I am trying to retrieve the base url from my proto datastore to be used to initialize my ktor client instance I know how to get the data from the datastore but I don't know how to block execution until that value is received so the client can be initialized with the base url
So my ktor client service asks for a NetworkURLS class which has a method to return the base url
Here is my property to retrieve terminalDetails from my proto datastore
val getTerminalDetails: Flow<TerminalDetails> = cxt.terminalDetails.data
.catch { e ->
if (e is IOException) {
Log.d("Error", e.message.toString())
emit(TerminalDetails.getDefaultInstance())
} else {
throw e
}
}
Normally when I want to get the values I would do something like this
private fun getTerminalDetailsFromStore() {
try {
viewModelScope.launch(Dispatchers.IO) {
localRepository.getTerminalDetails.collect {
_terminalDetails.value = it
}
}
} catch(e: Exception) {
Log.d("AdminSettingsViewModel Error", e.message.toString()) // TODO: Handle Error Properly
}
}
but in my current case what I am looking to do is return terminalDetails.backendHost from a function and that where the issue comes in I know I need to use a coroutine scope to retrieve the value so I don't need to suspend the function but how to a prevent the function returning until the coroutine scope has finished?
I have tried using async and runBlocking but async doesn't work the way I would think it would and runBlocking hangs the entire app
fun backendURL(): String = runBlocking {
var url: String = "localhost"
val job = CoroutineScope(Dispatchers.IO).async {
repo.getTerminalDetails.collect {
it.backendHost
}
}
url
}
Can anyone give me some assistance on getting this to work?
EDIT: Here is my temporary solution, I do not intend on keeping it this way, The issue with runBlocking{} turned out to be the Flow<T> does not finish so runBlocking{} continues to block the app.
fun backendURL(): String {
val details = MutableStateFlow<TerminalDetails>(TerminalDetails.getDefaultInstance())
val job = CoroutineScope(Dispatchers.IO).launch {
repo.getTerminalDetails.collect {
details.value = it
}
}
runBlocking {
delay(250L)
}
return details.value.backendHost
}
EDIT 2: I fully fixed my issue. I created a method with the same name as my val (personal decision) which utilizes runBlocking{} and Flow<T>.first() to block while the value is retrieve. The reason I did not replace my val with the function is there are places where I need the information as well where I can utilize coroutines properly where I am not initializing components on my app
val getTerminalDetails: Flow<TerminalDetails> = cxt.terminalDetails.data
.catch { e ->
if (e is IOException) {
Log.d("Error", e.message.toString())
emit(TerminalDetails.getDefaultInstance())
} else {
throw e
}
}
fun getTerminalDetails(): TerminalDetails = runBlocking {
cxt.terminalDetails.data.first()
}
Related
I need to implement a custom gRPC on Kotlin native side.
#ReactMethod can't be suspend func.
How can I run it?
#ReactMethod
fun connect(ipAddress: String, port: Int) {
try {
channel = ManagedChannelBuilder.forAddress(ipAddress, port).usePlaintext().build()
var guidKey = Metadata.Key.of("GUID", Metadata.ASCII_STRING_MARSHALLER)
metadata.put(guidKey, GUID)
val stub = DBServiceGrpcKt.DBServiceCoroutineStub(channel!!)
var request = GrpcDBService.SignInRequest.newBuilder()
.setUserName("user")
.setPassword("11111")
.build()
try {
//******* this part *****
suspend fun coroutine() {
var response = stub.trySignIn(request,metadata)
}
} catch (e: Exception) {
Log.d("grpcConnect", e.localizedMessage)
}
} catch (e: Error) {
Log.d("grpcConnect ", e.localizedMessage)
}
finally {
channel?.shutdown()
}
}
You need to create a coroutine, for example, define a scope (somewhere in your class) and use it with launch:
myPluginScope.launch {
val response = stub.trySignIn(request,metadata)
// Return, the result
}
Creating the scope is easy, the tricky part is to find where to cancel it. Check the documentation on React native modules to find a good place to call cancel on your scope:
val myPluginScope = CoroutineScope(SupervisorJob() + Dispatchers.Main.immediate)
Now, is important to decide whether the connect function should behave as an asynchronous function or not. For example, if the sign in operation takes time or uses the network, connect should probably return the result through a Promise or Callback, so the Javascript side is not blocked:
#ReactMethod
fun connect(ipAddress: String, port: Int, promise: Promise) {
myPluginScope.launch {
try {
// Make the sign in happen in a separate thread:
val response = withContext(context = Dispatchers.IO) {
stub.trySignIn(request, metadata)
}
// Resolve the promise in the calling thread (The UI thread)
promise.resolve(response.hypotheticalCode)
} catch (e: Exception) {
promise.reject("Sign in error!", e)
}
}
}
See:
https://reactnative.dev/docs/native-modules-android#promises
https://kotlinlang.org/docs/async-programming.html#coroutines
I have a suspend function
private suspend fun getResponse(record: String): HashMap<String, String> {}
When I call it in my main function I'm doing this, but the type of response is Job, not HashMap, how can I get the correct return type?
override fun handleRequest(event: SQSEvent?, context: Context?): Void? {
event?.records?.forEach {
try {
val response: Job = GlobalScope.launch {
getResponse(it.body)
}
} catch (ex: Exception) {
logger.error("error message")
}
}
return null
}
Given your answers in the comments, it looks like you're not looking for concurrency here. The best course of action would then be to just make getRequest() a regular function instead of a suspend one.
Assuming you can't change this, you need to call a suspend function from a regular one. To do so, you have several options depending on your use case:
block the current thread while you do your async stuff
make handleRequest a suspend function
make handleRequest take a CoroutineScope to start coroutines with some lifecycle controlled externally, but that means handleRequest will return immediately and the caller has to deal with the running coroutines (please don't use GlobalScope for this, it's a delicate API)
Option 2 and 3 are provided for completeness, but most likely in your context these won't work for you. So you have to block the current thread while handleRequest is running, and you can do that using runBlocking:
override fun handleRequest(event: SQSEvent?, context: Context?): Void? {
runBlocking {
// do your stuff
}
return null
}
Now what to do inside runBlocking depends on what you want to achieve.
if you want to process elements sequentially, simply call getResponse directly inside the loop:
override fun handleRequest(event: SQSEvent?, context: Context?): Void? {
runBlocking {
event?.records?.forEach {
try {
val response = getResponse(it.body)
// do something with the response
} catch (ex: Exception) {
logger.error("error message")
}
}
}
return null
}
If you want to process elements concurrently, but independently, you can use launch and put both getResponse() and the code using the response inside the launch:
override fun handleRequest(event: SQSEvent?, context: Context?): Void? {
runBlocking {
event?.records?.forEach {
launch { // coroutine scope provided by runBlocking
try {
val response = getResponse(it.body)
// do something with the response
} catch (ex: Exception) {
logger.error("error message")
}
}
}
}
return null
}
If you want to get the responses concurrently, but process all responses only when they're all done, you can use map + async:
override fun handleRequest(event: SQSEvent?, context: Context?): Void? {
runBlocking {
val responses = event?.records?.mapNotNull {
async { // coroutine scope provided by runBlocking
try {
getResponse(it.body)
} catch (ex: Exception) {
logger.error("error message")
null // if you want to still handle other responses
// you could also throw an exception otherwise
}
}
}.map { it.await() }
// do something with all responses
}
return null
}
You can use GlobalScope.async() instead of launch() - it returns Deferred, which is a future/promise object. You can then call await() on it to get a result of getResponse().
Just make sure not to do something like: async().await() - it wouldn't make any sense, because it would still run synchronously. If you need to run getResponse() on all event.records in parallel, then you can first go in loop and collect all deffered objects and then await on all of them.
So I have a flow where I need it to emit a value from cache, but at the end it will make an API call to pull values in case there was nothing in cache (or refresh the value it has). I am trying this
override val data: Flow<List<Data>> = dataDao.getAllCachedData()
.onCompletion {
coroutineScope {
launch {
requestAndCacheDataOrEmitError()
}
}
}
.map { entities ->
entities
.map { it.toData() }
.filter { it !is Data.Unknown }
}
.filterNotNull()
.catch { emitRepositoryError(it) }
So the idea is that we emit the cache, and then make an API call to fetch new data regardless of the original mapping. But I do not want it blocking. For example, if we use this flow, I do not ever want the calling function to be blocked by the onCompletion.
I think the problem is that the onCompletion never runs. I set some breakpoints/logs and it never runs at all, even outside of the coroutineScope.
I don't quite understand the work you are doing but I think when you are collecting flow on a certain scope. You end the scope that flow will be put into onCompletion
var job : Job? = null
fun scan() {
job = viewModelScope.launch {
bigfileManager.bigFile.collect {
if (it is ResultOrProgress.Result) {
_bigFiles.value = it.result ?: emptyList()
} else {
_updateProgress.value = (it as ResultOrProgress.Progress).progress ?: 0
}
}
}
}
fun endScreen(){
job?.cancel()
}
I have a spring boot kotlin app that creates a web socket connection to another spring app, sends multiple "subscribe" messages, and then needs to wait for receipt of one response per subscription on the web socket connection. The number of subscriptions open at a given time could be up to a few thousand.
I've come up with a basic working solution using CompletableFuture and coroutines, as below. Is there a more idiomatic or concise way to do this task, or is this a fine solution? Any suggestions for improvement are appreciated.
// InputObject / ResponseObject are generic placeholders
fun getItems(inputObjects: List<InputObject>): List<ResponseObject> {
val ret: ConcurrentLinkedQueue<ResponseObject> = ConcurrentLinkedQueue()
// create a completable future for each input object
val subscriptions: MutableMap<String, CompletableFuture<ResponseObject>> = mutableMapOf()
inputObjects.forEach {
subscriptions[it.id] = CompletableFuture()
}
// create web socket client configured with a lambda handler to
// fulfill each subscription
// each responseObject.id matches one inputObject.id
val client = createWebSocketClient({
try {
val responseObject = objectMapper.readValue(it, ResponseObject::class.java)
subscriptions[responseObject.id]?.complete(responseObject)
} catch (e: Exception) {
logger.warn("Exception reading data: ${e.message}")
}
})
runBlocking {
coroutineScope {
for (item in inputObjects) {
launch {
// create and send a subscribe request
client.sendMessage(createSubscribe(item.id))
// wait for each future to complete
// uses CompletableFuture extension await() from kotlinx-coroutines-jdk8
val result = subscriptions[item.id]?.await()
if (result != null) {
ret.add(result)
}
}
}
}
}
client.close()
return ret.toList()
}
edit: I found a similar question: How to pass result as it comes using coroutines?
Which options makes the most sense?
fun getItems(inputObjects: List<InputObject>): List<ResponseObject> {
val subscriptions = ids.associateTo(mutableMapOf()) { it.id to CompletableFuture<ResponseObject>() }
val client = createWebSocketClient({
try {
val responseObject = objectMapper.readValue(it, ResponseObject::class.java)
subscriptions[responseObject.id]?.complete(responseObject)
} catch (e: Exception) {
logger.warn("Exception reading data: ${e.message}")
}
})
return runBlocking(Dispatchers.IO) {
inputObjects
.mapNotNull {
client.sendMessage(createSubscribe(item.id))
subscriptions[item.id]?.await()
}
}
}
I try to write a kotlin multiplatform library (android and ios) that uses ktor. Thereby I experience some issues with kotlins coroutines:
When writing tests I always get kotlinx.coroutines.JobCancellationException: Parent job is Completed; job=JobImpl{Completed}#... exception.
I use ktors mock engine for my tests:
client = HttpClient(MockEngine)
{
engine
{
addHandler
{ request ->
// Create response object
}
}
}
A sample method (commonMain module) using ktor. All methods in my library are written in a similar way. The exception occures if client.get is called.
suspend fun getData(): Either<Exception, String> = coroutineScope
{
// Exception occurs in this line:
val response: HttpResponse = client.get { url("https://www.google.com") }
return if (response.status == HttpStatusCode.OK)
{
(response.readText() as T).right()
}
else
{
Exception("Error").left()
}
}
A sample unit test (commonTest module) for the above method. The assertTrue statement is never called since the exception is thrown before.
#Test
fun getDataTest() = runTest
{
val result = getData()
assertTrue(result.isRight())
}
Actual implementation of runTest in androidTest and iosTest modules.
actual fun<T> runTest(block: suspend () -> T) { runBlocking { block() } }
I thought when I use coroutineScope, it waits until all child coroutines are done. What am I doing wrong and how can I fix this exception?
you can't cache HttpClient of CIO in client variable and reuse, It would be best if change the following code in your implementation.
val client:HttpClient get() = HttpClient(MockEngine) {
engine {
addHandler { request ->
// Create response object
}
}
}
The library must be updated, this glitch is in the fix report here: https://newreleases.io/project/github/ktorio/ktor/release/1.6.1
The problem is that you cannot use the same instance of the HttpClient. My ej:
HttpClient(CIO) {
install(JsonFeature) {
serializer = GsonSerializer()
}
}.use { client ->
return#use client.request("URL") {
method = HttpMethod.Get
}
}