am not sure, but I don't think this was an intentional design choice by Google. Here's my explanation:
Firstly, the TF(TensorFlow) source code (basically) resolves x.assign(1) to tf.assign(x, 1) which gives us a hint for better understand the error message when it says Input 0.
The error message refers to x when it says Input 0 of the assign op.
It goes on to say that the first argument of the assign op was passed float from _arg_x_0_0:0.
TLDR
Thus for a run where a TF variable is provided as a feed, that variable will no longer be treated as a variable (but instead as the value it was assigned), and thus any attempts at further assigning a value to it would be erroneous since only TF variables can be assigned a value in the graph.
Fix
If your graph has variable assignment operation, don't pass a value to that same variable in your feed_dict. ¯_(ツ)_/¯. Assuming you're using the feed_dict to provide an initial value, you could instead assign it a value in a prior session run. Or, leverage tf.control_dependencies when building your graph to assign it an initial value from a placeholder as shown below:
import tensorflow as tf
x = tf.Variable(tf.constant(0.), name="x")
initial_x = tf.placeholder(tf.float32)
assign_from_placeholder = x.assign(initial_x)
with tf.control_dependencies([assign_from_placeholder]):
x_assign = x.assign(1)
with tf.Session() as s:
val = s.run(x_assign, {initial_x: 0.}) # Success!
Trying debug statements in Python/tensorflow1.0 using jupyter , but does not get any output printed from tf.Print
Thought sess.run(during training in below code) should have evaluated db1 tensor and print output which did not happen
However db1.eval in evaluate phase , printing entire tensor X with out "message X:".
def combine_inputs(X):
db1=tf.Print(X,[X],message='X:')
return (tf.matmul(X, W) + b,db1)
<<training code>>
_,summary=sess.run([train_op,merged_summaries])
## merged_summaries tensor triggers combine_inputs function. There are
## other tensor functions/coding in between , not giving entire code to keep
## it simple; code works as expected except tf.Print
<<evaluate code>>
print(db1.eval())
Confused on following
a) Why tf.Print is not printing during sess.run during training?
b) Why explicit db1.eval is necessary , expected tf.Print to trigger with
sess.run. If eval is required , could copy tensor X in my code to db1
and evaluate it with out tf.Print. Correct?
Tried going through other questions (like below one). Suggested to implement memory_util or predefined function. As learner could not understand why tf.Print does not work in my scenario
If anyone encountered similar issues , please assist. Thanks!
Similar question in stackoverflow
According to the documentation, tf.Print prints to standard error (as of version 1.1), and it's not compatible with jupyter notebook. That's why you can't see any output.
Check here:
https://www.tensorflow.org/api_docs/python/tf/Print
You can check the terminal where you launched the jupyter notebook to see the message.
import tensorflow as tf
tf.InteractiveSession()
a = tf.constant(1)
b = tf.constant(2)
opt = a + b
opt = tf.Print(opt, [opt], message="1 + 2 = ")
opt.eval()
In the terminal, I can see:
2018-01-02 23:38:07.691808: I tensorflow/core/kernels/logging_ops.cc:79] 1 + 2 = [3]
I have written a simple code using pybrain to predict a simple sequential data.
For example a sequence of 0,1,2,3,4 will supposed to get an output of 5 from the network. The dataset specifies the remaining sequence.
Below are my codes implementation
from pybrain.tools.shortcuts import buildNetwork
from pybrain.supervised.trainers import BackpropTrainer
from pybrain.datasets import SequentialDataSet
from pybrain.structure import SigmoidLayer, LinearLayer
from pybrain.structure import LSTMLayer
import itertools
import numpy as np
INPUTS = 5
OUTPUTS = 1
HIDDEN = 40
net = buildNetwork(INPUTS, HIDDEN, OUTPUTS, hiddenclass=LSTMLayer, outclass=LinearLayer, recurrent=True, bias=True)
ds = SequentialDataSet(INPUTS, OUTPUTS)
ds.addSample([0,1,2,3,4],[5])
ds.addSample([5,6,7,8,9],[10])
ds.addSample([10,11,12,13,14],[15])
ds.addSample([16,17,18,19,20],[21])
net.randomize()
trainer = BackpropTrainer(net, ds)
for _ in range(1000):
print trainer.train()
x=net.activate([0,1,2,3,4])
print x
The output on my screen keeps showing [0.99999999 0.99999999 0.9999999 0.99999999] every simple time. What am I missing? Is the training not sufficient? Because trainer.train()
shows output of 86.625..
The pybrain sigmoidLayer is implementing the sigmoid squashing function, which you can see here:
sigmoid squashing function code
The relevant part is this:
def sigmoid(x):
""" Logistic sigmoid function. """
return 1. / (1. + safeExp(-x))
So, no matter what the value of x, it will only ever return values between 0 and 1. For this reason, and for others, it is a good idea to scale your input and output values to between 0 and 1. For example, divide all your inputs by the maximum value (assuming the minimum is no lower than 0), and the same for your outputs. Then do the reverse with the result (e.g. multiply by 25 if you were dividing by 25 at the beginning).
Also, I'm no expert on pybrain, but I wonder if you need OUTPUTS = 4? It looks like you have only one output in your data, so I'm wondering if you could just use OUTPUTS = 1.
You may also try scaling the inputs and outputs to a particular part of the sigmoid curve (e.g. between 0.1 and 0.9) to make the pybrain's job easier, but that makes the scaling before and after a little more complex.