this is the Interface:
Namespace IBasBS100
Public Interface IBasBSMoedas <DispId(0)> <Obsolete("This method is obsolete. Use Actualiza(BasBE100.BasBEMoeda objMoeda, ref string strAvisos) instead.", False)>
Sub Actualiza(objMoeda As BasBEMoeda, Optional strAvisos As String = "")
<DispId(18)>
Sub Actualiza(objMoeda As BasBEMoeda, ByRef strAvisos As String)
<DispId(2)>
when i try to call the function that is not depracated it gives me the ambiguous error message:
Dim avisos As String
Dim bsmoedas As IBasBSMoedas = MotorPRI.Base.Moedas
bsmoedas.Actualiza(m, avisos)
I think its calling the depracated method.
Is there any way that i could explicitly call the non depracated method "Actualiza(objMoeda As BasBEMoeda, ByRef strAvisos As String)"?
PS: I can not change the interface, it's an external Library
I can only assume that the interface code was written in C# because that VB code won't compile. In VB, you don't explicitly state when passing an argument by reference, so the there's no way to differentiate between those two methods when calling one in VB code. In C#, you specify the ref or out keyword when passing an argument by reference, so there is no ambiguity in which overload you are calling, so it's allowed.
In short, you cannot call that interface method in VB. You can implement the interface in a class in VB and use a different name for one of the methods but you'd still have to call it through the class, not the interface. If you want to be able to use that interface then you're going to have to do it in C# code. Perhaps write a library in C# for the code that uses that interface and then consume that in your VB app.
I guess the other alternative to do it in VB would be to do so via Reflection. Far from ideal but I don't see another way.
Primavera v10 funtions and VisualBasic aren't compatible with each other. Some may work, most won't. I would recommend changing to C# since this is the "supported" language of primavera.
Related
I am building a small helper to fetch and populate all the controls of a ribbon group inside a collection.
Option Strict On
Imports Microsoft.Office.Tools.Ribbon
Private Function GetChildControls(Group As RibbonGroup) As IEnumerable(Of RibbonControl)
Dim ChildControls As New List(Of RibbonControl)
Dim SubControls As IEnumerable(Of RibbonControl) = Group.Items
ChildControls.AddRange(SubControls)
' ...
' Some recursive call over SubControls to get the children of each child (not relevant here)
' ...
Return ChildControls
End Function
Code breaks at ChildControls.AddRange(SubControls), with the following exception:
System.InvalidCastException: 'Unable to cast object of type Microsoft.Office.Tools.Ribbon.RibbonControl[]' to type Microsoft.Office.Tools.Ribbon.RibbonControlImpl[]'.'
I cannot find any reference at all on RibbonControlImpl. The Microsoft documentation is silent, and - surprisingly - so are Google or StackOverflow.
Changing ChildControls.AddRange(SubControls) into SubControls.ToList.ForEach(Sub(p) ChildControls.Add(p)) does not work either, but a classic For Each does the trick:
For Each MySubControl As RibbonControl In SubControls
ChildControls.Add(MySubControl)
Next
I would like to understand what is happening here? Is Impl a suffix to interface types to signify something? Maybe 'Impl' stands for 'Implementation'? I could not find any information on this either.
Just some thoughts, no idea if I am right; what do you think?
Office.Ribbon.RibbonControl is an interop interface, hence cannot be used as a generic type across assemblies. A guess would be that Microsoft implemented a non-interop RibbonControlImp wrapper to which RibbonControl is implicitly cast every time it is referenced as a generic type.
No idea how this would be achieved, but that would explain why For Each ... Next does not throw the error, whilst relying on generic collections does.
below code is c#
ctx.CreateStreamResponse(stream => new Session(_Sessions, stream).Process(),"video/mp4");
and i need to this code as VB.NET code. am converting as below
ctx.CreateStreamResponse(Function(stream) New Session(_Sessions, stream).Process(), "video/mp4")
But getting error
overload resolution failed because no accessible
"CreateStreamResponse" can be called with these arguments.
CreateStreamResponse needs 2 parameters
Stream (as my sample Function(stream) New Session(_Sessions, stream).Process())
content type (as my sample "video/mp4")
Anyone can help me, please
I believe the issue seems to be that the method which you pass into CreateStreamResponse should be a Sub not a Function. i.e:
ctx.CreateStreamResponse(Sub(stream) New Session(_Sessions, stream).Process(), "video/mp4")
CreateStreamResponse takes an Action(Of Stream) delegate as the first argument and a contentType of String as the second argument.
Thus you need to use Sub rather than a Function as in this case an Action delegate can only encapsulate methods that return void (sub procedures). Also, ensure that the Process method being invoked is also a Sub procedure.
If the problem persists then as suggested by Microsoft docs:
Review all the overloads for the method and determine which one you
want to call.
In your calling statement, make the data types of the arguments
match the data types of the parameters defined for the desired
overload. You might have to use the CType Function to convert one or
more data types to the defined types.
for more information see here
I am currently writing a wrapper for a native C++ class in CLI/C++. I am on a little GamePacket class at the moment. Consider the following class:
public ref class GamePacket
{
public:
GamePacket();
~GamePacket();
generic<typename T>
where T : System::ValueType
void Write(T value)
{
this->bw->Write(value);
}
};
I want that I'm able to call the function as following in C#, using my Wrapper:
Packet.Write<Int32>(1234);
Packet.Write<byte>(1);
However, I can't compile my wrapper. Error:
Error 1 error C2664: 'void System::IO::BinaryWriter::Write(System::String ^)' : cannot convert argument 1 from 'T' to 'bool'
I don't understand this error, where does the System::String^ comes from. I'm seeing a lot of overloads of the Write() method, does CLI/C++ not call the correct one, and if so, how can I make it call the correct one?
Reference MSDN: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.io.binarywriter.write(v=vs.110).aspx
Templates and generics don't work the same.
With templates, the code gets recompiled for each set of parameters, and the results can be pretty different (different local variable types, different function overloads selected). Specialization makes this really powerful.
With generics, the code only gets compiled once, and the overload resolution is done without actually knowing the final parameters. So when you call Write(value), the only things the compiler knows is that
value can be converted to Object^, because everything can
value derives from ValueType, because your constraint tells it
Unfortunately, using just that information, the compiler can't find an overload of Write that can be used.
It seems like you expected it to use Write(bool) when T is bool, Write(int) when T is int, and so on. Templates would work like that. Generics don't.
Your options are:
a dozen different copies of your method, each of which has a fixed argument type that can be used to select the right overload of BinaryWrite::Write
find the overload yourself using reflection, make a delegate matching the right overload, and call it
use expression trees or the dynamic language runtime to find and make a delegate matching the right overload, and then you call it
How might one go about aliasing a type in VB.NET or C# such that when the alias is used as an argument type in a function, accidentally using the not aliased type is an error?
i.e.
Imports AccessSpecifier = System.String
Module Accessors
Delegate Function IoOper(ByRef strm As System.IO.Stream) As Action
Public Function accessMethod(ByRef spec As AccessSpecifier) As IoOper
' implementation
' ...
End Function
End Module
Module Main
Public Sub Main()
Dim spec As AccessSpecifier = New AccessSpecifier(CType("READ_WRITE", Char()))
Dim val = Accessors.accessMethod(spec)
System.Console.WriteLine(val.GetType())
Dim shouldFail = Accessors.accessMethod("FAIL_ME")
System.Console.WriteLine(shouldFail.GetType())
End Sub
End Module
Or perhaps is there a better way to go about this?
Overall, I'm wanting the IDE to force me to know what I'm doing if I'm throwing Ints around to mean Flags, or States and Strings around to mean Names, Propertys and Records.
Help?
I've never liked Type aliasing in .NET. It makes for imprecise code and it is not immediately clear what is happening. As in your example, when an individual went looking for the AccessSpecifier.vb file (or class) they would not find it.
Also, Aliasing only works within YOUR project and only within a single code file. So you would have to define that alias in all the various code files where it was to be used.
A better (as in easier to read, easier to maintain, and more clear of intent) option is to create a class and overload the type conversion operators for automatic conversion to/from String. In this manner you retain your ability to use your new class as if it were a String, but you gain your strict type checking.
I have a following code which works fine
MsgBox(AddSomething(Of String)("Hello", "World"))
Public Function AddSomething(Of T)(ByVal FirstValue As T, ByVal SecondValue As T) As String
Return FirstValue.ToString + SecondValue.ToString
End Function
Now we are redesigning the application to work with parameters of different types which will be provided through XML
<SomeValues>
<Add Param1="Somedata" Param2="SomeData" MyType="String"/>
<Add Param1="Somedata" Param2="SomeData" MyType="MyBusinessObject"/>
</SomeValues>
If I try to provide the following it gives error as Of accepts only type
''''Get DetailsFromXml --- MyType,Param1,Param2
MsgBox(AddSomething(Of Type.GetType(MyType))(Param1,Param2))
How to solve this issue.
Edit
The above example is given to make the question simple. Actual issue is as follows
I am using SCSF of P&P.
Following is per view code which has to be written for each view
Private Sub tsStudentTableMenuClick()
Dim _StudentTableListView As StudentListView
_StudentTableListView = ShowViewInWorkspace(Of StudentListView)("StudentTable List", WorkspaceNames.RightWorkspace)
_StudentTableListView.Show()
End Sub
Now I want to show the views dynamically.
Public Sub ShowModalView(ByVal ViewName As String)
Dim _MasterListView As >>>EmployeeListView<<<<
_MasterListView = ShowViewInWorkspace(Of >>>EmployeeListView<<<)("Employee List", WorkspaceNames.RightWorkspace)
_MasterListView.Show()
End Sub
So the part shown using the arrows above has to be somehow dynamically provided.
The point of generics is to provide extra information at compile-time. You've only got that information at execution-time.
As you're using VB, you may be able to get away with turning Option Strict off to achieve late binding. I don't know whether you can turn it off for just a small piece of code - that would be the ideal, really.
Otherwise, and if you really can't get the information at compile-time, you'll need to call it with reflection - fetch the generic "blueprint" of the method, call MethodInfo.MakeGenericMethod and then invoke it.
I assume that the real method is somewhat more complicated? After all, you can call ToString() on anything...
(It's possible that with .NET 4.0 you'll have more options. You could certainly use dynamic in C# 4.0, and I believe that VB10 will provide the same sort of functionality.)
In .Net generics, you must be able to resolve to a specific type at compile time, so that it can generate appropriate code. Any time you're using reflection, you're resolving the type at run time.
In this case, you're always just calling the .ToString() method. If that's really all your code does, you could just change the parameter type to Object rather than use a generic method. If it's a little more complicated, you could also try requiring your parameters to implement some common interface that you will define.
If all you are doing is ToString, then making the parameters object instead would solve the problem in the simplest way. Otherwise you are going to have to bind the type at run-time, which in C# looks like:
System.Reflection.MethodInfo mi = GetType().GetMethod("AddSomething");
mi = mi.MakeGenericMethod(Type.GetType(MyType));
object result = mi.Invoke(this, new object[] { Param1, Param2 });
Because it involves reflection it won't be fast though... but I assume that's not a problem in this context.