I'm attempting to determine if a appointment item exists in a cached of online mailbox store. My code runs too slowly in the online store so I'm trying to hide the ribbon button for online stores.
public bool Control_Visible_AptDates(Office.IRibbonControl control)
{
if (control.Context is Outlook.Inspector)
{
Outlook.Inspector inspector = (Outlook.Inspector)control.Context;
if (inspector.CurrentItem is Outlook.AppointmentItem)
{
Outlook.AppointmentItem aptItem = inspector.CurrentItem as Outlook.AppointmentItem;
if (true)
{
//If item stored online return false
}
else
{
//If item stored in cached Exchange mailbox store return true
}
What is the best way to determine if the item is online or using cached Exchange mode?
Using Outlook Spy, I can see that there's a PR_STORE_OFFLINE which seems to be the property that I'm looking for. It exists in cached items only as far as I can tell.
bool offline = aptItem.PropertyAccessor.GetProperty("http://schemas.microsoft.com/mapi/proptag/0x6632000B");
Can this property be read using PropertyAccessor somehow or is Redemption required?
If Redemption is required can you provide a code snippet to get me started?
Thanks in advance!
related images-
PR_STORE_OFFLINE is only available on the IMsgStore object, not on the items. You can try to use Application.Session.ExchangeConnectionMode property - see https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/office/vba/api/outlook.namespace.exchangeconnectionmode.
Found service method that seems to work for me.
Should be able to rework it to check a mailitem as well, but I didn't test that scenario.
bool IsItemCachedExchange(Outlook._AppointmentItem aptItem)
{
try
{
bool result = false;
Outlook.Account account = aptItem.SendUsingAccount;
if (account != null)
{
Outlook.Store store = account.DeliveryStore;
result = store.IsCachedExchange;
Marshal.ReleaseComObject(store);
Marshal.ReleaseComObject(account);
return result;
}
else
{
result = false;
return result;
}
}
catch (Exception)
{
bool result = false;
return result;
}
}
public bool Control_Visible_AptDates(Office.IRibbonControl control)
{
try
{
if (control.Context is Outlook.Inspector)
{
Outlook.Inspector inspector = (Outlook.Inspector)control.Context;
if (inspector.CurrentItem is Outlook.AppointmentItem)
{
Outlook.AppointmentItem aptItem = inspector.CurrentItem;
bool isItemCachedLocal = IsItemCachedExchange(aptItem);
if (isItemCachedLocal == true)
{
return true;
}
else
{
return false;
}
}
else
{
return false;
}
}
else
{
return false;
}
}
catch (Exception)
{
return false;
}
}
Related
I'd like to reproduce the behavior of the Java browsing perspective as so : the user select a file (selectedFile) from a Custom Common Navigator View (VariabilityNavigator) and it displays only the related files to that selection in another Custom Common Navigator View (ConfigFileNavigator). It refreshes automatically as the selection goes.
I use Common navigator because I want to display the package of the related files and not the other ones or the empty ones. That I coded fine.
Could you please walk me thru the steps to do that ? Here is how far I got..
I have successfully coded the first view VariabilityNavigator.
I thought I would use a filter ConfigurationFilesFilter to get the selectedFile and use it to filter the related files.
I can get the selection from the VariabilityNavigator within the select(...) of ConfigurationFilesFilter code below
I then use it to filter the files I want to display using isRelatedToSelection. I haven't write that part yet, but it's not a problem for testing.
This method don't work for several reasons : it doesn't refresh and I have to click on the ConfigFileNavigator to get the result. What it should do : when I click on the first view and it should automatically display the result in the second view. Thanks for your help.
public class ConfigurationFilesFilter extends ViewerFilter {
String selectedFile;
public ConfigurationFilesFilter() {
}
#Override
public boolean select(Viewer viewer, Object parent, Object element) {
selectedFile = getVariabilityNavigatorSelection();
if (isChildElement(element)) {
return handleChild(element);
} else {
// manipulate tree viewer based on select decision for the sub elements
StructuredViewer sviewer = (StructuredViewer) viewer;
ITreeContentProvider provider = (ITreeContentProvider) sviewer.getContentProvider();
for (Object child : provider.getChildren(element)) {
if (select(viewer, element, child)) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
}
/**
*
* #param element
* #return true to be displayed
*/
private boolean handleChild(Object element) {
return true;
}
/**
* Check if an element is a java file and if it is related to the selection
*
* #param element
* #return boolean
*/
private boolean isChildElement(Object element) {
if (element instanceof IFile) {
if (((IFile) element).getFileExtension().equals("java")) {
return (isRelatedToSelection((IFile) element));
}
return false;
}
return false;
}
public String getVariabilityNavigatorSelection() {
IWorkbenchPage page = PlatformUI.getWorkbench().getActiveWorkbenchWindow().getActivePage();
IViewPart viewPart = page.findView(VariabilityNavigator.ID);
String VariabilityNavigatorSelection = "" ;
if (viewPart == null) {
VariabilityNavigatorSelection = "open Variability view. \r\nTo do so, open the menu as followed:\r\nWindow > Show view > Other... > SPL > Variability Navigator";
} else {
ISelectionProvider selProvider = viewPart.getSite().getSelectionProvider();
IStructuredSelection sel = (IStructuredSelection) selProvider.getSelection();
if (sel.isEmpty()) {
VariabilityNavigatorSelection = "selection vide";
}
Iterator<?> i = sel.iterator();
while (i.hasNext()) {
final Object o = i.next();
if (o instanceof IFile) {
VariabilityNavigatorSelection = ((IFile) o).getName();
} else
VariabilityNavigatorSelection = "Please select a file";
}
}
if (!VariabilityNavigatorSelection.isEmpty())
printTrace("selectPrint = " + VariabilityNavigatorSelection);
return VariabilityNavigatorSelection;
}
The documentation shows this C# snippet:
async void DisplayDeleteFileDialog(){
ContentDialog deleteFileDialog = new ContentDialog{
Title = "Delete file permanently?",
Content = "If you delete this file, you won't be able to recover it. Do you want to delete it?",
PrimaryButtonText = "Delete",
CloseButtonText = "Cancel"
};
ContentDialogResult result = await deleteFileDialog.ShowAsync();
// Delete the file if the user clicked the primary button.
/// Otherwise, do nothing.
if (result == ContentDialogResult.Primary) {
// Delete the file.
}
else {
// The user clicked the CLoseButton, pressed ESC, Gamepad B, or the system back button.
// Do nothing.
}
}
What I'm requesting is a C++/winRT version of this snippet.
IAsyncAction Async()
{
ContentDialog dialog;
dialog.Title(box_value(L"title"));
dialog.Content(box_value(L"content"));
dialog.PrimaryButtonText(L"primary");
dialog.CloseButtonText(L"close");
auto result = co_await dialog.ShowAsync();
if (result == ContentDialogResult::Primary)
{
}
}
I wanted to open content dialog on button click so I tried the code snippet provided by Kenny Kerr. Everything seemed to work fine without error but when i clicked the button no dialog was seen. i fixed it by placing below code
dialog.XamlRoot(myButton().XamlRoot());
Before auto result = co_await dialog.ShowAsync() line.
ContentDialog.xaml, xaml.h, xaml.cpp should not have the name or classes
named Windows::UI::Xaml::Controls::ContentDialog!!! My name is
ContentDialog1
DirectXPage.xaml.cpp
void YourNamespace::DirectXPage::UpdateStatus(String^ strMessage,
NotifyType type)
{
switch (type)
{
case NotifyType::StatusMessage:
StatusBorder->Background = ref new
SolidColorBrush(Windows::UI::Colors::Green);
break;
case NotifyType::ErrorMessage:
StatusBorder->Background = ref new
SolidColorBrush(Windows::UI::Colors::Red);
break;
default:
break;
}
StatusBlock->Text = strMessage;
// Collapse the StatusBlock if it has no text to conserve real estate.
if (StatusBlock->Text != "")
{
StatusBorder->Visibility = Windows::UI::Xaml::Visibility::Visible;
StatusPanel->Visibility = Windows::UI::Xaml::Visibility::Visible;
}
else
{
StatusBorder->Visibility = Windows::UI::Xaml::Visibility::Collapsed;
StatusPanel->Visibility = Windows::UI::Xaml::Visibility::Collapsed;
}
// Raise an event if necessary to enable a screen reader to announce
the status update.
auto peer = dynamic_cast<FrameworkElementAutomationPeer^>
(FrameworkElementAutomationPeer::FromElement(StatusBlock));
if (peer != nullptr)
{
peer->RaiseAutomationEvent(AutomationEvents::LiveRegionChanged);
}
}
void YourNameSpace::DirectXPage::NotifyUser(Platform::String^ strMessage,
NotifyType type)
{
if (Dispatcher->HasThreadAccess)
{
UpdateStatus(strMessage, type);
}
else
{
Dispatcher->RunAsync(CoreDispatcherPriority::Normal, ref new
DispatchedHandler([strMessage, type, this]()
{
UpdateStatus(strMessage, type);
ContentDialog1^ dlg = ref new ContentDialog1();
dlg->ContentDialog_SetTitle(L"Error Message");
dlg->ContentDialog_SetTextBlock(L"All textures must be chosen from
the x64\\Release or Debug\\YourNamespace\\AppX\\Assets\\
(Folder or sub-Folders)");
Windows::Foundation::IAsyncOperation<ContentDialogResult>^ result =
dlg->ShowAsync();
if (result->GetResults() == ContentDialogResult::Primary) {}
if (result->GetResults() == ContentDialogResult::Secondary) {}
}));
}
}
Goal
I'd like to have my ComboBox items suggest and append its items when something is contained in them, not just via the StartsWith function.
My ComboBox is bound to a DataView which contains clients [CompanyName], [Address], [City] in a long concatenation.
I want my users to be able to type in the city and still find the records which matches with all of the fields above. I know this is possible with Infragistics but I don't have that package.
Search Term: "Sher"
Costco, 123 1st Avenue, Sherbrooke
Provigo, 344 Ball Street, Sherbrooke
Sherbox, 93 7th Street, Montreal
Is this possible in VB.Net or should I be searching for something else?
I did some research and found the following question:
Override Winforms ComboBox Autocomplete Suggest Rule
In that question they reffer to another question:
C# AutoComplete
Let's quote the best answer from that question
The existing AutoComplete functionality only supports searching by
prefix. There doesn't seem to be any decent way to override the
behavior.
Some people have implemented their own autocomplete functions by
overriding the OnTextChanged event. That's probably your best bet.
For example, you can add a ListBox just below the TextBox and set
its default visibility to false. Then you can use the OnTextChanged
event of the TextBox and the SelectedIndexChanged event of the
ListBox to display and select items.
This seems to work pretty well as a rudimentary example:
public Form1()
{
InitializeComponent();
acsc = new AutoCompleteStringCollection();
textBox1.AutoCompleteCustomSource = acsc;
textBox1.AutoCompleteMode = AutoCompleteMode.None;
textBox1.AutoCompleteSource = AutoCompleteSource.CustomSource;
}
private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
acsc.Add("[001] some kind of item");
acsc.Add("[002] some other item");
acsc.Add("[003] an orange");
acsc.Add("[004] i like pickles");
}
void textBox1_TextChanged(object sender, System.EventArgs e)
{
listBox1.Items.Clear();
if (textBox1.Text.Length == 0)
{
hideResults();
return;
}
foreach (String s in textBox1.AutoCompleteCustomSource)
{
if (s.Contains(textBox1.Text))
{
Console.WriteLine("Found text in: " + s);
listBox1.Items.Add(s);
listBox1.Visible = true;
}
}
}
void listBox1_SelectedIndexChanged(object sender, System.EventArgs e)
{
textBox1.Text = listBox1.Items[listBox1.SelectedIndex].ToString();
hideResults();
}
void listBox1_LostFocus(object sender, System.EventArgs e)
{
hideResults();
}
void hideResults()
{
listBox1.Visible = false;
}
There's a lot more you could do without too much effort: append text
to the text box, capture additional keyboard commands, and so forth.
Improved the technique demonstrated by BenD in his answer so as to have the mechanism handle a bit more elegantly certain cornercases:
public sealed class CCComboboxAutocomplete : ComboBox
{
public CCComboboxAutocomplete()
{
AutoCompleteMode = AutoCompleteMode.Suggest; //crucial otherwise exceptions occur when the user types in text which is not found in the autocompletion list
}
protected override void OnTextChanged(EventArgs e)
{
try
{
if (DesignMode || !string.IsNullOrEmpty(Text) || !Visible) return;
ResetCompletionList();
}
finally
{
base.OnTextChanged(e);
}
}
protected override void OnKeyPress(KeyPressEventArgs e)
{
try
{
if (DesignMode) return;
if (e.KeyChar == '\r' || e.KeyChar == '\n')
{
e.Handled = true;
if (SelectedIndex == -1 && Items.Count > 0 && Items[0].ToString().ToLowerInvariant().StartsWith(Text.ToLowerInvariant()))
{
Text = Items[0].ToString();
}
DroppedDown = false;
return; //0
}
BeginInvoke(new Action(ReevaluateCompletionList)); //1
}
finally
{
base.OnKeyPress(e);
}
}
//0 Guardclose when detecting any enter keypresses to avoid a glitch which was selecting an item by means of down arrow key followed by enter to wipe out the text within
//1 Its crucial that we use begininvoke because we need the changes to sink into the textfield Omitting begininvoke would cause the searchterm to lag behind by one character That is the last character that got typed in
private void ResetCompletionList()
{
_previousSearchterm = null;
try
{
SuspendLayout();
var originalList = (object[])Tag;
if (originalList == null)
{
Tag = originalList = Items.Cast<object>().ToArray();
}
if (Items.Count == originalList.Length) return;
while (Items.Count > 0)
{
Items.RemoveAt(0);
}
Items.AddRange(originalList);
}
finally
{
ResumeLayout(performLayout: true);
}
}
private string _previousSearchterm;
private void ReevaluateCompletionList()
{
var currentSearchterm = Text.ToLowerInvariant();
if (currentSearchterm == _previousSearchterm) return; //optimization
_previousSearchterm = currentSearchterm;
try
{
SuspendLayout();
var originalList = (object[])Tag;
if (originalList == null)
{
Tag = originalList = Items.Cast<object>().ToArray(); //0
}
var newList = (object[])null;
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(currentSearchterm))
{
if (Items.Count == originalList.Length) return;
newList = originalList;
}
else
{
newList = originalList.Where(x => x.ToString().ToLowerInvariant().Contains(currentSearchterm)).ToArray();
}
try
{
while (Items.Count > 0) //1
{
Items.RemoveAt(0);
}
}
catch
{
try
{
Items.Clear();
}
catch
{
}
}
Items.AddRange(newList.ToArray()); //2
}
finally
{
if (currentSearchterm.Length >= 2 && !DroppedDown)
{
DroppedDown = true; //3
Cursor.Current = Cursors.Default; //4
Text = currentSearchterm; //5
Select(currentSearchterm.Length, 0);
}
ResumeLayout(performLayout: true);
}
}
//0 backup original list
//1 clear list by loop through it otherwise the cursor would move to the beginning of the textbox
//2 reset list
//3 if the current searchterm is empty we leave the dropdown list to whatever state it already had
//4 workaround for the fact the cursor disappears due to droppeddown=true This is a known bu.g plaguing combobox which microsoft denies to fix for years now
//5 Another workaround for a glitch which causes all text to be selected when there is a matching entry which starts with the exact text being typed in
}
Sorry for another answer in C# but I have a more improved answer based on xDisruptor's code.
Using kinda behavior (decorator).
You don't have to subclass ComboBox and change all existing combos in the designed.
Be careful when using Datasource instead of Items collection, because it'll raise an exception.
Code:
public class AutoCompleteBehavior
{
private readonly ComboBox comboBox;
private string previousSearchterm;
private object[] originalList;
public AutoCompleteBehavior(ComboBox comboBox)
{
this.comboBox = comboBox;
this.comboBox.AutoCompleteMode = AutoCompleteMode.Suggest; // crucial otherwise exceptions occur when the user types in text which is not found in the autocompletion list
this.comboBox.TextChanged += this.OnTextChanged;
this.comboBox.KeyPress += this.OnKeyPress;
this.comboBox.SelectionChangeCommitted += this.OnSelectionChangeCommitted;
}
private void OnSelectionChangeCommitted(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
if (this.comboBox.SelectedItem == null)
{
return;
}
var sel = this.comboBox.SelectedItem;
this.ResetCompletionList();
this.comboBox.SelectedItem = sel;
}
private void OnTextChanged(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(this.comboBox.Text) || !this.comboBox.Visible || !this.comboBox.Enabled)
{
return;
}
this.ResetCompletionList();
}
private void OnKeyPress(object sender, KeyPressEventArgs e)
{
if (e.KeyChar == '\r' || e.KeyChar == '\n')
{
e.Handled = true;
if (this.comboBox.SelectedIndex == -1 && this.comboBox.Items.Count > 0
&& this.comboBox.Items[0].ToString().ToLowerInvariant().StartsWith(this.comboBox.Text.ToLowerInvariant()))
{
this.comboBox.Text = this.comboBox.Items[0].ToString();
}
this.comboBox.DroppedDown = false;
// Guardclause when detecting any enter keypresses to avoid a glitch which was selecting an item by means of down arrow key followed by enter to wipe out the text within
return;
}
// Its crucial that we use begininvoke because we need the changes to sink into the textfield Omitting begininvoke would cause the searchterm to lag behind by one character That is the last character that got typed in
this.comboBox.BeginInvoke(new Action(this.ReevaluateCompletionList));
}
private void ResetCompletionList()
{
this.previousSearchterm = null;
try
{
this.comboBox.SuspendLayout();
if (this.originalList == null)
{
this.originalList = this.comboBox.Items.Cast<object>().ToArray();
}
if (this.comboBox.Items.Count == this.originalList.Length)
{
return;
}
while (this.comboBox.Items.Count > 0)
{
this.comboBox.Items.RemoveAt(0);
}
this.comboBox.Items.AddRange(this.originalList);
}
finally
{
this.comboBox.ResumeLayout(true);
}
}
private void ReevaluateCompletionList()
{
var currentSearchterm = this.comboBox.Text.ToLowerInvariant();
if (currentSearchterm == this.previousSearchterm)
{
return;
}
this.previousSearchterm = currentSearchterm;
try
{
this.comboBox.SuspendLayout();
if (this.originalList == null)
{
this.originalList = this.comboBox.Items.Cast<object>().ToArray(); // backup original list
}
object[] newList;
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(currentSearchterm))
{
if (this.comboBox.Items.Count == this.originalList.Length)
{
return;
}
newList = this.originalList;
}
else
{
newList = this.originalList.Where(x => x.ToString().ToLowerInvariant().Contains(currentSearchterm)).ToArray();
}
try
{
// clear list by loop through it otherwise the cursor would move to the beginning of the textbox
while (this.comboBox.Items.Count > 0)
{
this.comboBox.Items.RemoveAt(0);
}
}
catch
{
try
{
this.comboBox.Items.Clear();
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
Debug.WriteLine(ex.Message);
}
}
this.comboBox.Items.AddRange(newList.ToArray()); // reset list
}
finally
{
if (currentSearchterm.Length >= 1 && !this.comboBox.DroppedDown)
{
this.comboBox.DroppedDown = true; // if the current searchterm is empty we leave the dropdown list to whatever state it already had
Cursor.Current = Cursors.Default; // workaround for the fact the cursor disappears due to droppeddown=true This is a known bu.g plaguing combobox which microsoft denies to fix for years now
this.comboBox.Text = currentSearchterm; // Another workaround for a glitch which causes all text to be selected when there is a matching entry which starts with the exact text being typed in
this.comboBox.Select(currentSearchterm.Length, 0);
}
this.comboBox.ResumeLayout(true);
}
}
}
Usege:
new AutoCompleteBehavior(this.comboBoxItems);
this.comboBoxItems.Items.AddRange(new object[] { "John", "Tina", "Doctor", "Alaska" });
TIP: Can be further improved by making an extension to the ComboBox class like myCombo.ToAutoComplete()
A ComboBox,TextBox and I think a DropDownList has AutoComplete properties
Look at http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.windows.forms.combobox.autocompletemode(v=vs.110).aspx
It explains which AutoCompleteMode you should use and how to set the AutoCompleteSource
You could try the following lines, it worked for me
cbxName.AutoCompleteMode = AutoCompleteMode.SuggestAppend;
cbxName.AutoCompleteSource = AutoCompleteSource.ListItems;
I am new to OOP and still a bit confused by the concepts
I created a class` method that will extract two sets of data from a Zend_Session_Namespace. my problem now is that I don't know how to extract these data when its pulled into another method.
It might be best if I show you what I mean:
Public function rememberLastProductSearched()
{
$session = new Zend_Session_Namespace(searchedproducts);
if ($this->getRequest()->getParam('product-searched')) {
$session->ProductSearched = $this->getRequest()->getParam('product-searched');
return " $session->ProductSearched";
} else {
if ($session->ProductSearched) {
return " $session->ProductSearched ";
}
}
if ($this->getRequest()->getParam('search-term')) {
$session->SearchTerm = $this->getRequest()->getParam('search-term');
return " $session->SearchTerm";
} else {
if ($session->SearchTerm) {
return " $session->SearchTerm ";
}
}
This method should obtain two sets of data i.e the
$session->SearchTerm
$session->ProductSearched
my confusion is this; how do I now extract both sets of data in another method call (that is within the same class).i.e
Above is my attempt to extract the information- but it did not work.
Alternatively, should I have placed the information into an array- if so, can somebody please tell me how I could have done this.
It looks like what you're trying to do is use the product-searched and search-terms from params and store them in the session if they're set, otherwise access previously saved values. It would help a bit to see how you're calling this method, but I would probably modify your code slightly to return the session namespace object instead, since that then contains the two values, regardless of whether they came from params or were there already:
public function rememberLastProductSearched()
{
$searchedProducts = new Zend_Session_Namespace('searchedproducts');
if ($this->getRequest()->getParam('product-searched')) {
$searchedProducts->ProductSearched = $this->getRequest()->getParam('product-searched');
}
if ($this->getRequest()->getParam('search-term')) {
$searchedProducts->SearchTerm = $this->getRequest()->getParam('search-term');
}
return $searchedProducts;
}
I'm assuming you have this method in a controller class, so you'd call it like this:
public function searchAction()
{
$searchedProducts = $this->rememberLastProductSearched();
// do something with the values here
}
you'll then have the two values in $searchedProducts->ProductSearched and $searchedProducts->SearchTerm.
The line "return $something;" will stop the code execution and return the value. If you want to return more than one value, you will need to either return an array or use two separate functions to return the values. If you want to return an array, you could do it this way:
public function rememberLastProductSearched() {
$returnArray = array();
$session = new Zend_Session_Namespace(searchedproducts);
if ($this->getRequest()->getParam('product-searched')) {
$session->ProductSearched = $this->getRequest()->getParam('product-searched');
$returnArray['productSearched'] = $session->ProductSearched;
} else {
if ($session->ProductSearched) {
$returnArray['productSearched'] = $session->ProductSearched;
}
}
if ($this->getRequest()->getParam('search-term')) {
$session->SearchTerm = $this->getRequest()->getParam('search-term');
$returnArray['searchTerm'] = $session->SearchTerm;
} else {
if ($session->SearchTerm) {
$returnArray['searchTerm'] = $session->SearchTerm;
}
}
return $returnArray;
}
In your controller or wherever you wanted to check for those values:
$lastSearch = $this->rememberLastProductSearched();
echo $lastSearch['productSearched']; // Product Searched
echo $lastSearch['searchTerm']; // Search terms
But it might be cleaner to use two function
public function getLastProductSearched() {
$session = new Zend_Session_Namespace(searchedproducts);
if ($this->getRequest()->getParam('product-searched')) {
$session->ProductSearched = $this->getRequest()->getParam('product-searched');
$returnValue = $session->ProductSearched;
} else {
if ($session->ProductSearched) {
$returnValue = $session->ProductSearched;
}
}
return $returnValue;
}
public function getLastSearchTerms() {
$session = new Zend_Session_Namespace(searchedproducts);
if ($this->getRequest()->getParam('search-term')) {
$session->SearchTerm= $this->getRequest()->getParam('search-term');
$returnValue = $session->SearchTerm;
} else {
if ($session->SearchTerm) {
$returnValue = $session->SearchTerm;
}
}
return $returnValue;
}
And you could use them like this:
echo $this->getLastProductSearched(); // Product Searched
echo $this->getLastSearchTerms(); // Search terms
It will make your code easier to read and debug later on. A few more notes on your code. You could avoid using nested ifs by using ||.
if ($this->getRequest()->getParam('product-searched') || $session->ProductSearched) {
$returnValue = $this->getRequest()->getParam('product-searched') || $session->ProductSearched;
}
will achieve the same thing as :
if ($this->getRequest()->getParam('product-searched')) {
$session->ProductSearched = $this->getRequest()->getParam('product-searched');
$returnArray['productSearched'] = $session->ProductSearched;
} else {
if ($session->ProductSearched) {
$returnArray['productSearched'] = $session->ProductSearched;
}
}
Hope this helps !
Do anyone have good ideas of how to modify the toolbar for the WinForms version of the ReportViewer Toolbar?
That is, I want to remove some buttons and varius, but it looks like the solution is to create a brand new toolbar instead of modifying the one that is there.
Like, I had to remove export to excel, and did it this way:
// Disable excel export
foreach (RenderingExtension extension in lr.ListRenderingExtensions()) {
if (extension.Name == "Excel") {
//extension.Visible = false; // Property is readonly...
FieldInfo fi = extension.GetType().GetField("m_isVisible", BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.NonPublic);
fi.SetValue(extension, false);
}
}
A bit trickysh if you ask me..
For removing toolbarbuttons, an possible way was to iterate through the Control array inside the ReportViewer and change the Visible property for the buttons to hide, but it gets reset all the time, so it is not an good way..
WHEN do MS come with an new version btw?
Yeap. You can do that in a little tricky way.
I had a task to add more scale factors to zoom report. I did it this way:
private readonly string[] ZOOM_VALUES = { "25%", "50%", "75%", "100%", "110%", "120%", "125%", "130%", "140%", "150%", "175%", "200%", "300%", "400%", "500%" };
private readonly int DEFAULT_ZOOM = 3;
//--
public ucReportViewer()
{
InitializeComponent();
this.reportViewer1.ProcessingMode = ProcessingMode.Local;
setScaleFactor(ZOOM_VALUES[DEFAULT_ZOOM]);
Control[] tb = reportViewer1.Controls.Find("ReportToolBar", true);
ToolStrip ts;
if (tb != null && tb.Length > 0 && tb[0].Controls.Count > 0 && (ts = tb[0].Controls[0] as ToolStrip) != null)
{
//here we go if our trick works (tested at .NET Framework 2.0.50727 SP1)
ToolStripComboBox tscb = new ToolStripComboBox();
tscb.DropDownStyle = ComboBoxStyle.DropDownList;
tscb.Items.AddRange(ZOOM_VALUES);
tscb.SelectedIndex = 3; //100%
tscb.SelectedIndexChanged += new EventHandler(toolStripZoomPercent_Click);
ts.Items.Add(tscb);
}
else
{
//if there is some problems - just use context menu
ContextMenuStrip cmZoomMenu = new ContextMenuStrip();
for (int i = 0; i < ZOOM_VALUES.Length; i++)
{
ToolStripMenuItem tsmi = new ToolStripMenuItem(ZOOM_VALUES[i]);
tsmi.Checked = (i == DEFAULT_ZOOM);
//tsmi.Tag = (IntPtr)cmZoomMenu;
tsmi.Click += new EventHandler(toolStripZoomPercent_Click);
cmZoomMenu.Items.Add(tsmi);
}
reportViewer1.ContextMenuStrip = cmZoomMenu;
}
}
private bool setScaleFactor(string value)
{
try
{
int percent = Convert.ToInt32(value.TrimEnd('%'));
reportViewer1.ZoomMode = ZoomMode.Percent;
reportViewer1.ZoomPercent = percent;
return true;
}
catch
{
return false;
}
}
private void toolStripZoomPercent_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
ToolStripMenuItem tsmi = sender as ToolStripMenuItem;
ToolStripComboBox tscb = sender as ToolStripComboBox;
if (tscb != null && tscb.SelectedIndex > -1)
{
setScaleFactor(tscb.Items[tscb.SelectedIndex].ToString());
}
else if (tsmi != null)
{
if (setScaleFactor(tsmi.Text))
{
foreach (ToolStripItem tsi in tsmi.Owner.Items)
{
ToolStripMenuItem item = tsi as ToolStripMenuItem;
if (item != null && item.Checked)
{
item.Checked = false;
}
}
tsmi.Checked = true;
}
else
{
tsmi.Checked = false;
}
}
}
Get the toolbar from ReportViewer control:
ToolStrip toolStrip = (ToolStrip)reportViewer.Controls.Find("toolStrip1", true)[0]
Add new items:
toolStrip.Items.Add(...)
There are a lot of properties to set which buttons would you like to see.
For example ShowBackButton, ShowExportButton, ShowFindControls, and so on. Check them in the help, all starts with "Show".
But you are right, you cannot add new buttons. You have to create your own toolbar in order to do this.
What do you mean about new version? There is already a 2008 SP1 version of it.
Another way would be to manipulate the generated HTML at runtime via javascript. It's not very elegant, but it does give you full control over the generated HTML.
For VS2013 web ReportViewer V11 (indicated as rv), the code below adds a button.
private void AddPrintBtn()
{
foreach (Control c in rv.Controls)
{
foreach (Control c1 in c.Controls)
{
foreach (Control c2 in c1.Controls)
{
foreach (Control c3 in c2.Controls)
{
if (c3.ToString() == "Microsoft.Reporting.WebForms.ToolbarControl")
{
foreach (Control c4 in c3.Controls)
{
if (c4.ToString() == "Microsoft.Reporting.WebForms.PageNavigationGroup")
{
var btn = new Button();
btn.Text = "Criteria";
btn.ID = "btnFlip";
btn.OnClientClick = "$('#pnl').toggle();";
c4.Controls.Add(btn);
return;
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
I had this question for al ong time I I found the answer after a long tie and the main source of kowledge I used was this webpega: I'd like to thank you all guys adding the code that allowed me to do it and a picture with the result.
Instead of using the ReportViewer Class, you need to create a new classs, in my case, I named it ReportViewerPlus and it goes like this:
using Microsoft.Reporting.WinForms;
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.IO;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Windows.Forms;
namespace X
{
class ReportViewerPlus : ReportViewer
{
private Button boton { get; set; }
public ReportViewerPlus(Button but) {
this.boton = but;
testc(this.Controls[0]);
}
public ReportViewerPlus()
{
}
private void testc(Control item){
if(item is ToolStrip)
{
ToolStripItemCollection tsic = ((ToolStrip)item).Items;
tsic.Insert(0, new ToolStripControlHost(boton));
return;
}
for (int i = 0; i < item.Controls.Count; i++)
{
testc(item.Controls[i]);
}
}
}
}
You have to add the button directly in the constructor of the class and you can configure the button in your designer.
Here's a pic of the result, not perfect, but enough to go(safe link I swear, but I can't post my own pics, don't have enough reputation).
http://prntscr.com/5lfssj
If you look carefully in the code of the class, you'd see more or less how it works and you could make your changes and make it possible to establish it in other site of the toolbar.
Thank you so much for helping me in the past, I hope this helps lots of people!
Generally you are suppose to create your own toolbar if you want to modify it. Your solution for removing buttons will probably work if that is all you need to do, but if you want to add your own you should probably just bite the bullet and build a replacement.
You may modify reportviewer controls by CustomizeReportToolStrip method.
this example remove Page Setup Button, Page Layout Button in WinForm
public CustOrderReportForm() {
InitializeComponent();
CustomizeReport(this.reportViewer1);
}
private void CustomizeReport(Control reportControl, int recurCount = 0) {
Console.WriteLine("".PadLeft(recurCount + 1, '.') + reportControl.GetType() + ":" + reportControl.Name);
if (reportControl is Button) {
CustomizeReportButton((Button)reportControl, recurCount);
}
else if (reportControl is ToolStrip) {
CustomizeReportToolStrip((ToolStrip)reportControl, recurCount);
}
foreach (Control childControl in reportControl.Controls) {
CustomizeReport(childControl, recurCount + 1);
}
}
//-------------------------------------------------------------
void CustomizeReportToolStrip(ToolStrip c, int recurCount) {
List<ToolStripItem> customized = new List<ToolStripItem>();
foreach (ToolStripItem i in c.Items) {
if (CustomizeReportToolStripItem(i, recurCount + 1)) {
customized.Add(i);
}
}
foreach (var i in customized) c.Items.Remove(i);
}
//-------------------------------------------------------------
void CustomizeReportButton(Button button, int recurCount) {
}
//-------------------------------------------------------------
bool CustomizeReportToolStripItem(ToolStripItem i, int recurCount) {
Console.WriteLine("".PadLeft(recurCount + 1, '.') + i.GetType() + ":" + i.Name);
if (i.Name == "pageSetup") {
return true;
}
else if (i.Name == "printPreview") {
return true;
}
return false; ;
}