I have a raspi machine behind NAT in my room, and I want to access it from the interenet using the URL.I found this article.
https://developers.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-one/tutorials/ssh
However, it required me to run the cloudflared program on the connecting client. I understand that this is for the security purpose. Does it possible to make the connect without running the cloudflared program on the client machine.
A follow-up question would be is it possible to ssh into ipv6 machine that using the same technique.
There are various options when it comes to connecting to a machine running on a private network:
Running cloudflared on the client (which you already found)
Installing the WARP client on the user side, then using cloudflared on the server side to expose the service securely. Finally, route the network traffic for the private network on the tunnel via WARP. This approach is described in a tutorial here
Cloudflare started also supporting in browser rendering of an SSH session. I have wrote a tutorial describing how to set it up here.
Approach (3) would do away with the need of running a client since it relies on a simple browser.
Related
I've set up tailscale and connected to an exit node on my VPS on vultr.com. Predictably, I was kicked out and couldn't reconnect, as the VPS's public IP address has changed.
I can reboot the VPS and try again. What steps will I need to take? Does my VPS running behind an exit node even have a unique public address (which?), or does it need to be set up for something like port forwarding?
From looking at tailscale documentation, it looks like they came up with their own ssh, why? Why is the standard ssh inadequate for the purpose? I am not the admin of my tailscale network, and the admin is swamped right now. What can I do?
SSH uses TCP as transport and therefore requires the (srcaddr, srcport, dstaddr, dstport) tuple to be constant over the connection's lifetime.
I believe that since tailscale rotates connections dynamically, it is more suitable for use by clients than servers in a traditional client-server model, unless it provides an 'internal' virtual network over the distributed transport (which would kind of defeat the purpose of covering your tracks).
If you want to connect to your VPS over tailscale, you need to use their tools probably because of that. You can still connect directly to your VPS, though, through plain Internet, if it has any address of its own, and is not firewalled away (or similarly, NATed away). Your provider should either show you the address, or even better, provide access to out-of-band (like serial-port) command line access, where you can query the current addresses using commands like ip addr show.
In your Tailscale Admin console you should be able to see the machine's IP. Just use normal ssh and login that way.
So instead of ssh user#8.8.8.8 you'd do ssh user#100.64.0.1. Tailscale's own ssh client is useful if you want to hook deeper into their MagicDNS stuff, but it's not meant to be the only way to ssh into your machine.
If you run into errors, ping the machine you want to connect to (tailscale ping vps-machine-name). That should help you debug any tailscale client connection problems.
Hi I'm currently working on a side project. In this project I'll have a central server that will need to connect to several remote docker daemons. My problem is with authentication.
Given that the project will be hosted on Digitalocean, my first thought suggested that I'll accept only connections from the private networking interface. The problem is that that interface is accessible by all other servers in the same datacenter.
Second thought is to allow only requests from the central server using the DOCKER_HOST config, the problem is that if I understand correctly the if the private IP of the centeral server get known, the IP can be spoofed.
Third thought is to enable TLS ( https://docs.docker.com/articles/https/ ), I've never dealt with those things before and the tutorial is unclear for me, I lack the knowledge of the terminologies and it's being used heavily.
So basically the problem is that I have a central client and multiple remote docker hosts, what is the best way to connect to them? Thank you.
EDIT: I managed to solve the problem using HTTP authentication by running nginx as a proxy in front of the docker daemon.
My understand is you are trying to build a docker cluster, which can manage all nodes from one single central server.
this is very likely docker's Docker Swarm project, from their doc, they give some simple idea how this is work:
open a TCP port on each node for communication with the swarm manager
install Docker on each node
create and manage TLS certificates to secure your swarm
Sorry this should post as a comment but I do not have enough rep to do that.
I want to install a number of raspberry pis at remote locations and be able to log in to them remotely. (Will begin with 30-40 boxes and hopefully grow to 1000 individual raspberry pis soon.)
I need to be able to remotely manage these boxes. Going the easier route, forwarding a port on the router and setting a DHCP reservation, requires either IT support from the company we'll be doing the install for (many of which don't have IT), or it will require one of our IT people physically installing each box.
My tentative solution is to have each box create a reverse SSH tunnel to our server. My question is: How feasible would this be? How easy would it be to manage that many connections? Would it be an issue for a small local server to have 1000+ concurrent SSH connections? Is there an easier solution to this problem?
My end goal is to be able to ship someone a box, have them plug it in, and be able to access it.
Thanks,
w
An alternate solution would be to:
Install OpenVPN server on your server machine. How to install OpenVPN Server on the PI. Additionally, add firewall rules that block everything but traffic directed for the client's ssh and other services ports (if desired), from administrating machine(s).
Run OpenVPN clients on your Raspberry PI client machines. They will connect back to your VPN server. On a side note, the VPN server and administrating machine(s) need not be the same machine if resources are limited on the VPN server. How to install OpenVPN on the client Raspberry PIs.
SSH from administrating machine(s) to each client machine. Optionally, you could use RSA authentication to simplify authentication.
Benefits include encryption for the tunnel including ssh encryption for administrating, as well as being able to monitor other services on their respective ports.
I made a WebApp to manage this exact same setting in about 60 minutes with my java web template. All I can share are some scripts that I use to list the connection and info about them. You can use those to build your own app, it is really simple to display this in some fancy way in a fast web.
Take a look at my scripts: https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/625771/332669
Those will allow you to get the listening port, as well as the public IPs they're binded from. With that you can easilly plan a system where everything is easilly identificable with a simple BBDD.
You might find this docker container useful https://hub.docker.com/r/logicethos/revssh/
I want to make my site available world wide. Im using xampp server for hosting. I have no access to any kind of servers and modems. Situation is shown below:
My site server has local ip assigned by wifi router and it runs Windows 8.
Remember I have no access on any kind of servers and modems so port port-forwarding is impossible (out of my scope).
Its actually difficult, but not impossible.
One way, I would approach this is:
I would host a page on internet.
Then take request and store it in database.
One of my program will always be running from my computer.
Then check for request and curl the request to localhost. For this you may use Node.js (taking data from database using GET method and curl it to localhost).
This is the best I could think of. And I am working on it, when the code is ready I'll make it open source and notify you :)
But still, it's difficult, as you need to put user's request to sleep for 2 seconds and then transferring it.
Its slow, but may work out for you.
Disadvantages:
Program will be very slow and memory usage will be more.
Breaking may happen many times.
High bandwidth wastage
If not encrypted, MIM (Men in Middle) may possible.
Advantages:
Indirect method of hosting
Need not to worry about your code being lost.
I am looking forward for a better alternative and I would like to keep this question for bounty once again.
If you cannot open the necessary ports within your LAN you will require access to an external server. However, the external server does not need to host any code, e.g.
Create a Linux based ec2 instance using Amazon's free tier.
Install a package to redirect remote to local ports:
a. using socat:
Install socat using your distributions package manager
Connect via SSH: ssh -N -R 42500:127.0.0.1:80 -o ServerAliveInterval=60 ubuntu#xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx -N -R 8080:localhost:80 "socat TCP-LISTEN:8080,fork TCP:127.0.0.1:42500"
b. using a webserver and reverse proxy:
Install apache or nginx and any required reverse proxy modules and configure your VirtualHost to proxy requests to a local port, e.g. :8080 -> 127.0.0.1:42500
Connect via SSH: ssh -N -R 42500:127.0.0.1:80 -o ServerAliveInterval=60 ubuntu#xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
Your machine is now reachable via the ec2 instance http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:8080/.
I occasionally use this technique when debugging web service callbacks.
Update 17-02-2014
If you are a Windows user you will need to install a third-party tool to support ssh. Options include:
cygwin
git bash
PuTTY
PuTTY is the easiest choice if you are not familiar with *nix tools. To configure remote port forwarding in PuTTY expand the following setting: Connection -> SSH -> Tunnels. Given the previously described scenario, populate Source port as 42500, Desination as 127.0.0.1:80 and tick the Remote option. (You may also need to add the path to a PuTTY compatible private key in the Connection -> SSH -> Auth tab depending on your server configuration.
To test you have successfully forwarded a port, execute the command netstat -lnt on your server. You will see output similar to:
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:42500 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
Finally you can test with curl http://127.0.0.1:42500. You will see the output of your own machines web root running on port 80.
if you don't have a public IP address and cannot use port forwarding it is impossible to host the site
As people have said you need a public IP address. However, even if you did you should not use xampp as a public server, as it is designed for development and therefore has some security settings disabled.
I would recommend buying some shared web hosting, and uploading it to that. (you can get cheap hosting if you google 'shared web hosting', plus free .tk domains are avaliable: http://www.dot.tk/)
Do your company has any vpn network?
If it does and you have access to the vpn network, you can include your server to the vpn network and your guest will only need to login to your company vpn network then access your site like in a local network without using port forwarding. And since your data is very confidential, I assume that using vpn will also help to increase the security of your data.
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Thank You.
What you are asking is not possible without port forwarding.
Lets break it into steps.
To host your site locally you will need a IP that is static so that
users can access it specifically.
You will need a domain so that it can be converted into user friendly name.
A 24x7 Internet Connection is must! You added a Wifi Router in your Diagram and most of today's router are capable of port forwarding.
What i will do in your scenario is:
Instead of using XAMP, i will install WAMP because i am more familiar with it and easy to configure.(totally personal preference)
Then i would set my server "ONLINE".(Google how to set WAMP server online)
Forward port "80" from router settings to my local computer ip address.(mostly it is tagged as "Virtual Server","Firewall","Port Forwarding",etc vary router to router in settings)
Suppose you have a local ip "192.168.1.3" and global/router IP "254.232.123.232" then you would redirect all the HTTP request done towards router to your local IP.
[[[[254.232.123.232]]]] --+ :80 +-- --------->192.168.1.3
That is good for now, but then you will need to tackle dynamic IP problem of router. But don't worry, thanks to some free sites that will be easy!
Go to no-ip.org -> Setup Account -> and create a entry, just a subdomain for now to test whether everything is working fine.(subdomain like mysite.no-ip.org, later purchase a real Domain)
Input your IP address there(Router IP) and download its application which will automatically update their server if your local IP changes.
Wait for some minutes and Voila! Your site is live.
Not sure if i'm really up-to-date, but i'm looking in a way to convert my existing project to use HTML5 websockets.
Here's my situation :
- Client runs a modified java vnc applet with extra parameter (CONNECT).
- Modified stunnel listenin on webserver (with both public, private IP) port 443
- Client connects to 443 and sends (prior to RFB) a HTTP packet like :
'CONNECT 10.0.0.1:4001'
- Stunnel opens a new stream to 10.0.0.1:4001 using SSL wrapper
- VNC Server (#10.0.0.1:4001) responds, connection is established.
Now I want to get rid of the Java Applet and switch to Websocket using NoVNC.
I want to be able to :
- Open a single port on the webserver (HTTPS preferably)
- Have client connect using HTML5 only (no more java applet)
I cannot change :
- VNCServer will still be listening on private LAN only.
- VNCServer will still listen to a bunch of ports, each corresponding to
a virtual server
Questions are :
- How to give NoVNC the notion of target HOST:PORT ?
- Is stunnel still be usable ? Or should I change to websocket proxy ?
If anyone has a starting point, i'd really appreciate !
Disclaimer: I created noVNC so my answer may be heavily biased ;-)
I'll answer you second question first:
stunnel cannot be used directly by noVNC. The issue is that the WebSockets protocol has an HTTP-like initial handshake and the messages are framed. In addition, until binary payload support is added to WebSockets, the payload is base64 encoded by the websockets proxy (websockify). Adding the necessary support to stunnel would be non-trivial but certainly doable. In fact noVNC issue #37 is an aspirational feature to add this support to stunnel.
First question:
noVNC already has a concept of HOST:PORT via the RFB.connect(host, port, password) method. The file vnc_auto.html at the top level shows how to get noVNC to automatically connect on page load based on the host, port and password specified as URL query string parameters.
However, I think what you are really asking is how do you get noVNC to connect to alternate VNC server ports on the backend. This problem is not directly addressed by noVNC and websockify. There are several ways to solve this and it usually involves an out-of-band setup/authorization mechanism so that the proxy can't be used to launch attacks by arbitrary hosts. For example, at my company we have a web based management framework that integrates noVNC and when the user wants to connect to the console, an authenticated AJAX call is used to configure the proxy for that particular user and the system they want to connect to. Our web management interface is internal only.
Ganeti Web Manager uses a similar model and the source is available. They have a fork of VNCAuthProxy that has WebSockets support. They use a control channel from the web interface to the VNCAuthProxy to setup a temporary password associated with a specific VNC server host:port.
Also OpenStack (Nova) integrates noVNC uses a similar out-of-band token based model to allow access with their nova-vncproxy.
Some links:
Ganeti Web Manager
Wiki page about how noVNC works in Ganeti Web Manager
Ganeti Web Manager sources
Ganeti Web Manager VNCAUthProxy sources
Using noVNC in Nova/OpenStack
OpenStack fork of noVNC
Old nova-vnc-proxy code
Current nova vnc proxy code