When I knew WPE, I thought it was a low-consumption engine with small footprint, light weight and good performance. Then I tested WPE and Blink WebView with a sample demo that only opened a website in my mid-range mobile phone. The test results confused me，WPE has a lighter library size than WebView, but WPE has a larger memory and worse performace than WebView in runtime. Should I just use Blink WebView in Android?
Related
I am developing an iOS application for iPad. Currently I am using images of resolution 2048×1536 px (iPad3 resolution). If I run this app on iPad2 or iPad1 will it get fitted to its resolution (1024×768 px)? Or should I use a 1024×768 images and specify image#2x for iPad3?
Since I only have iPad3 , cannot know how the images will be seen in the lower resolution devices. But it should work perfectly on them too.
Any help greatly appreciated. Please cite your sources.
You could try this in the simulator if you don't have a non-retina device.
It's certainly possible and will usually look fine (at least for photos, text and icons may look worse when scaled down), but you are wasting quite a lot of memory which is pretty scarce on an iPad 1 (it only has 256 MB), so you should usually also include non-retina images.
Automatically scaling down images typically results in visual artifacts, which is why the SDK includes an easy way to include different versions of any image, instead of just a single big one.
As far as I know, all iOS devices (within the same family) have resolutions that are multiples of each other so automatic scaling artifacts are somewhat mitigated, but it is still best to include the correct resolution.
I am using HTML5 Canvas for rendering video, but the rendering is taking huge amount of CPU? I am using GtkLauncher (with webkit 1.8.0) for rendering the video on the Canvas.
Can some one please throw some light on this? Is video rendering on Canvas not efficient for embedded systems?
Also I would like to know, whether there is a way in HTML5 video tag to know the video frame rate, before I actually start to render the data on the Canvas. This I would need to know because I would have to set the timer (used for drawing the video frames) at that same frame rate .
Thanks and Regards,
Souvik
Most likely the video rendering is not accelerated and needs to
Decode on software
Resize on software
You did not give system details so this is just a guess. By poking browser internals you can dig out the truth.
Video framerate cannot be known beforehand and in theory can vary within one source. However if you host file yourself you can pre-extract this information using tools like ffmpeg and transfer the number in side-band (e.g. using AJAX / JSON).
Is there any canonical way to measure the performance of a CATiledLayer on iOS? In opengl land, it's pretty straightforward to track the FPS, is there any similar trick with UIScrollViews and CATiledLayers?
For context, we're tweaking the images going into a CATiledLayer and noticing severe differences in the zooming FPS and panning FPS with the UIScrollView. It's subjective but obvious and I was hoping there was a way to measure this so we can stop saying "wow, this seems a lot faster".
You can profile your app with Instrument's Core Animation tool. It will give you the FPS reading.
Note that this is only available on device and not on simulator.
I am developing a cocos2d game. I need to make it universal. Problem is that I want to use minimun amount of images to keep the universal binary as small as possible. Is there any possibility that I can use same images I am using for iphone, retina and iPad somehow? If yes, how can I do that? What image size and quality should it be? Any suggestion?
Thanks and Best regards
As for suggestions: provide HD resolution images for Retina devices and iPad, provide SD resolution images for non-Retina devices. Don't think about an all-in-one solution - there isn't one that's acceptable.
Don't upscale SD images to HD resolution on Retina devices or iPad. It won't look any better.
Don't downscale HD images for non-Retina devices. Your textures will still use 4x the memory on devices that have half or even a quarter of the memory available. In addition, downscaling images is bad for performance because it has to be done by the CPU on older devices. While you could downscale the image and save the downscaled texture, it adds a lot more complexity to your code and will increase the loading time.
There's not a single right answer to this question. One way to do it is to create images that are larger than you need and then scale them down. If the images don't have a lot of fine detail, that should work pretty well. As an example, this is the reason that you submit a 512x512 pixel image of your app icon along with your app to the App Store. Apple never displays the image at that size, but uses it to create a variety of smaller sizes for display in the App Store.
Another approach is to use vector images, which you can draw perfectly at any size that you need. Unfortunately, the only vector format that I can think of that's supported in iOS is PDF.
I'm trying to build a weather application on the iPad but it seems that I need some help in animation. Say I'm animating a Radar, so the radar source files have 10 gif/jpeg pictures in 900x700 pixel size. I've tried the UIImage animation technique using the tutorial here:
http://www.icodeblog.com/2009/07/24/iphone-programming-tutorial-animating-a-game-sprite/
but it seems that loading 10 images that big is too much for the iPad to handle and its crashing due to memory warnings. I'm researching other techniques to animate but I can't seem to find something that will do this efficiently.
I've looked at others like Core Animation using sprites, and Cocos2D with sprites. Can someone point in the right direction the best way to animate these big images? (keep in mind that these images are dynamic and changes often so the sprites will have to be recreated on a server and fetched from the iPad to do the animation). Thanks
OpenGL only creates textures with dimensions at powers of 2. In the case of your images, that's 1024x1024, which is a meg of memory per image. Still, that shouldn't be a problem with the iPad.
First, investigate using Xcode's profiling tools to ensure the images aren't being repeatedly loaded into memory at each loop of the animation (likely by way of new objects that aren't sharing cached textures). That could solve your problem from the start.
Second, I recommend using Cocos2D if only for the easy handling of textures and caching. Toss the images into a CCAnimation, pop that into a CCRepeatForever, run it with a CCSequence. When you're done hit CCTextureCache to release unused textures.
Third, lower your animation framerate to 30 or less (if only for this animation). It may be the iPad, but you making a weather app. Not a video game.
Finally, downgrade the size of your image. Justify all you want, but a large radar animation will not sell your app. And just because a website might already be playing that animation beautifully, remember that a desktop has vastly more memory and power than any smart phone.
Try breaking the animation image into into smaller parts and animate those instead by treating each components as sprites. It would be best if you use primarily code (CoreGraphics) and draw your radar "by hand" instead of just using images as if they were animated GIFs.