It now keep gives me this message, can not expand nor find detail. I really don't know what's going on here, how to make it more detailed?
Related
I am trying to figure out how I can get Intellij to reprot bad these issues in inspection reporting. This example I threw together shows 4 separate issues that do not get caught in anyway during inspection and I have all inspection settings turned on.
I understand the idea about the nature of Groovy and run-time vs compile-time errors. The issue I see though is that IntelliJ knows there is something possibly wrong here because the IDE underlines and shades it. So since it is aware and has a consistent messaging built-in regarding this type of potential issue, there should be a way to report on it even if it's just a weak warning or something. Instead I am given a clean inspection. Am I missing something in the configurations, is there a way to get this type of issue flagged?
I am using IntelliJ 2020.2 if that matters.
Edit:
To clarify what I am looking for is you can see in the picture the IDE is underline and highlight 4 variables/methods that I am calling that do not exist. Above the first 3 I commented the messaging the IDE gives me when I hover. Yet in the top right corner you can see the Green Check indicating the file passes inspection and is good to go.
So what I want is the inspection to actually not pass and indicate I have 4 potential issues in this file. In a full project the only way to know to know if any issues like this exist is to go line by line through my entire code base since these issues are not actually reported anywhere.
New to VisualStudio 2015, but not to programming. Have searched both Google and here for a lead on this, but considering the available search terms, I might not immediately uncover them.
I was looking into porting an old VB6 (200k+ LoC) to VB.Net in VS2015. Mostly just poking around to determine viability. Using a project converter, and have resolved most of the initial errors, and am familiar with how the Error List works.
However, it is throwing a new one at me. It now only has two lines of error, both showing the same thing. They both say:
" & ErrorName
That's a Quote, Ampersand, and ErrorName. That's all that show up on the error list line. No file. No line number. Double click on them does nothing.
I thought perhaps the project was corrupted, so I completely re-created it, adding all the modules, forms, classes, etc again, and it found a lot more errors to fix, which I fixed, and now these two lines show up again.
Does anyone have any indication where this is coming from, or, better yet, how to fix?
I've seen VB programmers report this misbehavior before, never with a good lead to explain the problem. It is specific to VS2015, the Roslyn integration caused many issues. In general a very buggy release, be sure to apply all available Updates, currently up to Update 3. If you have a license that includes an MSDN subscription then I recommend you install VS2012, the last "good" version of VS that was not yet affected by Microsoft's new focus on agile development.
I think the underlying issue is caused by the IDE simply not parsing the compiler error message correctly. Probably having to do with the statement with the error getting quoted in the message. Getting only part of the statement text and it fumbling quotes is a pretty good hint that this is where it went wrong.
So look at the actual output of the compiler, decent odds you'll now see the full error text. Use Tools > Options > Project and Solutions > Build and Run. Change the "MSBuild output build output verbosity" setting to Normal. After the failed build, use View > Output to see the compiler output. You'll probably have a lot of messages, consider copy/pasting the content.
When building an application in Visual Studio. It shows the following error when exceeding the error count
fatal error C1003: error count exceeds 100; stopping compilation
Is there a way to increase the error limit?
This limitation is hardcoded. Here is the post from the MSFT employee in the microsoft.public.vsnet.general group dated 2006 (look for 'Fatal Error C1003'):
Hi,
Unfortunately this 100 limitation is
hard coded and cannot be changed. It's
just inpractical to keep all errors
information around since one error may
cause other several errors.
I hope you understand the rational
behind this design by our product
team. However, if you still have
concerns about this, please feel free
to submit your feedback at
http://connect.microsoft.com/Main/content/content.aspx?ContentID=2220
which is monitored by our product
team. Thank you for your
understanding.
Sincerely, Walter Wang
(waw...#online.microsoft.com, remove
'online.') Microsoft Online Community
Support"
I don't think so. VS basically reports all errors it encounters during compilations. There might be some erroneous parts of the code that make the compiler getting caught in an infinite "error" loop.
The limit was implemented to avoid that. In most cases the 100 errors you get are just the same error reported over and over again. What would be the sense in increasing the number of repetitions?
Maybe you can post the code snippet where the error occurs first, so we can help you fix it.
I believe that it is a hard-coded limit, so no.
As others have commented, it's difficult to understand what you want to achieve by this.
At the end of the day, you'll have to fix them all, so get stuck in and start fixing them. Eventually, you'll get below 100, and you can start counting them.
It is not normally valuable to report the actual number of errors when this occurs. Most of the time, when you get C1003, it's actually only a few real errors, leading to a massive chain of other errors.
(e.g.)
If there is an error in a .h file, that error will be reported in every .cpp file that #includes it.
If there is an error that prevents any kind of identifier being defined (e.g. a class, variable, method name), then every time you try to use it later on, an error will be reported.
Workaround to reduce number of reported errors:
rename cl.exe to cl-orig.exe
roll your own cl.exe that launches cl-orig.exe, capturing its stdout / stderr
parse stderr, looking for error messages and counting them
breaks after first n errors
See http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms682499(v=vs.85).aspx for some hints.
I also have a project like this: sometimes Visual Studio decides there is a lot to do, emits 100 really irrelevant messages about other parts of the solution and aborts the build because it reached the message limit without working on the project I'm interested on.
The workaround we have found is to use msbuild to build the solution from a command prompt: the Use MSBuild walkthrough outlines the steps. msbuild outputs all messages to the console and once the build completes we can work and debug again in Visual Studio. Not ideal, but it lets us complete the task at hand.
I am an automation + manual tester. I would like to understand the reason how understanding the logs of an application(which i am working on) help me in improving my testing skills.
By viewing logs you will get some ideas about the error, if it is data level fix you can release and fix directly without dev team help.
In Java some times Runtime exception will occur, it will not convey messages to you in the interface about the exact problem. By viewing log you can get some ideas about the Runtime exception.
You see, I am really new into android, but the reason logs are important is because they can help you track down issues, such as Java.NullPointerExceptions and can help you trace back to where the issues were. I think there is also a way to create an error dialogue in the log, which can tell you that an error occurred. This is particularly essential in debugging, where you need to solve a problem in your app. I hope this helps, and best of luck. I think you can search up how to write stuff into a log at certain areas. I think the way on how to Log is to access Log class. http://developer.android.com/reference/android/util/Log.html
I have my own logger that includes part of a stack trace for each logging statement like this:
2015-03-27 23:12:56,582 INFO something something something (Abc.java:123) (Abc.java:201) (Test.java:99)
Eclipse would turn each parenthesis file/line combination into a clickable link. But IDEA only makes the last one clickable.
I can't find an option to turn the other ones into links. If it there is not out-of-the-box option to enable this behavior, is it feasible to easily implement a plug in for it? Perhaps someone knows of an existing plugin? I can imagine that for some languages some people had the need to make it clickable. I'm seeing the ConsoleURL plugin, which could be a starting point.
What's the easiest route to this?
I found an answer to my own question. I found a plugin called "Awesome Console", that's in the included list in IDEA. It automagically made the other file:line combinations clickable.