So I'm new to NextJS and am trying to learn the api. In the default hello.js file inside of the api folder there is an export default function which returns a json response. So now if I want to add another route would I have to create a seperate file for that or just add a function below to do so? I would like to just be able to add more functions to create more routes.
Yes you can have dynamic api routes just like you can have dynamic pages!
From the docs
For example, the API route pages/api/post/[pid].js has the following code:
export default function handler(req, res) {
const { pid } = req.query
res.end(`Post: ${pid}`)
}
Now, a request to /api/post/abc will respond with the text: Post: abc.
So you could definitely have different functions based on the api route you are trying to get to. You could use a switch or whatever works for you.
The Next JS docs = https://nextjs.org/docs/api-routes/dynamic-api-routes
Related
I have a router in Vue looking like this:
{
path: '/temporaryList/:tempUrl',
name: 'temporaryList',
component: () => import('../views/TemporaryListView.vue')
}
I want to send a value for the "tempUrl"-param that could for example look like this:
https%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.se%2F%5Bn%5Btest%5B~%5B
(this value is coming from encodeURIComponent() function, so it should be able to be used in the URL)
This does not seem to work for some reason, When I try to access this page I get:
"There was no web page at the URL: http://localhost:3000/temporaryList/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.se%2F%5Bn%5Btest%5B~%5B "
I have built this exact same solution with node and express where this didn't seem to be an issue. I don't know if the value of the param I send is to long for Vue? It also seems like Vue does not like when a params includes a "%" for example.
Is there any way you can make Vue routers allow this type of param-value?
Vite uses the decodeURIComponent function on the request URL. The value of the param i sent had "%" included in it which made Vite read every "%" as a "/". That made Vite searchfor a location that did not exist.
This npm-package solved my issue: https://github.com/ivesia/vite-plugin-rewrite-all
I have a JobPosts/Index page with multiple GET parameter bindings to allow filtering: let's take CityId and IsRemote for example. I don't want these to be passed as query string parameters, instead I want to use friendly routes for them. So I have defined these:
options.Conventions.AddPageRoute("/JobPosts/Index", "cities/{cityId}/jobs");
options.Conventions.AddPageRoute("/JobPosts/Index", "remote-jobs");
options.Conventions.AddPageRoute("/JobPosts/Index", "jobs");
The routes work just fine when I type them in the browser and the CityId one is bound properly, but two things are missing.
First, there is no way to specify a default value for my IsRemote param, which I want to set to true ONLY when using the remote-jobs URL.
And second, when trying to generate a URL like this:
<a asp-area="" asp-page="/JobPosts/Index" asp-route-cityId="#Model.CityId"></a>
I get the following URL:
https://localhost:44391/jobs?cityId=2265885
When what I actually expect is:
https://localhost:44391/cities/2265885/jobs
So it looks like the tag helper or the part responsible for constructing the URL doesn't look at all at the different routes to try and get a best match based on the list of parameters. Actually, it will always use the last page route defined for that page.
Nor do I have the option anywhere to specify a route name for the page route and then use asp-route to explicitly say which route I want.
Any ideas how to achieve that? Or if it's something that's on the roadmap for Razor Pages?
EDIT: Hardcoding the href is not an option. I want this to go through the proper routing services as there are other things to be done as well, like generating culture-specific URL for non-english users (eg. {cultureId}/cities/{cityId}/jobs - this is done through route conventions. Hardcoding the href would obviously bypass that.
There is a easy way to set IsRemote default value.
public bool IsRemote { get; set; } = true;
This tag asp-page will link to Page /JobPosts/Index.csthml directly,
https://localhost:44391/JobPosts?cityId=2265885
= https://localhost:44391/JobPosts/Index?cityId=2265885
If you are looking forward the URL https://localhost:44391/jobs?cityId=2265885
you could try this a tag to request.
Go to JobPosts
———————————————————————————————
Using a middleware to handle /remote-jobs
app.Run(next => async context =>
{
if (context.Request.Path == "/remote-jobs")
{
return View with default IsRemote
}
});
Hi i need some help for this issue, I need to run:
exports.someFunction = function () {
// i need call a route like this.
app.route('api/getdata');
};
I need call some route in express function. How can I do it?
I'm assuming that /api/getdata returns some sort of data (in a format like JSON) you need to use. In that case, it is pretty simple, just use Node's excellent unirest library. I find Node's http a little advanced for this case. Assuming that this is a GET request, it would look something along the lines of:
unirest.post('http://example.com/api/getdata').end(function (response) {
console.log(response.body);
});
Of course, you can use Node's http.get if you wanted or any other HTTP library you like.
I started using Laravel 3 last week, and then found the new 4 release and I'm trying to convert now.
I have a dozen+ routes that I want to deliver to a specific controller method. i.e., "/api/v1/owners/3/dogs/1 or /api/v1/owners/3" to run "myresourcecontroller#processRequest"
In Laravel 3 I was able to use this: (note * wildcard)
Route::any('api/v1/owners*', 'owners#processRequest'); // Process tags resource endpoints
I found this example from the documentation but it gives me an error. I get a NotFoundHttpException.
//[Pattern Based Filters](http://laravel.com/docs/routing#route-filters)
Route::filter('admin', function()
{
//
});
Route::when('admin/*', 'admin');
Not sure what I'm doing wrong? Is there another way to do this?
I don't want to use the Laravel 4 restful controllers, cause they don't seem to conform to complete restful design. i.e., no verbs in the url.
I have all of my processing written, I just need to be able to route to it.
I need to be able to create new records by POST /api/v1/owners or /api/v1/owners/3/dogs
I cannot use /api/v1/owners/create.
I'm trying to avoid having to write a route for every endpoint, i.e.,
Route::any('api/v1/owners/{owner_id}', 'owners#processRequest');
Route::any('api/v1/owners/{owner_id}/dogs/{dog_id}', 'owners#processRequest');
Thank you for any help
You should make use of resourceful controllers as they're a great asset when building an API. The endpoints you described can be achieved using resource controllers and nested resource controllers.
Route::resource('owners', 'OwnersController');
Route::resource('owners.dogs', 'OwnersDogsController');
Would allow you to create an owner with POST localhost/owners and create a dog on an owner with POST localhost/owners/3/dogs.
You can then wrap these routes in a route group to get the api/v1 prefix.
Route::group(['prefix' => 'api/v1'], function()
{
Route::resource('owners', 'OwnersController');
Route::resource('owners.dogs', 'OwnersDogsController');
});
Haven't used Laravel myself, but try any('api/v1/owners/*', (note slash before asterisk) as in the example.
This is essentially a continuation of the question here: Nodejs Passport display username.
app.get('/hello', function(req, res) {
res.render('index.jade', { name: req.user.username });
});
So users log in via PassportJS, and goes to index.jade, which contains #{name} in the body, which will be replaced by the value of req.user.username.
Question: Is it possible to use the value of req.user.username in index.jade's JavaScript? I tried assigning its value to a variable but it doesn't work.
I have been using the trick of having a hidden input with #{name} as value:
input(type='hidden', id='variableName', value='#{name}')
Then JavaScript can access this value using:
$("#variableName").val()
This works. But does it have any potential downside like security issues? What is the right way to do this?
You have a few options. One of them is what you did and put the value inside you html. You can also solve it by doing:
script
window.name = #{name};
This will create an inline script that sets the variable. The other option you have is using ajax. That means you probably need to make an extra route to reply to that request.