Pdf signature invalidates existing signature in Acrobat Reader - pdf

I'm using iText 7.1.15 and SignDeferred to apply signatures to pdf documents.
SignDeferred is required since the signature is created PKCS11 hardware token (usb key).
When i sign a "regular" pdf, e.g. created via word, i can apply multiple signatures and all signatures are shown as valid in the adobe acrobat reader.
If the pdf was created by combining multiple pdf documents with adobe DC, the first signature is valid but becomes invalid as soon as the seconds signature is applied.
Document in Adobe reader after the first signature is applied:
Document in Adobe reader after the second signature is applied:
The signatures of the same document are shown as valid in foxit reader.
I've found a similar issue on stackoverflow (multiple signatures invalidate first signature in iTextSharp pdf signing), but it was using iText 5 and i'm not sure it is the same problem.
Question: What can i do in order to keep both signatures valid in the Acrobat Reader?
Unsigned Pdf document on which the first signature becomes invalid:
https://github.com/suntsu42/iTextDemoInvalidSecondSignature/blob/master/test.pdf
Twice signed document which is invalid:
https://github.com/suntsu42/iTextDemoInvalidSecondSignature/blob/master/InvalidDocumentSignedTwice.pdf
Code used for signing
//Step #1 >> prepare pdf for signing (Allocate space for the signature and calculate hash)
using (MemoryStream input = new MemoryStream(pdfToSign))
{
using (var reader = new PdfReader(input))
{
StampingProperties sp = new StampingProperties();
sp.UseAppendMode();
using (MemoryStream baos = new MemoryStream())
{
var signer = new PdfSigner(reader, baos, sp);
//Has to be NOT_CERTIFIED since otherwiese a pdf cannot be signed multiple times
signer.SetCertificationLevel(PdfSigner.NOT_CERTIFIED);
if (visualRepresentation != null)
{
try
{
PdfSignatureAppearance appearance = signer.GetSignatureAppearance();
base.SetPdfSignatureAppearance(appearance, visualRepresentation);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
throw new Exception("Unable to set provided signature image", ex);
}
}
//Make the SignatureAttributeName unique
SignatureAttributeName = $"SignatureAttributeName_{DateTime.Now:yyyyMMddTHHmmss}";
signer.SetFieldName(SignatureAttributeName);
DigestCalcBlankSigner external = new DigestCalcBlankSigner(PdfName.Adobe_PPKLite, PdfName.Adbe_pkcs7_detached);
signer.SignExternalContainer(external, EstimateSize);
hash = external.GetDocBytesHash();
tmpPdf = baos.ToArray();
}
}
//Step #2 >> Create the signature based on the document hash
// This is the part which accesses the HSM via PCKS11
byte[] signature = null;
if (LocalSigningCertificate == null)
{
signature = CreatePKCS7SignatureViaPKCS11(hash, pin);
}
else
{
signature = CreatePKCS7SignatureViaX509Certificate(hash);
}
//Step #3 >> Apply the signature to the document
ReadySignatureSigner extSigContainer = new ReadySignatureSigner(signature);
using (MemoryStream preparedPdfStream = new MemoryStream(tmpPdf))
{
using (var pdfReader = new PdfReader(preparedPdfStream))
{
using (PdfDocument docToSign = new PdfDocument(pdfReader))
{
using (MemoryStream outStream = new MemoryStream())
{
PdfSigner.SignDeferred(docToSign, SignatureAttributeName, outStream, extSigContainer);
return outStream.ToArray();
}
}
}
}
}
Sample project
I've created a working sample project which uses a local certificate for signing. I also did update iText to version 7.2 but with the same result.
It also contains the document which cannot be signed twice (test.pdf)
https://github.com/suntsu42/iTextDemoInvalidSecondSignature/tree/master
Edit
I've applied the solution provided by MKL to the sample project on github.
As a second note, It is also possible to use PdfSigner but in this case, the bookmarks of the original document must be removed.

As already mentioned in a comment, the example document "InvalidDocumentSignedTwice.pdf" has the signature not applied in an incremental update, so here it is obvious that former signatures will break. But this is not the issue of the OP's example project. Thus, the issue is processed with an eye on the actual outputs of the example project.
Analyzing the Issue
When validating signed PDFs Adobe Acrobat executes two types of checks:
It checks the signature itself and whether the revision of the PDF it covers is untouched.
(If there are additions to the PDF after the revision covered by the signature:) It checks whether changes applied in incremental updates only consist of allowed changes.
The former check is pretty stable and standard but the second one is very whimsical and prone to incorrect negative validation results. Like in your case...
In case of your example document one can simply determine that the first check must positively validate the first signature: The file with only one (valid!) signature constitutes a byte-wise starting piece of the file with two signatures, so nothing can have been broken here.
Thus, the second type of check, the fickle type, must go wrong in the case at hand.
To find out what change one has to analyze the changes done during signing. A helpful fact is that doing the same using iText 5 does not produce the issue; thus, the change that triggered the check must be in what iText 7 does differently than iText 5 here. And the main difference in this context is that iText 7 has a more thorough tagging support than iText 5 and, therefore, also adds a reference to the new signature field to the document structure tree.
This by itself does not yet trigger the whimsical check, though, it only does so here because one outline element refers to the parent structure tree element of the change as its structure element (SE). Apparently Adobe Acrobat considers the change in the associated structure element as a change of the outline link and, therefore, as a (disallowed) change of the behavior of the document revision signed by the first signature.
So is this an iText error (adding entries to the structure tree) or an Adobe Acrobat error (complaining about the additions)? Well, in a tagged PDF (and your PDF has the corresponding Marked entry set to true) the content including annotations and form fields is expected to be tagged. Thus, addition of structure tree entries for the newly added signature field and its appearance not only should be allowed but actually recommended or even required! So this appears to be an error of Adobe Acrobat.
A Work-Around
Knowing that this appears to be an Adobe Acrobat bug is all well and good, but at the end of the day one might need a way now to sign such documents multiple times without current Adobe Acrobat calling that invalid.
It is possible to make iText believe there is no structure tree and no need to update a structure tree. This can be done by making the initialization of the document tag structure fail. For this we override the PdfDocument method TryInitTagStructure. As the iText PdfSigner creates its document object internally, we do this in an override of the PdfSigner method InitDocument.
I.e. instead of PdfSigner we use the class MySigner defined like this:
public class MySigner : PdfSigner
{
public MySigner(PdfReader reader, Stream outputStream, StampingProperties properties) : base(reader, outputStream, properties)
{
}
override protected PdfDocument InitDocument(PdfReader reader, PdfWriter writer, StampingProperties properties)
{
return new MyDocument(reader, writer, properties);
}
}
public class MyDocument : PdfDocument
{
public MyDocument(PdfReader reader, PdfWriter writer, StampingProperties properties) : base(reader, writer, properties)
{
}
override protected void TryInitTagStructure(PdfDictionary str)
{
structTreeRoot = null;
structParentIndex = -1;
}
}
Using MySigner for signing documents iText won't add tagging anymore and so won't make Adobe Acrobat complain about new entries in the structure tree.
The Same Work-Around in Java
As I feel more comfortable working in Java, I analyzed this and tested the work-around in Java.
Here this can be put into a more closed form (maybe it also can for C#, I don't know), instead of initializing the signer like this
PdfSigner pdfSigner = new PdfSigner(pdfReader, os, new StampingProperties().useAppendMode());
we do it like this:
PdfSigner pdfSigner = new PdfSigner(pdfReader, os, new StampingProperties().useAppendMode()) {
#Override
protected PdfDocument initDocument(PdfReader reader, PdfWriter writer, StampingProperties properties) {
return new PdfDocument(reader, writer, properties) {
#Override
protected void tryInitTagStructure(PdfDictionary str) {
structTreeRoot = null;
structParentIndex = -1;
}
};
}
};
(MultipleSignaturesAndTagging test testSignTestManuelTwiceNoTag)
TL;DR
iText 7 adds a structure element for the new signature field to the document structure tree during signing. If the parent node of this new node is referenced as associated structure element of an outline element, though, Adobe Acrobat incorrectly considers this a disallowed change. As a work-around one can tweak iText signing to not add structure elements.

I've got a similar problem with signatures after last update of Adobe Reader. I wrote a post on their community, but they still didn't answer me.
Take a look:
https://community.adobe.com/t5/acrobat-reader-discussions/invalid-signatures-after-adobe-reader-update-2022-001-20085/td-p/12892048
I am using a iText v.5.5.5 to generate pdf. I sign and certify pdf document in single method. Moreover, foxit reader shows that signatures are valid. I believe that this is an Adobe bug and it will be fixed soon :) Key are an log.

Related

PDFBOX - when signing PDF, SignatureInterface's sign is not called

I'm trying to sign PDF using PDFBOX library (mostly following CreateSignature and other classes from the example package in GitHub).
Having taken the SignatureInterface approach, I'm providing the one to the addSignature, yet the sign method is not being called.
Relevant code snippet:
private void signPDF(PDDocument document) throws Exception {
PDSignature signature = new PDSignature();
signature.setFilter(PDSignature.FILTER_ADOBE_PPKLITE);
signature.setSubFilter(PDSignature.SUBFILTER_ADBE_PKCS7_DETACHED);
signature.setName("iSure");
signature.setLocation("IL");
signature.setReason("Security");
signature.setSignDate(Calendar.getInstance(TimeZone.getTimeZone("UTC")));
// this is the only 'foreign' call here, it looks exactly as in example
setMDPPermission(document, signature, 1);
document.addSignature(signature, new Signer());
}
Immediately after calling signPDF, the document is being saved into an OutputStream.
PS: in the MDP permissions, I needed to remove "DigestMethod" entry, it fails PDF/A metadata validation - correct?
Well, tracing the COSWriter flow, I've finally found that when the save is not incremental, writing signature methods are not being called at all. This part is clearly stated in the examples, yet I've thought that it is relevant only for those specific scenarios or for a continuation of working with PDDocument, while my case is when signing is actually termination operation in the flow. Bottom line - my bad :(
So I've changed the method above as following:
// since forced to saveIncremental, need to finilized the input document and return a new one
private PDDocument signPDF(PDDocument document) throws Exception {
PDSignature signature = new PDSignature();
... this part stays exactly as it was
document.addSignature(signature, new Signer());
try (ByteArrayOutputStream baos = new ByteArrayOutputStream()) {
document.saveIncremental(baos);
return PDDocument.load(baos.toByteArray());
}
}
Another possibility is to pass the target OutputStream to the signPDF method and perform the actual flow termination here: saving the document and closing it afterwards.
Yet another one would be to call saveIncremental in the main flow (signPDF caller).
All those variation fill to me like rolling foreign concerns between the methods... If anyone has some better way to lay it out - I'll be happy to hear.

In Itext 7, how to sign a pdf with 2 steps?

Following the answers given in this previous question : In Itext 7, how to get the range stream to sign a pdf?, i've tried to reimplement the two steps signing method working in Itext 5 but i encounter an issue when trying to reopen the document result of the first step (with the PdfReader or a pdf reader).(invalid document)
Here is the presigning part for a document already containing an empty signature field named certification ... why is the result of this step invalid ?
PdfReader reader = new PdfReader(fis);
Path signfile = Files.createTempFile("sign", ".pdf");
FileOutputStream os = new FileOutputStream(signfile.toFile());
PdfSigner signer = new PdfSigner(reader, os, false);
signer.setFieldName("certification"); // this field already exists
signer.setCertificationLevel(PdfSigner.CERTIFIED_FORM_FILLING);
PdfSignatureAppearance sap = signer.getSignatureAppearance();
sap.setReason("Certification of the document");
sap.setLocation("On server");
sap.setCertificate(maincertificate);
BouncyCastleDigest digest = new BouncyCastleDigest();
PdfPKCS7 sgn = new PdfPKCS7(null, chain, hashAlgorithm, null, digest,false);
//IExternalSignatureContainer like BlankContainer
PreSignatureContainer external = new PreSignatureContainer(PdfName.Adobe_PPKLite,PdfName.Adbe_pkcs7_detached);
signer.signExternalContainer(external, 8192);
byte[] hash=external.getHash();
byte[] sh = sgn.getAuthenticatedAttributeBytes(hash, null, null,PdfSigner.CryptoStandard.CMS);// sh will be sent for signature
And here is the PreSignatureContainer class :
public class PreSignatureContainer implements IExternalSignatureContainer {
private PdfDictionary sigDic;
private byte hash[];
public PreSignatureContainer(PdfName filter, PdfName subFilter) {
sigDic = new PdfDictionary();
sigDic.put(PdfName.Filter, filter);
sigDic.put(PdfName.SubFilter, subFilter);
}
#Override
public byte[] sign(InputStream data) throws GeneralSecurityException {
String hashAlgorithm = "SHA256";
BouncyCastleDigest digest = new BouncyCastleDigest();
try {
this.hash= DigestAlgorithms.digest(data, digest.getMessageDigest(hashAlgorithm));
} catch (IOException e) {
throw new GeneralSecurityException("PreSignatureContainer signing exception",e);
}
return new byte[0];
}
#Override
public void modifySigningDictionary(PdfDictionary signDic) {
signDic.putAll(sigDic);
}
public byte[] getHash() {
return hash;
}
public void setHash(byte hash[]) {
this.hash = hash;
}
}
why is the result of this step invalid
Because you essentially discovered a bug... ;)
Your sample input file has one feature which triggers the bug: It is compressed using object streams.
When iText manipulates such a file, it also tries to put as many objects as possible into object streams. Unfortunately it also does so with the signature dictionary. This is unfortunate because after writing the whole file it tries to enter some information (which are not available before) into this dictionary which damages the compressed object stream.
What you can do...
You can either
wait for iText development to fix this issue - I assume this won't take too long but probably you don't have the time to wait; or
convert the file to sign into a form which does not use object streams - this can be done using iText itself but probably you cannot accept the file growth this means, or probably the files already are signed which forbids any such transformation; or
patch iText 7 to force the signature dictionary not to be added to an object stream - it is a trivial patch but you probably don't want to used patched libraries.
The patch mentioned above indeed is trivial, the method PdfSigner.preClose(Map<PdfName, Integer>) contains this code:
if (certificationLevel > 0) {
// add DocMDP entry to root
PdfDictionary docmdp = new PdfDictionary();
docmdp.put(PdfName.DocMDP, cryptoDictionary.getPdfObject());
document.getCatalog().put(PdfName.Perms, docmdp); // TODO: setModified?
}
document.close();
The cryptoDictionary.getPdfObject()) is the signature dictionary I mentioned above. During document.close() it is added to an object stream unless it has been written to the output before. Thus, you simply have to add a call to flush that object right before that close call and by parameter make clear that it shall not be added to an object stream:
cryptoDictionary.getPdfObject().flush(false);
With that patch in place, the PDFs your code returns are not damaged as above anymore.
As an aside, iText 5 does contain a similar line in the corresponding PdfSignatureAppearance.preClose(HashMap<PdfName, Integer>) right above the if block corresponding to the if block above. It seems to have been lost during refactoring to iText 7.

replace string in PDF document (ITextSharp or PdfSharp)

We use non-manage DLL that has a funciton to replace text in PDF document (http://www.debenu.com/docs/pdf_library_reference/ReplaceTag.php).
We are trying to move to managed solution (ITextSharp or PdfSharp).
I know that this question has been asked before and that the answers are "you should not do it" or "it is not easily supported by PDF".
However there exists a solution that works for us and we just need to convert it to C#.
Any ideas how I should approach it?
According to your library reference link, you use the Debenu PDFLibrary function ReplaceTag. According to this Debenu knowledge base article
the ReplaceTag function simply replaces text in the page’s content stream, so for most documents it wouldn’t have any effect. For some simple documents it might be able to replace content, but it really depends on how the PDF was constructed. Essentially it’s the same as doing:
DPL.CombineContentStreams();
string content = DPL.GetContentStreamToString();
DPL.SetPageContentFromString(content.Replace("Moby", "Mary"));
That should be possible with any general purpose PDF library, it definitely is with iText(Sharp):
void VerySimpleReplaceText(string OrigFile, string ResultFile, string origText, string replaceText)
{
using (PdfReader reader = new PdfReader(OrigFile))
{
byte[] contentBytes = reader.GetPageContent(1);
string contentString = PdfEncodings.ConvertToString(contentBytes, PdfObject.TEXT_PDFDOCENCODING);
contentString = contentString.Replace(origText, replaceText);
reader.SetPageContent(1, PdfEncodings.ConvertToBytes(contentString, PdfObject.TEXT_PDFDOCENCODING));
new PdfStamper(reader, new FileStream(ResultFile, FileMode.Create, FileAccess.Write)).Close();
}
}
WARNING: Just like in case of the Debenu function, for most documents this code wouldn’t have any effect or would even be destructive. For some simple documents it might be able to replace content, but it really depends on how the PDF was constructed.
By the way, the Debenu knowledge base article continues:
If you created a PDF using Debenu Quick PDF Library and a standard font then the ReplaceTag function should work – however, for PDFs created with tools that do subsetted fonts or even kerning (where words will be split up) then the search text probably won’t be in the content in a simple format.
So in short, the ReplaceTag function will only work in some limited scenarios and isn’t a function that you can rely on for searching and replacing text.
Thus, if during your move to managed solution you also change the way the source documents are created, chances are that neither the Debenu PDFLibrary function ReplaceTag nor the code above will be able to change the content as desired.
for pdfsharp users heres a somewhat usable function, i copied from my project and it uses an utility method which is consumed by othere methods hence the unused result.
it ignores whitespaces created by Kerning, and therefore may mess up the result (all characters in the same space) depending on the source material
public static void ReplaceTextInPdfPage(PdfPage contentPage, string source, string target)
{
ModifyPdfContentStreams(contentPage, stream =>
{
if (!stream.TryUnfilter())
return false;
var search = string.Join("\\s*", source.Select(c => c.ToString()));
var stringStream = Encoding.Default.GetString(stream.Value, 0, stream.Length);
if (!Regex.IsMatch(stringStream, search))
return false;
stringStream = Regex.Replace(stringStream, search, target);
stream.Value = Encoding.Default.GetBytes(stringStream);
stream.Zip();
return false;
});
}
public static void ModifyPdfContentStreams(PdfPage contentPage,Func<PdfDictionary.PdfStream, bool> Modification)
{
for (var i = 0; i < contentPage.Contents.Elements.Count; i++)
if (Modification(contentPage.Contents.Elements.GetDictionary(i).Stream))
return;
var resources = contentPage.Elements?.GetDictionary("/Resources");
var xObjects = resources?.Elements.GetDictionary("/XObject");
if (xObjects == null)
return;
foreach (var item in xObjects.Elements.Values.OfType<PdfReference>())
{
var stream = (item.Value as PdfDictionary)?.Stream;
if (stream != null)
if (Modification(stream))
return;
}
}

How to enable LTV for a timestamp signature?

I'm using iText 5.5.3 to sign PDF documents. I need these documents to be timestamped and LTV-enabled. I followed the instructions and used the addLtv method (code sample 5.9, page 137 in the Lowagie's white paper). I get a PDF with 2 signatures, which is normal: the first is my own signature, the second is the document-level timestamp.
However, Acrobat tells me my signature is LTV enabled, but the timestamp signature is not :
Image from Acrobat Pro XI http://img15.hostingpics.net/pics/727285so2.jpg
This is because the revocation info of the timestamp certificate is not embedded in the document :
Missing revocation info 1 http://img15.hostingpics.net/pics/491507so2a.jpg
Missing revocation info 2 http://img15.hostingpics.net/pics/312720so2b.jpg
From my understanding, the addLtv method should get all revocation information needed and embed it in the document. Is that correct, or do I have to "manually" get and embed these informations ?
This is the sample code this question is about:
public void addLtv(String src, String dest, OcspClient ocsp, CrlClient crl, TSAClient tsa) throws IOException, DocumentException, GeneralSecurityException
{
PdfReader r = new PdfReader(src);
FileOutputStream fos = new FileOutputStream(dest);
PdfStamper stp = PdfStamper.createSignature(r, fos, '\0', null, true);
LtvVerification v = stp.getLtvVerification();
AcroFields fields = stp.getAcroFields();
List<String> names = fields.getSignatureNames();
String sigName = names.get(names.size() - 1);
PdfPKCS7 pkcs7 = fields.verifySignature(sigName);
if (pkcs7.isTsp())
{
v.addVerification(sigName, ocsp, crl,
LtvVerification.CertificateOption.SIGNING_CERTIFICATE,
LtvVerification.Level.OCSP_CRL,
LtvVerification.CertificateInclusion.NO);
}
else
{
for (String name : names)
{
v.addVerification(name, ocsp, crl,
LtvVerification.CertificateOption.WHOLE_CHAIN,
LtvVerification.Level.OCSP_CRL,
LtvVerification.CertificateInclusion.NO);
}
}
PdfSignatureAppearance sap = stp.getSignatureAppearance();
LtvTimestamp.timestamp(sap, tsa, null);
}
This code identifies the most recently filled signature field of the PDF and checks whether it is a document time stamp or an usual signature.
If it is a document time stamp, the code adds validation information only for this document timestamp. Otherwise the code adds validation information for all signatures.
(The assumed work flow behind this is that the document is signed (for certification and/or approval) a number of times first, and then the document enters LTV cycles adding validation information and document time stamps but no usual signatures anymore. Your work flow may vary and, therefore, your program logic, too.)
Only after all this is done, a new document time stamp is added.
For this finally added time stamp no validation information are explicitly added to the PDF (if document time stamps from the same TSA have been applied in short succession, validation information included for a prior time stamp may be applicable). And this is why Adobe Reader/Acrobat usually does not consider this document time stamp LTV enabled.
If you need validation information for this final document time stamp, too, simply apply this method (the same as the method above, merely not adding a document time stamp) to the file with the document time stamp:
public void addLtvNoTS(String src, String dest, OcspClient ocsp, CrlClient crl) throws IOException, DocumentException, GeneralSecurityException
{
PdfReader r = new PdfReader(src);
FileOutputStream fos = new FileOutputStream(dest);
PdfStamper stp = new PdfStamper(r, fos, '\0', true);
LtvVerification v = stp.getLtvVerification();
AcroFields fields = stp.getAcroFields();
List<String> names = fields.getSignatureNames();
String sigName = names.get(names.size() - 1);
PdfPKCS7 pkcs7 = fields.verifySignature(sigName);
if (pkcs7.isTsp())
{
v.addVerification(sigName, ocsp, crl,
LtvVerification.CertificateOption.SIGNING_CERTIFICATE,
LtvVerification.Level.OCSP_CRL,
LtvVerification.CertificateInclusion.NO);
}
else
{
for (String name : names)
{
v.addVerification(name, ocsp, crl,
LtvVerification.CertificateOption.WHOLE_CHAIN,
LtvVerification.Level.OCSP_CRL,
LtvVerification.CertificateInclusion.NO);
}
}
stp.close();
}
Background
The reason why the iText addLtv example does not (necessarily) create LTV-enabled PDFs is that it is nearer to the best practices for LTV as proposed by ETSI in the PAdES specification than to Adobe's best practices for LTV.
According to ETSI TS 102 778-4 V1.1.2 (2009-12) the structure of a PDF document to which LTV is applied is illustrated in figure 2.
The life-time of the protection can be further extended beyond the life-of the last document Time-stamp applied by adding further DSS information to validate the previous last document Time-stamp along with a new document Time-stamp. This is illustrated in figure 3.
On the other hand, according to Adobe (as written by their PDF evangelist Leonard Rosenthol on the iText mailing list in January 2013),
LTV enabled means that all information necessary to validate the file
(minus root certs) is contained within. So this statement of yours would
be true.
the PDF is signed correctly and contains all necessary certificates,
a valid CRL or OSCP response for every certificate
But since the only way for that statement to be true is for the presence
of DSS, you must have DSS for LTV-enabled to appear. No timestamp
(regular or document level) is required.
Due to this divergence PDF documents with LTV according to ETSI usually are presented by Adobe software to have one not LTV-enabled document time stamp.
See also
enable LTV in iText
LTV enabled signature in PDF
Digital signature with timestamp in Java
What I did was to embed the LTV data for the timestamp before timestamping the document by requesting two timestamps (using the first one to extract LTV data and update DSS and the second one to actually timestamp the document):
Request a dummy timestamp token from the TSA
Extract and validate the trust-chain of this token
Add OSCP replies and CRLs for the certificates in the chain to the document DSS
Now request second timestamp for the document (including the updated DSS) and use it to timestamp the PDF
Verify that the two timestamps were signed by the same certificate (for the unlikely case that the TSA used different certificates)
Extracting the signing certificate from the tsa token:
IDigest messageDigest = tsaClient.GetMessageDigest();
byte[] tsImprint = new byte[messageDigest.GetDigestSize()];
messageDigest.DoFinal(tsImprint, 0);
byte[] tsToken;
try {
tsToken = tsaClient.GetTimeStampToken(tsImprint);
} catch(Exception e) {
throw new GeneralSecurityException(e.Message);
}
Asn1Sequence asn1Seq = Asn1Sequence.GetInstance(tsToken);
ContentInfo sigData = ContentInfo.GetInstance(asn1Seq);
TimeStampToken token = new TimeStampToken(sigData);
IX509Store tokenCerts = token.GetCertificates("COLLECTION");
List<X509Certificate> signingCerts = new List<X509Certificate>();
foreach(X509Certificate cert in tokenCerts.GetMatches(token.SignerID)) {
signingCerts.Add(cert);
}
// now perform LTV steps for signingCerts[0] ...

PDFBox not recognising pdf to be non printable

I am using PDFBox for validating a pdf document and one of the validation states that whether the pdf document is printable or not.
I use the following code to perform this operation:
PDDocument document = PDDocument.load("<path_to_pdf_file>");
System.out.println(document.getCurrentAccessPermission().canPrint());
but this is returning me true though when the pdf is opened, it shows the print icon disabled.
Access permissions are integrated into a document by means of encryption.
Even PDF documents which don't ask for a password when opened in Acrobat Reader may be encrypted, they essentially are encrypted using a default password. This is the case in your PDF.
PDFBox determines the permissions of an encrypted PDF only while decrypting it, not already when loading a PDDocument. Thus, you have to try and decrypt the document before inspecting its properties if it is encrypted.
In your case:
PDDocument document = PDDocument.load("<path_to_pdf_file>");
if (document.isEncrypted())
{
document.decrypt("");
}
System.out.println(document.getCurrentAccessPermission().canPrint());
The empty string "" represents the default password. If the file is encrypted using a different password, you'll get an exception here. Thus, catch accordingly.
PS: If you do not know all the passwords in question, you may still use PDFBox to check the permissions, but you have to work more low-level:
PDDocument document = PDDocument.load("<path_to_pdf_file>");
if (document.isEncrypted())
{
final int PRINT_BIT = 3;
PDEncryptionDictionary encryptionDictionary = document.getEncryptionDictionary();
int perms = encryptionDictionary.getPermissions();
boolean printAllowed = (perms & (1 << (PRINT_BIT-1))) != 0;
System.out.println("Document encrypted; printing allowed?" + printAllowed);
}
else
{
System.out.println("Document not encrypted; printing allowed? true");
}