I am trying to transform data in Mule 3 (DataWeave 1.0) but I am not getting the desire result.
This is the input payload:
[
"https://scrum-caller.com/repo/v1/inside#Changes",
[
{
"id": "8db55441-6255-4d24-8d39-658536985214",
"number": "0w-30",
"Desc": "maintain"
}
],
"https://scrum-caller.com/repo/v1/inside#Changes",
[
{
"id": "11111111-6666-2222-3g3g-854712547412",
"number": "5w-40",
"Desc": "on prod"
}
],
"https://scrum-caller.com/repo/v1/inside#Changes",
[
{
"id": "1ab32c5b-ffs3-3243-74fv-3376218042bb",
"number": "5w-30",
"Desc": "on test"
}
]
]
And my desire output need to be like the one below
{
"#odata.context": "https://scrum-caller.com/repo/v1/inside#Changes",
"value": [
{
"id": "8db55441-6255-4d24-8d39-658536985214",
"number": "0w-30",
"Desc": "maintain"
},
{
"id": "11111111-6666-2222-3g3g-854712547412",
"number": "5w-40",
"Desc": "on prod"
},
{
"id": "1ab32c5b-ffs3-3243-74fv-3376218042bb",
"number": "5w-30",
"Desc": "on test"
}
]
}
Thanks for helping guys.
Assuming all the URLs are the same, since the question doesn't provide details only an example, I just take the first element as the value of the input for "#odata.context", the the value is just filtering out the non-array elements and use the reduce operator to get a single array of the other elements.
%dw 1.0
%output application/json
---
{
"#odata.context" : payload[0],
value : payload filter ($ is :array) reduce ($ ++ $$)
}
Related
I need help in getting adobe-analytics data when multiple IDs are passed for multi-level breakdown using API 2.0.
I am getting first level data for V124 ----
"metricContainer": {
"metrics": [
{
"columnId": "0",
"id": "metrics/event113",
"sort": "desc"
}
]
},
"dimension": "variables/evar124",
but i want to use IDs returned in above call response to in second level breakdown of v124 to get v125 as---
"metricContainer": {
"metrics": [
{
"columnId": "0",
"id": "metrics/event113",
"sort": "desc",
"filters": [
"0"
]
}
],
"metricFilters": [
{
"id": "0",
"type": "breakdown",
"dimension": "variables/evar124",
"itemId": "2629267831"
},
{
"id": "1",
"type": "breakdown",
"dimension": "variables/evar124",
"itemId": "2629267832"
}
]
},
"dimension": "variables/evar125",
This always returns data only for 2629267831 ID and not 2629267832.
I want to get data for thousands of IDs (returned from first API call) in a single API call. What am i doing wrong?
There is an array of parent elements that you need filter and remove if the sky are empty and get the number and remove all the coincidences of the principal array.
Input:
[{
"number": "7358",
"sku": "301-01"
}, {
"number": "7358",
"sku": "301-02"
}, {
"number": "7359",
"sku": ""
}, {
"number": "7359",
"sku": "301-04"
}, {
"number": "7356",
"sku": ""
}, {
"number": "7356",
"sku": "301-05"
}, {
"number": "7356",
"sku": "301-07"
}]
Output:
[{
"number": "7358",
"sku": "301-01"
}, {
"number": "7358",
"sku": "301-02"
}]
In Output we only find the elements that complied with having their sku with content.
Try with this script:
The idea is to collect all number(s) where the sku is "" and create an array out of these. After that you can iterate through the payload and filter out objects where the number in the object is present in the array created in the previous step.
%dw 2.0
output application/json
var atleastOneEmptySku = (payload filter ($.sku == ""))..number
---
payload filter (!(atleastOneEmptySku contains $.number))
I want to work out the total number of occurences of 'id' in the following JSON String.
Does Karate have a quick way of doing this?
If it was at the top level I could do response.result.length but they are are in the embedded elements of 'test'. I could do this in javascript but just wondering if Karate has a quicker method.
{
"result": [
{
"test": [
{
"id": "x",
"price": "£5.00"
},
{
"id": "y",
"price": "£10.00"
},
{
"id": "z",
"price": "£10.00"
},
{
"id": "a",
"price": "£10.00"
}
]
},
{
"test": [
{
"id": "b",
"price": "£5.00"
},
{
"id": "c",
"price": "£10.00"
}
]
}
]
}
Here you go:
* def ids = $..id
* assert ids.length == 6
Do take some time to read about JsonPath in the docs.
I have a requirement, in the below JSON I have to delete all the id elements,
[
{
"id": "0a7936ed",
"code": "test",
"label": "test",
"type": "sell"
},
{
"id": "7bc1909b2",
"code": "test2",
"label": "test2",
"type": "Buy"
}
]
My JSON should be as below,
[
{
"code": "test",
"label": "test",
"type": "sell"
},
{
"code": "test2",
"label": "test2",
"type": "Buy"
}
]
Standard JS Array operations will work in Karate 1.0 onwards:
* def dest = source.map(x => { delete x.id; return x })
For older versions of Karate, a hint is that you can loop over any JS object key-values using karate.forEach() and you could write conditional logic to ignore id etc.
I'm trying to use UpdateRecord 1.9.0 processor to modify a JSON but it does not replace the values as I want.
this is the source message
{
"type": "A",
"ids": [{
"id": "1",
"value": "abc"
}, {
"id": "2",
"value": "def"
}, {
"id": "3",
"value": "ghi"
}
]
}
and the wanted output
{
"ids": [{
"userId": "1",
}, {
"userId": "2",
}, {
"userId": "3",
}
]
}
I have configured the processor as follows
processor config
Reader:
reader
Schema registry:
schema
writer:
writer
And it works, the output is a JSON without the field 'type' and the ids have the field 'userId' instead 'id' and 'value'.
To fill the value of userId, I defined the replace strategy and the property to replace:
strategy
But the output is wrong. The userId is always filled with the id of the last element in the array:
{
"ids": [{
"userId": "3"
}, {
"userId": "3"
}, {
"userId": "3"
}
]
}
I think the value of the expression is ok because if I try to replace only one record it works fine (/ids[0]/userId, ..id)
Nifi docs has a really similar example (example 3):
https://nifi.apache.org/docs/nifi-docs/components/org.apache.nifi/nifi-standard-nar/1.7.1/org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.UpdateRecord/additionalDetails.html
But it does not work for me.
What am I doing wrong?
thanks
Finally I have used JoltJSONTransform processor instead UpdateRecord
JoltJSONTransform
template:
[
{
"operation": "shift",
"spec": {
"ids":{
"*":{
"id": "ids[&1].userId"
}
}
}
}
]
Easier than UpdateRecord