Related
I am trying to make several pie charts that I can then transition between in a presentation. For this, it would be very useful for the automatic layouting to... get out of the way. The problem is that whenever I change a label, the whole plot moves around on the canvas so that it fits perfectly. I'd like the plot to stay centered, so it occupies the same area every time. I have tried adding center=(0,0) to ax.pie(), but to no avail.
Two examples:
Image smaller, left
Image larger, right
Instead of that effect, I'd like the pie chart to be in the middle of the canvas and have the same size in both cases (and I'd then manually make sure that the labels are on canvas by setting large margins).
The code I use to generate these two images is:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
# Draw labels, from
# https://matplotlib.org/3.2.2/gallery/pie_and_polar_charts/pie_and_donut_labels.html#sphx-glr-gallery-pie-and-polar-charts-pie-and-donut-labels-py
def make_labels(ax, wedges, labs):
bbox_props = dict(boxstyle="square,pad=0.3", fc="w", ec="k", lw=0.72)
kw = dict(arrowprops=dict(arrowstyle="-"),
bbox=bbox_props,
zorder=0, va="center")
for i, p in enumerate(wedges):
if p.theta2-p.theta1 < 5:
continue
ang = (p.theta2 - p.theta1) / 2. + p.theta1
y = np.sin(np.deg2rad(ang))
x = np.cos(np.deg2rad(ang))
horizontalalignment = {-1: "right", 1: "left"}[int(np.sign(x))]
connectionstyle = "angle,angleA=0,angleB={}".format(ang)
kw["arrowprops"].update({"connectionstyle": connectionstyle})
ax.annotate(labs[i], xy=(x, y),
xytext=(1.1*x,1.1*y),
horizontalalignment=horizontalalignment, **kw)
kw=dict(autoscale_on=False, in_layout=False, xmargin=1, ymargin=1)
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(3, 3), dpi=100, subplot_kw=kw)
wedges, texts = ax.pie(x=[1,2,3], radius=1,
wedgeprops=dict(width=1),
pctdistance=0.7,
startangle=90,
textprops=dict(fontsize=8),
center=(0, 0))
make_labels(ax, wedges, ["long text", "b", "c"])
#make_labels(ax, wedges, ["a", "b", "long text"])
plt.show()
Thanks a lot in advance!
How are you saving your figures? It looks like you may be using savefig(..., bbox_inches='tight') which automatically resized the figure to include all the artists.
If I run your code with fig.savefig(..., bbox_inches=None), I get the following output
I would like to generate a centered figure legend for subplot(s), for which there is a single label. For my actual use case, the number of subplot(s) is greater than or equal to one; it's possible to have a 2x2 grid of subplots and I would like to use the figure-legend instead of using ax.legend(...) since the same single label entry will apply to each/every subplot.
As a brief and simplified example, consider the code just below:
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
x = np.arange(10)
y = np.sin(x)
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
ax.plot(x, y, color='orange', label='$f(x) = sin(x)$')
fig.subplots_adjust(bottom=0.15)
fig.legend(mode='expand', loc='lower center')
plt.show()
plt.close(fig)
This code will generate the figure seen below:
I would like to use the mode='expand' kwarg to make the legend span the entire width of the subplot(s); however, doing so prevents the label from being centered. As an example, removing this kwarg from the code outputs the following figure.
Is there a way to use both mode='expand' and also have the label be centered (since there is only one label)?
EDIT:
I've tried using the bbox_to_anchor kwargs (as suggested in the docs) as an alternative to mode='expand', but this doesn't work either. One can switch out the fig.legend(...) line for the line below to test for yourself.
fig.legend(loc='lower center', bbox_to_anchor=(0, 0, 1, 0.5))
The handles and labels are flush against the left side of the legend. There is no mechanism to allow for aligning them.
A workaround could be to use 3 columns of legend handles and fill the first and third with a transparent handle.
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
x = np.arange(10)
y = np.sin(x)
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
fig.subplots_adjust(bottom=0.15)
line, = ax.plot(x, y, color='orange', label='$f(x) = sin(x)$')
proxy = plt.Rectangle((0,0),1,1, alpha=0)
fig.legend(handles=[proxy, line, proxy], mode='expand', loc='lower center', ncol=3)
plt.show()
I want to completely remove white space around my axes during active plot (not save_fig as others asked).
Here we cannot use bbox_inches='tight'. I can use tight_layout(pad=0).
When axis is on, it works fine, it shows all the ticks and x-y labels.
However, in some cases, I set the axis off. What I expected is to see the contents expand to fill up the empty space where the axes are. However, this does not work. It still keep the padding as there are still x-y labels and axes.
How can I remove the white space of invisible axes objects?
edit:
I am aware that I can use ax.set_yticks([]) and ax.set_xticks([]) to turn those off. But this is clumsy, I have to remember the the ticks before I clear them. And if I remove-then-add those ticks. The ticks cannot automatically update any more.
I wonder is there any more straightforward way to do this?
We can still see there is a small border spacing even after removing all ticks. If someone can come up a way to remove that too. It will be fantastic.
I would also like to keep the title if there is one. Thus the hard-coded ax.set_position([0,0,1,x]) is not very good for this usage. Surely we can still try to get the top spacing when there is a title, but if someone can provide a more direct/simple way to handle this, it will be preferred.
Example code:
def demo_tight_layout(w=10, h=6, axisoff=False, removeticks=False):
fig,ax = plt.subplots()
fig.set_facecolor((0.8, 0.8, 0.8))
rect = patches.Rectangle((-w/2, -h/2), w, h, color='#00ffff', alpha=0.5)
ax.add_patch(rect)
ax.plot([-w/2,w/2], [-h/2,h/2])
ax.plot([-w/2,w/2], [h/2,-h/2])
ax.set_ylabel("ylabel")
ax.margins(0)
_texts = []
if axisoff:
ax.set_axis_off()
_texts.append("axisoff")
if removeticks:
ax.set_xticks([])
ax.set_yticks([])
ax.set_ylabel("")
_texts.append("removeticks")
fig.text(0.5, 0.6, " ".join(_texts))
fig.tight_layout(pad=0)
plt.show()
return fig, ax, text
You may adjust the subplot parameters depending on whether you turned the axis off or not.
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from matplotlib import patches
def demo_tight_layout(w=10, h=6, axisoff=False):
fig,ax = plt.subplots()
fig.set_facecolor((0.8, 0.8, 0.8))
rect = patches.Rectangle((-w/2, -h/2), w, h, color='#00ffff', alpha=0.5)
ax.add_patch(rect)
ax.plot([-w/2,w/2], [-h/2,h/2])
ax.plot([-w/2,w/2], [h/2,-h/2])
ax.set_ylabel("ylabel")
ax.margins(0)
_texts = []
fig.tight_layout()
if axisoff:
ax.set_axis_off()
_texts.append("axisoff")
params = dict(bottom=0, left=0, right=1)
if ax.get_title() == "":
params.update(top=1)
fig.subplots_adjust(**params)
fig.text(0.5, 0.6, " ".join(_texts))
plt.show()
Now demo_tight_layout(axisoff=True) produces
and demo_tight_layout(axisoff=False) produces
You need to set the axes position to fill the figure. If you create your figure and plot with
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
fig = plt.figure()
ax = fig.gca()
ax.plot(some_x_data, some_y_data)
you need to add the following line to fill the figure with the axes:
ax.set_position([0, 0, 1, 1], which='both')
This sets the axes location relative to the figure size in the following way:
[left, bottom, width, height]
So to completely fill the figure use [0, 0, 1, 1] as shown above.
So taking your code, it should look like this (using fill_figure bool to check):
def demo_tight_layout(w=10, h=6, axisoff=False, removeticks=False, fill_figure=False):
fig,ax = plt.subplots()
fig.set_facecolor((0.8, 0.8, 0.8))
rect = patches.Rectangle((-w/2, -h/2), w, h, color='#00ffff', alpha=0.5)
ax.add_patch(rect)
ax.plot([-w/2,w/2], [-h/2,h/2])
ax.plot([-w/2,w/2], [h/2,-h/2])
ax.set_ylabel("ylabel")
ax.margins(0)
_texts = []
if axisoff:
ax.set_axis_off()
_texts.append("axisoff")
if removeticks:
ax.set_xticks([])
ax.set_yticks([])
ax.set_ylabel("")
_texts.append("removeticks")
fig.text(0.5, 0.6, " ".join(_texts))
fig.tight_layout(pad=0)
if fill_figure:
ax.set_position([0, 0, 1, 1], which='both')
plt.show()
return fig, ax, text
ax.set_position needs to be after fig.tight_layout.
If a figure title is needed, there is no direct way to do it. This unluckily can't be avoided. You need to adapt the height parameters manually so that the title fits in the figure, for example with:
ax.set_position([0, 0, 1, .9], which='both')
I am trying to make some figures for a scientific article, so I want my figures to have a specific size. I also see that Matplotlib by default adds a lot of padding on the border of the figures, which I don't need (since the figures will be on a white background anyway).
To set a specific figure size I simply use plt.figure(figsize = [w, h]), and I add the argument tight_layout = {'pad': 0} to remove the padding. This works perfectly, and even works if I add a title, y/x-labels etc. Example:
fig = plt.figure(
figsize = [3,2],
tight_layout = {'pad': 0}
)
ax = fig.add_subplot(111)
plt.title('title')
ax.set_ylabel('y label')
ax.set_xlabel('x label')
plt.savefig('figure01.pdf')
This creates a pdf file with exact size 3x2 (inches).
The issue I have is that when I for example add a text box outside the axis (typically a legend box), Matplotlib does not make room for the text box like it does when adding titles/axis labels. Typically the text box is cut off, or does not show in the saved figure at all. Example:
plt.close('all')
fig = plt.figure(
figsize = [3,2],
tight_layout = {'pad': 0}
)
ax = fig.add_subplot(111)
plt.title('title')
ax.set_ylabel('y label')
ax.set_xlabel('x label')
t = ax.text(0.7, 1.1, 'my text here', bbox = dict(boxstyle = 'round'))
plt.savefig('figure02.pdf')
A solution I found elsewhere on SO was to add the argument bbox_inches = 'tight' to the savefig command. The text box is now included like I wanted, but the pdf is now the wrong size. It seems like Matplotlib just makes the figure bigger, instead of reducing the size of the axes like it does when adding titles and x/y-labels.
Example:
plt.close('all')
fig = plt.figure(
figsize = [3,2],
tight_layout = {'pad': 0}
)
ax = fig.add_subplot(111)
plt.title('title')
ax.set_ylabel('y label')
ax.set_xlabel('x label')
t = ax.text(0.7, 1.1, 'my text here', bbox = dict(boxstyle = 'round'))
plt.savefig('figure03.pdf', bbox_inches = 'tight')
(This figure is 3.307x2.248)
Is there any solution to this that covers most cases with a legend just outside the axes?
So the requirements are:
Having a fixed, predefined figure size
Adding a text label or legend outside the axes
Axes and text cannot overlap
The axes, together with the title and axis labels, sits tightly agains the figure border.
So tight_layout with pad = 0, solves 1. and 4. but contradicts 2.
One could think on setting pad to a larger value. This would solve 2. However, since it's is symmetric in all directions, it would contradict 4.
Using bbox_inches = 'tight' changes the figure size. Contradicts 1.
So I think there is no generic solution to this problem.
Something I can come up with is the following: It sets the text in figure coordinates and then resizes the axes either in horizontal or in vertical direction such that there is no overlap between the axes and the text.
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import matplotlib.transforms
fig = plt.figure(figsize = [3,2])
ax = fig.add_subplot(111)
plt.title('title')
ax.set_ylabel('y label')
ax.set_xlabel('x label')
def text_legend(ax, x0, y0, text, direction = "v", padpoints = 3, margin=1.,**kwargs):
ha = kwargs.pop("ha", "right")
va = kwargs.pop("va", "top")
t = ax.figure.text(x0, y0, text, ha=ha, va=va, **kwargs)
otrans = ax.figure.transFigure
plt.tight_layout(pad=0)
ax.figure.canvas.draw()
plt.tight_layout(pad=0)
offs = t._bbox_patch.get_boxstyle().pad * t.get_size() + margin # adding 1pt
trans = otrans + \
matplotlib.transforms.ScaledTranslation(-offs/72.,-offs/72.,fig.dpi_scale_trans)
t.set_transform(trans)
ax.figure.canvas.draw()
ppar = [0,-padpoints/72.] if direction == "v" else [-padpoints/72.,0]
trans2 = matplotlib.transforms.ScaledTranslation(ppar[0],ppar[1],fig.dpi_scale_trans) + \
ax.figure.transFigure.inverted()
tbox = trans2.transform(t._bbox_patch.get_window_extent())
bbox = ax.get_position()
if direction=="v":
ax.set_position([bbox.x0, bbox.y0,bbox.width, tbox[0][1]-bbox.y0])
else:
ax.set_position([bbox.x0, bbox.y0,tbox[0][0]-bbox.x0, bbox.height])
# case 1: place text label at top right corner of figure (1,1). Adjust axes height.
#text_legend(ax, 1,1, 'my text here', bbox = dict(boxstyle = 'round'), )
# case 2: place text left of axes, (1, y), direction=="v"
text_legend(ax, 1., 0.8, 'my text here', margin=2., direction="h", bbox = dict(boxstyle = 'round') )
plt.savefig(__file__+'.pdf')
plt.show()
case 1 (left) and case 2 (right):
Doin the same with a legend is slightly easier, because we can directly use the bbox_to_anchor argument and don't need to control the fancy box around the legend.
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import matplotlib.transforms
fig = plt.figure(figsize = [3.5,2])
ax = fig.add_subplot(111)
ax.set_title('title')
ax.set_ylabel('y label')
ax.set_xlabel('x label')
ax.plot([1,2,3], marker="o", label="quantity 1")
ax.plot([2,1.7,1.2], marker="s", label="quantity 2")
def legend(ax, x0=1,y0=1, direction = "v", padpoints = 3,**kwargs):
otrans = ax.figure.transFigure
t = ax.legend(bbox_to_anchor=(x0,y0), loc=1, bbox_transform=otrans,**kwargs)
plt.tight_layout(pad=0)
ax.figure.canvas.draw()
plt.tight_layout(pad=0)
ppar = [0,-padpoints/72.] if direction == "v" else [-padpoints/72.,0]
trans2=matplotlib.transforms.ScaledTranslation(ppar[0],ppar[1],fig.dpi_scale_trans)+\
ax.figure.transFigure.inverted()
tbox = t.get_window_extent().transformed(trans2 )
bbox = ax.get_position()
if direction=="v":
ax.set_position([bbox.x0, bbox.y0,bbox.width, tbox.y0-bbox.y0])
else:
ax.set_position([bbox.x0, bbox.y0,tbox.x0-bbox.x0, bbox.height])
# case 1: place text label at top right corner of figure (1,1). Adjust axes height.
#legend(ax, borderaxespad=0)
# case 2: place text left of axes, (1, y), direction=="h"
legend(ax,y0=0.8, direction="h", borderaxespad=0.2)
plt.savefig(__file__+'.pdf')
plt.show()
Why 72? The 72 is the number of points per inch (ppi). This is a fixed typographic unit e.g. fontsizes are always given in points (like 12pt). Because matplotlib defines the padding of the text box in units relative to fontsize, which is points, we need to use 72 to transform back to inches (and then to display coordinates). The default dots per inch (dpi) is not touched here, but is accounted for in fig.dpi_scale_trans. If you want to change dpi you need to make sure the figure dpi is set when creating the figure as well as when saving it (use dpi=.. in the call to plt.figure() as well as plt.savefig()).
As of matplotlib==3.1.3, you can use constrained_layout=True to achieve the desired result. This is currently experimental, but see the docs for a very helpful guide (and the section specifically on legends). Note that the legend will steal space from the plot, but this is unavoidable. I've found that as long as the legend does not take up too much space relative to the size of the plot, then the figure gets saved without cropping anything.
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(3, 2), constrained_layout=True)
ax.set_title('title')
ax.set_ylabel('y label')
ax.set_xlabel('x label')
ax.plot([0,1], [0,1], label='my text here')
ax.legend(loc='center left', bbox_to_anchor=(1.1, 0.5))
fig.savefig('figure03.pdf')
I have found minor graphical issues while using the spanselector, cursor and fill_between widgets, which I would like to share with you.
All of them, can be experienced in this code (which I took from the matplolib example)
"""
The SpanSelector is a mouse widget to select a xmin/xmax range and plot the
detail view of the selected region in the lower axes
"""
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from matplotlib.widgets import SpanSelector
import matplotlib.widgets as widgets
Fig = plt.figure(figsize=(8,6))
Fig.set_facecolor('w')
Fig.set
Ax = Fig.add_subplot(211)
x = np.arange(0.0, 5.0, 0.01)
y = np.sin(2*np.pi*x) + 0.5*np.random.randn(len(x))
Ax.plot(x, y, '-')
Ax.set_ylim(-2,2)
Ax.set_title('Press left mouse button and drag to test')
RegionIndices = []
ax2 = Fig.add_subplot(212)
line2, = ax2.plot(x, y, '-')
def onselect(xmin, xmax):
if len(RegionIndices) == 2:
Ax.fill_between(x[:], 0.0, y[:],facecolor='White',alpha=1)
del RegionIndices[:]
indmin, indmax = np.searchsorted(x, (xmin, xmax))
indmax = min(len(x)-1, indmax)
Ax.fill_between(x[indmin:indmax], 0.0, y[indmin:indmax],facecolor='Blue',alpha=0.30)
thisx = x[indmin:indmax]
thisy = y[indmin:indmax]
line2.set_data(thisx, thisy)
ax2.set_xlim(thisx[0], thisx[-1])
ax2.set_ylim(thisy.min(), thisy.max())
Fig.canvas.draw()
RegionIndices.append(xmin)
RegionIndices.append(xmax)
# set useblit True on gtkagg for enhanced performance
span = SpanSelector(Ax, onselect, 'horizontal', useblit = True,rectprops=dict(alpha=0.5, facecolor='purple') )
cursor = widgets.Cursor(Ax, color="red", linewidth = 1, useblit = True)
plt.show()
I wonder if there is some way to avoid these two small issues:
1) You can see that when you select a region the spanselector box (purple) glitches. In this code the effect is barely noticeable but on plots with many lines is quite annoying (I have tried all the trueblit combinations to not effect)
2) In this code when you select a region, the area in the upper plot between the line and the horizontal axis is filled in blue. When you select a new region the old area is filled in white (to clear it) and the new one is filled with blue again. However, when I do that the line plotted, as well as, the horizontal axis, become thicker... Is there a way to clear such a region (generated with fill_between) without this happening... Or is it necessary to replot the graph? Initially, I am against doing this since I have a well structured code and importing all the data again into the spanselector method seems a bit messy... Which is the right way in python to delete selected regions of a plot?
Any advice would be most welcome