I am using sequelize (postgres) and I need to properly escape a query like this:
`
UPDATE "Pets"
SET "name" = CASE LOWER("name")
${input.pets
.map((pet) => `WHEN '${pet.name.toLowerCase()}' THEN '${pet.newName}'`)
.join('\n')}
ELSE "name"
END
WHERE LOWER("name") IN(${input.pets
.map((pet) => `'${pet.name.toLowerCase()}'`)
.join(',')});
`
Sample input.pets:
[{ name: "rocky", newName: "leo" }]
Does anyone have an idea how to achieve this with replacements?
I have found a thread on github which suggested something like this:
let data = [ [ 252456, 1, 55, '0' ],
[ 357083, 1, 56, '0' ],
[ 316493, 1, 57, '0' ] ];
db.query(
`INSERT INTO product (a, b) VALUES ${data.map(a => '(?)').join(',')};`,
{
replacements: data,
type: Sequelize.QueryTypes.INSERT
}
);
However, a 2d array is being used here not an array of objects. Is there a way to access individual properties from the array? When I try something like this
`
UPDATE "Pets"
SET "name" = CASE LOWER("name")
${input.pets
.map((_pet) => `WHEN ? THEN ?`)
.join('\n')}
ELSE "name"
END
WHERE LOWER("name") IN(${input.pets
.map((_pet) => `?`)
.join(',')});
`,
{ type: QueryTypes.UPDATE, replacements: input.pets },
The first ? turns out to be the whole object. Is there a way to access it's properties?
I also tried transforming input.pets into a 2d array but still couldn't get it to work as in example with insert above.
In advance thanks for your time
const names = input.pets.map((pet) => pet.name);
const newNames = input.pets.map((pet) => pet.newName);
`
UPDATE "Pets"
SET "name" = CASE LOWER("name")
${names.map((_) => `WHEN LOWER(:names) THEN :newNames`).join('\n')}
ELSE "name"
END
WHERE LOWER("name") IN(${names.map((_) => `LOWER(:names)`).join(',')});
`,
{ replacements: { names, newNames } },
This works. In cases like this it's better to work with simpler data structures. Another option I found is using sequelize.escape() built-in function, but it's not documented so I decided not to
EDIT:
After some testing, this works but for only one object in the input
If the input looks something like this:
[
{ name: "rocky", newName: "fafik" }
{ name: "asd", newName: "qwerty" }
]
Then in resut I get queries like this:
WHEN LOWER('rocky', 'asd') THEN 'fafik', 'qwerty'
WHEN LOWER('rocky', 'asd') THEN 'fafik', 'qwerty'
So it doesn't loop over arrays. Still the problem remains, how to access individual properties, whether from array or an object?
EDIT2: FINAL ANSWER
sequelize.query(
`
UPDATE "Pets"
SET "name" = CASE LOWER("name")
${input.pets.map(() => `WHEN ? THEN ?`).join('\n')}
ELSE "name"
END
WHERE LOWER("name") IN(?);
`,
{
replacements: [
...input.pets.flatMap((x) => [x.name.toLocaleLowerCase(), x.newName]),
input.pets.map((x) => x.name.toLocaleLowerCase()),
],
},
Related
I have followed the doc for the ReferenceArrayInput (https://marmelab.com/react-admin/Inputs.html#common-input-props) but it does not seem to be working with relationship fields.
For example, I have this many-to-many relation for my Users (serialized version) :
Coming from (raw response from my API):
I have setup the ReferenceArrayInput as followed :
<ReferenceArrayInput source="profiles" reference="profiles" >
<SelectArrayInput optionText="label" />
</ReferenceArrayInput>
I think it's making the appropriate calls :
But here is my result :
Any idea what I'm doing wrong ?
Thanks in advance for your help !
On docs, ReferenceArrayInput is said to expect a source prop pointing to an array os ids, array of primitive types, and not array of objects with id. Looks like you are already transforming your raw response from api, so if you could transform a bit more, mapping [{id}] to [id], it could work.
If other parts of your app expects profiles to be an array of objects, just create a new object entry like profilesIds or _profiles.
As gstvg said, ReferenceArrayInput expects an array of primitive type, not array of objects.
If your current record is like below:
{
"id": 1,
"tags": [
{ id: 'programming', name: 'Programming' },
{ id: 'lifestyle', name: 'Lifestyle' }
]
}
And you have a resource /tags, which returns all tags like:
[
{ id: 'programming', name: 'Programming' },
{ id: 'lifestyle', name: 'Lifestyle' },
{ id: 'photography', name: 'Photography' }
]
Then you can do something like this (it will select the tags of current record)
<ReferenceArrayInput
reference="tags"
source="tags"
parse={(value) => value && value.map((v) => ({ id: v }))}
format={(value) => value && value.map((v) => v.id)}
>
<AutocompleteArrayInput />
</ReferenceArrayInput>
I want to create a pdf document with the package 'pdf'. The example on the dart - page is working fine: https://pub.dev/packages/pdf#-example-tab-
You can see that the table is static. I want to create a dynamic table in the pdf document.
The columns will be constant, but the rows have to be dynamic.
I have tried to insert a for() - loop.
The syntax is not correct.
pdfWidget.Table.fromTextArray(context: context, data: <List<String>> [
<String>['Date', 'PDF Version', 'Acrobat Version'],
//.....
//more Strings here.....
]),
I ran into the same issue.
This seemed to work for me.
pdf.addPage(
MultiPage(
build: (context) => [
Table.fromTextArray(context: context, data: <List<String>>[
<String>['Msg ID', 'DateTime', 'Type', 'Body'],
...msgList.map(
(msg) => [msg.counter, msg.dateTimeStamp, msg.type, msg.body])
]),
],
),
);
where my msgList object was a custom List, ie: List<SingleMessage>
There are several ways to do it, I prefer to fill the List separately, like:
List<List<String>> salidas = new List();
salidas.add(<String>['Title1','Title2', ... , 'Title n']);
for(var indice=0;indice<records.length;indice++) {
List<String> recind = <String>[
records[indice].Stringfield1,
records[indice].Stringfield2,
...,
records[indice].Stringfieldn
];
salidas.add(recind);
}
...
fpdf.Table.fromTextArray(context: context,data: salidas),
I'm trying to mangle data returned from an api. I've got an array of objects returned. I want to delete the password field and then add a couple of additional fields. I'd like to use the spread operator but my process feels a bit clunky.
myArray.map( item => {
const newItem = { ...item };
delete newItem.password;
newItem.saved = true;
return newItem;
});
Is there a nicer way to do this?
Given an array of objects -
const myArrayOfObjects = [
{id: 1, keyToDelete: 'nonsense'},
{id: 2, keyToDelete: 'rubbish'}
];
Delete the attribute keyToDelete, and add a new key newKey with the value "someVar".
myArrayOfObjects.map(({ keyToDelete, ...item}) => { ...item, newKey:'someVar'});
Updating the array to
[
{id: 1, newKey:'someVar'},
{id: 2, newKey:'someVar'}
]
See this great post for more information on the deletion method.
I am working with a dgrid where I want to find a search term in my grid on two columns.
For instance, I want to see if the scientific name and commonName columns contain the string "Aca" (I want my search to be case insensitive)
My Grid definition:
var CustomGrid = declare([Grid, Pagination ]);
var gridStore = new Memory({ idProperty: 'tsn', data: null });
gridStore.queryEngine = rql.query;
grid = new CustomGrid({
store: gridStore,
columns:
[
{ field: "tsn", label: "TSN #"},
{ field: "scientificName", label: "Scientific Name"},
{ field: "commonName", label: "Common Name",},
],
autoHeight: 'true',
firstLastArrows: 'true',
pageSizeOptions: [50, 100],
}, id);
With the built in query language (I think simple query language), I was able to find the term in one column or the other, but I couldn't do a complex search that would return results for both columns.
grid.set("query", { scientificName : new RegExp(speciesKeyword, "i") });
grid.refresh()
I started reading and I think RQL can solve this problem, however, I am struggling with the syntax.
I have been looking at these pages:
http://rql-engine.eu01.aws.af.cm/
https://github.com/kriszyp/rql
And I am able to understand basic queries, however the "contains" syntax eludes me.
For instance if I had this simple data set and wanted to find the entries with scientific and common names that contain the string "Aca" I would think my contains query would look like this:
contains(scientificName,string:aca)
However, this results in no matches.
[
{
"tsn": 1,
"scientificName": "Acalypha ostryifolia",
"commonName": "Rough-pod Copperleaf",
},
{
"tsn": 2,
"scientificName": "Aegalius acadicus",
"commonName": "Northern Saw-whet Owl",
},
{
"tsn": 3,
"scientificName": "Portulaca pilosa",
"commonName": "2012-02-01",
},
{
"tsn": 4,
"scientificName": "Accipiter striatus",
"commonName": "Kiss-me-quick",
},
{
"tsn": 5,
"scientificName": "Acorus americanus",
"commonName": "American Sweetflag",
}
]
Can someone guide me in how to formulate the correct syntax? Thank you.
From what I'm briefly reading, it appears that:
contains was replaced by any and all
these are meant for array comparisons, not string comparisons
I'm not sure offhand whether RegExps can just be handed to other operations e.g. eq.
With dojo/store/Memory, you can also pass a query function which will allow you to do whatever you want, so if you wanted to compare for a match in one field or the other you could do something like this:
grid.set('query', function (item) {
var scientificRx = new RegExp(speciesKeyword, 'i');
var commonRx = new RegExp(...);
return scientificRx.test(item.scientificName) || commonRx.test(item.commonName);
});
Of course, if you want to filter only items that match both, you can do that with simple object syntax:
grid.set('query', {
scientificName: scientificRx,
commonName: commonRx
});
I want to select the MIN() and MAX() of a column from a table. But instead of querying the database twice I'd like to solve this in just one query.
I know I could do this
my $col = $schema->result_source("Birthday")->get_column("birthdate");
my $min = $col->min();
my $max = $col->max();
But it would query the database twice.
The only other solution I found is quite ugly, by messing around with the select and as attributes to search(). For example
my $res = $rs->search({}, {
select => [ {min => "birthdate"}, {max => "birthdate"},
as => [qw/minBirthdate maxBirthdate/]
});
say $res->get_column("minBirthdate")->first() . " - " . $res->get_column("maxBirthdate")->first();
Which produces this - my wanted SQL
SELECT MIN(birthdate), MAX(birthdate) FROM birthdays;
Is there any more elegant way to get this done with DBIx::Class?
And to make it even cooler, is there a way to respect the inflation/deflation of the column?
You can use columns as a shortcut to combine select and as attributes as such:
my $res = $rs->search(undef, {
columns => [
{ minBirthdate => { min => "birthdate" } },
{ maxBirthdate => { max => "birthdate" } },
]
});
Or, if you prefer more control over the SQL, use string refs, which can help with more complex calculations:
my $res = $rs->search(undef, {
columns => [
{ minBirthdate => \"MIN(birthdate)" },
{ maxBirthdate => \"MAX(birthdate)" },
]
});
Now, if you really want to clean it up a bit, I highly recommend DBIx::Class::Helpers, which allows you to write it as such:
my $minmax = $rs->columns([
{minBirthdate=>\"MIN(birthdate)"},
{maxBirthdate=>\"MAX(birthdate)"},
])->hri->single;
say "$minmax->{minBirthdate} - $minmax->{maxBirthdate}";