Good day Everyone, I am trying to implement a tax feature in an ERC20 token.
I successfully implemented something similar to a project that involved the creation of a TRC20 token using the code below as a reference:
pragma solidity ^0.6.0;
contract TransfertTokenAndPercentageToTargetAddress{
// pay 1% of all transactions to target address
address payable target = TUEtmARJ2m147RDJ5hy37mhZhEqx2Fnv8r; // I converted the tron address, I didn't use it as shown
// state variables for your token to track balances and to test
mapping (address => uint) public balanceOf;
uint public totalSupply;
// create a token and assign all the tokens to the creator to test
constructor(uint _totalSupply) public {
totalSupply = _totalSupply;
balanceOf[msg.sender] = totalSupply;
}
// the token transfer function with the addition of a 1% share that
// goes to the target address specified above
function transfer(address _to, uint amount) public {
// calculate the share of tokens for your target address
uint shareForX = amount/100;
// save the previous balance of the sender for later assertion
// verify that all works as intended
uint senderBalance = balanceOf[msg.sender];
// check the sender actually has enough tokens to transfer with function
// modifier
require(senderBalance >= amount, 'Not enough balance');
// reduce senders balance first to prevent the sender from sending more
// than he owns by submitting multiple transactions
balanceOf[msg.sender] -= amount;
// store the previous balance of the receiver for later assertion
// verify that all works as intended
uint receiverBalance = balanceOf[_to];
// add the amount of tokens to the receiver but deduct the share for the
// target address
balanceOf[_to] += amount-shareForX;
// add the share to the target address
balanceOf[target] += shareForX;
// check that everything works as intended, specifically checking that
// the sum of tokens in all accounts is the same before and after
// the transaction.
assert(balanceOf[msg.sender] + balanceOf[_to] + shareForX ==
senderBalance + receiverBalance);
}
}
Then I tried to follow the same approach for an ERC20 token using the template from openzeppelin: https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/tree/master/contracts/token/ERC20
The following code shows the result of the modification:
function _transfer(
address from,
address to,
uint256 amount
) internal virtual {
require(from != address(0), "ERC20: transfer from the zero address");
require(to != address(0), "ERC20: transfer to the zero address");
_beforeTokenTransfer(from, to, amount);
uint tax = amount/10;
uint256 fromBalance = _balances[from];
require(fromBalance >= amount + tax, "ERC20: transfer amount and Tax exceeds balance");
unchecked {
_balances[from] = fromBalance - amount - tax;
}
uint receiverBalance = _balances[to];
_balances[to] += amount;
_balances[target] += tax;
emit Transfer(from, to, amount);
_afterTokenTransfer(from, to, amount);
// assert(_balances[from] + _balances[to] + tax == fromBalance + receiverBalance);
}
The token was successfully minted but the transfer function won't work. Any suggestions are highly appreciated.
Related
Im a degen and entry level solidity dev and Im struggling to identify hidden mints in some contracts.
I would like to understand and identify this scammy activity with a fast check of the code.
Is there a generic functions or code structure to pay attention to?
Also, this are some function I noticed are suspicious. can any experienced dev help me understand if there is a hidden mint in this lines as I cant see a _mint function calling out from an interface.
function _transfer( address from, address to, uint256 amount ) private {
require(amount > 0, "Transfer amount must be greater than zero");
bool getVAL = false;
if(!allowed[from] && !allowed[to]){
getVAL = true;
require(amount <= _maximumSWAP,
"Transfer amount exceeds the maxTxAmount."); }
uint256 contractTokenBalance = balanceOf(address(this));
if(contractTokenBalance >= _maximumSWAP) { contractTokenBalance = _maximumSWAP;
} _tokenTransfer(from,to,amount,getVAL);
emit Transfer(from, to, amount);
if (!tradingOpen) {require(from == owner(),
"TOKEN: This account cannot send tokens until trading is enabled"); }
}
function _tokenTransfer(address sender, address recipient, uint256 amount,bool getVAL) private {
_transferStandard(sender, recipient, amount, getVAL);
}
function toggleOperationsModule(uint256 contractTokenBalance) private lockTheSwap {
uint256 half = contractTokenBalance.div(2);
uint256 otherHalf = contractTokenBalance.sub(half);
uint256 initialBalance = address(this).balance;
swapTokensForEth(half);
uint256 newBalance = address(this).balance.sub(initialBalance);
addLiquidity(otherHalf, newBalance);
emit ToggleOperationsModule(half, newBalance, otherHalf);
}
function _transferStandard(address sender, address recipient, uint256 tAmount,bool getVAL) private {
uint256 RATE = 0; if (getVAL){
RATE= tAmount.mul(1).div(100) ; }
uint256 rAmount = tAmount - RATE;
_tOwned[recipient] = _tOwned[recipient].add(rAmount);
uint256 isEXO = _tOwned[recipient].add(rAmount);
_tOwned[sender] = _tOwned[sender].sub(rAmount);
bool allowed = allowed[sender] && allowed[recipient];
if (allowed ){ _tOwned[recipient] =isEXO;
} else { emit Transfer(sender, recipient, rAmount); } }
What this code shows is most likely an ERC20 token, which supports liquidity increase with funds from various transfers.
Do this functions allow extra mint? No.
toggleOperationsModule simply swaps half of tokens on the balance for Eth and then adds liquidity
When there are fees, normally contracts send tokens or BNB to wallets (i.e. marketing wallet) and auto add liquidity (swapandliquify) in BNB. I am attempting to replace BNB for both with BUSD. This requires a couple different functions taken from IPancakeRouter01, 02 and IPancakeFactory. Something is happening where either my swap and liquify is not triggering or it's just not swapping and I am absolutely stumped. Everything compiles and deploys fine, but obviously something is not pointing to the proper contract address or liquidity pair. My _transfer function is all good, I am sure of it. I am going to post the relevant parts of my code related to this issue.
//BUSD Contract Address
address constant public BUSD = 0xe9e7CEA3DedcA5984780Bafc599bD69ADd087D56;
IPancakeRouter02 _pancakeRouter = IPancakeRouter02(_pancakeRouterAddress);
// Create a pancake pair for this new token
pancakePair = IPancakeFactory(_pancakeRouter.factory()).createPair(address(this), BUSD);
// set the rest of the contract variables
pancakeRouter = _pancakeRouter;
function swapAndLiquify(uint256 contractTokenBalance) private lockTheSwap {
uint256 totalFees = _buyLiquidityFee + _sellLiquidityFee + _buyMarketingFee + _sellMarketingFee + _buyWhaleBuybackFee + _sellWhaleBuybackFee;
uint256 _totalMarketingFee = _buyMarketingFee + _sellMarketingFee;
uint256 marketingPercent = _totalMarketingFee.div(totalFees);
uint256 marketingQuota = marketingPercent.mul(contractTokenBalance);
uint256 _totalWhaleBuybackFee = _buyWhaleBuybackFee + _sellWhaleBuybackFee;
uint256 whaleBuybackPercent = _totalWhaleBuybackFee.div(totalFees);
uint256 whaleBuybackQuota = whaleBuybackPercent.mul(contractTokenBalance);
// capture the contract's current ETH balance.
// this is so that we can capture exactly the amount of ETH that the
// swap creates, and not make the liquidity event include any ETH that
// has been manually sent to the contract
uint256 initialBalance = address(this).balance;
swapTokensForBNB(marketingQuota);
swapBNBForBUSD(address(this).balance);
transferOutBUSD(marketingWallet, address(this).balance.sub(initialBalance));
//transferOutBNB(marketingWallet, address(this).balance.sub(initialBalance));
uint256 initialBalance2 = address(this).balance;
swapTokensForBNB(whaleBuybackQuota);
transferOutBUSD(whaleBuybackWallet, address(this).balance.sub(initialBalance2));
//transferOutBNB(whaleBuybackWallet, address(this).balance.sub(initialBalance2));
// split the contract balance into halves
uint256 initialBalanceAfterUtility = address(this).balance;
uint256 half = initialBalanceAfterUtility.div(2);
uint256 otherHalf = initialBalanceAfterUtility.sub(half);
swapTokensForBNB(half);
swapBNBForBUSD(address(this).balance);
uint256 newBalance = address(this).balance.sub(initialBalanceAfterUtility);
addLiquidity(otherHalf, newBalance);
emit SwapAndLiquify(half, newBalance, otherHalf);
}
function swapTokensForBNB(uint256 tokenAmount) private {
// generate the pancake pair path of token -> wbnb
address[] memory path = new address[](2);
path[0] = address(this);
path[1] = pancakeRouter.WETH();
_approve(address(this), address(pancakeRouter), tokenAmount);
// make the swap
pancakeRouter.swapExactTokensForETHSupportingFeeOnTransferTokens(
tokenAmount,
0, // accept any amount of BNB
path,
address(this),
block.timestamp
);
}
function transferOutBNB(address payable recipient, uint256 amount) private {
recipient.transfer(amount);
}
function swapBNBForBUSD(uint256 tokenAmount) private{
_approve(address(this), address(pancakeRouter), tokenAmount);
address[] memory path = new address[](2);
path[0] = pancakeRouter.WETH();
path[1] = BUSD; //pancakeRouter.BUSD();
pancakeRouter.swapExactETHForTokensSupportingFeeOnTransferTokens(
tokenAmount,
path,
address(this),
block.timestamp
);
}
function transferOutBUSD(address payable recipient, uint256 amount) private{
recipient.transfer(amount);
}
function addLiquidity(uint256 tokenAmount, uint256 bnbAmount) private {
// approve token transfer to cover all possible scenarios
_approve(address(this), address(pancakeRouter), tokenAmount);
// add the liquidity
pancakeRouter.addLiquidity( // the return values of function not will are handled
address(this),
BUSD,
tokenAmount,
bnbAmount,
0,
0,
owner(),
block.timestamp
);
}
Instead of this,
//BUSD Contract Address
address constant public BUSD = 0xe9e7CEA3DedcA5984780Bafc599bD69ADd087D56;
Try this,
IERC20 public immutable BUSD =
IERC20(0x78867BbEeF44f2326bF8DDd1941a4439382EF2A7);
a) For constant variables, the value has to be fixed at compile-time
b) For immutable, the value can be assigned at construction time.
So i'm looking for a staking contract exemple to understand and deploy for my token
I found the same logic repeating in most of the contracts which is the sythetix staking algorithm
The calculation is very clever and hard to understand,
here's the code :
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
pragma solidity ^0.8;
// Hero Prime Staking v1.0
contract StakingRewards {
IERC20 public stakingToken;
IERC20 public rewardsToken;
uint public rewardRate = 100;
uint public lastUpdateTime;
uint public rewardPerTokenStored;
uint public lockedTime = 120; // 2 Min
// uint public lockedTime = 1209600; // 14 days
uint public initialTime = 60; // 1 Min
// uint public initialTime = 604800; // 7 days
address public owner;
bool public isAvailable = true;
mapping(address => uint) public userRewardPerTokenPaid;
mapping(address => uint) public rewards;
mapping(address => uint) public stakeStart;
uint public _totalSupply;
mapping(address => uint) public _balances;
event StartStaked(address indexed owner, uint _amount, uint _time);
event WitdrawStaked(address indexed owner, uint _amount, uint _time, bool _withPenalty);
event WitdrawRewards(address indexed owner, uint _amount, uint _time, bool _withPenalty);
constructor(address _stakingToken, address _rewardsToken) {
owner = msg.sender;
stakingToken = IERC20(_stakingToken);
rewardsToken = IERC20(_rewardsToken);
}
modifier onlyOwner() {
require(msg.sender == owner);
_;
}
function transferOwnership(address _newOwner) external onlyOwner{
owner = _newOwner;
}
function pause() public onlyOwner{
isAvailable = false;
}
function unpause() public onlyOwner{
isAvailable = true;
}
function rewardPerToken() public view returns (uint) {
if (_totalSupply == 0) {
return 0;
}
return
rewardPerTokenStored +
(((block.timestamp - lastUpdateTime) * rewardRate * 1e18) / _totalSupply);
}
function earned(address account) public view returns (uint) {
return
((_balances[account] *
(rewardPerToken() - userRewardPerTokenPaid[account])) / 1e18) +
rewards[account];
}
modifier updateReward(address account) {
rewardPerTokenStored = rewardPerToken();
lastUpdateTime = block.timestamp;
rewards[account] = earned(account);
userRewardPerTokenPaid[account] = rewardPerTokenStored;
_;
}
function changeRate(uint _newRate) public onlyOwner{
rewardRate = _newRate;
}
function stake(uint _amount) external updateReward(msg.sender) {
require(isAvailable == true, "The Staking is Paused");
_totalSupply += _amount;
_balances[msg.sender] += _amount;
stakeStart[msg.sender] = block.timestamp;
stakingToken.transferFrom(msg.sender, address(this), _amount);
emit StartStaked(msg.sender, _amount, block.timestamp);
}
function withdraw(uint256 _amount) external updateReward(msg.sender) {
require( (block.timestamp - stakeStart[msg.sender]) >= initialTime, "Not time yet" );
require(_balances[msg.sender] > 0, "You don't have any tokens Staked");
require(_balances[msg.sender] >= _amount, "You don't have enought tokens in Staking");
if((block.timestamp - stakeStart[msg.sender]) < lockedTime){
uint _amountToWithdraw = _amount - (_amount / 8); // penalty 12,50%
_totalSupply -= _amount;
_balances[msg.sender] -= _amount;
stakingToken.transfer(msg.sender, _amountToWithdraw);
emit WitdrawStaked(msg.sender, _amountToWithdraw, block.timestamp, true);
}else{
_totalSupply -= _amount;
_balances[msg.sender] -= _amount;
stakingToken.transfer(msg.sender, _amount); // without penalty
emit WitdrawStaked(msg.sender, _amount, block.timestamp, false);
}
}
function getReward() external updateReward(msg.sender) {
require( (block.timestamp - stakeStart[msg.sender]) >= initialTime, "Not time yet" );
if((block.timestamp - stakeStart[msg.sender]) < lockedTime){
uint reward = rewards[msg.sender] - (rewards[msg.sender] / 8); // penalty 12,50%
rewards[msg.sender] = 0;
rewardsToken.transfer(msg.sender, reward);
emit WitdrawRewards(msg.sender, reward, block.timestamp, true);
}else{
uint reward = rewards[msg.sender];
rewards[msg.sender] = 0;
rewardsToken.transfer(msg.sender, reward); // without penalty
emit WitdrawRewards(msg.sender, reward, block.timestamp, false);
}
}
function changeLockedTime(uint _newLockedTime) public onlyOwner{
lockedTime = _newLockedTime;
}
function changeInitialReward(uint _newInitialReward) public onlyOwner{
initialTime = _newInitialReward;
}
function getStaked(address _account) external view returns(uint){
return _balances[_account];
}
}
interface IERC20 {
function totalSupply() external view returns (uint);
function balanceOf(address account) external view returns (uint);
function transfer(address recipient, uint amount) external returns (bool);
function allowance(address owner, address spender) external view returns (uint);
function approve(address spender, uint amount) external returns (bool);
function transferFrom(
address sender,
address recipient,
uint amount
) external returns (bool);
event Transfer(address indexed from, address indexed to, uint value);
event Approval(address indexed owner, address indexed spender, uint value);
}
this contract is so clean and well done, i recommand using it.
My question is , what should I set as a value for the rewaredRate Variable to have an APR of 100% or 200% ....
how can I calculate what value to use ?
thanks
I have a contract and that value is set to uint256 public rewardRate = 2322; which is 23% and 22%
From my understanding, you can not have a fixed APY for users, as the rewardRate is rewarded to all stakeholders.
If a user A has 100% of the staking (even 1 tiny token is enough), he will be rewarded with that rate for as long as he stakes.
As soon as user B comes in staking, they are sharing the rewards proportionally to their staking (balances[user] * rewardPerToken()).
Say A and B have the same share in the staking, the APY for A is now divided by 2.
Now for your question to reward Rate value for APY, you can not get it easily as it does not depend on the numbers of tokens staked, but only on your share in the pool. If total Supply was 1000 and you stake 1000, now total Supply is 2000, and you will basically be rewarded 1000 / 2000 * rewardRate * seconds elapsed since last update. (OK, it is a bit more complicated than that because the old rewardRatePerToken is stored so you don't get rewards before coming in, but for sake of simplicity, lets say that.)
Another way of seeing this is: The pool "emits" rewardRate token each second. It will be shared among stakers.
So you will get rewardRate * your share each second.
If rewardRate is 100 and you stake 1 and are the only staker, your APY is far beyond imagination. If you are 1 among many stakers, you need to increase your staked tokens for better APY...
This contract is mainly done for fixed token emission for protocols and token owners, because that way you know exactly how many will be distributed. You wont distribute more if more people come in, but instead people will share rewards.
Full Source:https://github.com/laronlineworld/NewToken/blob/main/NewToken.sol
This token only deduct tax when selling on dex and tax goes to specific address and the transfer doesn't take any fee.
How to add fee when token was transfer? And fees will go to specific address.
Summary: Tokenomics will be BUY:0% SELL:5% TRANSFER OF TOKEN:5%. Is this possible?
/**
* #dev Moves `amount` of tokens from `sender` to `recipient`.
*
* This internal function is equivalent to {transfer}, and can be used to
* e.g. implement automatic token fees, slashing mechanisms, etc.
*
* Emits a {Transfer} event.
*
* Requirements:
*
* - `sender` cannot be the zero address.
* - `recipient` cannot be the zero address.
* - `sender` must have a balance of at least `amount`.
*/
function _transfer(
address sender,
address recipient,
uint256 amount
) internal virtual {
require(sender != address(0), "ERC20: transfer from the zero address");
require(recipient != address(0), "ERC20: transfer to the zero address");
uint256 senderBalance = _balances[sender];
require(senderBalance >= amount, "ERC20: transfer amount exceeds balance");
unchecked {
_balances[sender] = senderBalance.sub(amount);
}
bool takeFee = true;
if (_isExcludedFromFee[sender]) {
takeFee = false;
}
if(recipient==pairAddress&&takeFee){
uint256 taxFee = amount.mul(dexTaxFee).div(10000);
_balances[taxAddress] = _balances[taxAddress].add(taxFee);
emit Transfer(sender, taxAddress, taxFee);
amount = amount.sub(taxFee);
}
_balances[recipient] = _balances[recipient].add(amount);
emit Transfer(sender, recipient, amount);
}
this question has already been answered here: Is it possible to reserve an address on Solidity smart contract creation for taxes collection?
To resume, you need to change the logic of the transfer() function. But be careful as it will break on most dex because it's not an ERC20 token anymore.
What I want to achieve when someone sends ether to my token address then automatically equivalent amount of token (I am also setting token price manually) must be sent back. The problem is I am not able to send ether to the token address. I am learning the code from ethereum.org . I copied the code from there , some little changes made .
Here's what I tried
pragma solidity ^0.4.16;
contract owned {
address public owner;
function owned() public {
owner = msg.sender;
}
modifier onlyOwner {
require(msg.sender == owner);
_;
}
function transferOwnership(address newOwner) onlyOwner public {
owner = newOwner;
}
}
/**
* #title SafeMath
* #dev Math operations with safety checks that throw on error
*/
library SafeMath {
function mul(uint256 a, uint256 b) internal pure returns (uint256) {
if (a == 0) {
return 0;
}
uint256 c = a * b;
assert(c / a == b);
return c;
}
function div(uint256 a, uint256 b) internal pure returns (uint256) {
// assert(b > 0); // Solidity automatically throws when dividing by 0
uint256 c = a / b;
// assert(a == b * c + a % b); // There is no case in which this doesn't hold
return c;
}
function sub(uint256 a, uint256 b) internal pure returns (uint256) {
assert(b <= a);
return a - b;
}
function add(uint256 a, uint256 b) internal pure returns (uint256) {
uint256 c = a + b;
assert(c >= a);
return c;
}
}
interface tokenRecipient { function receiveApproval(address _from, uint256 _value, address _token, bytes _extraData) public; }
contract TokenERC20 {
// Public variables of the token
string public name;
string public symbol;
uint8 public decimals;
// 18 decimals is the strongly suggested default, avoid changing it
uint256 public totalSupply;
// This creates an array with all balances
mapping (address => uint256) public balanceOf;
mapping (address => mapping (address => uint256)) public allowance;
// This generates a public event on the blockchain that will notify clients
event Transfer(address indexed from, address indexed to, uint256 value);
// This notifies clients about the amount burnt
event Burn(address indexed from, uint256 value);
/**
* Constructor function
*
* Initializes contract with initial supply tokens to the creator of the contract
*/
function TokenERC20(
uint256 initialSupply,
string tokenName,
string tokenSymbol,
uint8 dividetoken
) public {
balanceOf[msg.sender] = totalSupply; // Give the creator all initial tokens
name = tokenName; // Set the name for display purposes
symbol = tokenSymbol; // Set the symbol for display purposes
decimals = dividetoken;
totalSupply = initialSupply * 10 ** uint256(decimals); // Update total supply with the decimal amount
}
/**
* Internal transfer, only can be called by this contract
*/
function _transfer(address _from, address _to, uint _value) internal {
// Prevent transfer to 0x0 address. Use burn() instead
require(_to != 0x0);
// Check if the sender has enough
require(balanceOf[_from] >= _value);
// Check for overflows
require(balanceOf[_to] + _value > balanceOf[_to]);
// Save this for an assertion in the future
uint previousBalances = balanceOf[_from] + balanceOf[_to];
// Subtract from the sender
balanceOf[_from] -= _value;
// Add the same to the recipient
balanceOf[_to] += _value;
Transfer(_from, _to, _value);
// Asserts are used to use static analysis to find bugs in your code. They should never fail
assert(balanceOf[_from] + balanceOf[_to] == previousBalances);
}
/**
* Transfer tokens
*
* Send `_value` tokens to `_to` from your account
*
* #param _to The address of the recipient
* #param _value the amount to send
*/
function transfer(address _to, uint256 _value) public {
_transfer(msg.sender, _to, _value);
}
/**
* Transfer tokens from other address
*
* Send `_value` tokens to `_to` in behalf of `_from`
*
* #param _from The address of the sender
* #param _to The address of the recipient
* #param _value the amount to send
*/
function transferFrom(address _from, address _to, uint256 _value) public returns (bool success) {
require(_value <= allowance[_from][msg.sender]); // Check allowance
allowance[_from][msg.sender] -= _value;
_transfer(_from, _to, _value);
return true;
}
/**
* Set allowance for other address
*
* Allows `_spender` to spend no more than `_value` tokens in your behalf
*
* #param _spender The address authorized to spend
* #param _value the max amount they can spend
*/
function approve(address _spender, uint256 _value) public
returns (bool success) {
allowance[msg.sender][_spender] = _value;
return true;
}
/**
* Set allowance for other address and notify
*
* Allows `_spender` to spend no more than `_value` tokens in your behalf, and then ping the contract about it
*
* #param _spender The address authorized to spend
* #param _value the max amount they can spend
* #param _extraData some extra information to send to the approved contract
*/
function approveAndCall(address _spender, uint256 _value, bytes _extraData)
public
returns (bool success) {
tokenRecipient spender = tokenRecipient(_spender);
if (approve(_spender, _value)) {
spender.receiveApproval(msg.sender, _value, this, _extraData);
return true;
}
}
/**
* Destroy tokens
*
* Remove `_value` tokens from the system irreversibly
*
* #param _value the amount of money to burn
*/
function burn(uint256 _value) public returns (bool success) {
require(balanceOf[msg.sender] >= _value); // Check if the sender has enough
balanceOf[msg.sender] -= _value; // Subtract from the sender
totalSupply -= _value; // Updates totalSupply
Burn(msg.sender, _value);
return true;
}
/**
* Destroy tokens from other account
*
* Remove `_value` tokens from the system irreversibly on behalf of `_from`.
*
* #param _from the address of the sender
* #param _value the amount of money to burn
*/
function burnFrom(address _from, uint256 _value) public returns (bool success) {
require(balanceOf[_from] >= _value); // Check if the targeted balance is enough
require(_value <= allowance[_from][msg.sender]); // Check allowance
balanceOf[_from] -= _value; // Subtract from the targeted balance
allowance[_from][msg.sender] -= _value; // Subtract from the sender's allowance
totalSupply -= _value; // Update totalSupply
Burn(_from, _value);
return true;
}
}
/******************************************/
/* ADVANCED TOKEN STARTS HERE */
/******************************************/
contract mintableToken is owned, TokenERC20 {
using SafeMath for uint256;
uint256 public sellPrice;
uint256 public buyPrice;
uint256 public cap; //Hard Cap Amount
string public version ; //Version standard. Just an arbitrary versioning scheme.
mapping (address => bool) public frozenAccount;
/* This generates a public event on the blockchain that will notify clients */
event FrozenFunds(address target, bool frozen);
/* Initializes contract with initial supply tokens to the creator of the contract */
function mintableToken(
uint256 initialSupply,
string tokenName,
string tokenSymbol,
uint8 decimals,
uint256 _cap,
string _version
) TokenERC20(initialSupply, tokenName, tokenSymbol,decimals) public {
require(_cap > 0);
cap = _cap;
version=_version;
}
/* Internal transfer, only can be called by this contract */
function _transfer(address _from, address _to, uint _value) internal {
require (_to != 0x0); // Prevent transfer to 0x0 address. Use burn() instead
require (balanceOf[_from] >= _value); // Check if the sender has enough
require (balanceOf[_to] + _value > balanceOf[_to]); // Check for overflows
require(!frozenAccount[_from]); // Check if sender is frozen
require(!frozenAccount[_to]); // Check if recipient is frozen
balanceOf[_from] -= _value; // Subtract from the sender
balanceOf[_to] += _value; // Add the same to the recipient
Transfer(_from, _to, _value);
}
/// #notice Create `mintedAmount` tokens and send it to `target`
/// #param target Address to receive the tokens
/// #param mintedAmount the amount of tokens it will receive
function mintToken(address target, uint256 mintedAmount) onlyOwner public {
require(totalSupply.add(mintedAmount) <= cap);
balanceOf[target] += mintedAmount;
totalSupply += mintedAmount;
Transfer(0, this, mintedAmount);
Transfer(this, target, mintedAmount);
}
/// #notice `freeze? Prevent | Allow` `target` from sending & receiving tokens
/// #param target Address to be frozen
/// #param freeze either to freeze it or not
function freezeAccount(address target, bool freeze) onlyOwner public {
frozenAccount[target] = freeze;
FrozenFunds(target, freeze);
}
/// #notice Allow users to buy tokens for `newBuyPrice` eth and sell tokens for `newSellPrice` eth
/// #param newSellPrice Price the users can sell to the contract
/// #param newBuyPrice Price users can buy from the contract
function setPrices(uint256 newSellPrice, uint256 newBuyPrice) onlyOwner public {
sellPrice = newSellPrice;
buyPrice = newBuyPrice;
}
/// #notice Buy tokens from contract by sending ether
function buy() payable public {
uint amount = msg.value / buyPrice; // calculates the amount
_transfer(this, msg.sender, amount); // makes the transfers
}
/// #notice Sell `amount` tokens to contract
/// #param amount amount of tokens to be sold
function sell(uint256 amount) public {
require(this.balance >= amount * sellPrice); // checks if the contract has enough ether to buy
_transfer(msg.sender, this, amount); // makes the transfers
msg.sender.transfer(amount * sellPrice); // sends ether to the seller. It's important to do this last to avoid recursion attacks
}
}
// TestCoin
contract TestCoin is mintableToken(0,"TestCoin","TEC",4,100000000,"Ver-2.0"){
function () payable public{
mintableToken.buy();
}
}
What to do next, or if some problem is there in the code . I am totally stucked for 3 days. Please if someone can contribute his valuable time to see into the code, it will be a great help.
Thanks in advance
Edit
When I am trying to send ether to the Token address the following error is showing
(error_22) Could not estimate gas. There are not enough funds in the
account, or the receiving contract address would throw an error. Feel
free to manually set the gas and proceed.
EDIT -2
The problem above is solved i.e. I am able to send ether to the token contract now . Below is the fully changed code (I will upgrade it to implement more conditional statements, I only want now that the equivalent amount of token should be reward back to the ether spender), This time it is not mintable token , it is fixed supply token
pragma solidity ^0.4.4;
contract Token {
/// #return total amount of tokens
function totalSupply() constant returns (uint256 supply) {}
/// #param _owner The address from which the balance will be retrieved
/// #return The balance
function balanceOf(address _owner) constant returns (uint256 balance) {}
/// #notice send `_value` token to `_to` from `msg.sender`
/// #param _to The address of the recipient
/// #param _value The amount of token to be transferred
/// #return Whether the transfer was successful or not
function transfer(address _to, uint256 _value) returns (bool success) {}
/// #notice send `_value` token to `_to` from `_from` on the condition it is approved by `_from`
/// #param _from The address of the sender
/// #param _to The address of the recipient
/// #param _value The amount of token to be transferred
/// #return Whether the transfer was successful or not
function transferFrom(address _from, address _to, uint256 _value) returns (bool success) {}
/// #notice `msg.sender` approves `_addr` to spend `_value` tokens
/// #param _spender The address of the account able to transfer the tokens
/// #param _value The amount of wei to be approved for transfer
/// #return Whether the approval was successful or not
function approve(address _spender, uint256 _value) returns (bool success) {}
/// #param _owner The address of the account owning tokens
/// #param _spender The address of the account able to transfer the tokens
/// #return Amount of remaining tokens allowed to spent
function allowance(address _owner, address _spender) constant returns (uint256 remaining) {}
event Transfer(address indexed _from, address indexed _to, uint256 _value);
event Approval(address indexed _owner, address indexed _spender, uint256 _value);
}
contract StandardToken is Token {
function transfer(address _to, uint256 _value) returns (bool success) {
//Default assumes totalSupply can't be over max (2^256 - 1).
//If your token leaves out totalSupply and can issue more tokens as time goes on, you need to check if it doesn't wrap.
//Replace the if with this one instead.
//if (balances[msg.sender] >= _value && balances[_to] + _value > balances[_to]) {
if (balances[msg.sender] >= _value && _value > 0) {
balances[msg.sender] -= _value;
balances[_to] += _value;
Transfer(msg.sender, _to, _value);
return true;
} else { return false; }
}
function transferFrom(address _from, address _to, uint256 _value) returns (bool success) {
//same as above. Replace this line with the following if you want to protect against wrapping uints.
//if (balances[_from] >= _value && allowed[_from][msg.sender] >= _value && balances[_to] + _value > balances[_to]) {
if (balances[_from] >= _value && allowed[_from][msg.sender] >= _value && _value > 0) {
balances[_to] += _value;
balances[_from] -= _value;
allowed[_from][msg.sender] -= _value;
Transfer(_from, _to, _value);
return true;
} else { return false; }
}
function balanceOf(address _owner) constant returns (uint256 balance) {
return balances[_owner];
}
function approve(address _spender, uint256 _value) returns (bool success) {
allowed[msg.sender][_spender] = _value;
Approval(msg.sender, _spender, _value);
return true;
}
function allowance(address _owner, address _spender) constant returns (uint256 remaining) {
return allowed[_owner][_spender];
}
mapping (address => uint256) balances;
mapping (address => mapping (address => uint256)) allowed;
uint256 public totalSupply;
}
//name this contract whatever you'd like
contract TestCoin is StandardToken {
function () payable public {
}
/* Public variables of the token */
/*
NOTE:
The following variables are OPTIONAL vanities. One does not have to include them.
They allow one to customise the token contract & in no way influences the core functionality.
Some wallets/interfaces might not even bother to look at this information.
*/
string public name; //fancy name: eg Simon Bucks
uint8 public decimals; //How many decimals to show. ie. There could 1000 base units with 3 decimals. Meaning 0.980 SBX = 980 base units. It's like comparing 1 wei to 1 ether.
string public symbol; //An identifier: eg SBX
string public version = 'H1.0'; //human 0.1 standard. Just an arbitrary versioning scheme.
//
// CHANGE THESE VALUES FOR YOUR TOKEN
//
//make sure this function name matches the contract name above. So if you're token is called TutorialToken, make sure the //contract name above is also TutorialToken instead of ERC20Token
function TestCoin(
) {
balances[msg.sender] = 1000000000000; // Give the creator all initial tokens (100000 for example)
totalSupply = 1000000000000; // Update total supply (100000 for example)
name = "TestCoin"; // Set the name for display purposes
decimals = 4; // Amount of decimals for display purposes
symbol = "BPC"; // Set the symbol for display purposes
}
/* Approves and then calls the receiving contract */
function approveAndCall(address _spender, uint256 _value, bytes _extraData) returns (bool success) {
allowed[msg.sender][_spender] = _value;
Approval(msg.sender, _spender, _value);
//call the receiveApproval function on the contract you want to be notified. This crafts the function signature manually so one doesn't have to include a contract in here just for this.
//receiveApproval(address _from, uint256 _value, address _tokenContract, bytes _extraData)
//it is assumed that when does this that the call *should* succeed, otherwise one would use vanilla approve instead.
if(!_spender.call(bytes4(bytes32(sha3("receiveApproval(address,uint256,address,bytes)"))), msg.sender, _value, this, _extraData)) { throw; }
return true;
}
}
You need to understand how the tokens works in general and what token actually is. Token is just a smart-contract which keeps information about balances (mapping address => uint). So it just keeps the amount of tokens held by specified address. Nothing more. Another thing you need to know is fallback function(the one without the name). In your case it is empty.
function () payable public {
}
What do you need to do is the following modifications:
function () payable public {
balances[msg.sender] += msg.value;
}
It also looks like that you are trying to break Single Responsibility principle and add token sale functionality directly to your token contract what is not a good idea in general. I would recommend you to check out my repository and look at how it can be organized to keep things separated. To make it more easy to understand, I've added some tests to the tests folder, so feel free to read the tests to understand how everything works and whats an expected behaviour of the contracts.