In karate version 0.9.6 the following code was working fine
* def response = { "firstName": "John", "lastName" : "doe", "age" : 26, "address" : { "streetAddress": "applewood", "city" : "Nara", "postalCode" : "630-0192" } }
* match response.toString() contains 'applewood'
But in karate version 1.1.0, The assertion failing with:
match failed: CONTAINS
$ | actual does not contain expected
(STRING:STRING)
'[object Object]'
'applewood'
classpath:...some classpath
Even I printed the response.toString() and its printing [object Object].
Is there any change in JS function support in karate feature files in v1.1.0?
You can try this change:
* match karate.toString(response) contains 'applewood'
A couple more points:
I consider what you are doing as bad-practice. It is better to narrow down the match to a single field
Also be aware of "type conversion": https://github.com/karatelabs/karate#type-conversion
Related
I am just wondering how can I do conditional schema validation. The API response is dynamic based on customerType key. If customerType is person then, person details will be included and if the customerType is org organization details will be included in the JSON response. So the response can be in either of the following forms
{
"customerType" : "person",
"person" : {
"fistName" : "A",
"lastName" : "B"
},
"id" : 1,
"requestDate" : "2021-11-11"
}
{
"customerType" : "org",
"organization" : {
"orgName" : "A",
"orgAddress" : "B"
},
"id" : 2,
"requestDate" : "2021-11-11"
}
The schema I created to validate above 2 scenario is as follows
{
"customerType" : "#string",
"organization" : "#? response.customerType=='org' ? karate.match(_,personSchema) : karate.match(_,null)",
"person" : "#? response.customerType=='person' ? karate.match(_,orgSchema) : karate.match(_,null)",
"id" : "#number",
"requestDate" : "#string"
}
but the schema fails to match with the actual response. What changes should I make in the schema to make it work?
Note : I am planning to reuse the schema in multiple tests so I will be keeping the schema in separate files, independent of the feature file
Can you refer to this answer which I think is the better approach: https://stackoverflow.com/a/47336682/143475
That said, I think you missed that the JS karate.match() API doesn't return a boolean, but a JSON that contains a pass boolean property.
So you have to do things like this:
* def someVar = karate.match(actual, expected).pass ? {} : {}
I am trying to use a match contains to verify my schema response and data types and sometimes it returns a null and sometimes it will return a string, as an example. I am trying the following but I am getting the assertion failed because it did not evaluate to true.
I am trying the following:
* match each $response.data.Results contains
"""
{
"providerID": '#number',
"firstName": "#? _ == '#string' || _ == '#null'",
"lastName": '#string',
"mI": "#? _ == '#string' || _ == '#null'",
"title": '#string',
"name": '#string',
"nameLFMT": '#string',
"status": '#string',
"specialties": '#array',
"locations": '#array',
"institutions": '#array',
"acceptNewPatient": '#string',
"imageUri": '#string',
"nearestLatitude": '#number',
"nearestLongitude": '#number'
}
"""
The data returned for "firstName" for example is "firstName":null,
Prior to the match each I am sending this:
Scenario: SearchResults
#Verify 200 response status returned
Given text query =
"""
{
Results: getSearchResults(searchLatitude:"48.942833",
searchLongitude: "-119.984549",
providerType: "Primary Care Physicians",
sortBy: "distance",
maxDistance:"600",
skip: 0,
take: 10) {
providerID
firstName
lastName
mI
title
name
nameLFMT
status
specialties
locations
institutions
acceptNewPatient
imageUri
nearestLatitude
nearestLongitude
}
}
"""
And request { query: '#(query)' }
When method post
Then status 200
I am not defining the schema, I have yet to figure out how to do this so I am not sure if that is my issue. I know this is probably how I should do this but I'm still learning.
Thanks for any help.
Ok I see one problem here:
"firstName": "#? _ == '#string' || _ == '#null'"
That's not going to work. The part that follows the #? has to be a valid JavaScript expression. This may be hard to understand if you are not familiar with JS but #string and friends are specific to the Karate match keyword and not something that works in JavaScript.
So what the above line is doing is checking if the value of firstName is equal to the literal string #string.
Fortunately Karate has a solution: (refer doc for 'fuzzy matching'):
"firstName": "##string"
Which is a convenience, the double ## means 'optional' that will match for both a string or null.
EDIT: for advanced cases, please read this: https://stackoverflow.com/a/50350442/143475
I am trying to make a Mongodb query in Mule with the $in function, but mule says Invalid input '$', expected Namespace or NameIdentifier
have a collection that stores user authorization
{
"_id" : ObjectId("584a0dea073d4c3e976140a9"),
"partnerDataAccess" : [
{
"factoryID" : "Fac-1",
"partnerID" : "Part-1"
}
],
"userID" : "z12",
}
{
"_id" : ObjectId("584f5eba073d4c3e976140ab"),
"partnerDataAccess" : [
{
"factoryID" : "Fac-1",
"partnerID" : "Part-2"
},
{
"factoryID" : "Fac-2",
"partnerID" : "Part-2"
}
],
"userID" : "w12",
}
the flow will submit a userID and partnerID and query the database to see if authorization exist
when I query from Robo 3T, I write queries like this
e.g. user w12 and partner Part-2
db.getCollection('user').find({
userID:"w12", "partnerDataAccess.partnerID": {$in : ["Part-2", "ALL"]}
})
The $in was used because there is the "ALL" setting for admins
but while I try to put the find part into the Mongodb connector, Mule gives error during development and runtime
Hardcoded:
<mongo:find-one-document collectionName="user" doc:name="Find one document" doc:id="a03a6689-6b9d-473c-b8a6-3b8d1e989e38" config-ref="MongoDB_Config">
<mongo:find-query ><![CDATA[#[{
userID:"w12",
"partnerDataAccess.partnerID": {$in : ["Part-2", "ALL"]}
}]]]></mongo:find-query>
</mongo:find-one-document>
parametized
<mongo:find-one-document collectionName="user" doc:name="Find one document" doc:id="a03a6689-6b9d-473c-b8a6-3b8d1e989e38" config-ref="MongoDB_Config">
<mongo:find-query ><![CDATA[#[{
userID: payload.User,
"partnerDataAccess.partnerID": {$in : [ payload.partner, "ALL"]}
}]]]></mongo:find-query>
</mongo:find-one-document>
Error:
during development:
Invalid input '$', expected } or ~ or , (line 3, column 38):
Runtime:
Message : "Script '{
userID:"w12",
"partnerDataAccess.partnerID": {$in : ["Part-2", "ALL"]}
} ' has errors:
Invalid input '$', expected Namespace or NameIdentifier (line 3, column 38):
at 3 : 3" evaluating expression:
I have tried removing the $ or escaping the $ with backslash but it does not work
I know my query is not actually complex, welcome any help
seems to have found the correct way
><![CDATA[#[{
userID:"w12",
"partnerDataAccess.partnerID": {"\$in" : ["Part-2", "ALL"]}
}]]]>
Is there any way to use fully qualified class name to search from Artifactory(similar to class-searth in Artifactory web UI). Based on this Documentation , i know i can use wildcard(*) and .class file extension like this:-
GET /api/search/archive?name=*Logger.class&repos=third-party-releases-local,repo1-cache
But i am looking for a way to use fully qualified class name similar to this:-
GET /api/search/archive?name=org.apache.log4j.Logger&repos=third-party-releases-local,repo1-cache
but this is not working.
You can use the Artifactory query language for this.
For example, a query for searching an archive item called org/apache/log4j/Logger.class in the jcenter-cache repository would be
items.find({
"repo" : "jcenter-cache",
"archive.entry.name":{"$eq":"Logger.class "},
"archive.entry.path":{"$eq":"org/apache/log4j"}
})
The response would be
{
"results" : [ {
"repo" : "jcenter-cache",
"path" : "org/apache/log4j/com.springsource.org.apache.log4j/1.2.16",
"name" : "com.springsource.org.apache.log4j-1.2.16.jar",
"type" : "file",
"size" : 481202,
"created" : "2015-12-30T20:57:36.305Z",
"created_by" : "admin",
"modified" : "2010-08-04T13:18:06.000Z",
"modified_by" : "admin",
"updated" : "2015-12-30T20:57:36.354Z"
} ],
"range" : {
"start_pos" : 0,
"end_pos" : 1,
"total" : 1
}
}
To run such a query using curl use the following when the query is inside a file names aql.txt
curl -H "content-type: text/plain" -uuser:password --data #aql.txt http://my-artifactory-host/api/search/aql
I am new to PIG scripting and working with JSONs. I am in the need of parsing multi-level json files in PIG. Say,
{
"firstName": "John",
"lastName" : "Smith",
"age" : 25,
"address" :
{
"streetAddress": "21 2nd Street",
"city" : "New York",
"state" : "NY",
"postalCode" : "10021"
},
"phoneNumber":
[
{
"type" : "home",
"number": "212 555-1234"
},
{
"type" : "fax",
"number": "646 555-4567"
}
]
}
I am able to parse a single level json through JsonLoader() and do join and other operations and get the desired results as JsonLoader('name:chararray,field1:int .....');
Is it possible to parse the above mentioned JSON file using the built-in JsonLoader() function of PIG 0.10.0. If it is. Please explain me how it is done and accessing fields of the particular JSON?
You can handle nested json loading with Twitter's Elephant Bird: https://github.com/kevinweil/elephant-bird
a = LOAD 'file3.json' USING com.twitter.elephantbird.pig.load.JsonLoader('-nestedLoad')
This will parse the JSON into a map http://pig.apache.org/docs/r0.11.1/basic.html#map-schema the JSONArray gets parsed into a DataBag of maps.
It is possible by creating your own UDF. A simple UDF example is shown in below link
http://pig.apache.org/docs/r0.9.1/udf.html#udf-java
C = load 'path' using JsonLoader('firstName:chararray,lastName:chararray,age:int,address:(streetAddress:chararray,city:chararray,state:chararray,postalCode:chararray),
phoneNumber:{(type:chararray,number:chararray)}')