mapPropertyErrors seems to only return null - error-handling

I can't seem to get the automatic error messages working. My configuration seems to be correct from what I've read online, yet the error always get's picked up in the catch after using the repository.save(entity) function. I'm specifically trying to get an error related to leaving the field empty but :required="true" doesn't seem to help. Could it be because they are translation fields? My entity is called suiteseven_usp.
I've got the following definition:
protected function defineFields(): FieldCollection
{
return new FieldCollection([
(new IdField('id', 'id'))->addFlags(new Required(), new PrimaryKey()),
(new TranslatedField('text'))->addFlags(new ApiAware(), new Required()),
(new TranslatedField('subtext'))->addFlags(new ApiAware(), new Required()),
new StringField('icon', 'icon'),
new StringField('type', 'type'),
new TranslationsAssociationField(UspTranslationDefinition::class, 'suiteseven_usp_id'),
]);
}
The following in computed: in my component:
...mapPropertyErrors('suiteseven_usp', [
'text',
'subtext'
]),
And this as one of the fields:
<sw-field
v-model="usp.text"
class="s7-usp-detail__text"
:label="$tc('s7-usp.detail.fieldTextLabel')"
:placeholder="$tc('s7-usp.detail.fieldTextPlaceholder')"
:disabled="!acl.can('usp.editor')"
:error="suitesevenUspTextError"
:required="true"
></sw-field>
This is my save function:
onSave() {
this.isLoading = true;
this.isSaveSuccessful = false;
return this.uspRepository.save(this.usp, Shopware.Context.api).then(() => {
this.isSaveSuccessful = true;
this.createNotificationSuccess({
title: this.$tc('global.default.success'),
message: this.$tc('s7-usp.detail.notificationSuccessMessage'),
});
if (!this.uspId) {
this.$router.push({name: 's7.usp.detail', params: {id: this.usp.id}});
}
this.uspRepository.get(this.usp.id, Shopware.Context.api).then((updatedUsp) => {
this.usp = updatedUsp;
this.isLoading = false;
});
}).catch(() => {
this.createNotificationError({
title: this.$tc('global.default.error'),
message: this.$tc('s7-usp.detail.notificationErrorMessage'),
});
this.isLoading = false;
});
},

You also need to set Required flag to TranslationsAssociationField also.
(new TranslationsAssociationField(UspTranslationDefinition::class, 'suiteseven_usp_id'))->addFlags(new Required()),

Related

Wait until API fully loads before running next function -- async/await -- will this work?

I am a beginner with Javascript with a bit of knowledge of VueJs. I have an array called tickets. I also have a data api returning two different data objects (tickets and user profiles).
The tickets have user ids and the user profiles has the ids with names.
I needed to create a method that looks at both of that data, loops through it, and assigns the full name of the user to the view.
I was having an issue where my tickets object were not finished loading and it was sometimes causing an error like firstname is undefined. So, i thought I'd try and write an async/await approach to wait until the tickets have fully loaded.
Although my code works, it just doesn't "feel right" and I am not sure how reliable it will be once the application gets larger.
Can I get another set of eyes as to confirmation that my current approach is OK? Thanks!
data() {
return {
isBusy: true,
tickets: [],
userProfiles: [],
}
},
created() {
this.getUserProfiles()
this.getTickets()
},
methods: {
getUserProfiles: function() {
ApiService.getUserProfiles().then(response => {
this.userProfiles = response.data
})
},
getTickets() {
ApiService.getTickets().then(response => {
this.tickets = response.data
this.assignNames(this.tickets)
this.isBusy = false
})
},
// lets wait until the issues are loaded before showing names;
async assignNames() {
let tickets = await this.tickets
var i
for (i = 0; i < this.tickets.length; i++) {
if (tickets[i].assigned_to !== null) {
const result = this.userProfiles.filter(profile => {
return profile.uid == tickets[i].assigned_to
})
tickets[i].assigned_to = result[0].firstname + ' ' + result[0].lastname
}
}
}
}
}
</script>
There are several ways you could do this. Here is the one I prefer without async/await:
created() {
this.load();
},
methods: {
getUserProfiles: function() {
return ApiService.getUserProfiles().then(response => {
this.userProfiles = response.data
})
},
getTickets() {
return ApiService.getTickets().then(response => {
this.tickets = response.data
})
},
load() {
Promise.all([
this.getUserProfiles(),
this.getTickets()
]).then(data => {
this.assignNames();
this.isBusy = false;
});
},
assignNames(){
const tickets = this.tickets;
for (let i = 0; i < this.tickets.length; i++) {
if (tickets[i].assigned_to !== null) {
const result = this.userProfiles.filter(profile => {
return profile.uid == tickets[i].assigned_to
})
tickets[i].assigned_to = result[0].firstname + ' ' + result[0].lastname
}
}
}
}

Angular 5 HTTPClient not returning results for RouteResolver

I have to say HttpClient Observables, subscriptions etc are pretty hard/time consuming to get right.
I have been working on a problem for a while now and tearing my hair out. I have a service that I need to be able to perform a mapping function on.
loadAllSummary(organisationId: number) {
return this.http.get('/api/aircrafts/organisations/' + organisationId)
.pipe(
map(data => data.forEach(datum => {
console.log('why am i not getting here! ' + JSON.stringify(data));
return this.mapToSummary(datum);
}))
);
}
with the mapToSummary() method:
private mapToSummary(aircraft: Aircraft): IAircraftSummary {
const lastDate: Date = new Date(Math.max.apply(null, aircraft.workorders.map(function(e) {
return new Date(e.date);
})));
return new AircraftSummary({
lastWork: lastDate,
rego: aircraft.registration,
make: aircraft.make,
model: aircraft.model,
contact: (aircraft.owner.type.endsWith('primary')) ? aircraft.owner.principal : aircraft.operator.principal,
phone: (aircraft.owner.type.endsWith('primary')) ? aircraft.owner.contact.phone : aircraft.operator.contact.phone
});
}
Now, I need these summaries as input data to a view, so I borrowed code from the interwebs and created this ResolverService:
#Injectable()
export class AircraftsResolverService implements Resolve<IAircraftSummary[]> {
constructor(private service: AircraftService,
private router: Router) { }
resolve(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot,
state: RouterStateSnapshot): Observable<IAircraftSummary[]> {
console.log('called AircraftsResolverService')
const id = route.params['id'];
if (isNaN(+id)) {
console.log(`Organisation id was not a number: ${id}`);
this.router.navigate(['/login']);
return Observable.of(null);
}
return this.service.loadAllSummary(+id)
.map(summaries => {
console.log(summaries)
if (summaries) {
return summaries;
}
console.log(`Summaries were not found: ${id}`);
this.router.navigate(['/organisations/', +id]);
return null;
})
.catch(error => {
console.log(`Retrieval error: ${error}`);
this.router.navigate(['/organisations/', +id]);
return Observable.of(null);
});
}
}
Which I then refer to in the ngOnInit call...
ngOnInit() {
this.currentUser = this.authenticationService.returnCurrentUser();
this.route.data
.subscribe(({aircrafts}) => {
this.aircrafts = aircrafts;
const id = +this.route.snapshot.paramMap.get('id');
console.log(' where are my aircraft!' + JSON.stringify(aircrafts));
this.ELEMENT_DATA = aircrafts;
this.displayedColumns = ['Last Work', 'Rego', 'Make', 'Model', 'Contact', 'Phone'];
this.dataSource = new MatTableDataSource(this.ELEMENT_DATA);
this.dataSource.sort = this.sort;
console.log(id);
if (id) {
this.organisationService.getById(id).subscribe(org => {
this.organisation = org;
});
} else {
console.log('its bad');
}
});
console.log(this.dataSource);
}
The console log under the subscribe is undefined and the console.logs under the service never get triggered. So once again, I find myself not understanding why subscription fire or not fire, or whatever it is that they do.
How do I get past this? thanks everyone.
EDIT: appears that the problem is actually in the ResolverService, I have been able to determine that the data service is getting the results and that they are correct. For some reason, the resolver service can't see them.
The answer was in the route resolver, or rather the app-routing-module. I should have included it in the question, because some of the angular saltys would have picked it up
I was trying to do this:.
{ path: 'organisations/:orgId/aircrafts/:id', component: AircraftsComponent, resolve: {aircrafts : AircraftsResolverService}, canActivate: [AuthGuard] },
But you can't, you have to do this:
{ path: 'organisations/aircrafts/:orgId/:id', component: AircraftsComponent, resolve: {aircrafts : AircraftsResolverService}, canActivate: [AuthGuard] },
results in very non-resty urls, but, hey, whatever works, right?

How to avoid duplicate entries in IBM JSONStore

WL.JSONStore.get(collectionName).change(data, options) method does not seem to work for duplicate values. I get duplicate values entered whenever data is loaded through the adapter. Below is the code that I have used to avoid duplicate entries.
init(){
console.log('JSONStore init function callled');
let collections = {
activities: {
searchField: {serialKey: 'string'},
adapter: {
name: 'ServiceAdapter',
add: 'pushActivities',
remove: 'removeActivity',
replace: 'replaceActivity',
load: {
procedure: 'getActivities',
params: [],
key: 'rows'
}
}
}
}
WL.JSONStore.init(collections).then((success) => {
console.log('-->JSONStore init success')
}, (failure) => {
console.log('-->JSONStore init failed', failure)
})
}
load() {
let dataRequest = new
WLResourceRequest("/adapters/ServiceAdapter/getActivities",
WLResourceRequest.GET);
dataRequest.send().then(
(response) => {
this.data = response.responseJSON.rows;
this.activityService.put(this.data);
})
}
put(data){
console.log('--> JSONStore put function called');
let collectionName = 'activities';
let options = {
replaceCriteria: ['serialKey'],
addNew: true,
markDirty: false
};
WL.JSONStore.get(collectionName).change(data, options).then((success) => {
console.log('--> JSONStore put success')
}, (failure) => {
console.log('--> JSONStore put failed', failure)
})
}
Adapter Function:
function getActivities() {
var path = 'employees' + '/_all_docs?include_docs=true';
var input = {
method : 'get',
returnedContentType : 'json',
path : path,
};
var response = MFP.Server.invokeHttp(input);
if (!response.rows) {
response.isSuccessful = false;
return response;
} else {
var results = [];
for (var i=0; i < response.rows.length; i++) {
results.push(response.rows[i].doc);
}
return {'rows': results};
}
}
I have even tried by:
searchFields: {serialKey: 'string',serialId: 'string'}
replaceCriteria: ['serialKey','serialId']
But no luck.
NOTE: There is no error in the former one, whereas the later results in an error.
ERROR : PROVISION_TABLE_SEARCH_FIELDS_MISMATCH (I have already tried to destroy the collection and perform the change, as the link suggests.
I have followed the below link:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ep6w1zXoI-k
I am using the below versions:
mfpdev : 8.0.0-2017102406
Let me know if you need any more details.

Howto remove a entry from the tree in a Less visitor plugin

I tried the following:
module.exports = function(less) {
function RemoveProperty() {
this._visitor = new less.visitors.Visitor(this);
};
RemoveProperty.prototype = {
isReplacing: true,
isPreEvalVisitor: true,
run: function (root) {
return this._visitor.visit(root);
},
visitRule: function (ruleNode, visitArgs) {
if(ruleNode.name[0].value != '-some-aribitrary-property')
{
return ruleNode;
}
else
{
return new less.tree.Rule([], [], 0,"");
}
}
};
return RemoveProperty;
};
return new less.tree.Rule([], [], 0,""); still result in a empty output like : ; also return nothing will give me an error: TypeError: Cannot read property 'splice' of undefined.
It can.. but its not ideal from a performance perspective.. return an empty array
visitRule: function (ruleNode, visitArgs) {
if (ruleNode.variable) {
return [];
}
return ruleNode;
},
If you check out the toCSS visitor it does this alot.
But I think it should allow undefined too.. Will look at adding that soon.

Routing/Modularity in Dojo (Single Page Application)

I worked with backbone before and was wondering if there's a similar way to achieve this kind of pattern in dojo. Where you have a router and pass one by one your view separately (like layers) and then you can add their intern functionality somewhere else (e.g inside the view) so the code is very modular and can be change/add new stuff very easily. This code is actually in jquery (and come from a previous project) and it's a "common" base pattern to develop single application page under jquery/backbone.js .
main.js
var AppRouter = Backbone.Router.extend({
routes: {
"home" : "home"},
home: function(){
if (!this.homeView) {
this.homeView= new HomeView();
}
$('#content').html(this.homeView.el);
this.homeView.selectMenuItem('home-link');
}};
utils.loadTemplate(['HomeView'], function() {
app = new AppRouter();
Backbone.history.start();
});
utils.js
loadTemplate: function(views, callback) {
var deferreds = [];
$.each(views, function(index, view) {
if (window[view]) {
deferreds.push($.get('tpl/' + view + '.html', function(data) {
window[view].prototype.template = _.template(data);
}));
} else {
alert(view + " not found");
}
});
$.when.apply(null, deferreds).done(callback);
}};
HomeView.js
window.HomeView = Backbone.View.extend({
initialize:function () {
this.render();
},
render:function () {
$(this.el).html(this.template());
return this;
}
});
And basically, you just pass the html template. This pattern can be called anywhere with this link:
<li class="active"><i class="icon-home"></i> Dashboard</li>
Or, what is the best way to implement this using dojo boilerplate.
The 'boilerplate' on this subject is a dojox.mvc app. Reference is here.
From another aspect, see my go at it a while back, ive setup an abstract for 'controller' which then builds a view in its implementation.
Abstract
Then i have an application controller, which does following on its menu.onClick
which fires loading icon,
unloads current pane (if forms are not dirty)
loads modules it needs (defined 'routes' in a main-menu-store)
setup view pane with a new, requested one
Each view is either simply a server-html page or built with a declared 'oocms' controller module. Simplest example of abstract implementation here . Each implements an unload feature and a startup feature where we would want to dereference stores or eventhooks in teardown - and in turn, assert stores gets loaded etc in the setup.
If you wish to use templates, then base your views on the dijit._TemplatedMixin
edit
Here is a simplified clarification of my oocms setup, where instead of basing it on BorderLayout, i will make it ContentPanes:
Example JSON for the menu, with a single item representing the above declared view
{
identifier: 'view',
label: 'name',
items: [
{ name: 'myForm', view: 'App.view.MyForm', extraParams: { foo: 'bar' } }
]
}
Base Application Controller in file 'AppPackagePath/Application.js'
Note, the code has not been tested but should give a good impression of how such a setup can be implemented
define(['dojo/_base/declare',
"dojo/_base/lang",
"dijit/registry",
"OoCmS/messagebus", // dependency mixin which will monitor 'notify/progress' topics'
"dojo/topic",
"dojo/data/ItemFileReadStore",
"dijit/tree/ForestStoreModel",
"dijit/Tree"
], function(declare, lang, registry, msgbus, dtopic, itemfilereadstore, djforestmodel, djtree) {
return declare("App.Application", [msgbus], {
paneContainer: NULL,
treeContainer: NULL,
menuStoreUrl: '/path/to/url-list',
_widgetInUse: undefined,
defaultPaneProps: {},
loading: false, // ismple mutex
constructor: function(args) {
lang.mixin(this, args);
if(!this.treeContainer || !this.paneContainer) {
console.error("Dont know where to place components")
}
this.defaultPaneProps = {
id: 'mainContentPane'
}
this.buildRendering();
},
buildRendering: function() {
this.menustore = new itemfilereadstore({
id: 'appMenuStore',
url:this.menuStoreUrl
});
this.menumodel = new djforestmodel({
id: 'appMenuModel',
store: this.menustore
});
this.menu = new djtree( {
model: this.menumodel,
showRoot: false,
autoExpand: true,
onClick: lang.hitch(this, this.paneRequested) // passes the item
})
// NEEDS a construct ID HERE
this.menu.placeAt(this.treeContainer)
},
paneRequested: function(item) {
if(this.loading || !item) {
console.warn("No pane to load, give me a menustore item");
return false;
}
if(!this._widgetInUse || !this._widgetInUse.isDirty()) {
dtopic.publish("notify/progress/loading");
this.loading = true;
}
if(typeof this._widgetInUse != "undefined") {
if(!this._widgetInUse.unload()) {
// bail out if widget says 'no' (isDirty)
return false;
}
this._widgetInUse.destroyRecursive();
delete this._widgetInUse;
}
var self = this,
modules = [this.menustore.getValue(item, 'view')];
require(modules, function(viewPane) {
self._widgetInUse = new viewPane(self.defaultProps);
// NEEDS a construct ID HERE
self._widgetInUse.placeAt(this.paneContainer)
self._widgetInUse.ready.then(function() {
self.paneLoaded();
})
});
return true;
},
paneLoaded: function() {
// hide ajax icons
dtopic.publish("notify/progress/done");
// assert widget has started
this._widgetInUse.startup();
this.loading = false;
}
})
})
AbstractView in file 'AppPackagePath/view/AbstractView.js':
define(["dojo/_base/declare",
"dojo/_base/Deferred",
"dojo/_base/lang",
"dijit/registry",
"dijit/layout/ContentPane"], function(declare, deferred, lang, registry, contentpane) {
return declare("App.view.AbstractView", [contentpane], {
observers: [], // all programmatic events handles should be stored for d/c on unload
parseOnLoad: false,
constructor: function(args) {
lang.mixin(this, args)
// setup ready.then resolve
this.ready = new deferred();
// once ready, create
this.ready.then(lang.hitch(this, this.postCreate));
// the above is actually not nescessary, since we could simply use onLoad in contentpane
if(typeof this.content != "undefined") {
this.set("content", this.content);
this.onLoad();
} else if(typeof 'href' == "undefined") {
console.warn("No contents nor href set in construct");
}
},
startup : function startup() {
this.inherited(arguments);
},
// if you override this, make sure to this.inherited(arguments);
onLoad: function() {
dojo.parser.parse(this.contentNode);
// alert the application, that loading is done
this.ready.resolve(null);
// and call render
this.render();
},
render: function() {
console.info('no custom rendering performed in ' + this.declaredClass)
},
isDirty: function() { return false; },
unload: function() {
dojo.forEach(this.observers, dojo.disconnect);
return true;
},
addObserver: function() {
// simple passthrough, adding the connect to handles
var handle = dojo.connect.call(dojo.window.get(dojo.doc),
arguments[0], arguments[1], arguments[2]);
this.observers.push(handle);
}
});
});
View implementation sample in file 'AppPackagePath/view/MyForm.js':
define(["dojo/_base/declare",
"dojo/_base/lang",
"App/view/AbstractView",
// the contentpane href will pull in some html
// in the html can be markup, which will be renderered when ready
// pull in requirements here
"dijit/form/Form", // markup require
"dijit/form/Button" // markup require
], function(declare, lang, baseinterface) {
return declare("App.view.MyForm", [baseinterface], {
// using an external HTML file
href: 'dojoform.html',
_isDirty : false,
isDirty: function() {
return this._isDirty;
},
render: function() {
var self = this;
this.formWidget = dijit.byId('embeddedForm') // hook up with loaded markup
// observer for children
dojo.forEach(this.formWidget._getDescendantFormWidgets(), function(widget){
if(! lang.isFunction(widget.onChange) )
console.log('unable to observe ' + widget.id);
self.addObserver(widget, 'onChange', function() {
self._isDirty = true;
});
});
//
},
// #override
unload: function() {
if(this.isDirty()) {
var go = confirm("Sure you wish to leave page before save?")
if(!go) return false;
}
return this.inherited(arguments);
}
})
});