If I had a SQL Server query that returns numbers in order like this
1
2
3
5
6
7
9
10
11
how can I remove numbers such that no two adjacent pairs are consecutive by 1? The above should be returned like
3
5
7
9
Is this possible to do?
We can use LEAD and LAG here:
WITH cte AS (
SELECT id, LAG(id) OVER (ORDER BY id) lag_id, LEAD(id) OVER (ORDER BY id) lead_id
FROM yourTable
)
SELECT id
FROM cte
WHERE lag_id <> id - 1 OR lead_id <> id + 1
ORDER BY id;
You can try to use LEAD and LAG window functions and calculation what rows are consecutive by 1.
SELECT Val
FROM (
SELECT *,
LEAD(Val) OVER(ORDER BY Val) - Val gap1,
Val - LAG(Val) OVER(ORDER BY Val) gap2
FROM T
) t1
WHERE gap1 > 1 OR gap2 > 1
Related
How to get the rows of the longest consecutive same value?
Table Learning:
rowID
values
1
1
2
1
3
0
4
0
5
0
6
1
7
0
8
1
9
1
10
1
Longest consecutive value is 1 (rowID 8-10 as rowID 1-2 is 2 and rowID 6-6 is 1). How to query to get the actual rows of consecutive values (not just rowStart and rowEnd values) like :
rowID
values
8
1
9
1
10
1
And for longest consecutive values of both 1 and 0?
DB Fiddle
I think that the simplest approach is to use a window count to define the islands. Then to get the "longest" island, we just need to aggregate, sort and limit:
select min(valueid) grp_start, max(valueid) grp_end
from (select t.*, sum(value = 0) over(order by valueid) grp from testing t) t
where value = 1
group by grp
order by count(*) desc limit 1
In the DB Fiddle that you provided, the query returns:
grp_start
grp_end
8
10
This is a gaps and islands problem, and one approach is to use the difference in row numbers method:
WITH cte AS (
SELECT *, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY rowID) rn1,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY values ORDER BY rowID) rn2
FROM yourTable
),
cte2 AS (
SELECT *,
MIN(rowID) OVER (PARTITION BY values, rn1 - rn2) AS minRowID,
MAX(rowID) OVER (PARTITION BY values, rn1 - rn2) AS maxRowID
FROM cte1
),
cte3 AS (
SELECT *, RANK() OVER (PARTITION BY values ORDER BY maxRowID - minRowID DESC) rnk
FROM cte2
)
SELECT rowID, values
FROM cte3
WHERE rnk = 1
ORDER BY values, rowID;
Is it possible to rank item by partition without use CTE method
Expected Table
item
value
ID
A
10
1
A
20
1
B
30
2
B
40
2
C
50
3
C
60
3
A
70
4
A
80
4
By giving id to the partition to allow agitated function to work the way I want.
item
MIN
MAX
ID
A
10
20
1
B
30
40
2
C
50
60
3
A
70
80
4
SQL Version: Microsoft SQL Sever 2017
Assuming that the value column provides the intended ordering of the records which we see in your question above, we can try using the difference in row numbers method here. Your problem is a type of gaps and islands problem.
WITH cte AS (
SELECT *, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY value) rn1,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY item ORDER BY value) rn2
FROM yourTable
)
SELECT item, MIN(value) AS [MIN], MAX(value) AS [MAX], MIN(ID) AS ID
FROM cte
GROUP BY item, rn1 - rn2
ORDER BY MIN(value);
Demo
If you don't want to use a CTE here, for whatever reason, you may simply inline the SQL code in the CTE into the bottom query, as a subquery:
SELECT item, MIN(value) AS [MIN], MAX(value) AS [MAX], MIN(ID) AS ID
FROM
(
SELECT *, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY value) rn1,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY item ORDER BY value) rn2
FROM yourTable
) t
GROUP BY item, rn1 - rn2
ORDER BY MIN(value);
You can generate group IDs by analyzing the previous row item value that could be obtained with the LAG function and finally use GROUP BY to get the minimum and maximum value in item groups.
SELECT
item,
MIN(value) AS "min",
MAX(value) AS "max",
group_id + 1 AS id
FROM (
SELECT
*,
SUM(CASE WHEN item = prev_item THEN 0 ELSE 1 END) OVER (ORDER BY value) AS group_id
FROM (
SELECT
*,
LAG(item, 1, item) OVER (ORDER BY value) AS prev_item
FROM t
) items
) groups
GROUP BY item, group_id
Query produces output
item
min
max
id
A
10
20
1
B
30
40
2
C
50
60
3
A
70
80
4
You can check a working demo here
I'm trying to achieve the following "rank" result given the original dataset composed by the column ID and CODE.
id code rank
1 A 1
2 A 1
3 A 1
4 B 2
5 B 2
6 C 3
7 C 3
8 C 3
9 A 4
10 A 4
Using the RANK_DENSE instruction over the CODE column i get the following result (with the A code getting the same rank value also after "the break" between the rows)
id code rank
1 A 1
2 A 1
3 A 1
4 B 2
5 B 2
6 C 3
7 C 3
8 C 3
9 A 1
10 A 1
Is it possible to achieve the results as shown in the first (example) table, with the A code changing rank when there is a separation between the group formed by id: 1-2-3 and the one formed by id: 9-10 without using a cursor?
Thanks
You want to find sequences of values and give them a rank. You can do this with a difference of row numbers approach. The following assigns a different number to each grouping:
select o.*, dense_rank() over (order by grp, code)
from (select o.*,
(row_number() over (order by id) -
row_number() over (partition by code order by id)
) as grp
from original o
) o;
If you want the assignment in the same order as the original data, then you can order by the id, but that requires an additional window function:
select o.*, dense_rank() over (order by minid) as therank
from (select o.*, min(id) over (partition by grp, code) as minid
from (select o.*,
(row_number() over (order by id) -
row_number() over (partition by code order by id)
) as grp
from original o
) o
) o;
SUM by if current is the same as previous row. Works from SQL Server 2012.
WITH CTE AS (
SELECT id, code,
CASE Code WHEN LAG(CODE) OVER (ORDER BY id) THEN 0 ELSE 1 END AS Diff
FROM Table1)
SELECT id, code, SUM(Diff) OVER (ORDER BY id) FROM CTE
Please also see similar question at How to make row numbering with ordering, partitioning and grouping
I have a table like so
ID OrdID Value
1 1 0
2 2 0
3 1 1
4 2 1
5 1 1
6 2 0
7 1 0
8 2 0
9 2 1
10 1 0
11 2 0
I want to get the count of consecutive value where the value is 0. Using the example above the result will be 3 (Rows 6, 7 and 8). I am using sql server 2008 r2.
I am going to presume that id is unique and increasing. You can get counts of consecutive values by using the different of row numbers. The following counts all sequences:
select grp, value, min(id), max(id), count(*) as cnt
from (select t.*,
(row_number() over (order by id) - row_number() over (partition by value order by id)
) as grp
from table t
) t
group by grp, value;
If you want the longest sequence of 0s:
select top 1 grp, value, min(id), max(id), count(*) as cnt
from (select t.*,
(row_number() over (order by id) - row_number() over (partition by value order by id)
) as grp
from table t
) t
group by grp, value
having value = 0
order by count(*) desc
A query using not exists to find consecutive 0s
select top 1 min(t2.id), max(t2.id), count(*)
from mytable t
join mytable t2 on t2.id <= t.id
where not exists (
select 1 from mytable t3
where t3.id between t2.id and t.id
and t3.value <> 0
)
group by t.id
order by count(*) desc
http://sqlfiddle.com/#!3/52989/3
I have a table
Val | Number
08 | 1
09 | 1
10 | 1
11 | 3
12 | 0
13 | 1
14 | 1
15 | 1
I need to return the last values where Number = 1 (however many that may be) until Number changes, but do not need the first instances where Number = 1. Essentially I need to select back until Number changes to 0 (15, 14, 13)
Is there a proper way to do this in MSSQL?
Based on following:
I need to return the last values where Number = 1
Essentially I need to select back until Number changes to 0 (15, 14,
13)
Try (Fiddle demo ):
select val, number
from T
where val > (select max(val)
from T
where number<>1)
EDIT: to address all possible combinations (Fiddle demo 2)
;with cte1 as
(
select 1 id, max(val) maxOne
from T
where number=1
),
cte2 as
(
select 1 id, isnull(max(val),0) maxOther
from T
where val < (select maxOne from cte1) and number<>1
)
select val, number
from T cross join
(select maxOne, maxOther
from cte1 join cte2 on cte1.id = cte2.id
) X
where val>maxOther and val<=maxOne
I think you can use window functions, something like this:
with cte as (
-- generate two row_number to enumerate distinct groups
select
Val, Number,
row_number() over(partition by Number order by Val) as rn1,
row_number() over(order by Val) as rn2
from Table1
), cte2 as (
-- get groups with Number = 1 and last group
select
Val, Number,
rn2 - rn1 as rn1, max(rn2 - rn1) over() as rn2
from cte
where Number = 1
)
select Val, Number
from cte2
where rn1 = rn2
sql fiddle demo
DEMO: http://sqlfiddle.com/#!3/e7d54/23
DDL
create table T(val int identity(8,1), number int)
insert into T values
(1),(1),(1),(3),(0),(1),(1),(1),(0),(2)
DML
; WITH last_1 AS (
SELECT Max(val) As val
FROM t
WHERE number = 1
)
, last_non_1 AS (
SELECT Coalesce(Max(val), -937) As val
FROM t
WHERE EXISTS (
SELECT val
FROM last_1
WHERE last_1.val > t.val
)
AND number <> 1
)
SELECT t.val
, t.number
FROM t
CROSS
JOIN last_1
CROSS
JOIN last_non_1
WHERE t.val <= last_1.val
AND t.val > last_non_1.val
I know it's a little verbose but I've deliberately kept it that way to illustrate the methodolgy.
Find the highest val where number=1.
For all values where the val is less than the number found in step 1, find the largest val where the number<>1
Finally, find the rows that fall within the values we uncovered in steps 1 & 2.
select val, count (number) from
yourtable
group by val
having count(number) > 1
The having clause is the key here, giving you all the vals that have more than one value of 1.
This is a common approach for getting rows until some value changes. For your specific case use desc in proper spots.
Create sample table
select * into #tmp from
(select 1 as id, 'Alpha' as value union all
select 2 as id, 'Alpha' as value union all
select 3 as id, 'Alpha' as value union all
select 4 as id, 'Beta' as value union all
select 5 as id, 'Alpha' as value union all
select 6 as id, 'Gamma' as value union all
select 7 as id, 'Alpha' as value) t
Pull top rows until value changes:
with cte as (select * from #tmp t)
select * from
(select cte.*, ROW_NUMBER() over (order by id) rn from cte) OriginTable
inner join
(
select cte.*, ROW_NUMBER() over (order by id) rn from cte
where cte.value = (select top 1 cte.value from cte order by cte.id)
) OnlyFirstValueRecords
on OriginTable.rn = OnlyFirstValueRecords.rn and OriginTable.id = OnlyFirstValueRecords.id
On the left side we put an original table. On the right side we put only rows whose value is equal to the value in first line.
Records in both tables will be same until target value changes. After line #3 row numbers will get different IDs associated because of the offset and will never be joined with original table:
LEFT RIGHT
ID Value RN ID Value RN
1 Alpha 1 | 1 Alpha 1
2 Alpha 2 | 2 Alpha 2
3 Alpha 3 | 3 Alpha 3
----------------------- result set ends here
4 Beta 4 | 5 Alpha 4
5 Alpha 5 | 7 Alpha 5
6 Gamma 6 |
7 Alpha 7 |
The ID must be unique. Ordering by this ID must be same in both ROW_NUMBER() functions.