My top package.json:
{
"name": "foo",
"version": "0.0.0",
"private": true,
"workspaces": [
"apps/*",
"packages/*"
],
"devDependencies": {
"#foo/eslint-config": "*"
},
"engines": {
"npm": ">=7.0.0",
"node": ">=14.0.0"
},
"dependencies": {},
"packageManager": "npm#8.18.0"
}
and I have a package in packages/#foo/eslint-config.
However, when I do npm install, I get an error saying that #foo/eslint-config is not in the registry.
I am assuming that I have either wrong directory structure.
Figured it out.
The package should have gone directly to packages/eslint-config directory.
The package name still needs to have the scope, i.e. #foo/eslint-config.
It appears that workspaces do not use the same convention of nesting scoped packages under a sub-directory as node_modules do.
It also appears that the folder name has no significance, as long as it is directly in the directory defined in workspaces configuration and has the correct package name.
Alternatively, you can also just update your workspaces configuration to read from packages/#foo/*.
Related
I'm using yarn v1.22 and yarn workspace for building my application as a monorepo. Here is the package.json for our component library package. I want to use publishConfig to override the main field when I do npm publish or yarn publish. But when I tried to run those commands, the main field is no changed. Can anyone share some suggestions? Thanks.
{
"name": "components",
"private": false,
"version": "0.1.2",
"main": "src/index.ts",
"files": [
"dist"
],
"publishConfig": {
"main": "dist/index.js"
}
}
Is there a way to setup a local folder to be used as package.json repository. The goal is to be able to use the cloud repository (https://www.npmjs.com/package) but the modules which are not found there to be searched and installed from a local folder.
Example package.json:
{
"name": "myproject",
"version": "0.0.0",
"dependencies": {
"standard-npm-module": "1.0.0", // installed from https://www.npmjs.com/package/standard-npm-module
"local-module": "1.0.0", // installed from local folder because it wont be found in https://www.npmjs.com/package/local-module
}
}
PS Yarn or npm any solution will be OK.
you can use local paths. for instance, see the package.json snippet below.
{
"name": "baz",
"dependencies": {
"bar": "file:../foo/bar"
}
}
you can also leverage npm, for instance:
npm install --save /path/to/module
Background
I'm an absolute beginner in BuckleScript, and while I've downloaded packgages with npm before, I've never written a library.
Goal: installing my new package local package in my project using npm
I am trying to wrap some parts of the service worker api in JavaScript. I have started with a file bs-service-worker/src/ExtendableEvent.re like so
type _extendableEvent('a);
type extendableEvent_like('a) = Dom.event_like(_extendableEvent('a));
type extendableEvent = extendableEvent_like(Dom._baseClass);
[#bs.send] external waitUntil: (extendableEvent, Js.Promise.t('a)) => unit
= "waitUntil";
This compiles and produces ExtendableEvent.bs.js as expected.
Now, though, I'd like to go ahead and test what I have so far by creating a new npm project and importing what I have locally. I created a new sibling directory and did an npm install ../bs-service-worker. That succeeded, and then I did a sanity-check build on my new BuckleScript project. That also succeeded.
The issue: opening my module causes an error
When I add open ExtendableEvent; to Demo.re in the new project, I get the following error:
We've found a bug for you!
/home/el/workbench/bucklescript/bs-service-worker-examples/src/Demo.re 11:6-20
9 │
10 │ /**/
11 │ open ExtendableEvent;
12 │
13 │ /*
The module or file ExtendableEvent can't be found.
- If it's a third-party dependency:
- Did you list it in bsconfig.json?
- Did you run `bsb` instead of `bsb -make-world`
(latter builds third-parties)?
- Did you include the file's directory in bsconfig.json?
What I've tried
I'm guessing I'm misusing BuckleScript here instead of npm because npm is so widely adopted and well documented that I think I'd have found the problem, but I'm definitely not ruling out the possibility that I'm misusing npm, too.
I do have "bs-service-worker" listed as a bs-dependency. I also tried "../bs-service-worker" in case BuckleScript didn't like the virtual directory, but it didn't seem to help.
My npm run build command is indeed npx bsb -make-world.
More code:
bs-service-worker/bs-config.json
{
"name": "bs-service-worker",
"version": "0.1.0",
"sources": {
"dir" : "src",
"subdirs" : true,
"public": "all"
},
"package-specs": {
"module": "commonjs",
"in-source": true
},
"suffix": ".bs.js",
"bs-dependencies": [
],
"warnings": {
"error" : "+101"
},
"namespace": true,
"refmt": 3
}
bs-service-worker-examples/bsconfig.json
{
"name": "bs-service-worker-examples",
"version": "0.1.0",
"sources": {
"dir" : "src",
"subdirs" : true
},
"package-specs": {
"module": "commonjs",
"in-source": true
},
"suffix": ".bs.js",
"bs-dependencies": [
"bs-service-worker",
"bs-fetch",
],
"warnings": {
"error" : "+101"
},
"namespace": true,
"refmt": 3
}
bs-service-worker-examples/package.json
{
"name": "bs-service-worker-examples",
"version": "0.0.1",
"scripts": {
"build": "npx bsb -make-world",
"start": "npx bsb -make-world -w",
"clean": "npx bsb -clean-world"
},
"keywords": [
"BuckleScript"
],
"author": "Eleanor (https://webbureaucrat.bitbucket.io)",
"license": "MIT",
"devDependencies": {
"bs-platform": "^7.3.2"
},
"dependencies": {
"bs-fetch": "^0.6.1",
"bs-service-worker": "file:../bs-service-worker"
}
}
Easy Reproduction of the Issue
The fastest way to reproduce this would be to fork this repository and try to add it as a local npm dependency.
The problem seems to be that you have "namespace": true in your library's bsconfig.json, which will wrap all the modules in a namespace module with a silly generated name based on the name field. In this case it will be BsServiceWorker I think.
You could just remove that setting, or set it to false, but namespacing is a good idea to avoid collisions between modules from different libraries, or your own app, so I would recommend setting it to a custom, sensible name. For example:
"namespace": "ServiceWorker"
You can then open ExtendableEvent in the consumer project with:
open ServiceWorker.ExtendableEvent;
For more details, see the documentation on the namespace field.
When run locally, it seems to work fine but crashes when its on pipeline
EDIT: After removing npx, it produces a different error:
I have followed the advice of installing the plugin:
npm install eslint-plugin-react#latest --save-dev
But seeps to repeat itself.
Here's my retracted bitbucket-pipelines.yml config:
- step:
name: CI
caches:
- node
script:
- npm install
- npm run lint
- npm run test
eqautes to package.json
"lint": "eslint --ext .js,.ts,.tsx src --ignore-pattern node_modules/",
"test": "jest --verbose --colors --coverage",
Here's my eslint config file:
{
"env": {
"browser": true,
"es6": true,
"jest": true
},
"extends": [
"eslint:recommended",
"plugin:react/recommended",
"airbnb"
],
"globals": {
"Atomics": "readonly",
"SharedArrayBuffer": "readonly"
},
"parser": "#typescript-eslint/parser",
"parserOptions": {
"ecmaFeatures": {
"jsx": true
},
"ecmaVersion": 2018,
"sourceType": "module"
},
"plugins": [
"react",
"#typescript-eslint"
],
"settings": {
"import/resolver": {
"node": {
"extensions": [".js", ".ts", ".tsx"],
"paths": ["src"]
}
}
},
"rules": {
...
}
}
}
An update to Visual Studio Code fixed this for me.
I was unwittingly on a 2 year old version.
Fixed it by removing NODE_ENV in pipelines's .env due to this:
npm install (in package directory, no arguments):
Install the dependencies in the local node_modules folder.
In global mode (ie, with -g or --global appended to the command), it
installs the current package context (ie, the current working
directory) as a global package.
By default, npm install will install all modules listed as
dependencies in package.json.
With the --production flag (or when the NODE_ENV environment variable
is set to production), npm will not install modules listed in
devDependencies.
NOTE: The --production flag has no particular meaning when adding a
dependency to a project.
it happened to to.
tried hard to find the answer.
Apparently, eslint searchs for a roots in the working directory, or something like that, to find the modules to import.
It happens that i've had two apps in my project folder, and only one had the eslintrc.josn.
I fixed to use eslint on the entire project oppening the vs settings.json and add the following:
"eslint.workingDirectories": ["./app1","./app2"...]
if u have more than one app on ur project folder, u should try it
I'm about to write a yeoman generator where the whole template is hosted on a git repository. So the package.json of my yeoman generator looks like
{
"name": "generator-foo",
"version": "0.1.0",
"description": "",
"files": [
"generators"
],
"keywords": [
"yeoman-generator"
],
"dependencies": {
"foo-template": "git://somewhere-in-the-world/foo-template.git#0.1.0",
"chalk": "^1.1.3",
"yeoman-generator": "^1.1.1",
"yosay": "^2.0.0"
}
}
Is there any way to prevent npm install from installing the foo-template package, i.e. running any postinstall script just for this package? Instead, it should be just downloaded to node_modules.
As describe here, postinstall scripts can be disabled globally for npm using --ignore-scripts flag.
As a complete solution, I would move your explicit dependency to foo-template to your local postinstall section with ignore scripts enabled:
{
"name": "generator-foo",
...
"postinstall": "npm install --ignore-scripts git://somewhere-in-the-world/foo-template.git#0.1.0",
"peerDependencies": {
"foo-template": "git://somewhere-in-the-world/foo-template.git#0.1.0"
}
}
Note that to make sure the dependency is explicitly described, we should mark it as a peerDependency (e.g. prevents package removal on prune).