I want to make a make a case-insensitivty query in mongodb that accecpt (RED,red,Red) but I have a large data set , I can't make a case for each color. I want a solution to make case sentivity for the whole colors set field.
Related
This is a very simple thing and I can't believe Tableau makes it so hard. I have a bunch of fields, and one measure has many zeroes. I just want to create a subset of the data where this measure > 0.
I can do it with a filter, but I since I will use it several times, it makes sense to create a set once and keep using it. Am I wrong to want to do that? Because I am finding it's just easier to just keep creating the filter in different sheets instead of trying to figure out the set.
I keep referring to this page, but they start out by telling you to right click on a dimension and create a set.
https://help.tableau.com/current/pro/desktop/en-us/sortgroup_sets_create.htm
I keep ending up here. What does it mean to apply a condition where the sum > 0? I want a set with any value > 0. That's not the same as a sum.
Actually your use case is not appropriate for sets. Sets in tableau work on IN/OUT principle. So the sets can be used as a T/F condition as well as used to differentiate the members IN and OUT of that set e.g. by differentiating these by colors.
What I can understand is that you just want to create a Calculating field which you can use as a ready filter as well as for differentiation also.
To illustrate let's take the following sample data
Now create a calculated field with the following calculation
[Measure] > 0
(Note- this would exclude negative values also. If your data set has negative values and you just want to exclude 0 values use <> instead.)
This calculated field will serve your purpose. See
and
Better seen with average
and
Good Luck.
I am attempting to create a sql statement in XE8 at runtime to search an oracle database based on the value in a textbox. I find multiple different ways that attempt to explain this online, but I am not understanding what it is asking.
I want to search a server based on a select statement and populate TDB components (labels only) based on the data. The furthest I have gotten is to get data populated, but the where
' ... somevalue = ' + textbox.text;
seems to have no effect.
What components do I need to make this happen? I am connected to the database, and it appears that I can get some kinda data out of it, but I can't seem to figure out how to filter the results. Obviously, I cannot create this sql statement at design time as the value of textbox.text will change depending on the user's input.
My error was in how to dynamically change what the data aware components got data as it would not always be the same. I had to manually go in and modify their datafield properties. Once I did this, my query functioned correctly.
In several notes applications, instead of handling related data as separate documents, if the size of the data is small (less than the 32k limit), I'll make several multi valued fields and display it in what I call a "List Panel". It's a table where each column displays one multi-value field. Since fielda(1) goes with fieldb(1) that goes with fieldc(1) there is a concept of rows. (I did a similar thing in my auditing routine discussed here )
It is always assumed that each field has exactly the same number of elements.
All the multi-value fields are then stored on the single document. This avoids several coding conventions that made my eyes bleed like having date changed, who changed it, new value fields for each field we wanted to audit. Another thing that this kept to a minimum was having to provide multiple fields for the same thing that locked you into a limit. Taxrate1, Taxrate2, Taxrate3, etc...
In my "Listpanel" the first column is a vertical checkbox. (One for each element in my lists) This is so I can select one item to bring up and edit, or select multiple values to delete "rows" or apply some kind of mass change to them.
What would be the best way to handle this under xPages to get this functionality? I tried making a table but am having the devil of a time to get the checkboxes to line up with their corresponding data items.
Views and dojo-grids seem to assume we're using a document for each row.....
This TableWalker may provide what you want http://www-10.lotus.com/ldd/ddwiki.nsf/dx/Tutorial-Introduction-to-XPages-Exercise-23
It was created when XPages was all very new, so it's SSJS rather than Java. But if you're comfortable wiith Java, converting it probably won't be a challenge.
You could use a repeat control to display the values and build a table using the table row tags in the repeat. You would want to calculate the id of the checkbox to be able to take an action on that selected row. The repeat var would be just one of your multi-value fields and you use the index of the repeat to get the value for that row from the other multi-value fields.
The title says the vague question, but, I will be more specific. I'm more of a hardware oriented person with some experience in VB, Java, and C++. I've been asked to modify a form in Access which uses SQL queries to take information from a database. The edit I am trying to make is to a form that has selections to narrow down the data it queries from to appear in a listbox in the center of the form (so, like radio buttons to specify a certain height or weight of an object in the database). The selections, as they are selected, concatenate additional specifications to an string that is then run as an SQL query. What I am trying to accomplish is to take a column of the narrowed-down data and find the maximum number in the column and the average of the numbers in the column. It seems really simple and know how to do that with regular lists and arrays, but I'm at a loss with my limited knowledge. I've considered making another SQL string, but in another part of the form, it was done with two strings (so, one to put the data in the listbox from the database and one to pull the specific column of the narrowed down data). That being said, it doesn't seem logical to me to pull the same sets of data each time, so I'm wondering if I can just pull the info from the already pulled info. At the bottom of the code set is this:
ItemList.RowSource = vSQLStock
ItemList = Null
ItemList.Requery
QuoteList.RowSource = vSQLNonStock
QuoteList = Null
QuoteList.Requery
Both vSQLStock and vSQLNonStock have their own sets of SQL strings that are run by this function, or as far as I can tell (I'm still studying up on SQL) put the narrowed down items in the QuoteList listbox. What I'm asking is if there is a way with any function that can be used to go through this information? Specifically, take a column and do some calculations on the data. I don't want to run another SQL query and bog down the server, but rather manipulate the data on the user's computer.
An example of what happens is the user selects whether the item is stock/nonstock, searches by the name/code/ID, and then puts all the matches on the listbox on the form. The listbox shows lines of data with columns like Name, Cost, Size, Weight, etc. of which I am looking to do calculations on the Cost column. Hopefully this is enough information; I appreciate any advice.
It looks from your question like you are attempting to get the Maximum and the Average from a SQL query.
the syntax:
SELECT MAX(myColumn) as MyMax, AVG(myColumn) as MyAverage
FROM myTable
WHERE . . .
Will return the Maximum and Average Values within SQL Server or within MS Access
If you're really bound and determined to do this locally with the data you've already retrieved from the server, then you probably need to look into working with adodb.recordsets. You can kind of treat it like an array. Kind of.
I really recommend querying the server for the data you need though. It's a world simpler.
dim rs as ADODB.Recordset
Set rs = QuoteList.Recordset
rs.MoveFirst
Do Until rs.EOF
' loop through recordset doing something
rs.MoveNext
Loop
I'm using sunspot and solr for a rails app to search ebook contens, for highlight feature I have to set the ebook_content as a stored filed, every time I queried solr for result, it sends back the entire document content about the book, which makes the query very slow.
How could I only get the result without the stored field?
The fl parameter of Solr allows you to specify which fields you want returned in the result. If you had fields id, title, ebook_content, then you could use fl=id,title to omit the ebook_content field. I don't think there's support in Solr for getting all fields except one (e.g. -ebook_content).
Update
If you don't want to return the field in the normal results, but still want highlighting on that field, exclude the field as I described above, then turn on the highlighter:
hl=true
set the field(s) which should be highlighted:
hl.fl=ebook_content
and set the size of the highlighting fragment (in characters):
hl.fragsize=50
your finished query looks something like this:
?q=search term&fl=id,title&hl=true&hl.fl=ebook_content&hl.fragsize=50